
Sead Spuzic
Related Authors
Sead Spuzic
University of South Australia
Hanne Kirstine Adriansen
Aarhus University
abhishek jella
University of South Australia
sead spuzic
University of South Australia
Kazem Abhary
University of South Australia
Alexis Delamare
University College Dublin
William Shakalis
Simmons University
Nagib C Callaos
Universidad Simón Bolívar
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Sead Spuzic
“reliability”, “sustainability” and “aesthetics” is presented using the case of engineering
design, a discipline that traditionally has an image of being a strictly calculated, rigid framework. It has
been widely recognised that engineering design encompasses two ways of thinkingdcreative and critical.
A central argument that the synergy of creativity and criticality is significantly enhanced by connecting
true interdisciplinary augmentation with the fine arts is discussed along with reflecting on the
importance of such an approach in higher
contribute in improving the transferability and transparency of some basic concepts relevant to science,
education and engineering. Knowledge sharing can be adversely affected by concepts and specific
terms which are in common use but can vary in meaning. Since contemporary technological issues
typically involve several disciplines it would be useful to analyse areas where effective communication
and transfer of knowledge between academic and engineering disciplines might benefit from clarification.
Examples of concepts that impede knowledge sharing are identified and mitigating strategies
proposed.
important to analyse hindrances that slow or even prevent the growth, communication and use of knowledge. This treatise
hypothesises that the differences in interpretations of some basic epistemological, ontological and didactic concepts significantly
contribute to the ambiguities and other impediments in knowledge processing. Examples of such misconceptions are presented
and a mitigation strategy discussed. Interaction between computerised media and humans such as the rise of the open sources of
knowledge and the participatory Web uncover new gates for cross-disciplinary sharing and application of knowledge.
We are whirling at galactic velocities in the Universe the limits of which must be to our best knowledge described as―infinite. Are we hopelessly lost in an endless and eternal space, or are we unimaginably rich because of the limitless resources around us?
In the following chapters, the concept and structure of knowledge will be disused, categories of misinforming modes identified, examples of ambiguous concepts presented, and improved definitions will be developed. A hierarchy of transparent principal terms will be proposed, giving the basic mathematical and chemophysical terms priority. Strategy ensuring that the updated knowledge repositories conform to this cross-disciplinary nomenclature will be applied to develop a foundation for an ontological lexicon.