
Zach Kotze
Related Authors
Ana Arroyo
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Sebastián Francisco Maydana
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Sevgi Dönmez
Inönü üniversitesi
Juan Manuel Tebes
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
Pablo Jaruf
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Ivan Strenski
University of California, Riverside
Glenn Schwartz
Johns Hopkins University
Israel Finkelstein
Tel Aviv University
Erez Ben-Yosef
Tel Aviv University
Tiina Arppe
University of Helsinki
InterestsView All (11)
Uploads
Papers by Zach Kotze
exchange as a social and political tool. This article provides a brief overview of these recent trends in the study of human sacrifice in the ancient Near East before turning to George Bataille’s views of the practice in the context of his theories of general economy and religion. It is argued that his notions of expenditure and transgression serve as useful tools for the interpretation of several instances of anthropoctony in the ancient Near East.
eye” has been identified as an insidiously malicious gesture that
communicates hostility. To date, however, the conceptual content of this
expression has not been adequately detailed against the background of the
ancient Israelite belief regarding the magical powers of the eye. This
paper seeks to investigate the scope of the metonym קרץ עין “to pinch the
eye” in order to come to a verifiable interpretation of the locution. It is
argued that the focus of this figurative expression is the causation of harm
to another person and that the idiom was motivated by the ancient
Israelite belief in the evil eye.
interpreted as a figurative reference to the expression of anger in
the eyes. This article attempts to highlight the importance of the
theory of linguistic relativity by demonstrating the culture-specific
nature of this metaphoric expression. It is argued that the conventional interpretation obscures the full significance of this figure
within the historical context of the ancient Israelite belief in the
agency of the eye. In response to an earlier accusation by Eliphaz,
Job claims that his predicament is the result of the malevolent eye of
his adversary.
about the eye that has stimulated much debate. Presenting the eye of
YHWH as a powerful organ consuming Job’s vitality, the expression
is highly controversial. As with other texts that describe YHWH as
the persecutor of man, Job 7:8 was conveniently omitted by the
Greek translator. Contemporary scholarship has found ways to interpret the combination as a metaphor for the searching, or the
caring and protective eye of YHWH. A close investigation of the
image and focus of this figure, however, demonstrates that it can
only be understood in terms of the ancient Israelite belief in the evil
eye.
exchange as a social and political tool. This article provides a brief overview of these recent trends in the study of human sacrifice in the ancient Near East before turning to George Bataille’s views of the practice in the context of his theories of general economy and religion. It is argued that his notions of expenditure and transgression serve as useful tools for the interpretation of several instances of anthropoctony in the ancient Near East.
eye” has been identified as an insidiously malicious gesture that
communicates hostility. To date, however, the conceptual content of this
expression has not been adequately detailed against the background of the
ancient Israelite belief regarding the magical powers of the eye. This
paper seeks to investigate the scope of the metonym קרץ עין “to pinch the
eye” in order to come to a verifiable interpretation of the locution. It is
argued that the focus of this figurative expression is the causation of harm
to another person and that the idiom was motivated by the ancient
Israelite belief in the evil eye.
interpreted as a figurative reference to the expression of anger in
the eyes. This article attempts to highlight the importance of the
theory of linguistic relativity by demonstrating the culture-specific
nature of this metaphoric expression. It is argued that the conventional interpretation obscures the full significance of this figure
within the historical context of the ancient Israelite belief in the
agency of the eye. In response to an earlier accusation by Eliphaz,
Job claims that his predicament is the result of the malevolent eye of
his adversary.
about the eye that has stimulated much debate. Presenting the eye of
YHWH as a powerful organ consuming Job’s vitality, the expression
is highly controversial. As with other texts that describe YHWH as
the persecutor of man, Job 7:8 was conveniently omitted by the
Greek translator. Contemporary scholarship has found ways to interpret the combination as a metaphor for the searching, or the
caring and protective eye of YHWH. A close investigation of the
image and focus of this figure, however, demonstrates that it can
only be understood in terms of the ancient Israelite belief in the evil
eye.