
Dávid Petruț
Related Authors
Monica Gui
National Museum of Transylvanian History
Ádám Szabó
Hungarian National Museum
mariana-cristina popescu
National Museum of Transylvanian History
George Cupcea
Muzeul National de Istorie a Transilvaniei Cluj Napoca
Cristina-Georgeta Alexandrescu
Independent Researcher
Silvia Mustață
Babes-Bolyai University
InterestsView All (8)
Uploads
Papers by Dávid Petruț
of soldiers in muscle cuirass (lorica, thorax), pteruges and paludamentum
(in addition to other elements), is linked to the funerary commemoration of
equestrian individuals who either fulfilled one or more posts within the militia equestris at one point during their lives or died while holding such a position. These members of the equestrian order chose to be commemorated in this way out of the desire to emphasize their service and devotion to the state and to the emperor himself domi militiaeque i.e. ‘home and abroad’. As such, these monuments are important sources for the social history of the Roman world and implicitly Roman Dacia, even if they are detached from their original epitaph, the commemorated persons retaining their anonymity. One of the most intriguing examples of full body armour representations from Roman Dacia comes from Brâncovenești in Mureș County (Hu: Marosvécs). Even though a detailed description of the relief was published over 30 years ago, apart from some elusive hints to its significance, and despite the numerous interesting questions it poses, no comprehensive analysis has been undertaken so far. The present paper intends to do justice to the relief from Brâncovenești by giving a long overdue detailed analysis of the piece.
specialists. In Italy their production started in the mid-1st century BC and mostly ended by the late 1st century AD, being pushed out of the market by the cheaper and more practical Firmalampen developed in northern Italy. Even so, type I lamps were used in Dacia, a province founded in a
period when these lamps ceased to be produced in Italy. The present study brings into discussion a number of 54 pieces, coming from various sites of the province, mainly Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa as well as from several auxiliary forts. While the archaeological data is scarce and no fabrics analyses could be carried out, the present paper sets out to explore different possibilities with regard to this apparent chronological anomaly. The investigation is based on the patterns of distribution of these lamps in the province, as well as their proportion within the local lamp finds against the backdrop of the chronological evolution of production in Italy and the provinces.
of the ceramic lighting devices discovered throughout
the years in the necropolis of Porolissum, situated on
Ursoieș Hill. The assemblage at hand, while not particularly
large, amounting to 41 finds, comprises some interesting
pieces that might have some implications concerning aspects
such as supply and use, also allowing for some cultural inferences
to be drawn especially with regard to the connection of
some pieces to the numerus Palmyrenorum Porolissensium
stationed here. The research carried out in the said area of
the site can be ascribed to three phases, the earliest being
the excavations of M. Moga from 1949, which produced
7 finds, followed a decade later by the research carried out
by M. Macrea (1958–1959) producing 8 lamps, while
the most recent work was undertaken by the team of the
Necropolis Porolissensis Project between 2006 and 2008.
As part of the latter research a number of incineration
graves as well as a funerary precinct and a funerary mound
were excavated, unfortunately however the comprehensive
publication of the results has not yet been achieved. With
regard to the ceramic lighting devices, a total of 26, mostly
fragmentary lamp finds can be accounted for, roughly half
(14) coming from the graves, while the rest being discovered
in the spaces between the burials. The present paper intends
to deal exclusively with the question of the ceramic lamps
from a mainly typological standpoint, aiming to answer
questions with regard to the aforementioned aspects of supply
and use within the settlement of Porolissum.
of the way in which the Roman army functioned
as well as for the everyday life of the troops. Supply can be
understood as the conjunction of local production and the
import of various goods. The problem of military pottery
production in Dacia has so far been largely neglected by
researchers in Roman archaeology. Indeed, clear connections
between production sites associated with military bases, i.e.
pottery workshops situated in the vicus, and the forts they
were meant to supply, are yet to be established. Due to this
general shortcoming we are forced to rely to a great extent on
‘indirect evidence’ for the assessment of local military pottery
production. The notion of indirect evidence in this case
refers mainly to particular categories of the material culture,
such as implements and tools used in pottery production, but
also wasters and other discarded by-products linked to the
process of manufacture. Evidence derived from the analysis
of certain traits and patterns in the pottery assemblages which
might indicate the parameters of local production are equally
significant. The underlying principle behind this approach
is based on the assumption that the overwhelming majority
of the pottery assemblages were produced in the immediate
vicinity of the fort, i.e. in the vicus.
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the pottery production
linked with the auxiliary fort of Buciumi in Dacia
Porolissensis. The question of local pottery production can
be addressed only in conjectural terms, as there is no clear
archaeological data referring to pottery workshops in connection
with the fort, due to the lack of research in the area
of the vicus so far. The main source for this investigation
consists in the pottery assemblages discovered chiefly in the
barracks of the fort. The ultimate aim of this investigation is
to raise certain questions concerning the character of military
pottery production in this region of the Dacian limes, as part
of the general phenomenon observed in most of the European
frontier provinces and most often discussed under the term
‘legionary ware’.
In: L. Vagalinski, N. Sharankov (eds.), Limes XXII. Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies Ruse, Bulgaria, September 2012, Sofia, 2015, 259-268.
of soldiers in muscle cuirass (lorica, thorax), pteruges and paludamentum
(in addition to other elements), is linked to the funerary commemoration of
equestrian individuals who either fulfilled one or more posts within the militia equestris at one point during their lives or died while holding such a position. These members of the equestrian order chose to be commemorated in this way out of the desire to emphasize their service and devotion to the state and to the emperor himself domi militiaeque i.e. ‘home and abroad’. As such, these monuments are important sources for the social history of the Roman world and implicitly Roman Dacia, even if they are detached from their original epitaph, the commemorated persons retaining their anonymity. One of the most intriguing examples of full body armour representations from Roman Dacia comes from Brâncovenești in Mureș County (Hu: Marosvécs). Even though a detailed description of the relief was published over 30 years ago, apart from some elusive hints to its significance, and despite the numerous interesting questions it poses, no comprehensive analysis has been undertaken so far. The present paper intends to do justice to the relief from Brâncovenești by giving a long overdue detailed analysis of the piece.
specialists. In Italy their production started in the mid-1st century BC and mostly ended by the late 1st century AD, being pushed out of the market by the cheaper and more practical Firmalampen developed in northern Italy. Even so, type I lamps were used in Dacia, a province founded in a
period when these lamps ceased to be produced in Italy. The present study brings into discussion a number of 54 pieces, coming from various sites of the province, mainly Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa as well as from several auxiliary forts. While the archaeological data is scarce and no fabrics analyses could be carried out, the present paper sets out to explore different possibilities with regard to this apparent chronological anomaly. The investigation is based on the patterns of distribution of these lamps in the province, as well as their proportion within the local lamp finds against the backdrop of the chronological evolution of production in Italy and the provinces.
of the ceramic lighting devices discovered throughout
the years in the necropolis of Porolissum, situated on
Ursoieș Hill. The assemblage at hand, while not particularly
large, amounting to 41 finds, comprises some interesting
pieces that might have some implications concerning aspects
such as supply and use, also allowing for some cultural inferences
to be drawn especially with regard to the connection of
some pieces to the numerus Palmyrenorum Porolissensium
stationed here. The research carried out in the said area of
the site can be ascribed to three phases, the earliest being
the excavations of M. Moga from 1949, which produced
7 finds, followed a decade later by the research carried out
by M. Macrea (1958–1959) producing 8 lamps, while
the most recent work was undertaken by the team of the
Necropolis Porolissensis Project between 2006 and 2008.
As part of the latter research a number of incineration
graves as well as a funerary precinct and a funerary mound
were excavated, unfortunately however the comprehensive
publication of the results has not yet been achieved. With
regard to the ceramic lighting devices, a total of 26, mostly
fragmentary lamp finds can be accounted for, roughly half
(14) coming from the graves, while the rest being discovered
in the spaces between the burials. The present paper intends
to deal exclusively with the question of the ceramic lamps
from a mainly typological standpoint, aiming to answer
questions with regard to the aforementioned aspects of supply
and use within the settlement of Porolissum.
of the way in which the Roman army functioned
as well as for the everyday life of the troops. Supply can be
understood as the conjunction of local production and the
import of various goods. The problem of military pottery
production in Dacia has so far been largely neglected by
researchers in Roman archaeology. Indeed, clear connections
between production sites associated with military bases, i.e.
pottery workshops situated in the vicus, and the forts they
were meant to supply, are yet to be established. Due to this
general shortcoming we are forced to rely to a great extent on
‘indirect evidence’ for the assessment of local military pottery
production. The notion of indirect evidence in this case
refers mainly to particular categories of the material culture,
such as implements and tools used in pottery production, but
also wasters and other discarded by-products linked to the
process of manufacture. Evidence derived from the analysis
of certain traits and patterns in the pottery assemblages which
might indicate the parameters of local production are equally
significant. The underlying principle behind this approach
is based on the assumption that the overwhelming majority
of the pottery assemblages were produced in the immediate
vicinity of the fort, i.e. in the vicus.
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the pottery production
linked with the auxiliary fort of Buciumi in Dacia
Porolissensis. The question of local pottery production can
be addressed only in conjectural terms, as there is no clear
archaeological data referring to pottery workshops in connection
with the fort, due to the lack of research in the area
of the vicus so far. The main source for this investigation
consists in the pottery assemblages discovered chiefly in the
barracks of the fort. The ultimate aim of this investigation is
to raise certain questions concerning the character of military
pottery production in this region of the Dacian limes, as part
of the general phenomenon observed in most of the European
frontier provinces and most often discussed under the term
‘legionary ware’.
In: L. Vagalinski, N. Sharankov (eds.), Limes XXII. Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies Ruse, Bulgaria, September 2012, Sofia, 2015, 259-268.
project that could only be brought to a successful conclusion with the combined effort of the entire community of Roman pottery specialists from Romania. The hosting of the 31st International Congress of the Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores in Romania in 2018 represented the ideal opportunity for the implementation of this project whose main goal is to particularize the pottery production within the above mentioned two provinces in the wider context of the ceramic industry across the entire Empire.