Eugenio Bulygin en la Teoría del Derecho contemporánea. Ferrer Beltrán, Moreso, Navarro, Rodríguez (coord), 2022
En su artículo "La concepción expresiva de las normas" , los profesores Carlos Alchourrón y Eugen... more En su artículo "La concepción expresiva de las normas" , los profesores Carlos Alchourrón y Eugenio Bulygin distinguen dos concepciones de las normas, que denominan respectivamente "hilética" y "expresiva". De acuerdo con la primera, las normas son el significado de formulaciones normativas, en tanto que, para la segunda, son el resultado del uso prescriptivo del lenguaje. Si bien la concepción expresiva no admite una lógica de normas, los autores muestran que puede desarrollarse un aparato conceptual paralelo al de la concepción hilética y una lógica de proposiciones normativas que tiene pocas diferencias con la lógica deóntica clásica. En este trabajo defiendo la posibilidad de analizar la fundamentación de las sentencias judiciales con algunas herramientas lógicas de la concepción expresiva, posibilidad que fue primero defendida y luego rechazada por Eugenio Bulygin.
In their article "The Expressive Conception of Norms" , professors Carlos Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin distinguish two conceptions of norms, which they call respectively "hyletic" and "expressive". According to the first, norms are the meaning of normative formulations, while, for the second, they are the result of the prescriptive use of language. Although the expressive conception does not admit a logic of norms, the authors show that a conceptual apparatus parallel to that of the hyletic conception and a logic of normative propositions that has little difference from classical deontic logic can be developed. In this work I defend the possibility of analyzing the foundation of judicial decisions with some logical tools of the expressive conception, a possibility that was first defended and later rejected by Eugenio Bulygin.
Uploads
Papers by Hugo Zuleta
In their article "The Expressive Conception of Norms" , professors Carlos Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin distinguish two conceptions of norms, which they call respectively "hyletic" and "expressive". According to the first, norms are the meaning of normative formulations, while, for the second, they are the result of the prescriptive use of language. Although the expressive conception does not admit a logic of norms, the authors show that a conceptual apparatus parallel to that of the hyletic conception and a logic of normative propositions that has little difference from classical deontic logic can be developed. In this work I defend the possibility of analyzing the foundation of judicial decisions with some logical tools of the expressive conception, a possibility that was first defended and later rejected by Eugenio Bulygin.
It contributes to the general theory of law with a formal analysis of such concepts as obligation, permission, prohibition, commitment, rule, authority, power, rights, and responsibility. It analyses the formal properties of normative systems, helping to clarify notions such as legal gaps and legal contradictions.
In their article "The Expressive Conception of Norms" , professors Carlos Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin distinguish two conceptions of norms, which they call respectively "hyletic" and "expressive". According to the first, norms are the meaning of normative formulations, while, for the second, they are the result of the prescriptive use of language. Although the expressive conception does not admit a logic of norms, the authors show that a conceptual apparatus parallel to that of the hyletic conception and a logic of normative propositions that has little difference from classical deontic logic can be developed. In this work I defend the possibility of analyzing the foundation of judicial decisions with some logical tools of the expressive conception, a possibility that was first defended and later rejected by Eugenio Bulygin.
It contributes to the general theory of law with a formal analysis of such concepts as obligation, permission, prohibition, commitment, rule, authority, power, rights, and responsibility. It analyses the formal properties of normative systems, helping to clarify notions such as legal gaps and legal contradictions.