Hello @devksec,
Thank you for reaching out!
To set expectations, please note that addressing custom database table modifications or specific custom configurations is beyond the scope of our support.
However, I can definitely check with the development team if the table’s size seems unusual compared to typical installations. If you could provide more details to help us do that, that would be helpful.
<span style=”box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;”>Also, for more information on how Jetpack works with multisite, and which features are supported and which are </span>not, you can refer to our public documentation here: Jetpack Multisite.
If you want privacy, you can contact us directly here: https://jetpack.com/contact-support/.
Please include a link to this thread if you decide to reach out directly.
Look forward to your updates!
Thread Starter
dev
(@devksec)
Hello,
For the table jetpack_active_plan, the size is 15355 making it the largest autoload table of the site.
This is overly large and should either be not auto-loaded or theres an issue causing it to be so large.
Hi @devksec –
We are looking into this. Please share your site’s URL to help with our investigation.
Thread Starter
dev
(@devksec)
Hello,
Do you require the multisite URL or subsites? Please provide an email or secure transfer method and i’ll have those sent over.
Hi @devksec –
I heard back from our development team on this and they didn’t consider the size of 15355 that you reported as being excessively large, so they don’t think there is an issue causing an inflated size.
Are you seeing a measurable performance impact on your site attributable to this option specifically?
You can answer via email at:
https://jetpack.com/contact-support/?rel=support&hpi=1
When you do respond, include the multisite URL and subsite URLs, along with a link to this thread.
Thanks!
