
Andrew Valenti
I’ve been fortunate to observe the evolution of the IT industry from providing computers that not much more than calculators and electronic typewriters, to the growth of enterprise-wide processing systems, and to, at present, ubiquitous personal digital assistance. My belief is that the next wave of computing will be not to replace human thinking, but to augment and accelerate human learning. My objective is to take the technology and educator skills I’ve developed over the past 25 years and focus on creating tools to improve teaching, learning, and collaboration across languages and cultures.
Phone: 617.627.3814
Address: Tufts University
169 Holland Street
Suite 317B
Somerville, MA 02144
Phone: 617.627.3814
Address: Tufts University
169 Holland Street
Suite 317B
Somerville, MA 02144
less
Related Authors
Morten H. Christiansen
Cornell University
Beat Signer
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Timothy Jordan
Canadian University of Dubai
George K. # Zarifis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Adrian Cussins
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (National University of Colombia)
Sumesh MK
University of Delhi
Albert Bastardas-Boada
Universitat de Barcelona
Marc Champagne
Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Tad Zawidzki
The George Washington University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
InterestsView All (12)
Uploads
Papers by Andrew Valenti
Several competing hypothesis based on behavioral experiments attempt to explain the hard problem were reviewed by Finkbeiner, M., Gollan, T., & Caramazza, A. (2006). The authors suggest none to be entirely correct and that a simpler cognitive mechanism, selection-by-threshold, best explains many of the observed facilitatory and inhibitory cross-language effects. Subsequent research by Kroll et al. (2008) and Golan & Ferreira (2007) suggests that behavioral studies, specifically those that examine asymmetrical language switching costs in and of itself may not reveal the means of lexical selection.
Rather than relying on behavioral studies, more recent research has examined the evidence on the neural basis of language selection which suggests that inhibitory control is required to enable the bilinguals to speak one language alone. This paper seeks to review the research and identify the consensus, if one exists, on the neurological structures that serve as the locus of language selection and control.
that “code-switching” in bilinguals, i.e., the change from
one language to another, comes at a cost. What is still unclear
is the exact nature of the cost. In this paper, we develop
a connectionist model for Green’s Inhibitory Control (IC) hypothesis
for a bilingual lexical decision task (Green, 1998, 74),
which hypothesizes that the cost of switching between two languages
in this task is due to inhibitory forces among different
task schema and word forms. We were able to fit the model to
the empirical data from Von Studnitz and Green (1997, Experiment
1), thus providing a proof-of-concept model that the IC
hypothesis can account for the observed language switching
costs. More extensive, systematic explorations of the model
and its parameters in related but different tasks are, however,
required to determine the extent of the IC applicability.
Several competing hypothesis based on behavioral experiments attempt to explain the hard problem were reviewed by Finkbeiner, M., Gollan, T., & Caramazza, A. (2006). The authors suggest none to be entirely correct and that a simpler cognitive mechanism, selection-by-threshold, best explains many of the observed facilitatory and inhibitory cross-language effects. Subsequent research by Kroll et al. (2008) and Golan & Ferreira (2007) suggests that behavioral studies, specifically those that examine asymmetrical language switching costs in and of itself may not reveal the means of lexical selection.
Rather than relying on behavioral studies, more recent research has examined the evidence on the neural basis of language selection which suggests that inhibitory control is required to enable the bilinguals to speak one language alone. This paper seeks to review the research and identify the consensus, if one exists, on the neurological structures that serve as the locus of language selection and control.
that “code-switching” in bilinguals, i.e., the change from
one language to another, comes at a cost. What is still unclear
is the exact nature of the cost. In this paper, we develop
a connectionist model for Green’s Inhibitory Control (IC) hypothesis
for a bilingual lexical decision task (Green, 1998, 74),
which hypothesizes that the cost of switching between two languages
in this task is due to inhibitory forces among different
task schema and word forms. We were able to fit the model to
the empirical data from Von Studnitz and Green (1997, Experiment
1), thus providing a proof-of-concept model that the IC
hypothesis can account for the observed language switching
costs. More extensive, systematic explorations of the model
and its parameters in related but different tasks are, however,
required to determine the extent of the IC applicability.