Image optimisation really needs improvement
-
Hi,
Image optimisation is not powerful enough, even with the “Optimise Losslessly” option disabled.
I have noticed this on a very large number of images.Here is an example:
– Original photo size: 218 KB
– Saved (JPG): 1.3 KB
– WebP/AVIF Saved: 54.23 KBThe same photo optimised by TinyJPG:
– Saved (JPG): 106 KB (and it is very little or not at all destructive: personally I cannot see any difference between the original image and the optimized one).The performance of image optimization really needs to be improved, otherwise this tool will not be useful enough.
Thank you,
Eric
The page I need help with: [log in to see the link]
The topic ‘Image optimisation really needs improvement’ is closed to new replies.