Danuta Okoń
Address: Prof. dr hab. Danuta Okoń
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Instytut Historyczny
Ul. Krakowska 71–79
70–004 Szczecin
Polska
[email protected]
[email protected]
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Instytut Historyczny
Ul. Krakowska 71–79
70–004 Szczecin
Polska
[email protected]
[email protected]
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Danuta Okoń
According to the first one, line 5 is to be read as C(aio) Sam(bucio) C(ai) f(ilio) Q(uirina) Maiore, and the person mentioned is considered a senatorial legate.
According to the other one, line 5 is to be read as C(aio) Sam(mio) C(ai) f(ilio) Q(uirina)/O(ufentina) Maiore, and the person mentioned is considered a centurion.
divinae), which made it necessary to correct numerous inscriptions after Geta's death. Domna's sister, Iulia Maesa, and her niece Iulia Soemias both bore the titles: Augusta, mater (or avia) Augusti, mater castrorum, mater castrorum et senatus. The titulature of the last empress of Emesa, Iulia Mammaea, included all of the terms known from the nomenclature of her predecessors, as well as completely new ones — mater universi generis humani. The fact that numen and maiestas of the empresses were worshipped and that the term sanctissima was often added in reference to them was another similar element of the propaganda.
the recreation of the full nomenclature regarding P. Fu(...) Pontianus, legat of Moesia
Inferior. The author demonstrates how the man in question was identified with: P. Furius Pontianus,
Pontius Furius Pontianus, Pontius Fuscus Pontianus, C. Pontius Pontianus Fuficius
Maximus, supporting the identification of the said legate with the latter. The article concludes
with two options concerning the reconstruction of the geneology of Pontianus.
character of his family line, its connections with the house of the Antonini, and his own unquestioned position of the leader of the Senate. It is assumed that Glabrio was related by blood to the family of
Marcus Aurelius and this fact could have heavily influenced Pertinax’s nomination. Glabrio was a
symbol of the modern authority of the Senate as well as the tradition and permanence of the Roman
Empire. As the leader of the Senate he gained widespread respect, and both the position of his gens and relationships with the Antonine family made him a real capax imperii. The resignation from the imperial power proved him to be also a prudent man as much as it gave Acilii Glabriones a chance to
function in the elite of the Roman Empire in the centuries to come.
According to the first one, line 5 is to be read as C(aio) Sam(bucio) C(ai) f(ilio) Q(uirina) Maiore, and the person mentioned is considered a senatorial legate.
According to the other one, line 5 is to be read as C(aio) Sam(mio) C(ai) f(ilio) Q(uirina)/O(ufentina) Maiore, and the person mentioned is considered a centurion.
divinae), which made it necessary to correct numerous inscriptions after Geta's death. Domna's sister, Iulia Maesa, and her niece Iulia Soemias both bore the titles: Augusta, mater (or avia) Augusti, mater castrorum, mater castrorum et senatus. The titulature of the last empress of Emesa, Iulia Mammaea, included all of the terms known from the nomenclature of her predecessors, as well as completely new ones — mater universi generis humani. The fact that numen and maiestas of the empresses were worshipped and that the term sanctissima was often added in reference to them was another similar element of the propaganda.
the recreation of the full nomenclature regarding P. Fu(...) Pontianus, legat of Moesia
Inferior. The author demonstrates how the man in question was identified with: P. Furius Pontianus,
Pontius Furius Pontianus, Pontius Fuscus Pontianus, C. Pontius Pontianus Fuficius
Maximus, supporting the identification of the said legate with the latter. The article concludes
with two options concerning the reconstruction of the geneology of Pontianus.
character of his family line, its connections with the house of the Antonini, and his own unquestioned position of the leader of the Senate. It is assumed that Glabrio was related by blood to the family of
Marcus Aurelius and this fact could have heavily influenced Pertinax’s nomination. Glabrio was a
symbol of the modern authority of the Senate as well as the tradition and permanence of the Roman
Empire. As the leader of the Senate he gained widespread respect, and both the position of his gens and relationships with the Antonine family made him a real capax imperii. The resignation from the imperial power proved him to be also a prudent man as much as it gave Acilii Glabriones a chance to
function in the elite of the Roman Empire in the centuries to come.
In this monograph, I present their cursus honorum and I determine the impact of holding the military tribunate on their subsequent careers - to what extent the military tribunate made it possible for them to attain magistracies and offices of praetorian rank and, in the future, the consulship and post-consular offices.
Four chapters contain analyses of senatorial careers of tribuni militum (laticlavii and angusticlavii) presented in a problematic way, taking into account the chronology of the cursus honorum. For this purpose, I used my career typology, presented for the first time in 2017 in the second volume of the Album senatorum monograph.
In Chapter One, I presented basic information about the tribunes: their number, nomenclature, appointment procedure, period of service and territorial and social origin.
In Chapter Two, I discussed a group of individual distinctions (dona militaria, adlectio and commendation Augusti) and their connection with attaining magistracies. I determined to what extent special distinctions were a result of merits from the period of military service, and to what extent they were due to social origins.
I devoted Chapter Three to higher command positions: legatus legionis, praepositus, dux with an indication of the rules that governed their attainment (and exceptions to them). I answered questions about the qualifications of Roman senators to perform these functions and about the existence of the viri militares category.
In Chapter Four, I included information on the structure of the governorship of Roman provinces, taking into account the proportions between praetorian and consular provinces, and imperial and senatorial provinces. I paid particular attention to provincial governorships with legions, to which people with military experience were predestined. I showed the order in which provincial governorships and a possible consulship and proconsulships of Asia and Africa appeared in the cursus honorum.
In the Conclusion, I presented two career models: tribuni laticlavii and tribuni angusticlavii, highlighting their similarities and differences.
In this monograph, I proved that the military tribunate held at a young age had a significant impact on a person’s further career.
social, individual, official, nationalized, appropriated and forbidden, condemned and controversial. The authors show various examples of
damnatio memoriae ("condemnation of memory"), giving their reasons, try to recreate at the same time
processes of change, manipulation and displacement from undesirable collective memory
events, heroes or symbols.
(Elity w świecie starożytnym, 18–20.09.2013). Jej organizacja spoczywała na barkach pracowników i doktorantów Zakładu Historii Starożytnej Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
W toku kilkudniowych, nierzadko burzliwych, obrad narodziła się koncepcja wspólnej publikacji jako sposobu ogłoszenia środowisku naukowemu nowych ustaleń badawczych. Rezonans naszych działań przerósł oczekiwania – wielu badaczy którzy, pomimo chęci, z różnych względów nie dotarli na konferencję, zgłosiło chęć dołączenia swoich artykułów. Te zbieżne z tematem obrad włączyliśmy do publikacji, wkrótce podzielonej na dwa tomy: obcojęzyczny i polski. Zastosowany podział jest adekwatny do międzynarodowego charakteru spotkania i odzwierciedla strukturę programu obrad. Oba
tomy stanowią nie tylko zwieńczenie konferencji, ale i swoisty przegląd stanu badań nad elitami w Starożytności.
Warto podkreślić, że publikowane teksty mają szerokie spektrum czasowe, począwszy od starożytnego Bliskiego Wschodu, poprzez kulturę Antyku klasycznego, aż po schyłek dziejów świata starożytnego; w takiej też kolejności chronologicznej zostały przez Redaktorów ułożone. Wybór ten może być równie dobrze zastąpiony przez Czytelnika kryterium problemowym.
W niniejszym tomie wiele tekstów poświęcono elitom politycznym: Katarzyna Balbuza, Michał Baranowski, Krzysztof Królczyk, Marta Wawrzynkiewicz piszą o przedstawicielach domów panujących, Krzysztof Hipp, Hadrian L. Kryśkiewicz, Tomasz Ładoń, Danuta Okoń, Szymon Olszaniec, Maciej Piegdoń, Marek Wilczyński, Paulina Kucharska-Budzik o arystokracji, natomiast Jerzy Ciecieląg, Jerzy R. Pachlowski, Sławomir Jędraszek — o elitach prowincjonalnych. Należy zwrócić uwagę, że także inne rodzaje elit znalazły w tomie należne im miejsce: Łukasz Berger, Kamil Biały, Małgorzata
Cieśluk, Anna Głodowska, Krystyna Tuszyńska omówili zagadnienia związane z problematyką elit intelektualnych, zaś ks. Stanisław Adamiak, Lucyna Kostuch, Dariusz Spychała podjęli wątek elit religijnych.
Część rozważań wykracza poza zakreślone powyżej zagadnienia, ukazując zarówno obrzeża świata antycznego (Grzegorz Domański, Agnieszka Matuszewska, Cezary Namirski), jak i recepcję wzorów antycznych w kulturze (Renata Gałaj-Dempniak, Artur Kaźmierczak).
Tytułowe elity zostały potraktowane przez Autorów i jako całość i jako zbiór jednostek, z którego zaprezentowano wybrane postaci. W efekcie powstała praca zróżnicowana, ukazująca omawiany problem z różnych punktów widzenia. Stanowi to atut niniejszej publikacji, gdyż nie pozwala na zamknięcie analiz na jednym polu badawczym, zyskując tak cenny walor holistyczny.
Za ten efekt podziękowania należą się wszystkim Autorom, którzy zechcieli przygotować zamieszczone w tym tomie teksty.
Mam nadzieję, że wspomniane publikacje nie będą jedynymi rezultatami spotkania w Szczecinie, a tak dobrze rozpoczęta współpraca będzie kontynuowana przez długie lata.
The symposiums, which were not infrequently turbulent, gave rise to the concept of this publication as a medium to reveal new research findings to the scholarly community. The response to our efforts was far beyond our expectations – many scholars of antiquity, who were unable to attend the conference for various reasons, declared their wish to submit papers for this publication. We included some of them, related to the topics of the meeting, in the present volume.
It is noteworthy that the published papers cover a wide temporal range, from the ancient Near East, through the culture of classical antiquity, to the decline of the ancient world. This is also the chronological order in which these papers have been arranged. Readers can just as well substitute this selection with the subject matter criterion: Piotr Briks, Mireille Corbier, Stefan Zawadzki write about the representatives of the ruling house, Aleksey Egorov, Daria Dymskaya, Candice Greggi, Peter Herz, Henryk Kowalski, Katarzyna Maksymiuk, Danuta Okoń, Benet Salway, Stefan Zawadzki about aristocracy, while Christer Bruun, Babett Edelmann-Singer, Michael Sommer, Andrzej Wypustek write about provincial elites.
The authors treat the elites of the ancient world both as a whole and as a group of individuals, with selected figures being presented. Consequently, the work that has emerged is of diverse character, presenting the main topic from various perspectives. This is the very advantage of this publication, as the analyses are not limited to one research area, but offer a valuable holistic approach. We are grateful to all of the authors who contributed to this monograph for the achievement of this effect.
The materials, which for various reasons have not been included in this volume, are to be published in the forthcoming volume already in press.
I hope that the results of the meeting in Szczecin will extend beyond the aforementioned publications and that this cooperation, which has so successfully been initiated, will continue for many years to come.