Papers by CONCHA MARTÍNEZ
Theoria-revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia, 2004
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative.... more Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Given a system of logic we have a Norma, a standard of correctness. The problem is that we need another Norma to establish when the standard of correctness is to be applied. Subsequently we start by clarifying the senses in which the term 'logic' and the term 'normativity' are being used. Then we explore two different epistemologies for logic to see the sort of defence of the normativity of logic they allow for; if any. The analysis concentrates on the case of classical logic. In particular the issue will be appraised from the perspective put forward by the epistemology based on the methodology of wide reflective equilibrium and the scientific one underlying the view of logic as model.
We explore prospects for practice-based approaches to logical theory, in particular the link betw... more We explore prospects for practice-based approaches to logical theory, in particular the link between classical and intuitionistic logic and the inferential structure of traditional practices of representation & argument in science and mathematics. After discussing some key notions about practice, we outline the connection between representation practices and classical logic, and then consider a spectrum of actual practices followed or proposed by (real) scientists. Intuitionistic logic helps to clarify the potential of practice-based approaches for understanding pluralism, and to hammer some key points about the general thesis.
Palabras Y Pensamientos Una Mirada Analitica Palavras E Pensamentos Uma Perspectiva Analitica I Jornadas Hispano Portuguesas De Filosofia Analitica Santiago De Compostela 20 22 De Noviembre Novembro De 2002 2003 Isbn 84 9750 141 1 Pags 329 341, 2003
Actas Del Iv Congreso De La Sociedad De Logica Metodologia Y Filosofia De La Ciencia En Espana Valladolid 3 6 De Noviembre De 2004 2004 Isbn 84 688 8448 0 Pags 379 381, 2004
Actas Del I Congreso De La Sociedad De Logica Metodologia Y Filosofia De La Ciencia En Espana Madrid 15 16 Y 17 De Diciembre De 1993 1997 Isbn 84 604 8342 8 Pags 98 101, 1997
Actas Del V Congreso De La Sociedad De Logica Metodologia Y Filosofia De La Ciencia En Espana 2006 Isbn 978 84 9349419 3 Pags 54 58, 2006
Lenguajes Naturales Y Lenguajes Formales Actas Del V Congreso De Lenguajes Naturales Y Lenguajes Formales Vol 2 1990 Isbn 84 7665 691 2 Pags 611 618, 1990
Lenguajes Naturales Y Lenguajes Formales Actas Del Viii Congreso De Lenguajes Naturales Y Lenguajes Formales 1992 Isbn 84 477 0002 X Pags 433 440, 1992
Paideia 2005 Isbn 84 9750 402 X, 2005
Current Topics in Logic and Analytic Philosophy Colloquium on Logic and Analytic Philosophy at Santiago De Compostela Temas Actuales De Logica Y Filosofia Analitica Coloquio Compostelano De Filosofia Analitica Santiago De Compostela 2001 2005 2007 Isbn 978 84 9750 811 7 Pags 203 220, 2007
Studies in Universal Logic, 2014
In this chapter, we intend to look at Henkin’s reviews, a total of forty-six. The books and paper... more In this chapter, we intend to look at Henkin’s reviews, a total of forty-six. The books and papers reviewed deal with a large variety of subjects that range from the algebraic treatment of logical systems to issues concerning the philosophy of mathematics and, not surprisingly—given his active work in mathematical education—one on the teaching of this subject. Most of them were published in The Journal of Symbolic Logic and only one in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. We will start by sorting these works into subjects and continue by providing a brief summary of each of them in order to point out those aspects that are originally from Henkin, and what we take to be mistakes. This analysis should disclose Henkin’s personal views on some of the most important results and influential books of his time; for instance, Godel’s discovery of the consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis with the axioms of set theory or Church’s Introduction to Logic. It should also provide insight into how various outstanding results in logic and the foundations of mathematics were seen at the time. Finally, we will relate Henkin’s reviews to Henkin’s major contributions.
Acceso de usuarios registrados. Acceso de usuarios registrados Usuario Contraseña. ...
... Analítica, Santiago de Compostela, 20-22 de noviembre-novembro de 2002. Información General. ... more ... Analítica, Santiago de Compostela, 20-22 de noviembre-novembro de 2002. Información General. Autores: José Luis Falguera López ( coord. ), José M. Sagüillo ( coord. ), Concha Martínez ( coord. ), Antonio JT Zilhâo ( coord. ...
dialnet.unirioja.es
... José Miguel Sagüillo Fernández-Vega. Tesis doctoral dirigida por Rafael Beneyto Torres. Unive... more ... José Miguel Sagüillo Fernández-Vega. Tesis doctoral dirigida por Rafael Beneyto Torres. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (1989). Resumen. ... Resumen. Funciones de complejidad y su relación con las familias abstractas de lenguajes. Joaquim Gabarró Vallés. ...
Logica trianguli, 1997
Fitchs problem and the" knowability paradox" involve a couple of argumentations that ar... more Fitchs problem and the" knowability paradox" involve a couple of argumentations that are to each other in the same relation as Cantors uncollected multitudes theorem and Russells paradox. The authors exhibit the logical nature of the theorem and of the paradox ...
... VOLUME 95 EDITORS Leszek Nowak (founding editor) Jerzy Brzeziski Andrzej Klawiter Krzysztof à... more ... VOLUME 95 EDITORS Leszek Nowak (founding editor) Jerzy Brzeziski Andrzej Klawiter Krzysztof àastowski Izabella Nowakowa Katarzyna Paprzycka (editor-in-chief) Marcin Paprzycki Piotr Przybysz (assistant editor) Michael J. Shaffer Piotr Ziemian (assistant editor ...
ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be ... more ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Given a sys-tem of logic we have a Norma, a standard of correctness. The problem is that we need another Norma to establish when the standard of correctness is to be applied. Subsequently we start by clarifying the senses in which the term ‘logic ’ and the term ‘normativity ’ are being used. Then we explore two different epistemo-logies for logic to see the sort of defence of the normativity of logic they allow for; if any. The analysis concentrates on the case of classical logic. In particular the issue will be appraised from the perspective put forward by the epistemology based on the methodology of wide reflective equilibrium and the scientific one underlying the view of logic as model.
Theoria-revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia, 2004
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative.... more Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Given a system of logic we have a Norma, a standard of correctness. The problem is that we need another Norma to establish when the standard of correctness is to be applied. Subsequently we start by clarifying the senses in which the term "logic" and the term "normativity" are being used. Then we explore two different epistemologies for logic to see the sort of defence of the normativity of logic they allow for; if any. The analysis concentrates on the case of classical logic. In particular the issue will be appraised from the perspective put forward by the epistemology based on the methodology of wide reflective equilibrium and the scientific one underlying the view of logic as model.
Uploads
Papers by CONCHA MARTÍNEZ