Drone surveying: how it works and what accuracy to expect

Drone surveying is the process of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with onboard GNSS receivers to capture geospatial data from above [4].

The type of sensor on the drone, such as an RGB camera, multispectral camera, or LIDAR, determines how the data is collected and what outputs are produced.

Surveyors adopt drones because they address persistent challenges in traditional field methods. They reduce time on site, lower costs for data collection [8], and scale across large or hard-to-reach areas [9], while still meeting the accuracy requirements of many engineering and planning projects [10].

Last updated:
Drone surveying guide

Academic studies confirm that UAV photogrammetry can reach centimeter-level accuracy when flights use strong image overlap and RTK or PPK GNSS correction [10]. These results match field reports from real-world surveys, even when mapping hundreds of hectares in a single flight.[11] [19] [21] [23] [24]

Drone surveying has moved from a novelty to a widely used tool on professional job sites [43]. Yet many surveyors and engineers still ask the same questions: What accuracy can I rely on? How does a typical workflow look like? [44]

This guide answers those questions with evidence and real-world examples.

How does drone surveying work

RGB cameras are the go-to option when you need accurate data quickly and at low cost [8].

A standard camera captures many overlapping images of the same area from different angles. Each image is tagged with precise coordinates thanks to the onboard GNSS receivers.

Photogrammetry or mapping software then stitches these into accurate 2D or 3D geo-referenced survey outputs [5].

Drone Photogrammetry illustration
Photogrammetry combines images that contain the same point on the ground from multiple vantage points to yield detailed 2D and 3D maps.

Other sensors can be used depending on the application. Drone LIDAR produces dense 3D point clouds and can capture ground detail through vegetation [6].

Illustration of a WingtraOne GEN II drone with Wingtra LIDAR flying over a landscape with power lines and a forest.
Drone LIDAR involves a LIDAR scanner that shoots millions of laser light pulses to the ground below its flight path. It then receives the pulse information that bounces off the surfaces below—hard ground, leaves, branches, infrastructure.

Multispectral cameras record light beyond the visible spectrum to detect differences in vegetation health and soil conditions [7].

Most surveyors start with RGB photogrammetry because it is straightforward to run, accurate for many applications, and cost-effective.

Why surveyors use drone surveying

Drone surveying is growing because it solves persistent problems in traditional field workflows.

Faster capture on large or complex sites

Research shows that drone surveys can reduce project duration by up to 45% and cut field costs by 50% [8]. Teams avoid long days of walking, setting up instruments, or returning to the site when plans change.

Field efficiency does not remove the need for quality checks, control, and appropriate ground truth, drones shorten field time, but do not eliminate surveying fundamentals.

Orthomosaic of Chennault airport Digital elevation model (Chennault airport)

During a drainage study at Chennault International Airport, surveyors captured high-resolution data across 2,200 acres (890 ha) with verified accuracy of 1.5 cm horizontally and 2.5 cm vertically.

Achieving the same result with traditional methods would have taken weeks [13].

Access to busy or unsafe areas

Drones can take off from small clearings and capture data without closing roads, rail lines, or active construction zones.

As with any aerial method, projects must still follow airspace rules and site constraints, but drones reduce the need for prolonged exposure to traffic or hazardous terrain.

Dothan Alabama 3D drone output

The Alabama Department of Transportation used aerial surveying to map the busy US 231 highway while traffic continued to flow and reported 5–8 cm accuracy across the site. This avoided the need to place crews along the roadway[9].

Survey-grade accuracy at scale

Academic studies confirm that UAV photogrammetry achieves centimeter-level accuracy when flights use RTK or PPK GNSS correction and well-distributed checkpoints [10]. Field results match this.

Accuracy depends strongly on flight geometry, GCP/checkpoint layout, and surface conditions, so consistency across large areas requires disciplined workflow.

In Indiana, surveyors mapped 3,000 acres and delivered 1.5 cm absolute accuracy across the entire project [11].

Rich datasets from one flight

A single drone survey produces orthomosaics, elevation models, point clouds, volumes, and 3D context.

When project needs shift, teams can extract new deliverables from the same dataset without returning to the field.

This flexibility is widely documented in engineering and earth-science applications [10].

Road construction point cloud Road construction elevation model

A segment of the highway rendered from drone data as a point cloud (left) and a digital elevation model (right) offers rich insight, including highly-accurate location details and measurements.

Repeatable results for progress and compliance

Because drone capture is fast, surveyors can repeat flights frequently.

This builds a timeline of site conditions, which helps track progress, validate claims, and support compliance.

PCL pilot flying survey drone at in solar field
PCL Construction uses recurring drone surveys for this reason, describing each flight as “a snapshot in time” that improves project oversight [12].

Managing labor shortages

Studies note that autonomous modes make UAV surveying accessible to users with limited field experience [10].

This helps teams manage labor shortages and frees specialists to focus on review and analysis rather than data capture.

GIS specialists, surveyors and non-experts on the field using drones for surveying with end-to-end solution
Integrated surveying platforms streamline this even further. Wingtra's workflow captures imagery, GNSS correction data, and checkpoint measurements in one connected system, then combines them automatically during data processing.

This reduces manual steps and makes it easier for first-time users to run accurate surveys.

What accuracy you can expect from drone surveying

Accuracy is the critical factor in drone surveying. Covering more ground is only valuable if results meet professional standards.

Sub-5 cm (2 in) is commonly achievable with disciplined workflows. Accuracy depends on sensor quality, flight altitude, overlap, GNSS corrections, lens calibration, and control.

Accuracy shown in engineering and cadastral applications

Recent studies on engineering and cadastral work report ~2–3 cm (0.8–1.2 in) horizontal and ~3–6 cm (1.2–2.4 in) vertical errors with UAV photogrammetry when RTK/PPK and well-placed GCPs are used [17] [18].

Total stations are still best for control networks and boundary pegs. But for large sites, drones now deliver survey-grade results far faster.

High-accuracy survey orthomosaic maps
Example of checkpoint-validated accuracy on a dense urban survey: horizontal RMSE of 1.0–1.5 cm (0.39–0.59 in) and vertical RMSE of 0.5 cm (0.20 in), with a ground sampling distance of 1.1 cm (0.43 in).

Field-proven results across real projects

Survey teams routinely validate these numbers in practice:

Wingtra drone orthomosaic oil and gas
1,000 acres (400 ha) surveyed with 2.3 cm (1 in) accuracy, supporting pipeline and terminal monitoring [19].

Similar results have been documented in road, rail, industrial land, and pipeline projects where drone outputs were checked against independent ground control and total station measurements.

Factors that affect accuracy

Drone survey accuracy depends on two things: the quality of the images and the precision of the positioning data.

Photogrammetry reconstructs a 3D model by matching shared features across many overlapping images, so any factor that affects image quality or geotag precision will affect the final results.

The main factors influencing accuracy include:

Relative accuracy

How well features match each other inside the model, comes from clear images with a good ground sampling distance (GSD), high overlap, and stable camera performance.

These factors allow the software to match points reliably and reconstruct surfaces at the correct scale [47].

Absolute accuracy

Absolute accuracy describes how well the model matches real-world coordinates. It depends on the precision of the image geotags and, when used, the quality of ground control. With PPK, geotag accuracy improves to a few centimeters when the base station logs correction data correctly.

As a rule of thumb, absolute accuracy is typically one to two times the GSD horizontally and two to three times the GSD vertically [47].

RTK, PPK, and ground control points (GCPs)

RTK and PPK both correct the drone’s GNSS positions to reduce absolute error in each image. This significantly reduces the need for dense GCPs.

GCP with middle pin
Studies show the most consistent results when RTK or PPK is paired with a small set of well-distributed GCPs [17] [18].

How to validate accuracy with checkpoints

Checkpoints are the most reliable way to confirm the accuracy of a drone survey.

A checkpoint is a surveyed target on the ground that is not used in processing. Comparing its true coordinates to the coordinates in the drone model gives the horizontal and vertical error for the project.

Surveyor setting up checkpoint for drone surveying
Ground Control Points (GCPs) are physical markers with known coordinates used to anchor your drone map to real-world positions, improving absolute accuracy. Checkpoints look similar but are used to validate your map’s accuracy by comparing surveyed vs processed coordinates.

Why checkpoints matter

Independent checkpoint validation is the standard method used in engineering, cadastral, and legal surveys.

Both the ISPRS 2024 study and the 2022 cadastral accuracy assessment highlight this step as essential for verifying UAV results [17]
[18].

It is the same principle used to validate GNSS or total station work, measure a known point and compare it to the model.

How to place checkpoints

GCP measured by a base station
Checkpoints should be:

How validation works in practice

Base and checkpoints
Example of checkpoints imported into the software

This gives you the final accuracy numbers that can be reported for quality control documentation.

The drone surveying workflow

Modern surveying platforms guide you through mission planning, GNSS setup, data capture, and processing without switching tools.

With Wingtra, the drone, base station, and rover record all required data. WingtraCLOUD then combines the imagery, correction logs, and checkpoints automatically. This connected workflow helps new users capture reliable data and speeds up accuracy validation.

1. Plan the flight

Create a drone survey flight plan

You define the survey area, coordinate system, flight altitude, overlap, and payload in the planning software. This step can happen in the office or on site before you start setting up equipment.

2. Set up GNSS and checkpoints

Measure targets with the rover

On site, you set up the GNSS base station on a known point (or a point that will later be precisely calculated), level it, and start logging correction data.

You then place checkpoints and, if needed, GCPs around the site and survey them with a GNSS rover. These points will later be used to validate and, if desired, increase the accuracy of the model.

3. Capture the data

Launch and fly the drone survey

You run a preflight check (batteries, sensors, airspace, geofence, weather) and then launch the drone.

It follows an automatic flight pattern and captures overlapping images with GNSS positions.

4. Process the images

Process drone images
After landing, you stop base station logging and transfer the images and GNSS data. The software combines images, PPK logs, and checkpoint measurements into one project. Photogrammetry processing then creates orthomosaics, DSMs and point clouds.

5. Validate accuracy

Validate accuracy of a drone survey

Independent checkpoints provide the accuracy proof. These are surveyed targets that were not used in processing. Comparing their measured coordinates to the drone model yields the horizontal and vertical RMSE values required for engineering work.

Studies highlight this validation step as essential for legal or high-precision use cases [17]
[18].

6. Deliver and export

Share survey topographic results with a link

The final outputs, orthomosaics, elevation models and points clouds, can be exported to common formats for Civil 3D, ArcGIS, QGIS, or other design and geospatial tools.

This allows teams to use drone data in the same workflows as traditional survey data.

For a deeper look at each step, refer to the full drone survey workflows: RGB photogrammetry, LIDAR

What deliverables you get from a drone survey

A single drone flight produces several geospatial outputs.

These deliverables help with design, measurement, reporting, and documentation across land development, construction, mining, and infrastructure work.

Orthomosaic (TIF, TIFF, JPG, JP2)

Loch Craignish Orthomosaic

An orthomosaic is a distortion-free, true-scale aerial image where every pixel has real-world coordinates. It is created by projecting overlapping images onto a surface model.

Use: mapping, visual inspection, area measurements, change detection, and background layers for GIS.

Example datasets: orthomosaic outputs.

Digital surface model (DSM) (TIF, IMG, ASC)

Digital surface model

A DSM is a raster elevation model showing the top of everything on site, including vegetation, buildings, stockpiles, and equipment.

Use: cut-and-fill planning, solar analysis, line-of-sight checks, volumetrics, and surface modeling.

Source: generated from a point cloud (photogrammetry or LIDAR).

Digital terrain model (DTM) (TIF, IMG, ASC)

Digital Terrain model (DTM)

A DTM represents the bare ground after removing vegetation and structures.

Use: engineering design, hydrology, drainage studies, road planning, and flood modeling.

Source: created by filtering ground points in a point cloud or DSM.

Digital elevation model (DEM) (TIF, IMG, HGT)

Drone data mapping output DEM Indiana port authority

A DEM is a general term for a gridded elevation model. It can represent either a DSM or a DTM depending on how the surface was generated.

Use: base layer for slope, aspect, hillshade, contour generation, and terrain analyses.

3D point cloud (LAS, LAZ, PLY)

RGB 3D point cloud

Point clouds are dense collections of 3D points that describe the site in detail. They allow precise measurements of distances, heights, breaklines, volumes, and slopes, and are a core output of drone-based 3D mapping.

Use: engineering design, stockpile calculations, topographic modeling, and structural inspection.

Source: generated from photogrammetry or LIDAR.

Example outputs: RGB point cloud dataset or LiDAR point cloud dataset.

3D textured mesh (OBJ, FBX, DAE)

GEN II Zurich city mapping oblique ContextCapture 3D reality mesh output 5

A 3D textured model combines a surface mesh with imagery to create a realistic visual representation of the site.

Use: communicating design options, documenting progress, or inspecting structures and urban areas.

Example output: 3D mesh dataset.

Multispectral indices (NDVI, NDRE, SAVI) (TIF, IMG)

MicaSense RedEdge-MX NDVI output

Multispectral sensors produce raster layers that show plant vigor, land cover, or stress conditions.

Use: agriculture, forestry, habitat monitoring, and ecosystem analysis.

Example outputs: multispectral datasets.

Where drone surveying is used

Drone surveying is now common across land development, construction, mining, infrastructure, and environmental projects.

Teams use it whenever they need accurate measurements over large areas, quick access to changing conditions, or a safe way to capture data in complex terrain.

Land development and planning

Surveyors use drone data to create topographic maps, city-scale mapping for planning and taxation and digital twins. Orthomosaics and terrain models support design, grading, permitting, and early feasibility studies.

Superblock drone data capture in Cancún

Large-scale cadastre survey with 5 cm (2 in) accuracy, supporting boundary mapping [22].

Construction and earthworks

Drones help track progress, check cut-and-fill quantities, monitor stockpiles, and document site conditions for claims or coordination. Frequent surveys give teams a reliable timeline of work completed, which improves scheduling and quality control.
Cut and fill TurnPoint Geomatics WingtraOne drone output

Daily cut-fill monitoring with ~1 cm (0.4 in) accuracy, enabling real-time progress tracking [23].

Mining and quarry operations

Open-pit mines use drones to monitor pit walls, reconcile volumes, update surface models, and track daily changes. Drone surveys reduce the time crews spend around active equipment and deliver consistent results for production reporting.

Stockpile image WingtraOne data Estevan mine

Regular mine pit surveys achieving 2–4 cm (0.8–1.6 in) accuracy, enabling tighter reconciliation and production reporting [21].

Infrastructure and transportation

Road, rail, and utility projects use drone data to map corridors, check clearances, support design updates, and maintain asset records. Aerial capture reduces the need for lane closures or direct access to busy or hazardous areas.

Point cloud (lake + rail) generated with Metashape
Entire lake and rail corridor survey with ~4 cm (2 in) accuracy, supporting asset management [24].

Environmental and land management

Agencies and consultants use drones for floodplain studies, habitat assessment, erosion tracking, coastal monitoring, forest mapping, and restoration work. Terrain models and time-series imagery support long-term analysis.
Suicide Basin Alaska glacier orthomosaic Suicide Basin Alaska glacier elevation model

Digital elevation model used to assess the changes to ice levels atop Suicide Basin (to the right-hand side of the outputs) which indicates the status of the water level and how it interacts with the Mendenhall Glacier (left-hand side of outputs) [48].

Photogrammetry vs LIDAR: when to use each

Lidar vs photogrammetry illustration

Photogrammetry and LIDAR are the two main methods used in drone surveying.

Both create accurate 3D outputs but work in different ways. Most surveyors use RGB photogrammetry for general mapping and switch to LIDAR only when the terrain or vegetation requires it [6].

When to use photogrammetry

Digital twin of Olten train station (drone data)

Photogrammetry uses overlapping images to reconstruct the surface in 3D. It is the standard choice for most surveying work because it is easier to capture and process, cost-effective, and produces photorealistic results [6].

When to use LIDAR

High-density LIDAR point cloud of a highway corridor, showing roadway elevation, vegetation, and surrounding structures.
High-density LIDAR point cloud of a highway corridor, showing roadway elevation, vegetation, and surrounding structures.

LIDAR sends thousands of laser pulses per second and measures their return time. It captures dense point clouds and can record the ground even through vegetation [6].

Use it when the project requires:

  • ground detail under trees or brush
  • mapping steep or complex terrain
  • modeling powerlines or utilities
  • high-density 3D data
  • early-morning, late-evening, or
  • low-light capture

Choosing between them

Most surveyors start with RGB photogrammetry because it covers the majority of use cases and delivers the accuracy needed for design and measurement work.

LIDAR adds value when vegetation, terrain, or structural detail limit what photogrammetry can see.

For deeper guidance, see the full comparison in the LIDAR vs photogrammetry page.

Key takeaways

LIDAR drone on-site and LIDAR outputs on screen

Drone surveying has become a practical tool for surveyors, engineers, and GIS teams who need accurate data across large or complex sites.

With RTK or PPK GNSS correction, a solid workflow, and a few checkpoints, photogrammetry routinely delivers centimeter-level accuracy supported by academic research and field projects.

The result is faster capture, safer operations, and consistent, repeatable data for land development, construction, mining, infrastructure, and environmental projects.

As the technology matures, drones now sit alongside traditional instruments in modern survey workflows, each method used where it contributes the most accuracy, efficiency, or detail.

Watch demo

Watch the full drone surveying workflow with Wingtra.

Author

Wingtra provides a surveying and mapping workflow used across land development, construction, mining, and environmental projects.

Built on ETH Zurich research, the platform combines high-accuracy aerial data capture with open geospatial outputs, supporting compatibility with tools like Esri and Trimble.

Wingtra’s solutions are available through more than 100 surveying and geospatial equipment specialists worldwide and are deployed by over 1,500 organizations, including U.S. Departments of Transportation, the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and leading companies in construction and mining such as CEMEX, PCL Construction, and Gold Fields.

References

  1. Largest aerial surveys by a drone [Case study] | Wingtra. (n.d.). Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/surveying-gis/these-are-some-of-the-largest-aerial-surveys-by-a-drone-case-study/
  2. Loosli, E. (2025, March 7). Surveyors track earthworks daily with fast, accurate drone data | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/surveyors-track-earthworks-daily-with-fast-accurate-drone-data/
  3. Loosli, E. (2024, November 14). Fast, detailed urban drone survey of Cancún to promote development | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/urban-drone-survey-of-cancun/
  4. WingtraRAY technical specifications. (2025). https://wingtra.com/wp-content/uploads/WingtraRAY-Technical-Specifications.pdf
  5. Mastering drone photogrammetry: complete guide to high-quality surveys | Wingtra. (2023, October 30). Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/drone-photogrammetry/
  6. LIDAR vs. photogrammetry: what sensor to choose for a given application | Wingtra. (2025, February 13). Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/lidar-drone/lidar-vs-photogrammetry-what-sensor-to-choose/
  7. Maximize Precision with Multispectral Drones: Benefits, Use Cases & Solutions | Wingtra. (2024, June 28). Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/multispectral-drone/
  8. Ibrahim, A., Afonja, Y., Omale, D., Omale, D., Idoko, I., Idoko, I., Alagbe, A., Oduyemi, A., Akintuyi, O., Ibrahim, R., & Azeez, Z. (2025). Assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle versus terrestrial method of topographic surveying. Environmental Technology and Science Journal, 16(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.4314/etsj.v16i1.9
  9. Loosli, E. (2025d, April 30). High-res RGB and oblique Wingtra data a boon for Alabama DOT | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/high-res-rgb-and-oblique-wingtra-data-a-boon-for-alabama-dot/
  10. Perera, G.S.N. & Nalani, H.A. (2022). UAVs for a complete topographic survey. XXIV ISPRS Congress, Nice, France. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-441-2022
  11. Loosli, E. (2025b, March 7). Drone survey gives Ports of Indiana a high-accuracy business upgrade | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/drone-survey-gives-ports-of-indiana-a-high-accuracy-business-upgrade/
  12. Loosli, E. (2023, November 2). Drone solar panel inspection is becoming more and more feasible, and here’s why [case study] | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/drone-solar-panel-inspection-is-becoming-more-and-more-feasible-and-heres-why-case-study/
  13. Loosli, E. (2023, November 3). WingtraOne fetches powerful data for the US Army Corps of Engineers and an industrial airfield | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/wingtraone-fetches-powerful-data-for-the-us-army-corps-of-engineers/
  14. Asset Media. (n.d.). Surveying skills shortage & industry research. https://www.consultingsurveyors.com.au/resources/researchstudies/surveying-skills/
  15. Focus Consulting. (2025, February 19). The skills gap in surveying and construction. Focus Consulting Building Surveyors. https://www.focuscs.co.uk/2025/02/19/the-skills-gap-in-surveying-and-construction/
  16. Loosli, E. (2023a, October 27). WingtraOne takes road surveys to the next level of speed, savings and safety | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/wingtraone-estonian-road-survey/
  17. Accuracy assessment of UAV photogrammetry system with RTK measurements for direct georeferencing. (2024). ISPRS Annals. https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/X-1-2024/169/2024/isprs-annals-X-1-2024-169-2024.pdf
  18. Monjardín-Armenta, S. A., Rangel-Peraza, J. G., Sanhouse-García, A. J., Plata-Rocha, W., Rentería-Guevara, S. A., & Mora-Félix, Z. D. (2024). Statistical comparison analysis of different real-time kinematic methods for the development of photogrammetric products: CORS-RTK, CORS-RTK + PPK, RTK-DRTK2, and RTK + DRTK2 + GCP. Open Geosciences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0650
  19. Loosli, E. (2025e, March 7). WingtraOne GEN II offers more efficient, higher-accuracy drone pipeline inspection data [case study] | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/wingtraone-gen-ii-offers-more-efficient-higher-accuracy-drone-pipeline-inspection-data-case-study/
  20. Loosli, E. (2024c, November 26). Drone solar land survey data prevents construction errors on flooded Illinois soil | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/drone-solar-land-survey/
  21. Loosli, E. (2025e, March 7). Westmoreland boosts productivity with drone mine surveys [case study] | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/westmoreland-boosts-productivity-with-drone-mine-surveys-case-study/
  22. Loosli, E. (2024b, November 14). Fast, detailed urban drone survey of Cancún to promote development | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/urban-drone-survey-of-cancun/
  23. Loosli, E. (2025e, March 7). Surveyors track earthworks daily with fast, accurate drone data | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/surveyors-track-earthworks-daily-with-fast-accurate-drone-data/
  24. Loosli, E. (2021, April 14). Swiss Federal Railways relies on drone data to maintain and develop its rail infrastructure | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/swiss-federal-railways-relies-on-drone-data-to-maintain-and-develop-its-rail-infrastructure/
  25. Https://www.reddit.com/r/UAVmapping/comments/1Ku51mb/question_how_many_hectaressqm_can_the_matrice_350/ [Online forum post]. (n.d.). Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/UAVmapping/comments/1Ku51mb/question_how_many_hectaressqm_can_the_matrice_350/
  26. Trinity Pro Cameras Overview Technical Specifications. (n.d.). https://lp.quantum-systems.com/hubfs/Downloadables/QS_Trinity_Pro_Overview_Cameras_V002_241023_Screen.pdf?hsLang=en
  27. WingtraRAY | Survey drone for fast results and full confidence | Wingtra. (n.d.). Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/ray
  28. PR-296 - Trinity R10 | EASA. (n.d.). EASA. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/domains/drones-air-mobility/drones-evtol-designs/approved-drones-eu-operations/pr-296-trinity-r10
  29. P-Themes. (n.d.). Trinity Pro. Measur Drones. https://measurusa.com/products/trinity-pro
  30. P-Themes. (n.d.-a). DJI Matrice 350 RTK. Measur Drones. https://measurusa.com/products/dji-matrice-350-rtk?variant=42691909091505
  31. Blue UAS cleared list. (n.d.). https://www.diu.mil/blue-uas-cleared-list
  32. PR-42 - Matrice 350 | EASA. (2024, July 11). EASA. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/domains/drones-air-mobility/drones-evtol-designs/approved-drones-eu-operations/pr-42-matrice-350
  33. PR-120 - Matrice 350 RTK FlySafe | EASA. (n.d.). EASA. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/domains/drones-air-mobility/drones-evtol-designs/approved-drones-eu-operations/pr-120-matrice-350
  34. Wingtra configurator. (n.d.). https://configurator.wingtra.com/configurator?config=_zfu14enaz&location=_ad6lhvjig
  35. Matrice 350 RTK - Specs - DJI. (n.d.). DJI. https://enterprise.dji.com/matrice-350-rtk/specs
  36. Schwefel, L. (2025, July 25). Remote sensing and drones in environmental field surveys. Fulcrum. https://www.fulcrumapp.com/blog/remote-sensing-and-drones-in-environmental-field-surveys/
  37. Drone mapping cameras for high-resolution imagery | Wingtra. (n.d.). Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/mapping-drone-wingtraone/drone-sensors/
  38. Cameras available for Trinity Pro. (n.d.). Quantum Systems. https://quantum-systems.com/cameras-overview-trinity-pro/
  39. Matrice 350 RTK - DJI. (n.d.). DJI. https://enterprise.dji.com/matrice-350-rtk
  40. Gunn, T. (2025, July 11). WingtraRAY: Your Field Guide to Wingtra’s new Fixed-Wing VTOL. Advexure. https://advexure.com/blogs/news/wingtraray-your-field-guide-to-wingtra-s-new-fixed-wing-vtol
  41. Performing Advanced Aerial Mapping with Quantum Systems’ Trinity Pro. (2025, January 27). Commercial UAV News. https://www.commercialuavnews.com/performing-advanced-aerial-mapping-with-quantum-systems-trinity-pro
  42. Li, R. (n.d.). Complete PPK workflow for DJI enterprise drones. https://enterprise-insights.dji.com/blog/ppk-post-processed-kinematics-workflow
  43. r/UAVmapping [Online forum post]. (n.d.). Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/UAVmapping/
  44. Alvarado, E. (n.d.). Global Drone Survey Results 2025 | Drone Industry Insights. Drone Industry Insights. https://droneii.com/global-drone-survey-results-2024
  45. P-Themes. (n.d.-b). DJI TB100 Intelligent Flight Battery for Matrice 400. Measur Drones. https://measurusa.com/products/dji-tb100-intelligent-flight-battery-for-matrice-400
  46. P-Themes. (n.d.-b). DJI RC Plus 2 Enterprise. Measur Drones. https://measurusa.com/products/dji-rc-plus-2-enterprise
  47. Factors affecting output accuracy of WingtraOne data. (n.d.). https://knowledge.wingtra.com/en/accuracy-of-wingtraone-outputs
  48. Loosli, E. (2023, November 9). Climate scientists use drone data to monitor glacier lake flooding impact on Alaskan communities | Wingtra. Wingtra. https://wingtra.com/case_studies/glacier-lake-flooding-alaska/

We use cookies to provide a user-friendly experience. By continuing to browse this site, you give consent for cookies to be used and stored on your device. To find out more please read our Privacy Policy.