
Davide Panagia
Davide Panagia,
B.A. Hons. (Manitoba), M.Litt. (Oxon, Rhodes Scholar), Ph.D. (Johns Hopkins).
Davide Panagia is Professor of Political Science at UCLA.
B.A. Hons. (Manitoba), M.Litt. (Oxon, Rhodes Scholar), Ph.D. (Johns Hopkins).
Davide Panagia is Professor of Political Science at UCLA.
less
Related Authors
Ian Alexander Moore
Loyola Marymount University
Ceciel Meiborg
The New School University
Sjoerd van Tuinen
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Isabell Schrickel
Leuphana University
J.J. Sylvia IV
Fitchburg State University
Adrian Johnston
University of New Mexico
Sara Pasetto
Charles University, Prague
Alberto Simonetti
University of Perugia
Uploads
Papers by Davide Panagia
https://aipulse.org/the-algorithm-dispositif-notes-towards-an-investigation/
PLEASE NOTE: This essay is forthcoming in New Literary History. These are the page proofs.
ABSTRACT: In this essay I claim that film matters to political theory not because of the stories films recount, but because the medium of film offers political theorists an image of political thinking that emphasizes the stochastic serialization of actions. I thus argue that the stochastic serialization of moving images that films project make available for democratic theory an experience of resistance and change as a felt discontinuity of succession, rather than as an inversion of hierarchical power. In my treatment of these issues I rely on Hume’s ontology of “broken appearances” and “interrupted perceptions”, as well as Stanley Cavell’s ontology of film as treated in The World Viewed, and elaborate the following four aspects of the relation between film and political theory: 1. The Action-Image; 2. Discontinuity and the Fact of Series; 3. Actors, Artificial Persons, and Human Somethings; 4. Political Resistance and an Aesthetics of Politics. The manner in which I proceed is to show the aspectual overlay between film and political thinking. Such a method of exposition suggests a further, methodological, site of mattering of film to political theory: namely, that the stochastic serialization of moving images in film provides political theory with a genre for elaborating ideas that is not reducible to the analytics of causal argument.
https://aipulse.org/the-algorithm-dispositif-notes-towards-an-investigation/
PLEASE NOTE: This essay is forthcoming in New Literary History. These are the page proofs.
ABSTRACT: In this essay I claim that film matters to political theory not because of the stories films recount, but because the medium of film offers political theorists an image of political thinking that emphasizes the stochastic serialization of actions. I thus argue that the stochastic serialization of moving images that films project make available for democratic theory an experience of resistance and change as a felt discontinuity of succession, rather than as an inversion of hierarchical power. In my treatment of these issues I rely on Hume’s ontology of “broken appearances” and “interrupted perceptions”, as well as Stanley Cavell’s ontology of film as treated in The World Viewed, and elaborate the following four aspects of the relation between film and political theory: 1. The Action-Image; 2. Discontinuity and the Fact of Series; 3. Actors, Artificial Persons, and Human Somethings; 4. Political Resistance and an Aesthetics of Politics. The manner in which I proceed is to show the aspectual overlay between film and political thinking. Such a method of exposition suggests a further, methodological, site of mattering of film to political theory: namely, that the stochastic serialization of moving images in film provides political theory with a genre for elaborating ideas that is not reducible to the analytics of causal argument.
Published by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Georges Canguilhem, Editor
In 1951 and 1952, UNESCO conducted an international enquiry into the teaching of philosophy, with special reference to its place in the educational systems of various countries. The Teaching of Philosophy presents examinations of philosophy teaching in Cuba, Egypt, France, the German Federal Republic, India, Italy, United Kingdom and the United States, along with conclusions that emerged from replies to the UNESCO questionnaire. Most conclusions are in the form of suggestions for measures best suited to the development and improvement of philosophy teaching, with particular reference to education for international understanding.
Panagia develops the long disputed political legacy of French theory through an exploration of how these thinkers came to understand an aesthetic of mimesis as a credentialing standard for selection to political participation. Since, in France, the ability to imitate well is a state qualification necessary to access offices of elite power, the political, aesthetic, and philosophical critique of mimesis became one of the defining features of sentimental empiricist thought. By exploring the historical, intellectual, cultural, and philosophical complexities of this political aesthetic, Panagia shows how and why postwar French thinkers turned to a tradition of sentimental empiricism in order to develop a new form of criticism attentive to the dispositional powers of domination.
https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/ten-theses-for-an-aesthetics-of-politics