
Ana Falcato
CV
Address: Walluf, Hessen, Germany
Address: Walluf, Hessen, Germany
less
Related Authors
Stuart J. Murray
Carleton University
Rita Barnard
University of Pennsylvania
Alexandra Effe
University of Oslo
Gillian Dooley
Flinders University of South Australia
Robert Alex Smith
University of Cape Town
Eckard Smuts
University of Stellenbosch
Michael Jardine
University Of Winchester
Joseph Conte
SUNY: University at Buffalo
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Ana Falcato
The Philosophy and Psychology of Delusions: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
In The Greeks and the Irrational (1951), Eric Dodds systematically explores some of the most impressive manifestations of the irrational in Greek thought and myth. This chapter draws on structural features of his account to offer a conception of guilt as a primary emotion that can influence a cultural framework as a whole. It seeks to provide a structural account of both irrational guilt-mechanisms and their genetic development, which can speculatively be traced either to a historic-religious evolution (as Dodds does) or, more prosaically, to psychogenetic roots. Building on the main insights of Dodds’s masterpiece regarding this specific emotional pattern, the chapter situates them in a twenty-first century global context, in an attempt to explain what can be not only irrational but maddening about guilt and guilt-mechanisms. To this end, the chapter presents a model of the constitution of the guilt-mechanism in the emotionally susceptible mind – as laid out by Dodds himself – and then compares that model with the genetic account defended by Bernard Williams in Shame and Necessity (1993). This comparison of the two models reveals the shortcomings of both and confirms Dodds’s structural insight concerning guilt and guilt-mechanisms: the idea that guilt as a cultural phenomenon may either overwhelm the subject and lead to self-destruction or rescue her from a moral abyss.
tipo de interpretação das mesmas, de veio tipicamente empirista, que reduziria os seus principais
impactos a um conjunto de distúrbios ou alterações quási-mecânicas da sensibilidade. Contra tal
reducionismo, e em articulação com novos temas de elaboração e uma estratégia metodológica
radical, através da qual alguns dos seus mais exímios praticantes exerceram notáveis esforços de
leitura e análise, a fenomenologia instituiu no pensamento contemporâneo esse dom de “torcer
reflexivamente” os seus objetos de interpretação, subtraindo-lhe os laivos de paridade imediata
com a experiência para melhor penetrar a sua complexa tessitura interna.
O presente dossier temático reúne propostas de interpretação de várias emoções – cuja “travessia”
íntima implica uma experiência ou conversão de teor moral –, desde uma persp ectiva
fenomenológica e com referência explícita a autores da tradição sob análise.
Contrary to belief, it is not thereby argued (or meant) that care is (or should be) a mode of behaving or reaching out to our fellow men or of specifically fulfilling a social, humanist or cross-generational duty. In spite of his professed wish to keep the Analytic of Dasein separate from any contemporary project of a philosophy of the subject, Heidegger’s core notion of ‘care’ is self-referring and deeply egotistical.
In this paper, I defend an altogether different framework for thinking about care, grounded in a deep appeal to one’s earliest memories and the intimate world in which they are anchored – a world which, under the care of our elders (mostly our grandparents and other members of their generation), helped to form the type of being we now are. The formative bond we share with those who once cared for us, who have in the meantime become fragile and dependent, imposes a duty of care that is anything but burdensome or rooted in a concern for my future or anticipated lifespan. This paper thus seeks to rebut the specific treatment Heidegger gave to one of the core notions in his thought.
The Philosophy and Psychology of Delusions: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
In The Greeks and the Irrational (1951), Eric Dodds systematically explores some of the most impressive manifestations of the irrational in Greek thought and myth. This chapter draws on structural features of his account to offer a conception of guilt as a primary emotion that can influence a cultural framework as a whole. It seeks to provide a structural account of both irrational guilt-mechanisms and their genetic development, which can speculatively be traced either to a historic-religious evolution (as Dodds does) or, more prosaically, to psychogenetic roots. Building on the main insights of Dodds’s masterpiece regarding this specific emotional pattern, the chapter situates them in a twenty-first century global context, in an attempt to explain what can be not only irrational but maddening about guilt and guilt-mechanisms. To this end, the chapter presents a model of the constitution of the guilt-mechanism in the emotionally susceptible mind – as laid out by Dodds himself – and then compares that model with the genetic account defended by Bernard Williams in Shame and Necessity (1993). This comparison of the two models reveals the shortcomings of both and confirms Dodds’s structural insight concerning guilt and guilt-mechanisms: the idea that guilt as a cultural phenomenon may either overwhelm the subject and lead to self-destruction or rescue her from a moral abyss.
tipo de interpretação das mesmas, de veio tipicamente empirista, que reduziria os seus principais
impactos a um conjunto de distúrbios ou alterações quási-mecânicas da sensibilidade. Contra tal
reducionismo, e em articulação com novos temas de elaboração e uma estratégia metodológica
radical, através da qual alguns dos seus mais exímios praticantes exerceram notáveis esforços de
leitura e análise, a fenomenologia instituiu no pensamento contemporâneo esse dom de “torcer
reflexivamente” os seus objetos de interpretação, subtraindo-lhe os laivos de paridade imediata
com a experiência para melhor penetrar a sua complexa tessitura interna.
O presente dossier temático reúne propostas de interpretação de várias emoções – cuja “travessia”
íntima implica uma experiência ou conversão de teor moral –, desde uma persp ectiva
fenomenológica e com referência explícita a autores da tradição sob análise.
Contrary to belief, it is not thereby argued (or meant) that care is (or should be) a mode of behaving or reaching out to our fellow men or of specifically fulfilling a social, humanist or cross-generational duty. In spite of his professed wish to keep the Analytic of Dasein separate from any contemporary project of a philosophy of the subject, Heidegger’s core notion of ‘care’ is self-referring and deeply egotistical.
In this paper, I defend an altogether different framework for thinking about care, grounded in a deep appeal to one’s earliest memories and the intimate world in which they are anchored – a world which, under the care of our elders (mostly our grandparents and other members of their generation), helped to form the type of being we now are. The formative bond we share with those who once cared for us, who have in the meantime become fragile and dependent, imposes a duty of care that is anything but burdensome or rooted in a concern for my future or anticipated lifespan. This paper thus seeks to rebut the specific treatment Heidegger gave to one of the core notions in his thought.
Palavras-chave: vergonha; sentido de vergonha; Beobachtungen.
Abstract: This essay contradicts a wide-spread tendency, even in classic interpretations of his practical philosophy, to isolate Kant’s famous moral and decisional rigorism against the influence of emotions or sensible, subjective, impressions. A careful examination of Kant’s work on Antropology, strictly construed, as well as of some fundamental notes from the so-called pre-critical period allows us to grasp that and how Kant actually ascribed a fundamental role in moral matters even to a negative emotion (or affective disposition) like shame.
Key-words: shame; sense of shame; Beobachtungen.
Within psychiatry, there are several disputes about the nature and origin of delusions. Whereas some authors see only an abnormal phenomenon that needs to be treated by psychological or pharmacological means, others hold that delusions can be psychologically adaptive and even have epistemic benefits. This book brings together an interdisciplinary group of contributors to build consensus around what delusions are and how they impact the human mind. Part 1 provides readers with an informed historical discussion of delusions and carefully examines the contemporary impact of these historical perspectives. Part 2 analyzes the impact of contemporary views of delusions on the mental and emotional life of human agents. Finally, Part 3 explores the normative frameworks of delusions and analyzes the impact of some of their behavioral consequences on the daily life of subjects and their caregivers.
The Philosophy and Psychology of Delusions is essential reading for researchers and graduate students working at the intersection of philosophy, psychiatry, and psychology.
In this presentation, I defend an altogether different experience of care, grounded in a deep appeal to one’s earliest memories and the intimate world to which they are anchored and which, under the care of our elders (mostly our grandparents or a generation with more leisure time and availability to nurture a child’s hopes and daily needs), helped form the human being we now are. The strong appeal of a formative bond with caring people that have, in the meantime, become fragile and dependent, imposes a duty of care that is all but burdensome, rooted in my concern for my future, or anticipated life-spam. In fact, the need to care for our elders now is yet another common enterprise – just as our first shared experiences were joint ventures – and the daily routine of help and assistance, sheltered by a common emotional background, is one of joy and shared purpose, notwithstanding our different stations and critical needs in life.