
Yvette Watt
Address: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
less
Related Authors
Galen Strawson
The University of Texas at Austin
Cynthia R . Nielsen
University of Dallas
Alejandra B Osorio
Wellesley College
Claire Bishop
Graduate Center of the City University of New York
Romy Golan
Graduate Center of the City University of New York
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
Shaun Gallagher
University of Memphis
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Florin Curta
University of Florida
John Sutton
Macquarie University
InterestsView All (22)
Uploads
Papers by Yvette Watt
This paper examines data from a survey of Animal Studies scholars undertaken by the authors in 2015. While the survey was broad ranging, this paper focuses on three interconnected elements; the respondents’ opinions on what role they think the field should play in regard to animal advocacy, their personal commitment to animal advocacy, and how their attitudes toward advocacy in the field differ depending on their dietary habits. While the vast majority of respondents believe that the field should demonstrate a commitment to animal wellbeing, our findings suggest that respondents’ level of commitment to animal advocacy is informed by whether they choose to eat animal products or not. We conclude that this reflects the breadth of the field as well as the fact that it is a relatively new area of study and as such is still evolving. In relation to the question posed in the title of this article – should we eat our research subjects? – it seems that Animal Studies scholars are divided on that issue; some do, some don’t, but for those who do eat their research subjects there is a degree of unease about the contradictions that such a choice implies.Watt, Yvette M.; O'Sullivan, Siobhan; and Probyn-Rapsey, Fiona, Should We Eat Our Research Subjects? Advocacy and Animal Studies, Animal Studies Journal, 7(1), 2018, 180-205.
Available at:http://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol7/iss1/9
Jennifer Mather problematizes in her article "Octopus Mind" the imagining of the mind of other animals. Several commentators to her article discuss the challenges (and limitations) of finding adequate cognitive methods and concepts for accessing the mind and experience of octopuses in response to Mather's article. Building on Godfrey-Smith's expansion to Mather's article, our commentary seeks to offer aesthetics as a paradigm for exploring mind and mindfulness in octopuses. We first argue that the arts provide methodologies and approaches to perform what Godfrey-Smith terms an "imaginative leap" to access the experience of octopuses. Secondly, we propose aesthetics as an explanatory paradigm for conceptualizing the mind of an octopus. We finish with a brief overview and introduction of how we are pursuing such a perspective in our current project Okto-Lab. Laboratory for Octopus Aesthetics (www.okto-lab.org.)