
Suneet Chauhan
Related Authors
Don Ross
University College Cork
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Giulia Sissa
Ucla
Philip C Hébert
University of Toronto
Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes
University of Michigan
Ross Upshur
University of Toronto
Talia Bettcher
California State University, Los Angeles
Ahmed El-Agwany
Alexandria University
Antonio Simone Laganà
Università degli Studi di Palermo
Kenneth Pecoraro
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Uploads
Papers by Suneet Chauhan
(PNBPP) are unknown. Our objectives are to compare PNBPP at 1 and 2 years in children
delivered via vaginal delivery (VD) versus cesarean delivery (CD) and in children
delivered via VD with or without reported shoulder dystocia (SD).
Study Design Retrospective cohort of children diagnosed with neonatal brachial
plexus palsy (NBPP). Maternally reported delivery history and presence of SD were
recorded with Student t-test, chi-square test, and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence
intervals (CI) calculated for comparisons.
Results Of 387 cases of NBPP, 8% (30) delivered via CD. Rates of PNBPP were higher in
the VD group at 1 and 2 years (60% of CD and 85% of VD; OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11–0.62 at
1 year; 33% of CD and 73% of VD; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05–0.39 at 2 years). There was no
difference in PNBPP in women with VD with or without maternally reported SD (87 vs.
85%, p ¼ 0.68 at 1 year; 64 vs. 61%, p ¼ 0.61 at 2 years).
Conclusion PNBPP is possible with CD, and there is no difference in PNBPP in VD with
or without maternally reported SD. A prospective study is warranted to ascertain
associative factors.
regarding small for gestational age (SGA).
STUDY DESIGN: Along with American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin on abnormal growth, guidelines
from England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were
reviewed.
RESULTS: There are no guidelines on SGA from Canada, Australia,
and New Zealand. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
(RCOG) guideline agrees with ACOG’s definition of abnormal
growth, but there are noticeable variances in the diagnosis and management
of SGA. RCOG has more recommendations than ACOG (18 vs
4, respectively). The articles referenced varied, with only 13 similar
articles being cited by the both committees.
CONCLUSION: The differences in the 2 guidelines suggest that there is
variance in how 2 committees synthesize the literature and issue
recommendations.
(PNBPP) are unknown. Our objectives are to compare PNBPP at 1 and 2 years in children
delivered via vaginal delivery (VD) versus cesarean delivery (CD) and in children
delivered via VD with or without reported shoulder dystocia (SD).
Study Design Retrospective cohort of children diagnosed with neonatal brachial
plexus palsy (NBPP). Maternally reported delivery history and presence of SD were
recorded with Student t-test, chi-square test, and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence
intervals (CI) calculated for comparisons.
Results Of 387 cases of NBPP, 8% (30) delivered via CD. Rates of PNBPP were higher in
the VD group at 1 and 2 years (60% of CD and 85% of VD; OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11–0.62 at
1 year; 33% of CD and 73% of VD; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05–0.39 at 2 years). There was no
difference in PNBPP in women with VD with or without maternally reported SD (87 vs.
85%, p ¼ 0.68 at 1 year; 64 vs. 61%, p ¼ 0.61 at 2 years).
Conclusion PNBPP is possible with CD, and there is no difference in PNBPP in VD with
or without maternally reported SD. A prospective study is warranted to ascertain
associative factors.
regarding small for gestational age (SGA).
STUDY DESIGN: Along with American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin on abnormal growth, guidelines
from England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were
reviewed.
RESULTS: There are no guidelines on SGA from Canada, Australia,
and New Zealand. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
(RCOG) guideline agrees with ACOG’s definition of abnormal
growth, but there are noticeable variances in the diagnosis and management
of SGA. RCOG has more recommendations than ACOG (18 vs
4, respectively). The articles referenced varied, with only 13 similar
articles being cited by the both committees.
CONCLUSION: The differences in the 2 guidelines suggest that there is
variance in how 2 committees synthesize the literature and issue
recommendations.