DeLancey, Scott 2018. The inclusive-exclusive distinction in Kuki-Chin and Naga Belt Languages, In Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey, and Amos Teo (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics (NEIL), 8. Canberra, Australian National University: Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access
In some Tibeto-Burman languages we find a distinction, in the pronouns and/or in verbal agreement... more In some Tibeto-Burman languages we find a distinction, in the pronouns and/or in verbal agreement forms, between exclusive and inclusive 1 st person plural forms ā a category which has come to be known as CLUSIVITY (Filiminova 2005). This distinction is absent in many other languages of the family (LaPolla 2005). Until recently we had very few examples of this distinction in the " Naga " and Kuki-Chin languages of the Indo-Myanmar border region. Recent research has uncovered the exclusive/inclusive distinct in several more of these languages, and correspondences between the forms make it clear that we must reconstruct this distinction for the common ancestor at least of Kuki-Chin and the Ao group, and probably of the other languages of the Naga Belt. This then offers a likely explanation for the innovative 1 st person singular pronouns found in most of these languages, as we will see in Section 2. The Kuki-Chin and Naga forms further correspond to forms in Kiranti languages, suggesting that they can be reconstructed for Proto-Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Nevertheless, the similarities among the exclusive, inclusive, and 1 st person singular forms in the various Kuki-Chin and Naga Belt languages provide an argument for a Kuki-Naga branch of the family.
Uploads
Papers by Scott DeLancey
(2021). Jinghpaw and South Central/Kuki-Chin represent two hypothesized groupings, Sal and Kuki-Naga, which are the major constituents of this proposed branch, so these comparisons are adduced as potential evidence for the Central hypothesis. Included in these lexical comparisons is a substantial number of sets where there are Jinghpaw comparanda for one or the other, or both, of the alternating verbal stems reconstructed for PKC. It is argued that these represent particularly strong evidence for a special genealogical connection between the languages.
(2021). Jinghpaw and South Central/Kuki-Chin represent two hypothesized groupings, Sal and Kuki-Naga, which are the major constituents of this proposed branch, so these comparisons are adduced as potential evidence for the Central hypothesis. Included in these lexical comparisons is a substantial number of sets where there are Jinghpaw comparanda for one or the other, or both, of the alternating verbal stems reconstructed for PKC. It is argued that these represent particularly strong evidence for a special genealogical connection between the languages.