
Yaniv Hagbi
Related Authors
Johannes Zachhuber
University of Oxford
Daniel D. Hutto
University of Wollongong
Galen Strawson
The University of Texas at Austin
Shaun Gallagher
University of Memphis
Andrei Orlov
Marquette University
Tommaso di Carpegna Falconieri
Urbino "Carlo Bo"
Fabien Montcher
Saint Louis University
John Tolan
Université de Nantes
Tomás Mantecón
Universidad de Cantabria
Pasquale Terracciano
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Uploads
Papers by Yaniv Hagbi
As a philosophical descendant of the rigid logic of the Eleatic school and
figures such as Parmenides and Zeno, Diodorus Cronus had a problem with the Aristotelian idea of motion. On the other hand, he tried not to ignore the changed state of affairs and to account for change and movement. He claimed that while change as a process does not make any sense, we must acknowledge that something has been changed. That brings us to a unique time-perception of the order of things that challenges linear time in a similar manner to the rabbinic notion of Oral Torah and the kabbalistic tzimtzum. Both, Oral Torah, as a text still being created but already given on Mount Sinai, and the tzimtzum — incorporating what Wolfson calls “circular linearity” — bear close similarities with Cronus’ time perception. One must stress that there is no apparent historical connection between Diodorus Cronus and the rabbis and there are obvious fundamental differences between them; however, their shared notion of the retrospective future bears very interesting affinities that the present article wishes to bring to the fore. To do so, this article will describe the concept of retrospective future in Jewish thought, chart Cronus’ conception of the ‘master argument’, and compare between them.
Keywords: Hermeneutics, Time, Oral Torah, future contingents, Diodorus Cronus, tzimtzum, The ‘master argument’, motion, non-linear, retrospective future.
The central Oulipian idea, the idea of formulating the constraint by which new works can be produced and created, is very similar to the idea of constant interpretation in rabbinic literature. Moreover, new works – made possible by the constraint – are in the future, as a potential, but also in the past, as a realization, in the constraint itself before it is realized. Here is an inherent, non-linear conception of time, or in the language of the Talmud: “everything that an accomplished student will in the future innovate was already told to Moses at Mt. Sinai”. The same "future" in which everything "has already been told" is the subject of this article. Here, too, lies the same tension between the determinism dictated by language and its own constraints and between the freedom of its users to create in it, between "engraved” (ḥarut) and "freedom" (ḥerut). The article will show how the blurring of linear time is part and parcel of both Oulipo and Rabbinical thought. The article will do so by describing the connection between Diodorus Kronos’ (340? -284 BC) famous "Master argument", the Oulipian notion of constraint and the idea of the giving of the dual Torah at Mount Sinai: the written and the oral. The linear time of past-present-future to which we are accustomed is replaced by a past that takes place in the future from the present.
Textual transmission, in the context of the present essay, is part and parcel of the broader notion of “linguistic materialism.” The material aspect of language is everything that reveals language to our senses. Linguistic materialism is perceived here as the idea that meaning is to be found, not only in words, but also in the concrete material of which language is made. Thus, in order for a text to be transmitted, one or more objects need to be exchanged. Sounds, ink, paper, parchment, letters, books: all are materialistic manifestations of language that enable the act of textual transmission.
As a philosophical descendant of the rigid logic of the Eleatic school and
figures such as Parmenides and Zeno, Diodorus Cronus had a problem with the Aristotelian idea of motion. On the other hand, he tried not to ignore the changed state of affairs and to account for change and movement. He claimed that while change as a process does not make any sense, we must acknowledge that something has been changed. That brings us to a unique time-perception of the order of things that challenges linear time in a similar manner to the rabbinic notion of Oral Torah and the kabbalistic tzimtzum. Both, Oral Torah, as a text still being created but already given on Mount Sinai, and the tzimtzum — incorporating what Wolfson calls “circular linearity” — bear close similarities with Cronus’ time perception. One must stress that there is no apparent historical connection between Diodorus Cronus and the rabbis and there are obvious fundamental differences between them; however, their shared notion of the retrospective future bears very interesting affinities that the present article wishes to bring to the fore. To do so, this article will describe the concept of retrospective future in Jewish thought, chart Cronus’ conception of the ‘master argument’, and compare between them.
Keywords: Hermeneutics, Time, Oral Torah, future contingents, Diodorus Cronus, tzimtzum, The ‘master argument’, motion, non-linear, retrospective future.
The central Oulipian idea, the idea of formulating the constraint by which new works can be produced and created, is very similar to the idea of constant interpretation in rabbinic literature. Moreover, new works – made possible by the constraint – are in the future, as a potential, but also in the past, as a realization, in the constraint itself before it is realized. Here is an inherent, non-linear conception of time, or in the language of the Talmud: “everything that an accomplished student will in the future innovate was already told to Moses at Mt. Sinai”. The same "future" in which everything "has already been told" is the subject of this article. Here, too, lies the same tension between the determinism dictated by language and its own constraints and between the freedom of its users to create in it, between "engraved” (ḥarut) and "freedom" (ḥerut). The article will show how the blurring of linear time is part and parcel of both Oulipo and Rabbinical thought. The article will do so by describing the connection between Diodorus Kronos’ (340? -284 BC) famous "Master argument", the Oulipian notion of constraint and the idea of the giving of the dual Torah at Mount Sinai: the written and the oral. The linear time of past-present-future to which we are accustomed is replaced by a past that takes place in the future from the present.
Textual transmission, in the context of the present essay, is part and parcel of the broader notion of “linguistic materialism.” The material aspect of language is everything that reveals language to our senses. Linguistic materialism is perceived here as the idea that meaning is to be found, not only in words, but also in the concrete material of which language is made. Thus, in order for a text to be transmitted, one or more objects need to be exchanged. Sounds, ink, paper, parchment, letters, books: all are materialistic manifestations of language that enable the act of textual transmission.
discern where its gaze is directed. Chelm is a city
unlike all others, for beyond it lies nothing: it
physically separates us from the void. Chelm is
known in Jewish folklore as a city of fools. But the
truth of Chelm is much darker—its inhabitants
harbor an ancient and fearsome metaphysical
wisdom beneath a facade of folly. If we dare
to look directly at this wisdom, we risk being
blinded.
Yaniv Hagbi’s novel weaves the stories of Chelm
into a dizzying plot. It focuses on the tale of the
son of the Chelm blacksmith, who seeks to save
his soul from the city’s grotesque logic. He is
exiled to the neighboring city of Z, where logic
and practical reasoning prevail. But the city
of Z cannot endure life alongside the spiraling
spectacle of folly for long, and the blacksmith’s
son is forced to return to Chelm one last time—
this time as the leader of Z’s inhabitants, to fight
against his birthplace and destroy it.
https://afikbooks.com/shop/%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%A9%D7%94-%D7%97%D7%9C%D7%9D/
Jewish culture places a great deal of emphasis on texts and their means of transmission. At various points in Jewish history, the primary mode of transmission has changed in response to political, geographical, technological, and cultural shifts. Contemporary textual transmission in Jewish culture has been influenced by secularization, the return to Hebrew and the emergence of modern Yiddish, and the new centers of Jewish life in the United States and in Israel, as well as by advancements in print technology and the invention of the Internet. Volume XXXI of Studies in Contemporary Jewry deals with various aspects of textual transmission in Jewish culture in the last two centuries.