Gian Paolo Demuro
Professore ordinario di Diritto penale
GIAN PAOLO DEMURO
• Professore ordinario di Diritto penale nel Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Sassari
• Vice Direttore della Scuola di specializzazione per le professioni legali dell’Università di Sassari
• Dottore di ricerca in Diritto penale italiano e comparato presso l’Università degli Studi di Pavia
• Componente del comitato scientifico della rivista trimestrale Diritto penale contemporaneo
• Componente dell'editorial board di Criminal Justice Network
• Componente della direzione della rivista Diritto@Storia, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Giuridiche e Tradizione Romana
• Componente del comitato scientifico della rivista DPU - Diritto Penale e Uomo
• Componente del Comitato editoriale della rivista Sistema penale (SP)
• Revisore della Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale
• Revisore della rivista La legislazione penale
Address: Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza
Università di Sassari
Viale Mancini, 5
07100 SASSARI
GIAN PAOLO DEMURO
• Professore ordinario di Diritto penale nel Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Sassari
• Vice Direttore della Scuola di specializzazione per le professioni legali dell’Università di Sassari
• Dottore di ricerca in Diritto penale italiano e comparato presso l’Università degli Studi di Pavia
• Componente del comitato scientifico della rivista trimestrale Diritto penale contemporaneo
• Componente dell'editorial board di Criminal Justice Network
• Componente della direzione della rivista Diritto@Storia, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Giuridiche e Tradizione Romana
• Componente del comitato scientifico della rivista DPU - Diritto Penale e Uomo
• Componente del Comitato editoriale della rivista Sistema penale (SP)
• Revisore della Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale
• Revisore della rivista La legislazione penale
Address: Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza
Università di Sassari
Viale Mancini, 5
07100 SASSARI
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Gian Paolo Demuro
suoi ingredienti, rappresentazione e volizione, da accertare rigorosamente attraverso l’utilizzo degli indicatori, strumento indispensabile per sfuggire alla normativizzazione del dolo e per la riaffermazione invece della sua essenza psicologica.
The sentence describes a case in which causality and negligence are intertwined and the controversial configurability of the negligent competition in a malicious offense is again proposed. The inadmissibility of the institution can be reached through an articulated path, in which the principles of guilt and fragmentation take on a decisive role. The central point is the thickness to be attributed to the concept of cooperation, for which a conscious interaction between conducts is deemed necessary, demonstrated on the objective level. The principle of fragmentation also requires that the discovery of an implicit discipline must prove incontrovertible when the thesis does not make a contraction of the area of the criminally relevant, but rather its expansion. Excluding the figure of competition, the merit of punishment is expressed on the mono-subjective level, through a careful consideration of the precautionary rule, of the degree of concreteness of the reference event and of its assessment.
Systematic interpretation allows to understand the conceptual links between the provision to be applied and the remaining provisions set out both by the criminal system strictly speaking and by the entire legal system. Systematic interpretation normally marks the inclusion of a type of crime in the factual, regulatory and value context. Given this definition, this essay discusses the applicative difficulties, most especially the definition of a system-wide notion, which is complicated in criminal law due the difficulty of finding a fundamental idea suitable for creating a system. The outcome of this investigation points to the fact that the constitutional principle are ideally suited for fulfilling this role. Consequently, an interpretation that is constitution is always systematic. The analysis follows the systematic path, emphasizing the inherent discretional nature of the choice and application of the interpretative method between the provision and the norm, and the natura...
suoi ingredienti, rappresentazione e volizione, da accertare rigorosamente attraverso l’utilizzo degli indicatori, strumento indispensabile per sfuggire alla normativizzazione del dolo e per la riaffermazione invece della sua essenza psicologica.
The sentence describes a case in which causality and negligence are intertwined and the controversial configurability of the negligent competition in a malicious offense is again proposed. The inadmissibility of the institution can be reached through an articulated path, in which the principles of guilt and fragmentation take on a decisive role. The central point is the thickness to be attributed to the concept of cooperation, for which a conscious interaction between conducts is deemed necessary, demonstrated on the objective level. The principle of fragmentation also requires that the discovery of an implicit discipline must prove incontrovertible when the thesis does not make a contraction of the area of the criminally relevant, but rather its expansion. Excluding the figure of competition, the merit of punishment is expressed on the mono-subjective level, through a careful consideration of the precautionary rule, of the degree of concreteness of the reference event and of its assessment.
Systematic interpretation allows to understand the conceptual links between the provision to be applied and the remaining provisions set out both by the criminal system strictly speaking and by the entire legal system. Systematic interpretation normally marks the inclusion of a type of crime in the factual, regulatory and value context. Given this definition, this essay discusses the applicative difficulties, most especially the definition of a system-wide notion, which is complicated in criminal law due the difficulty of finding a fundamental idea suitable for creating a system. The outcome of this investigation points to the fact that the constitutional principle are ideally suited for fulfilling this role. Consequently, an interpretation that is constitution is always systematic. The analysis follows the systematic path, emphasizing the inherent discretional nature of the choice and application of the interpretative method between the provision and the norm, and the natura...