Related Authors
Tristan Carter
McMaster University
Ellery Frahm
Yale University
Dan Hicks
University of Oxford
Paolo Biagi
Università Ca' Foscari Venezia
Miljana Radivojević
University College London
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Iain Davidson
University of New England - Australia
Enrico Cirelli
Università di Bologna
Kristian Kristiansen
University of Gothenburg
Yannis Hamilakis
Brown University
InterestsView All (23)
Uploads
Papers by Klaus Herkert
underrepresented in the region when compared to other periods. Recent research at the site of Grotte des Teux-Blancs
provides new insights into the Palaeolithic occupation of the site and proves its use during the Magdalenian. Since the first
excavation in 1913, the site has received little attention from researchers. To reconstruct the site’s occupation history, excavations
were carried out in the back-dirt in addition to a new analysis of the known inventories. These excavations were able to
provide insights into the 1913 excavation methods as the excavated sediments were deposited on the back-dirt separated by
layers, forming an inverse stratigraphy. The analysis of the finds shows a small Middle Palaeolithic and a larger Upper Palaeolithic
assemblage. In particular, the lithic and organic artefacts attest to the use of the site, in a hunting context, during the
Magdalenian. The embedding of the site in the Magdalenian of Eastern France suggests that Grotte des Teux-Blancs, together
with other sites west of the Bresse, was part of the same settlement system as the sites of the French Jura.
Résumé de Thèse dans le Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française (119/2) p. 337-339.
view should be avoided. The last three decades provided a technological approach to lithic research. Likewise, there are also very different approaches how lithic assemblages should be classified. Beside the Bordes-Binford debate if assemblages can be seen as made by distinct groups or if they are functional units,
many other hypotheses have been formulated (like environmental, transformative or recycling approaches,
production analysis, core classification criteria, as well as functional analysis within use-wear or hafting studies). In the context of lithic analysis, Eric Boëda’s research is of outstanding interest, because he formulated many technological approaches that are very often used, and in some research traditions they
are nearly standard. This paper uses his newly published work (Boëda 2013) as an opportunity to resume his litho-technological approaches, but also to discuss Boëda’s approaches and try to integrate these into the context of lithic analysis. In his recent work, Eric Boëda sums up his litho-technological research of the past three decades and combines it with the sociocultural work of Gilbert Simondon, Yves Deforge, André Leroi-Gourhan and others. The focus lies on the understanding of how and why lithic artifacts develop and change through time, particularly with regard to production schemes and techno-functional aspects, wherein Boëda presents a classification of six different core-types. The theoretical work is concluded and elucidated with the example of blade industries in the Near East. More than only presenting a classical review or a summary of Boëda’s latest work, this paper also aims to help make the complex theme accessible to non-
French speakers. Thus, the emphasis lies on the theoretical, litho-technological aspects, particularly on the terminological understanding and the core-type classification. Since Boëda’s work combines a broad spectrum of philosophical and theoretical framework with lithic analyses, we try to clarify and revise important points and supplement them with own approaches. The aim of this paper is to contextualize his approaches and show that they round out other lithic analysis to a more holistic view of lithic artifacts with the goal to contribute to complete the Paleohistoriography.
Unpublished manuscript (in german) composed for an excursion in the Dordogne in September 2012 under the direction of Harald Floss.
underrepresented in the region when compared to other periods. Recent research at the site of Grotte des Teux-Blancs
provides new insights into the Palaeolithic occupation of the site and proves its use during the Magdalenian. Since the first
excavation in 1913, the site has received little attention from researchers. To reconstruct the site’s occupation history, excavations
were carried out in the back-dirt in addition to a new analysis of the known inventories. These excavations were able to
provide insights into the 1913 excavation methods as the excavated sediments were deposited on the back-dirt separated by
layers, forming an inverse stratigraphy. The analysis of the finds shows a small Middle Palaeolithic and a larger Upper Palaeolithic
assemblage. In particular, the lithic and organic artefacts attest to the use of the site, in a hunting context, during the
Magdalenian. The embedding of the site in the Magdalenian of Eastern France suggests that Grotte des Teux-Blancs, together
with other sites west of the Bresse, was part of the same settlement system as the sites of the French Jura.
Résumé de Thèse dans le Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française (119/2) p. 337-339.
view should be avoided. The last three decades provided a technological approach to lithic research. Likewise, there are also very different approaches how lithic assemblages should be classified. Beside the Bordes-Binford debate if assemblages can be seen as made by distinct groups or if they are functional units,
many other hypotheses have been formulated (like environmental, transformative or recycling approaches,
production analysis, core classification criteria, as well as functional analysis within use-wear or hafting studies). In the context of lithic analysis, Eric Boëda’s research is of outstanding interest, because he formulated many technological approaches that are very often used, and in some research traditions they
are nearly standard. This paper uses his newly published work (Boëda 2013) as an opportunity to resume his litho-technological approaches, but also to discuss Boëda’s approaches and try to integrate these into the context of lithic analysis. In his recent work, Eric Boëda sums up his litho-technological research of the past three decades and combines it with the sociocultural work of Gilbert Simondon, Yves Deforge, André Leroi-Gourhan and others. The focus lies on the understanding of how and why lithic artifacts develop and change through time, particularly with regard to production schemes and techno-functional aspects, wherein Boëda presents a classification of six different core-types. The theoretical work is concluded and elucidated with the example of blade industries in the Near East. More than only presenting a classical review or a summary of Boëda’s latest work, this paper also aims to help make the complex theme accessible to non-
French speakers. Thus, the emphasis lies on the theoretical, litho-technological aspects, particularly on the terminological understanding and the core-type classification. Since Boëda’s work combines a broad spectrum of philosophical and theoretical framework with lithic analyses, we try to clarify and revise important points and supplement them with own approaches. The aim of this paper is to contextualize his approaches and show that they round out other lithic analysis to a more holistic view of lithic artifacts with the goal to contribute to complete the Paleohistoriography.
Unpublished manuscript (in german) composed for an excursion in the Dordogne in September 2012 under the direction of Harald Floss.
et al., 1995). Thus, the CURSE could be seen as the subsistential dependency on lithic raw material, while the BLESSING would lie in its low cost availability within the habitat.
The aim of the research is a better understanding of the strategies of how and where the prehistoric human groups got their lithic raw materials and weather there are differences between the two hominids or not. As usual many local and regional raw materials had been used by both of them. But to determine long distance movements the Paleogene lacustrine or freshwater silex can help. Paleogene (lately named Tertiary) silex is often bound to single outcrops and has a distinguish habit. In old collections and in the new excavations or surveys a couple of artefacts knapped from freshwater silex could be documented. The results of the analyses and the re-construction of possible movements shall be presented here.
for Middle Paleolithic and Early Upper Paleolithic (Aurignacian) activity.
Jurassic chert and residual cretaceous flint are available as raw materials in immediate proximity to the site. While the use of both has been attested for the Middle Paleolithic assemblages, only flint use has yet been reported for the Aurignacien sector in question.
Nevertheless, there is new evidence for more diverse raw material use patterns in the Early Upper Paleolithic of Saint-Martin-sous-Montaigu, including both flint and chert.
In the context of the international research projects SFB 1070 „ResourceCultures“, PCR UMR 6298 and DFG FL 244/5-1, a team from Tübingen (under the direction of Prof. Harald Floss) undertook new surface collections in St. Martin in 2014. The collected material bears evidence of the same artifact spectrum among the two raw material types such as cores, blades and bladelets as well as retouched forms, especially end scrapers. Due to intense weathering, resulting in strong surface alteration and a high degree of fragmentation as well as recent human activity (wine agriculture and plowing), the identification of chert artifacts
is not always easy. Nevertheless, they show the same technological characteristics as the flint artefacts, though in a slightly less refined way, and thus differ in terms of curation, pointing to a more opportunistic ad hoc use of the direct available chert raw material. This point seems to be further strengthened by the presence of a considerable amount of modified frost
shattered pieces.
These observations stand in contrast to the general assumption of high quality raw material preferences starting with the Upper Paleolithic. Until now, there have also been no reports of chert use for neighboring sites with Aurignacian present, thus making the site of La Roche an interesting case study in the research area of southern Burgundy with its multitude of late Middle Paleolithic, Transitional and Early Upper Paleolithic assemblages.
Full text available via: http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-63207