
Malika JMILA
Related Authors
Joseph Carroll
University of Missouri - St. Louis
Diane Pecorari
University of Leeds
Na'ama Pat-El
The University of Texas at Austin
Ahmar Mahboob
The University of Sydney
Mehdi Riazi
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Eitan Grossman
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Martin Haspelmath
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Hatice Karaman
Yeditepe University
Timothy Morton
Rice University
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Malika JMILA
acquisition (SLA). However, current research in applied linguistics still explores various issues
in interlanguage, particularly the initial state (the representation that learners use to make sense
of second language input). That is, do the properties of interlanguage come from UG or the first
language (L1)? Does this count as access to UG? Does L1 grammar constitute the initial state?
Does UG count as the initial state? In this paper, I will provide evidence from the production of
Arab learners of English to support the fact that UG is undoubtedly involved in the development
of L2, and to challenge the claim that UG is irrelevant in L2 acquisition. I will outline the
evidence put forward in the published literature indicating that universal grammar principles
shape the processes of acquiring a second language. More specifically, I will provide evidence
from the linguistic behavior of Moroccan learners of English, showing that L2 learners transfer
their pre-existing knowledge to the target language, which indicates that they indirectly pick up
from UG, a cognitive move that can be considered as an indirect access to UG. However, I by no
means claim that our understanding of the nature of UG itself is clear enough in any conclusive
way, as more research should be conducted in this connection.
acquisition (SLA). However, current research in applied linguistics still explores various issues
in interlanguage, particularly the initial state (the representation that learners use to make sense
of second language input). That is, do the properties of interlanguage come from UG or the first
language (L1)? Does this count as access to UG? Does L1 grammar constitute the initial state?
Does UG count as the initial state? In this paper, I will provide evidence from the production of
Arab learners of English to support the fact that UG is undoubtedly involved in the development
of L2, and to challenge the claim that UG is irrelevant in L2 acquisition. I will outline the
evidence put forward in the published literature indicating that universal grammar principles
shape the processes of acquiring a second language. More specifically, I will provide evidence
from the linguistic behavior of Moroccan learners of English, showing that L2 learners transfer
their pre-existing knowledge to the target language, which indicates that they indirectly pick up
from UG, a cognitive move that can be considered as an indirect access to UG. However, I by no
means claim that our understanding of the nature of UG itself is clear enough in any conclusive
way, as more research should be conducted in this connection.