
Holman Andrei
Address: Iași, Judetul Iasi, Romania
less
Related Authors
Sergio A Useche
University of Valencia
Omri Gillath
University of Kansas
Lucienne Kleisen
University of NSW at Canberra
Leo Medrano
SEGEMAR
carol holland
Aston University
Foo Keng Yuen
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Brenton McNally
Griffith University
luca cerniglia
Università Telematica Internazionale Uninettuno
Uploads
Papers by Holman Andrei
driving styles, was originally built in Israel. In line with other previous adaptations of this
instrument in different cultural contexts (such as Argentina), our research aimed to
develop a valid and reliable Romanian version of the MDSI and to evaluate its external
and construct validity. We conducted two studies aimed at this objective. Study 1
(n = 1237) first tested the factorial adequacy of the previous MDSI versions in our
Romanian sample. Then, the culture-specific version of the MDSI that emerged from the
factor analysis was examined in terms of its structure, internal consistency, item proprieties,
and associations to socio-demographic variables and self-reported traffic crashes
and offenses. Study 2 (n = 835) examined the associations between the driving styles
assessed by this newly developed measure and several relevant personality traits: sensation
seeking (both general and in traffic), desire for control, driving anger, normlessness,
dutifulness and frustration discomfort. The results of the two studies support the validity
and reliability of this culture-specific version of the MDSI. In comparison to the previous
versions, the Romanian MDSI version addresses a supplementary driving style, concerning
the violation of rules perceived as irrational in the respective situation. The reasons for the
emergence of this distinct driving style in the Romanian driving context, as well as its relationships
to the high traffic crashes rate in this country are discussed.
on quality of life and heart-focused anxiety, in patients with cardiovascular disease
(N = 106) admitted in the hospital, undergoing medication or who had undergone
surgery. The influence of the type of treatment on the heart-focused anxiety and on
the quality of life was mediated by illness perceptions. Consequently, patients who
have undergone cardiac surgery have a better quality of life and lower levels of
heart-focused anxiety than those relying only on medication to treat their illness.
people waiting for an organ transplant and the number of donated organs. In order to reduce
this gap, people‟s attitudes towards posthumous organ donation for transplantation need to
be properly assessed, in order to elaborate efficient interventions designed to increase the
frequency of consent organ donation from deceased family members. This present article
reports the multi-step development of such an attitude measure on Romanian samples.
Across three successive studies, we generated a belief-type attitude instrument including
statements relevant for the population under scrutiny and investigated and tested its
factorial structure. The results of the third study, in which we performed a confirmatory
factor analysis on the structure extracted in an exploratory manner in the second, confirm
the factorial validity of the instrument. The newly developed scale assessing the attitude
toward posthumous organ donation for transplantation in Romania includes four factors:
altruism, lack of information, transgression of the sacrality of the donor‟s body and the
relieving of the donor‟s family suffering.
organ donation rates. Objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to assess the willingness
to donate (WTD) a family member’s organs in the inhabitants of a large Romanian city
(Iasi) and to analyze its factors; and (2) to determine the most important behaviors of the
medical staff for our respondents in a hypothetical donation decision scenario.
Methods. The study included a representative sample of the Iasi population. The
instrument addressed WTD a family member’s organs, both in general and in the particular
situation of knowing that the deceased had a positive attitude toward organ donation,
knowledge of transplantation-related issues, endorsement of beliefs concerning organ
donation, and the importance of a set of medical staff’s behaviors.
Results. The questionnaire was completed by 1,034 participants, 48% (n ¼ 496) of whom
would most likely consent to donate a family member’s organs, 18% (n ¼ 191) would most
likely refuse and 34% (n ¼ 347) were unsure. The following factors were found to influence
this variable: believing in the possible reversibility of brain death (P ¼ .004); believing that
body integrity should be preserved after death (P < .001); believing that part of the
deceased continues to live through the organ recipients (P ¼ .001); and being concerned
about mutilation after donation (P < .001).
Conclusions. The WTD the organs of a deceased next of kin in the Iasi population, even
when the deceased had positive attitudes on the matter, is lower than that reported by
other studies in other European countries. It is mainly influenced by knowledge and
concerns regarding the posthumous manipulation of the body. Consent in a potential
donation situation also depends on the way in which the medical staff interacts with the
bereaved family.
assess its construct validity and psychometric proprieties. First, we discuss the history of the
psychological construct of persistence, defined here as the tendency to remain engaged in
specific goal-related activities, despite difficulties, obstacles, fatigue, prolonged frustration or
low perceived feasibility. The developed scale, measuring motivational persistence, contains
three-factors: long-term purposes pursuing, current purposes pursuing and recurrence of
unattained purposes. The results of the two validation studies conducted, employing both
exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, advocate the hypothesized structure. Also, the
Pearson and canonical correlations between the three factors of the new self-report scale
and other three related measures (and their factors) indicate good levels of convergent and
divergent validity of the new scale.
essential in the biomedical research – has generated numerous critiques in all the research fields
which involve human participants. In Psychology, it has been accepted upon certain conditions
inspired by the utilitarian calculus of the costs versus the scientific gains of the study in all the
versions of the research ethics code elaborated by the American Psychological Association. This
code represents the main reference point in setting the acceptability limits of the worldwide
empirical research methodologies. This acceptance of deception stems, at least partially, from its
frequent use in the studies developed in the dominant trend of psychology, even from the
beginnings of its elaboration. These political aspects of psychological science with consequences
on ethical regulations are accompanied by an empirical level of debating between the critics and
the defenders of the practice of deception. Thus, the specificities of the field created the
circumstances in which all ethical debates regarding this practice are accompanied by empirical
arguments, derived mostly from studies investigating its psychological consequences on
participants. The article presents a synthesis of these empirically based ethical controversies,
concerning, among others, the benefits of the deceiving procedures and their negative effects on
participants, the limitation versus the promotion of their autonomy, the decrease or increase in
validity of the studies using it. Given the relative ambiguity, induced by the plurality of ethical
stances and empirical arguments as well as the conditioned legitimacy of this practice –
instituted by the psychological research ethics code – the final decision concerning its use
represents the psychologist’s responsibility, who has the complicated task to estimate the
parameters of the costs / benefits balance in each particular case.
beauty, by dividing them into eight major research lines, each illustrated by a set of most
representative theories and results: evolutionary, sociocultural and body image approaches,
researches on the cross-cultural standards of beauty, on its factors, effects, personal benefits and
media representations
driving styles, was originally built in Israel. In line with other previous adaptations of this
instrument in different cultural contexts (such as Argentina), our research aimed to
develop a valid and reliable Romanian version of the MDSI and to evaluate its external
and construct validity. We conducted two studies aimed at this objective. Study 1
(n = 1237) first tested the factorial adequacy of the previous MDSI versions in our
Romanian sample. Then, the culture-specific version of the MDSI that emerged from the
factor analysis was examined in terms of its structure, internal consistency, item proprieties,
and associations to socio-demographic variables and self-reported traffic crashes
and offenses. Study 2 (n = 835) examined the associations between the driving styles
assessed by this newly developed measure and several relevant personality traits: sensation
seeking (both general and in traffic), desire for control, driving anger, normlessness,
dutifulness and frustration discomfort. The results of the two studies support the validity
and reliability of this culture-specific version of the MDSI. In comparison to the previous
versions, the Romanian MDSI version addresses a supplementary driving style, concerning
the violation of rules perceived as irrational in the respective situation. The reasons for the
emergence of this distinct driving style in the Romanian driving context, as well as its relationships
to the high traffic crashes rate in this country are discussed.
on quality of life and heart-focused anxiety, in patients with cardiovascular disease
(N = 106) admitted in the hospital, undergoing medication or who had undergone
surgery. The influence of the type of treatment on the heart-focused anxiety and on
the quality of life was mediated by illness perceptions. Consequently, patients who
have undergone cardiac surgery have a better quality of life and lower levels of
heart-focused anxiety than those relying only on medication to treat their illness.
people waiting for an organ transplant and the number of donated organs. In order to reduce
this gap, people‟s attitudes towards posthumous organ donation for transplantation need to
be properly assessed, in order to elaborate efficient interventions designed to increase the
frequency of consent organ donation from deceased family members. This present article
reports the multi-step development of such an attitude measure on Romanian samples.
Across three successive studies, we generated a belief-type attitude instrument including
statements relevant for the population under scrutiny and investigated and tested its
factorial structure. The results of the third study, in which we performed a confirmatory
factor analysis on the structure extracted in an exploratory manner in the second, confirm
the factorial validity of the instrument. The newly developed scale assessing the attitude
toward posthumous organ donation for transplantation in Romania includes four factors:
altruism, lack of information, transgression of the sacrality of the donor‟s body and the
relieving of the donor‟s family suffering.
organ donation rates. Objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to assess the willingness
to donate (WTD) a family member’s organs in the inhabitants of a large Romanian city
(Iasi) and to analyze its factors; and (2) to determine the most important behaviors of the
medical staff for our respondents in a hypothetical donation decision scenario.
Methods. The study included a representative sample of the Iasi population. The
instrument addressed WTD a family member’s organs, both in general and in the particular
situation of knowing that the deceased had a positive attitude toward organ donation,
knowledge of transplantation-related issues, endorsement of beliefs concerning organ
donation, and the importance of a set of medical staff’s behaviors.
Results. The questionnaire was completed by 1,034 participants, 48% (n ¼ 496) of whom
would most likely consent to donate a family member’s organs, 18% (n ¼ 191) would most
likely refuse and 34% (n ¼ 347) were unsure. The following factors were found to influence
this variable: believing in the possible reversibility of brain death (P ¼ .004); believing that
body integrity should be preserved after death (P < .001); believing that part of the
deceased continues to live through the organ recipients (P ¼ .001); and being concerned
about mutilation after donation (P < .001).
Conclusions. The WTD the organs of a deceased next of kin in the Iasi population, even
when the deceased had positive attitudes on the matter, is lower than that reported by
other studies in other European countries. It is mainly influenced by knowledge and
concerns regarding the posthumous manipulation of the body. Consent in a potential
donation situation also depends on the way in which the medical staff interacts with the
bereaved family.
assess its construct validity and psychometric proprieties. First, we discuss the history of the
psychological construct of persistence, defined here as the tendency to remain engaged in
specific goal-related activities, despite difficulties, obstacles, fatigue, prolonged frustration or
low perceived feasibility. The developed scale, measuring motivational persistence, contains
three-factors: long-term purposes pursuing, current purposes pursuing and recurrence of
unattained purposes. The results of the two validation studies conducted, employing both
exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, advocate the hypothesized structure. Also, the
Pearson and canonical correlations between the three factors of the new self-report scale
and other three related measures (and their factors) indicate good levels of convergent and
divergent validity of the new scale.
essential in the biomedical research – has generated numerous critiques in all the research fields
which involve human participants. In Psychology, it has been accepted upon certain conditions
inspired by the utilitarian calculus of the costs versus the scientific gains of the study in all the
versions of the research ethics code elaborated by the American Psychological Association. This
code represents the main reference point in setting the acceptability limits of the worldwide
empirical research methodologies. This acceptance of deception stems, at least partially, from its
frequent use in the studies developed in the dominant trend of psychology, even from the
beginnings of its elaboration. These political aspects of psychological science with consequences
on ethical regulations are accompanied by an empirical level of debating between the critics and
the defenders of the practice of deception. Thus, the specificities of the field created the
circumstances in which all ethical debates regarding this practice are accompanied by empirical
arguments, derived mostly from studies investigating its psychological consequences on
participants. The article presents a synthesis of these empirically based ethical controversies,
concerning, among others, the benefits of the deceiving procedures and their negative effects on
participants, the limitation versus the promotion of their autonomy, the decrease or increase in
validity of the studies using it. Given the relative ambiguity, induced by the plurality of ethical
stances and empirical arguments as well as the conditioned legitimacy of this practice –
instituted by the psychological research ethics code – the final decision concerning its use
represents the psychologist’s responsibility, who has the complicated task to estimate the
parameters of the costs / benefits balance in each particular case.
beauty, by dividing them into eight major research lines, each illustrated by a set of most
representative theories and results: evolutionary, sociocultural and body image approaches,
researches on the cross-cultural standards of beauty, on its factors, effects, personal benefits and
media representations