As we begin the New Year and the new millennium, we realize that it has been far too long since w... more As we begin the New Year and the new millennium, we realize that it has been far too long since we publicly thanked our guest reviewers. The editorial ambit of Administration & Society is as wide as our imagination can stretch. Even an editorial board as large, distinguished, and hardworking as ours cannot cover the range of subjects that come before us. Thus, our guest reviewers are indispensable to the operation of the journal. Some are former board members; some we hope are future board members, as the kind of articles we must review changes over the years. We have said many times over the years that the anonymous peer review process is one of the quintessential and defining features of academia. To be a part of and a witness to that process is one of the most rewarding experiences in the profession. And within this amazing process is a truly inspiring aspect-the willingness of fellow academicians to perform the always difficult task of reviewing and taking part in the dialogue that ensues between reviewers, the authors, and sometimes the editor. The sincere desire to help an author even when that author may be critical of the reviewer's work, and even through several revisions, always makes us proud of our profession. Perhaps the status of being on an editorial board is some kind of compensation for board members, though it seems pitiful compared to the expenditure of time, effort, and patience. All the more amazing, therefore, is the donated toil of the guest reviewers. Theirs must surely be a labor of love-of discovery, of learning, of teaching, and of bringing forth new ideas into the world of dialogue. We therefore take this opportunity to thank them and to salute their professionalism. We hope we did not miss anyone or print a wrong affiliation. If so, please let us know.
Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology 319 which each might be expected to exist. In § 4, we con... more Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology 319 which each might be expected to exist. In § 4, we consider some further visibility asymmetries at the word level, including some that go the wrong way, and identify the source of these ' anti-HDAs '. In § 5 we briefly consider two further topics relevant to HDAs : in § 5.1 we consider how HDAs play a role in the phonology of signs, and § 5.2 has a brief discussion of the connection between HDAs and language acquisition. § 6 is a conclusion. I J I J J J I A syntagmatic local asymmetry is illustrated in (9) : (9) Syntagmatic HDA: permissible and impermissible constituents a. C J D J H b. C J D J H J c. C J D J H J * d . C J D J H J J
As we begin the New Year and the new millennium, we realize that it has been far too long since w... more As we begin the New Year and the new millennium, we realize that it has been far too long since we publicly thanked our guest reviewers. The editorial ambit of Administration & Society is as wide as our imagination can stretch. Even an editorial board as large, distinguished, and hardworking as ours cannot cover the range of subjects that come before us. Thus, our guest reviewers are indispensable to the operation of the journal. Some are former board members; some we hope are future board members, as the kind of articles we must review changes over the years. We have said many times over the years that the anonymous peer review process is one of the quintessential and defining features of academia. To be a part of and a witness to that process is one of the most rewarding experiences in the profession. And within this amazing process is a truly inspiring aspect-the willingness of fellow academicians to perform the always difficult task of reviewing and taking part in the dialogue that ensues between reviewers, the authors, and sometimes the editor. The sincere desire to help an author even when that author may be critical of the reviewer's work, and even through several revisions, always makes us proud of our profession. Perhaps the status of being on an editorial board is some kind of compensation for board members, though it seems pitiful compared to the expenditure of time, effort, and patience. All the more amazing, therefore, is the donated toil of the guest reviewers. Theirs must surely be a labor of love-of discovery, of learning, of teaching, and of bringing forth new ideas into the world of dialogue. We therefore take this opportunity to thank them and to salute their professionalism. We hope we did not miss anyone or print a wrong affiliation. If so, please let us know.
Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology 319 which each might be expected to exist. In § 4, we con... more Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology 319 which each might be expected to exist. In § 4, we consider some further visibility asymmetries at the word level, including some that go the wrong way, and identify the source of these ' anti-HDAs '. In § 5 we briefly consider two further topics relevant to HDAs : in § 5.1 we consider how HDAs play a role in the phonology of signs, and § 5.2 has a brief discussion of the connection between HDAs and language acquisition. § 6 is a conclusion. I J I J J J I A syntagmatic local asymmetry is illustrated in (9) : (9) Syntagmatic HDA: permissible and impermissible constituents a. C J D J H b. C J D J H J c. C J D J H J * d . C J D J H J J
Uploads
Papers by Elan Dresher