
Efe Sevin
Efe Sevin is an assistant professor of public relations at the Department of Mass Communication at Towson University (Maryland, US). His current research focuses on the identifying and measuring the impacts of social networks on place branding and public diplomacy campaigns. Prior to joining Towson University, he worked at Reinhardt University (Georgia, US), University of Fribourg (Switzerland), and Kadir Has University (Turkey). His works have been published in several academic journals and books including American Behavioral Scientist, Public Relations Review, and Cities. His most recent book, Public Diplomacy and the Implementation of Foreign Policy in the US, Sweden and Turkey, was published by Palgrave MacMillan in 2017.
Efe Sevin received his Ph.D. from American University’s School of International Service, Washington, D.C. He completed his graduate studies at Emerson College, Boston, MA as a Foreign Fulbright scholar, and his undergraduate studies at Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Supervisors: Craig Hayden and Rhonda Zaharna
Efe Sevin received his Ph.D. from American University’s School of International Service, Washington, D.C. He completed his graduate studies at Emerson College, Boston, MA as a Foreign Fulbright scholar, and his undergraduate studies at Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Supervisors: Craig Hayden and Rhonda Zaharna
less
Related Authors
Emrah Budak
Mersin University
Dr. Faruk Yazar
Necmettin Erbakan University
Ahmet Gökbel
Ahi Evran University
Aysel Çetinkaya
Kocaeli University
Oğuz Göksu
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University
Hazel ÇAĞAN-ELBİR
Middle East Technical University
InterestsView All (30)
Uploads
Papers by Efe Sevin
situation in which countries need to manage the international environment in a relatively short period,
their practices could signal how digitization is going to influence public diplomacy in the longer run. This
paper explores state public diplomacy in the context of a public health crisis. It develops a theoretical
framework of public diplomacy on social media through how and what states communicated during the
first year of the Covid-19 pandemic. Through keyword and hashtag analyses, we identify two patterns.
First, states usually regard social media as an instrument for domestic communication rather than public
diplomacy. The international impact of messaging has not been prioritized or well-recognized. Social
media platforms such as Twitter have global outreach and messaging can be seen by audiences all over
the world. Messages intended for the domestic audience could have an international impact. Thus, any
communication on digital platforms should consider their public diplomacy outcomes. Second, while
social media platforms are claimed to be for networking at different levels, states tend to connect with
other states rather than with international organizations during the pandemic. States do not like to
mention international organizations like the WHO and the UN on Twitter. Instead, they were either busy
dealing with internal problems or cooperating with another state to combat the virus.
Keywords: public diplomacy, soft power, meta-analysis, topic modeling, text mining
situation in which countries need to manage the international environment in a relatively short period,
their practices could signal how digitization is going to influence public diplomacy in the longer run. This
paper explores state public diplomacy in the context of a public health crisis. It develops a theoretical
framework of public diplomacy on social media through how and what states communicated during the
first year of the Covid-19 pandemic. Through keyword and hashtag analyses, we identify two patterns.
First, states usually regard social media as an instrument for domestic communication rather than public
diplomacy. The international impact of messaging has not been prioritized or well-recognized. Social
media platforms such as Twitter have global outreach and messaging can be seen by audiences all over
the world. Messages intended for the domestic audience could have an international impact. Thus, any
communication on digital platforms should consider their public diplomacy outcomes. Second, while
social media platforms are claimed to be for networking at different levels, states tend to connect with
other states rather than with international organizations during the pandemic. States do not like to
mention international organizations like the WHO and the UN on Twitter. Instead, they were either busy
dealing with internal problems or cooperating with another state to combat the virus.
Keywords: public diplomacy, soft power, meta-analysis, topic modeling, text mining
http://www.amazon.com/Controlling-Message-Strategic-Approach-Branding/dp/3838389409/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1281973734&sr=1-1