Latest News for: civil cases

Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 12 - Case: Civil Case No. 26-2047Holloman v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC - Judge: Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
The appointment of counsel for a plaintiff in a civil case is rare because Congress has not provided any mechanism or funding to compensate counsel appointed in civil cases.5 Therefore, the Court ...
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 38 - Case: Civil Case No. 25-1168Neely v. Altium Packaging - Judge: Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
ROBERTA NEELY, ). ). Plaintiff, ) Case No.. 6.25-cv-1168-EFM-ADM. ). v. ) ... The court expects Neely to continue to participate in this case and meet the deadlines set forth in the scheduling order (ECF 14), whether she proceeds pro se or retains new counsel.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 5 - Case: Civil Case No. 26-3014Loggins (ID 2000006876) v. Langford - Judge: District Judge John W. Lungstrum (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. WILLIAM LOGGINS, JR.,. Petitioner, ... CASE NO ... 3.) The MOSC granted Petitioner until and including March 4, 2026 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 14 - Case: Civil Case No. 25-3217Alton v. Curtis - Judge: District Judge John W. Lungstrum (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
) Case No ... years had elapsed since he began his "initial period" of enlistment; but those courts dismissed the petitions because appellate review of petitioner's case had been completed.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 31 - Case: Civil Case No. 25-2186Assad v. Crutchfield et al *** - Judge: District Judge Eric F. Melgren (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
Lead Case No ... Case No ... During the course of the litigation, all parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all other similar laws or statutes.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 54 - Case: Civil Case No. 24-2496Morelli v. Crutchfield et al - Judge: District Judge Eric F. Melgren (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
Lead Case No ... Case No ... During the course of the litigation, all parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all other similar laws or statutes.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 72 - Case: Civil Case No. 25-3091Cheatham (ID 2000064842) v. Howes et al - Judge: District Judge John W. Lungstrum (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
CASE NO ... Plaintiff brings this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C ... If the case is not dismissed based a failure to exhaust, the Court will address the underlying merits ... facts in this case.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 112 - Case: Civil Case No. 23-2184Western First Aid & Safety, LLC v. Aramark Uniform - Judge: District Judge Toby Crouse (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 23 Feb 2026
Case No ... The case proceeded to a bench trial, and the parties submitted post-trial proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law ... Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 provides that actions may be tried to the bench.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 39 - Case: Civil Case No. 25-2682Rakestraw v. Hershey Company, The et al - Judge: Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 20 Feb 2026
Unlike a criminal defendant, a plaintiff in a civil case has no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel.2For employment discrimination cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of ...
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 15 - Case: Civil Case No. 25-3280Butler (ID 2000152231) v. Geither - Judge: District Judge John W. Lungstrum (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 20 Feb 2026
CASE NO ... the facts supporting asserted grounds for relief only by reference to materials supplementing the petition, the Court determined that the specific circumstances of this case justify doing so.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 380-1 - Case: Civil Case No. 24-2445Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Genesh, - Judge: Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 20 Feb 2026
Case No ... In any event, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires Stuart to produce documents ... Because the discovery request explicitly sought attachments, the case is inapplicable here.
Edit

Memphis police make gang bust, Tyré Nichols civil case may have two trials

Commercial Appeal 20 Feb 2026
Attorneys in the ongoing civil lawsuit stemming from Tyré Nichols' beating at the hands of now-former Memphis police officers were in court this week, arguing a motion to split up the trial for the parties involved in the case.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 380 - Case: Civil Case No. 24-2445Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Genesh, - Judge: Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 20 Feb 2026
Case No ... In any event, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires Stuart to produce documents ... Because the discovery request explicitly sought attachments, the case is inapplicable here.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 99 - Case: Civil Case No. 23-1270Adams et al. v. Fruth et al. - Judge: Magistrate Judge Brooks G. Severson (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 20 Feb 2026
Case No ... contributed to significant delays in the underlying case ... 17 does not appear threatened under the facts of this case." 291 F ... Thus, as in Sloan, the Court finds the Unzueta opinion to be "instructive in this case." Id.
Edit

Opinion: Doc No. 361 - Case: Civil Case No. 24-4089Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corporation et al v. - Judge: District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil (United States District Court for the District of Kansas)

Public Technologies 20 Feb 2026
) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. ) ... ). Plaintiff/ ) ... ) CIVIL ACTION. v. ). ) No ... ) CIVIL ACTION ... In these cases, plaintiff/counterclaim defendant Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corporation and Healthgen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

Article Search

tools
×
×
×
×