
Alice M W Hunt
Address: Center for Applied Isotope Studies
University of Georgia
120 Riverbend Rd
Athens, GA 30602
University of Georgia
120 Riverbend Rd
Athens, GA 30602
less
Related Authors
John P Hart
New York State Museum
Sheilagh Ogilvie
University of Oxford
Nicole Herbots
Arizona State University
Ellery Frahm
Yale University
Dan Hicks
University of Oxford
Christina Tsoraki
University of Leicester
Barbara Voss
Stanford University
Mathias Mehofer
University of Vienna
Miljana Radivojević
University College London
Enrico Cirelli
Università di Bologna
InterestsView All (19)
Uploads
Books by Alice M W Hunt
The volume is structured around the themes 'Research design and data analysis', 'Foundational concepts', 'Evaluating ceramic provenance', 'Investigating ceramic manufacture', 'Assessing vessel function', and 'Dating ceramic assemblages'. It provides a common vocabulary and offers practical tools and guidelines for ceramic analysis using techniques and methodologies ranging from network analysis and typology to rehydroxylation dating and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Each chapter provides the theoretical background and practical guidelines, such as cost and destructiveness of analysis, for each technique, as well as detailed case studies illustrating the application and interpretation of analytical data for answering anthropological questions.
Palace Ware Across the Neo-Assyrian Imperial Landscape is the first work of its kind; providing in-depth analysis of the formal and fabric characteristic, production technology, and raw material provenance of Palace Ware, and locating these data within the larger narratives of power, presentation, symbol and meaning that shaped the Neo-Assyrian imperial landscape.
Papers by Alice M W Hunt
studies of clay and sediment reference materials
(RMs) conducted by the Center for Applied Isotope Studies,
University of Georgia, and the Research Reactor
Center, University of Missouri–Columbia. Here we report
the following major, minor and trace element mass fractions
determined using wavelength dispersive and energy
dispersive X-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron
activation analysis for three fireclay RMs (cˇ.137–139)
manufactured by Mittal Steel Ostrava a.s. and distributed
by Brammer Standard Company, Inc.: major elements
reported as oxides Na2O, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5. K2O,
CaO, TiO2, MnO, Fe2O3 and the following minor and trace
elements: As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Eu, Hf, La, Lu, Nb,
Nd, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sm, Sn, Sr, Ta, Tb, Th, U, V, Y,
Yb, Zn, and Zr.
were determined using wavelength dispersive and energy
dispersive X-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron
activation analysis for five clay certified reference materials
(NCS DC 60102–60105, 61101) distributed by the
National Research Center for Certified Reference Materials
in China. We report mass fractions for 10 major and the
following 29 minor and trace elements: As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr,
Cs, Cu, Eu, Hf, La, Lu, Nb, Nd, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sm, Sr,
Ta, Tb, Th, U, V, Y, Yb, Zn, and Zr.
This paper demonstrates the viability of quartz CL for ceramic studies (i) by determining that the effect of thermal radiation (heat) does not alter the genetic defect structure of quartz (up to 1100°C) and (ii) using genetic quartz types to differentiate geological groups in an experimental ceramic assemblage which could not be identified using traditional methods (INAA and ceramic petrography).
It is our responsibility as archaeological scientists, regardless of background, to communicate effectively and accurately. This paper explores the use of the term ‘provenance’ in archaeology, geology and the archaeological sciences, and attempts to move toward a common understanding of the theoretical concepts and scientific reality behind it.
Talks by Alice M W Hunt
The premise of ceramic provenance using geochemical analyses is that raw material signatures are chemically distinct and that those chemical signatures can be detected in ceramic fabrics. Sediments are generally not directly suitable for potting and must first be processed and refined, changing their mineralogical and chemical signature (Rice 1987: 118–119). What is measured then, in chemical provenance studies, is the chemical profile of a ceramic fabric, which may or may not be related chemically to the raw sediment from which it is composed (e.g. Hein et al. 2004). The degree to which ceramic fabrics reflect their raw materials provenance is a level of uncertainty which is often overlooked when communicating results of these studies.
An additional level of uncertainty exists related to the chemical homogeneity of the ceramic raw materials themselves. Geochemical variability in the natural world is limited: a finite number of elements bond in predictable ways to crystallise a finite number of minerals, and those minerals combine to form a predicable and finite number of rock types. Like crystallisation, weathering of rocks follows an established trajectory so that the chemical and mineralogical heterogeneity of detrital sediments is limited further still. Sediments from different geographic locations or provenance can have the same chemical signature (e.g. Klein and Langmuir 1989). This geochemical homogeneity is another level of uncertainty which is often ignored in ceramic provenance studies.
These layers of uncertainty and failure to effectively communicate them in geochemical provenance studies impact the larger archaeological narrative through the misidentification of ceramic provenance upon which social, economic and political theories and relative chronologies are based.
This paper evaluates uncertainty in chemical provenance studies of archeological ceramics related to human behaviour and natural geological homogeneity and proposes new vocabulary for communicating this uncertainty within the wider archaeological community.
CL uses lattice structure defects alongside chemical impurities to ‘fingerprint’ quartz origin. Although quartz is chemically stable, its lattice is vulnerable to low temperature metamorphism at 573oC, the α-β quartz transition. For quartz CL to be used for provenance of archaeological ceramics, it is necessary to determine experimentally whether this metamorphism interferes with the diagnostic CL fingerprint of quartz.
This paper explains the theory of quartz CL provenance, evaluates the successful results of the ‘firing’ experiment, and explores the use of CL quartz provenance using an archaeological case study of highly levigated ceramics.
The volume is structured around the themes 'Research design and data analysis', 'Foundational concepts', 'Evaluating ceramic provenance', 'Investigating ceramic manufacture', 'Assessing vessel function', and 'Dating ceramic assemblages'. It provides a common vocabulary and offers practical tools and guidelines for ceramic analysis using techniques and methodologies ranging from network analysis and typology to rehydroxylation dating and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Each chapter provides the theoretical background and practical guidelines, such as cost and destructiveness of analysis, for each technique, as well as detailed case studies illustrating the application and interpretation of analytical data for answering anthropological questions.
Palace Ware Across the Neo-Assyrian Imperial Landscape is the first work of its kind; providing in-depth analysis of the formal and fabric characteristic, production technology, and raw material provenance of Palace Ware, and locating these data within the larger narratives of power, presentation, symbol and meaning that shaped the Neo-Assyrian imperial landscape.
studies of clay and sediment reference materials
(RMs) conducted by the Center for Applied Isotope Studies,
University of Georgia, and the Research Reactor
Center, University of Missouri–Columbia. Here we report
the following major, minor and trace element mass fractions
determined using wavelength dispersive and energy
dispersive X-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron
activation analysis for three fireclay RMs (cˇ.137–139)
manufactured by Mittal Steel Ostrava a.s. and distributed
by Brammer Standard Company, Inc.: major elements
reported as oxides Na2O, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5. K2O,
CaO, TiO2, MnO, Fe2O3 and the following minor and trace
elements: As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Eu, Hf, La, Lu, Nb,
Nd, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sm, Sn, Sr, Ta, Tb, Th, U, V, Y,
Yb, Zn, and Zr.
were determined using wavelength dispersive and energy
dispersive X-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron
activation analysis for five clay certified reference materials
(NCS DC 60102–60105, 61101) distributed by the
National Research Center for Certified Reference Materials
in China. We report mass fractions for 10 major and the
following 29 minor and trace elements: As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr,
Cs, Cu, Eu, Hf, La, Lu, Nb, Nd, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sc, Sm, Sr,
Ta, Tb, Th, U, V, Y, Yb, Zn, and Zr.
This paper demonstrates the viability of quartz CL for ceramic studies (i) by determining that the effect of thermal radiation (heat) does not alter the genetic defect structure of quartz (up to 1100°C) and (ii) using genetic quartz types to differentiate geological groups in an experimental ceramic assemblage which could not be identified using traditional methods (INAA and ceramic petrography).
It is our responsibility as archaeological scientists, regardless of background, to communicate effectively and accurately. This paper explores the use of the term ‘provenance’ in archaeology, geology and the archaeological sciences, and attempts to move toward a common understanding of the theoretical concepts and scientific reality behind it.
The premise of ceramic provenance using geochemical analyses is that raw material signatures are chemically distinct and that those chemical signatures can be detected in ceramic fabrics. Sediments are generally not directly suitable for potting and must first be processed and refined, changing their mineralogical and chemical signature (Rice 1987: 118–119). What is measured then, in chemical provenance studies, is the chemical profile of a ceramic fabric, which may or may not be related chemically to the raw sediment from which it is composed (e.g. Hein et al. 2004). The degree to which ceramic fabrics reflect their raw materials provenance is a level of uncertainty which is often overlooked when communicating results of these studies.
An additional level of uncertainty exists related to the chemical homogeneity of the ceramic raw materials themselves. Geochemical variability in the natural world is limited: a finite number of elements bond in predictable ways to crystallise a finite number of minerals, and those minerals combine to form a predicable and finite number of rock types. Like crystallisation, weathering of rocks follows an established trajectory so that the chemical and mineralogical heterogeneity of detrital sediments is limited further still. Sediments from different geographic locations or provenance can have the same chemical signature (e.g. Klein and Langmuir 1989). This geochemical homogeneity is another level of uncertainty which is often ignored in ceramic provenance studies.
These layers of uncertainty and failure to effectively communicate them in geochemical provenance studies impact the larger archaeological narrative through the misidentification of ceramic provenance upon which social, economic and political theories and relative chronologies are based.
This paper evaluates uncertainty in chemical provenance studies of archeological ceramics related to human behaviour and natural geological homogeneity and proposes new vocabulary for communicating this uncertainty within the wider archaeological community.
CL uses lattice structure defects alongside chemical impurities to ‘fingerprint’ quartz origin. Although quartz is chemically stable, its lattice is vulnerable to low temperature metamorphism at 573oC, the α-β quartz transition. For quartz CL to be used for provenance of archaeological ceramics, it is necessary to determine experimentally whether this metamorphism interferes with the diagnostic CL fingerprint of quartz.
This paper explains the theory of quartz CL provenance, evaluates the successful results of the ‘firing’ experiment, and explores the use of CL quartz provenance using an archaeological case study of highly levigated ceramics.
Assyrian "palace ware", a thin-walled fine ware, is believed to imitate metal vessels used in the Neo-Assyrian court. Previous studies of this ware have tended to focus on issues of provenance and date. This paper will address the semiotics of Assyrian 'palace ware' through a comprehensive analysis of its production and use throughout the Neo-Assyrian empire. The techniques required to manufacture 'palace ware' forms are not exclusive; most skilled potters in the Levant would have been technically able to reproduce them. However comparison of 'palace ware' chaîne opératoire in the central polity and more peripheral regions, as well as study of how these vessels were being used, suggests several significant difference which might indicate differing social or cultural contexts. Finally, the agency by which social meaning and ideology are transmitted or transformed will be discussed.
Palace ware from the Neo-Assyrian central polity will be examined macroscopically, petrographically and using electron beam and radiation methods to establish a chaîne opératoire. X-ray radiography will be used to evaluate vessel formation, firing and finishing techniques. Scanning electron microscopy with an energy dispersive detector (SEM-EDS) and electron microprobe (EPMA) analyses will be employed to examine raw clay processing techniques and refine provenance assignments of these ceramics because palace ware is extremely difficult to provenance due to the rarity of mineral inclusions (<0.5%) (Hunt 2007).
These analyses were carefully selected to provide measurable and quantifiable technological signatures of the manufacturing process. The technological signatures of central polity made palace ware are crucial to understanding the semiotics of palace ware in annexed territories; whether the manufacture location and/or manufacture technique impacted the social identity of the vessels. This contribution is part of ongoing research by the author into the dynamics of Neo-Assyrian imperialism in the southern Levant.