• Resolved Eric

    (@ericcodrongmailcom)


    Hi,

    Image optimisation is not powerful enough, even with the “Optimise Losslessly” option disabled.
    I have noticed this on a very large number of images.

    Here is an example:
    – Original photo size: 218 KB
    – Saved (JPG): 1.3 KB
    – WebP/AVIF Saved: 54.23 KB

    The same photo optimised by TinyJPG:
    – Saved (JPG): 106 KB (and it is very little or not at all destructive: personally I cannot see any difference between the original image and the optimized one).

    The performance of image optimization really needs to be improved, otherwise this tool will not be useful enough.

    Thank you,

    Eric

    The page I need help with: [log in to see the link]

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Plugin Support litetim

    (@litetim)

    @ericcodrongmailcom
    Thank you for contacting us and we are sorry for the experience you have with our services.
    The end result of the optimization is set a bit more to the safe side(after having problems on other sites). For now we will it like that until we finish our currenct critical tasks.
    I will forward to my dev colleagues and we will try to see what can be improved to make a better compression.

    Thank you!

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)

The topic ‘Image optimisation really needs improvement’ is closed to new replies.