
Helmut Heit
Helmut Heit is director of the Kolleg Friedrich Nietzsche at the Klassik Stiftung Weimar and honorary professor of philosophy at the Technische Universität Berlin. He studied philosophy and political sciences in Hannover, Melbourne and Berlin and received his Dr. phil. 2003 in Hannover for a study on the emergence of Western philosophy in ancient Greece. Before coming to Weimar, he was associate professor for German and European Philosophy and vice-director of the Academy of European Culture at Tongji University in Shanghai, and he still holds a visiting affiliation there. He previously worked at Technische Universität Berlin (2007-15) Humboldt Universität Berlin (2006-07), University of California at San Diego (2005-06) and Leibniz Universität Hannover (2003-06). He also held a teaching assignment at the Munich Business School (2011-15), was invited scholar in Pelotas, Brazil (2014-15) and at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton (2012-13).
He works in the fields of philosophy of culture, philosophy of science, critical theory, social philosophy and European identity and values. In historical terms, his research covers 19th and 20th century German philosophy. A main focus of his recent study is Nietzsche’s cultural philosophy of science.
Helmut Heit is co-editor of Nietzsche-Studien and of the book-series Monographien und Texte der Nietzscheforschung (de Gruyter), member of the executive board of the German Nietzsche-Gesellschaft, and he was founding director of the Berliner Nietzsche-Colloquium. He is member of the advisory board of Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie, liaison professor (Vertrauensdozent) of Hans Böckler Foundation, and fellow of the Center for Philosophy and Ethics of Science Hannover.
He works in the fields of philosophy of culture, philosophy of science, critical theory, social philosophy and European identity and values. In historical terms, his research covers 19th and 20th century German philosophy. A main focus of his recent study is Nietzsche’s cultural philosophy of science.
Helmut Heit is co-editor of Nietzsche-Studien and of the book-series Monographien und Texte der Nietzscheforschung (de Gruyter), member of the executive board of the German Nietzsche-Gesellschaft, and he was founding director of the Berliner Nietzsche-Colloquium. He is member of the advisory board of Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie, liaison professor (Vertrauensdozent) of Hans Böckler Foundation, and fellow of the Center for Philosophy and Ethics of Science Hannover.
less
Related Authors
Catherine Rowett
University of East Anglia
Ian James Kidd
University of Nottingham
Galen Strawson
The University of Texas at Austin
Martin Kusch
University of Vienna
Heather Douglas
Michigan State University
Brian Leiter
University of Chicago
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Omar W. Nasim
University of Regensburg
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
Shaun Gallagher
University of Memphis
InterestsView All (20)
Uploads
Books by Helmut Heit
B.D. Mtichel in Isis. Vol. 105/0 (2014): "Perhaps the collection's greatest strength is the way that it strikes a balance between deepening our understanding of many of the better-known influences on Nietzsche's thought and also opening up many other avenues of exploration, particularly in the human and social sciences. While several recent studies have attended to Nietzsche and science, no other volume brings together so many diverse essays from the leading figures in Nietzsche scholarship in English and German. This work will be invaluable to any scholar interested in Nietzsche, providing, as it does, a new panoramic view of his interactions with the natural and human sciences of the nineteenth century."
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/680289
Papers by Helmut Heit
B.D. Mtichel in Isis. Vol. 105/0 (2014): "Perhaps the collection's greatest strength is the way that it strikes a balance between deepening our understanding of many of the better-known influences on Nietzsche's thought and also opening up many other avenues of exploration, particularly in the human and social sciences. While several recent studies have attended to Nietzsche and science, no other volume brings together so many diverse essays from the leading figures in Nietzsche scholarship in English and German. This work will be invaluable to any scholar interested in Nietzsche, providing, as it does, a new panoramic view of his interactions with the natural and human sciences of the nineteenth century."
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/680289
The main part of this paper is devoted to a reconstruction of Nietzsche’s philosophy of science n the contexts of his reading and understanding of contemporary science. The 19th century saw the rise of the natural sciences to cultural hegemony and of historical consciousness. Nietzsche’s philosophy of science is shaped by his training in philology in three main regards: He shared the predominant view that Western scientific thought emerged in ancient Greece, he applied historical consciousness to the development and validity of science, and he employed the notion of interpretation to comprehend the construction and reconstruction of (scientific) theories and world-views. Moreover, Nietzsche combined his background in the humanities with a thorough and life-long interest in the natural sciences, as the paper indicates by two significant examples. Nietzsche read several physiological studies, among others by Herman von Helmholtz, and took them as evidence for a constructivist understanding of sensory experience. His reading of Emil du Bois-Reymond and Friedrich Albert Lange provided him with an instrumentalist and anti-absolutist understanding of scientific theories. In the light of these debates, Nietzsche went a step further and brings the not yet questioned culture role of science to the fore. The unique composition of timely and untimely, original and contextual features in Nietzsche’s view provide an inspiring perspective on science in our contemporary world. Nietzsche not only observed the constructive and hypothetical character of our scientific ways of world-making, but invited fundamental contemplation about human goals and the proper role of science in future culture. This does not make him an enemy of science but a demanding friend.
: This paper argues that essential features of Feyerabend’s philosophy, namely his radicalization of critical rationalism and his turn to relativism, could be understood better in the light of his engagement with early Greek thought. In contrast to his earlier, Popperian views he came to see the Homeric worldview as a genuine alternative, which was not falsified by the Presocratics. Unlike socio-psychological and externalist accounts my reading of his published and unpublished material suggests that his alternative reconstruction of the ancient beginnings of the Western scientific tradition motivate and justify his moderate Protagorean relativism
We show the significance of Feyerabends work on archaic and ancient Greek thought and his engagement with the history of human understanding of nature. The Philosophy of Nature, written in the early 1970s, is a companion book to Against Method. This work not only improves or understanding of Feyerabend intellectual development, but also sheds new light on Western philosophy, history, and science.
Departing from a comparison between Nietzsche and Paul Feyerabend, this paper argues that Nietz-sche develops the idea of a life-affirming, artistic, and joyfull science as a possible result of a cultural history of asceticism and sublimation. The closing sections of Genealogy of Morals introduce a distinction between normal and idealist science and discuss their respective relation to asceticism. The practice of normal scientific labour and the idealist quest for truth both reveal the lack of autonomous ideals. An analysis of his hypothetical and perspectival understanding of knowledge-claims shows (against Charles Larmore) that Nietzsche's discussion of truth is neither inconsistent nor self-refuting. Nietzsche is no enemy of science but assumes a privileged position for philosophy in the hierarchy of disciplines within a broader context of cultural emancipation.
Tradução do original realizado por Leonardo Camacho de Oliveira (Mestre em Filosofia e bacharel em Direito e Filosofia pela UFPel)
O presente volume suplementar da Revista Dissertatio de Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Pelotas, denominado "Dossiê Naturalismo" reúne artigos de diversos autores importantes no cenário contemporâneo sobre Naturalismo. By Juliano do Carmo, Adriano N. De Brito, Helmut Heit, Clademir Araldi, Fabricio Pontin, Jack Ritchie, and Mark Timmons
ABSTRACT: The title of this paper connects two words, which are often applied to Nietzsche's philosophy, but usually not simultaneously, since perspectivism and naturalism are often seen as alternative or even contradictory concepts. While perspectivism is associated with aesthetic, constructivist, Kantian if not relativist and postmodern readings of Nietzsche, the notion of naturalism brings him closer to science, empiricism and realism. Accordingly, many of those who ascribe versions of perspectivism to Nietzsche harbour reservations against naturalistic readings and vice versa. However, this paper argues that Nietzsche neither develops or defends 'naturalism' nor 'perspectivism' in the form of spelled out doctrines or theories. We should be reluctant to apply such apparently strict denominators to his philosophy, since they may well be fundamentally misleading. Moreover, such approaches tend to result in confirming preconceptions rather than generating new ideas. So regarding the question whether Nietzsche should be called a 'naturalist' it seems to me that evil severely outweighs necessity in this case. Nietzsche does not teach doctrines but exemplifies, tests and proposes certain philosophical practices. These philosophical practices contain of naturalistic and perspectival features. He invites his readers to adopt naturalist perspectives and he experimentally explores them in his practical contexts to pursue a certain project. Nietzsche's naturalizing accounts of mind, philosophy, and science, his apparent empiricism, sensualism, and materialism are always counterbalanced by critical epistemology.
https://www.incircolorivistafilosofica.it/tre-anni-di-filosofia-occidentale-nella-repubblica-popolare-cinese/
You may also find the unpublished German version of that paper here
https://www.mdr.de/kultur/videos-und-audios/audio-radio/philosophie-in-china-helmut-heit-im-gespraech-100.html