
sean lennon
Related Authors
Judith L Green
University of California, Santa Barbara
E. Wayne Ross
University of British Columbia
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Don Ross
University College Cork
Jo Tondeur
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
danah boyd
Microsoft Research
Bob Jessop
Lancaster University
Radhika Gajjala
Bowling Green State University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Giulia Sissa
Ucla
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by sean lennon
in infancy and Suzy, his eldest daughter, died while he was abroad) he pursued questions
of morality, religion and ethics more openly. Always found in his writings, his later works were more profound in scope and utility for such controversial topics. “Was it Heaven? Or Hell?” was one of his latest pieces. Mark Twain would continue to
experience trauma that influenced his writing; he later witnessed the death of both his wife and youngest daughter (Jean). Twain would perish just a few months after Jean,
dying in Bermuda in 1910
traditional and hybrid formatted curriculums. Definitions and conceptual framework of both constructs are discussed
and their benefits towards cognitions and reflection are highlighted. Best practices, including examples of previous
courses are presented as well as the pedagogy and planning necessary for readers to implement successfully into their
own courses. Paper also includes strategies and techniques for possible use
Personality (FFM) the paper makes the statement that similar traits can also be correlated to teaching, with all
three processes delineated into a singular model. Designated as the Triadic Trait Model, the outliers are correlated by their shared traits or adjectives. The paper also asserts that these processes, especially teacher leadership, can be associated to the classroom teaching dynamic. Background and history of both the Transformative leadership Model and the Five Factor Model are included.
uses anecdotal points and discussions with teacher-educators in examining possible ideas that may foster teacher buy-in and compliance toward institutional-level policy.
standards. In Common Core, a major standard calls for the understanding and development of
the credibility of sources, a higher order thinking skill necessary for the Effective Speaking and
Listening standard for 11th and 12th graders. But what are the views of the teachers who develop
these strategies and are they aware of media bias and contradiction? This study illustrates the
results of a survey sent out to high school social studies teachers about their perceptions of
television media. Results suggest that there is a discrepancy between high school social studies
teachers’ perceptions of television news for personal viewing as compared to classroom use.
is a series, or continuation, of increasingly difficult
ethical riddles successfully implemented in a classroom
environment to spur complex, critical thinking and dialogue.
The activity is designed upon the scenario of a
runaway train with different and challenging choices,
segueing neatly into group discussions of ethics while
limiting potential disruptions or controversies. It fits
nicely with multiple standards, goals and/or outcomes
and can be accommodated to multiple grade levels and
courses. It is a powerful, yet easily implemented classroom
exercise for educators to develop higher order
thinking and dialogue for their students.
Talks by sean lennon
in infancy and Suzy, his eldest daughter, died while he was abroad) he pursued questions
of morality, religion and ethics more openly. Always found in his writings, his later works were more profound in scope and utility for such controversial topics. “Was it Heaven? Or Hell?” was one of his latest pieces. Mark Twain would continue to
experience trauma that influenced his writing; he later witnessed the death of both his wife and youngest daughter (Jean). Twain would perish just a few months after Jean,
dying in Bermuda in 1910
traditional and hybrid formatted curriculums. Definitions and conceptual framework of both constructs are discussed
and their benefits towards cognitions and reflection are highlighted. Best practices, including examples of previous
courses are presented as well as the pedagogy and planning necessary for readers to implement successfully into their
own courses. Paper also includes strategies and techniques for possible use
Personality (FFM) the paper makes the statement that similar traits can also be correlated to teaching, with all
three processes delineated into a singular model. Designated as the Triadic Trait Model, the outliers are correlated by their shared traits or adjectives. The paper also asserts that these processes, especially teacher leadership, can be associated to the classroom teaching dynamic. Background and history of both the Transformative leadership Model and the Five Factor Model are included.
uses anecdotal points and discussions with teacher-educators in examining possible ideas that may foster teacher buy-in and compliance toward institutional-level policy.
standards. In Common Core, a major standard calls for the understanding and development of
the credibility of sources, a higher order thinking skill necessary for the Effective Speaking and
Listening standard for 11th and 12th graders. But what are the views of the teachers who develop
these strategies and are they aware of media bias and contradiction? This study illustrates the
results of a survey sent out to high school social studies teachers about their perceptions of
television media. Results suggest that there is a discrepancy between high school social studies
teachers’ perceptions of television news for personal viewing as compared to classroom use.
is a series, or continuation, of increasingly difficult
ethical riddles successfully implemented in a classroom
environment to spur complex, critical thinking and dialogue.
The activity is designed upon the scenario of a
runaway train with different and challenging choices,
segueing neatly into group discussions of ethics while
limiting potential disruptions or controversies. It fits
nicely with multiple standards, goals and/or outcomes
and can be accommodated to multiple grade levels and
courses. It is a powerful, yet easily implemented classroom
exercise for educators to develop higher order
thinking and dialogue for their students.
The concept is relatively simple; students are asked a singular question, to be written and turned in on the last day of their regular class. They will then be asked, or given the same question upon their return. They are not allowed to see what they originally wrote until they have finished the assignment for the second time. The question; what in your mind constitutes good teaching, elicits multiple responses from the students and quite usually will generate different responses once back from apprenticeship. The original questions are then given back to the students and a dialogue is generated about the differences in perceptions, thoughts and attitudes and what might have occurred to have changed their perspectives and/or mind.
The presentation will explain the set up and creation of the activity, the roles and assumptions of the students and the expectations of the university in the apprenticeship program. The instructors will also elaborate on the teaching protocols and subsequent dialogues generated in the activity. Data from one activity will be presented to illustrate the differences students had from before apprenticeship to afterwards.
Realistically, the incorporation of pedagogy and technology has revolved around the individual educators themselves, who, after acquiring something new and useful, must then determine the best way to utilize it to their own needs and teaching style(s). Though circumstantial, empirical observation by the author(s) has developed the hypothesis that many educators have found themselves recipients of new apparatus and/or programs with little to no formal training on how to use them. Teachers, left to their own to develop instruction, or at least a rational for later incorporation, and usually under pressure by administration or stakeholders in defending or justifying the cost tend to develop eclectic but (usually) minimally effective ways in incorporating the technology to their classes or lessons. This further enhances the gap or lags of incorporation, especially in context to the new technology savvy students, while embittering many educators to the potential of the new technologies available to them.
The concept of the Interactive Lesson Plan was developed as a practical way to incorporate the versatility of Microsoft Word (though any word processing program can easily be used) as a student directed note taking tool in conjunction with a media player, usually a digital projector though a multi-media packaged television can just as easily be used. The ease of the program in attaching a myriad of Internet links and supplemental materials developed the concept of simple note taking into easily created yet powerful multi-media lessons. The paradigm shift into incorporating the multiple lessons and presentations into a standardized and complete, easy to utilize curriculum came about with the advent of flash drive technology and the ease of transporting whole reams of information and data from one computer to the next.
The Interactive Lesson Plan is a tested, effective technology utilized in four different curriculums in a three year span. It is easily adaptable to multiple formats and stylized templates and utilizes a base technology accessible, and knowledgeable to many, if not most educators. It is a simple, yet powerful and pragmatic incorporation of a stable and effective technology platform that educators can easily use and incorporate into their lessons and curriculums, despite differences in grade level, subjects, students, schools, and even geography.
Controversy can be a powerful educational tool yet it also is problematic and incendiary, potentially causing far more problems to the educational process, students and even the teacher than their potential outcomes. The same study that illustrated teachers’ opinions of the effectiveness of controversial issues in fostering civic education also highlighted a reluctance of teachers to do so, in fear or backlash or reprisals (Byford, Lennon & Russell, 2009). As a correlation to the high reward controversy can foster, there is also the risk that the issues themselves can cause problems both within and outside the classroom. This risk is what makes many teachers leery of using controversy despite its universal acceptance (primarily with the social studies curriculum) of its impact and success.
This presentation focuses on the effective concept of questioning skills, primarily within a practicum, classroom enabled format, to guide students in and around controversial issues. The objective is to allow the students to delve into controversy and to use critical thinking to best conceptualize or understand complex, nuanced issues. Directive, guiding questioning techniques will be explored and illustrated as to how a teacher can utilize generalized prompts to guide students towards a specific concept or knowledge set, or to move them away from potential conflict or issues. Conceptually described as directional questioning; this is a generalized type of linear questioning prompts that follow a direction or order designed to guide students to a concept without direct influence of the teacher . The order is relatively simple in scope and understanding; questioning can move from up (deductive) to down (inductive) or to a spiral, non-directional route. It must be noted that spiral questioning is the most difficult to implement but it is potentially the most powerful of the linear questioning designs. The presentation will discuss the concept of linear questioning, how and where they best work and the strategies useful in implementing them. The presentation will also incorporate examples and an open forum component to address any questions the audience may have.
In regards to leadership one will determine their ethical view on similar ‘lenses’ or perceptions as distorted or altered by heuristic impulses and beliefs. The leader will respond to a situation (stimuli) through analysis of emotion and/or reason before contrasting the action through moral judgment or conceptualization. Hume and Kant disagreed on the order of the actions; emotions or logic first, but both espoused the two as integral factors in ethical choice. Sometimes referred to as the ‘moral box’, this is a vague description of the influential outliers of choice; personality, emotion, reason, and of course ethical constraints as defined individualistically or by group, family and/or societal expectations.
The FFM personality model is a meta-analysis derived from the English lexicon of personality descriptors. Through a simple data reduction technique, the myriad of adjectives was incorporated into five factors or super-traits from which multiple sub-traits can be further delineated. These traits are basically descriptors, or adjectives which can then be modeled or compared to the traits as described in transactional and transformative leadership. The similarities are not random; distinct personalities will determine basic leadership concepts or ideals of the individual as well as the humanistic and ethical choices or viewpoints they may consider or follow when making decisions. Transformative leadership derives its strength from the building or incorporation of culture and values; outcomes which moral and ethical choices propagate.