The present study is based on a systematic research review. Systematic review is to identify, eva... more The present study is based on a systematic research review. Systematic review is to identify, evaluate, and summaries the findings of all relevant studies. Systematic reviews represent one of the most important forms of research evidences upon which clinicians, their patients and policy makers rely when making decisions. The review of literature is significant constituent of the research process and should be carried out in an organized manner. It involves a systematic identification, location and analysis of documents containing information related to the research problem. The reason of reviewing literature is to determine what has already done by the scientific community related to the research problem and to gain a notion regarding different aspects of the subject matter understudy. The major objective of the current study is to conduct a systematic review on Suicidal behavior in borderline Personality disorder among adolescents. To accomplish this objective, it was very important to collect the literature on; (A). Adolescents (B). Suicidal behavior. (C). Borderline personality disorder among adolescents.
Based on the discussion about the role of ethnic history(Volksgeschichte) as a methodically innov... more Based on the discussion about the role of ethnic history(Volksgeschichte) as a methodically innovative approach in German historical research after 1918, this article examines the relationship of ethnically and regionally oriented approaches in the historiography of ...
of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see... more of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see how many people are here.” The film pays attention to the peculiar context of the Roma Holocaust remembrance: the continued persecution of the Roma throughout Europe that is still present today. The film features Raymond Gurême, who was born in a Traveler family in France, and who survived imprisonment in different camps during World War II. The 89-year-old man claims that in September 2014 he was assaulted in his caravan by a French police officer with a baton. As Mr. Gurême concludes: “The French gendarmerie treated us very badly during the war. I think it’s almost the same today.”
... 2. Mai 2007 Editor: L. Cárdenas ... (S. 51) Das Gegenteil ist der Fall: Clemen glaubte an ein... more ... 2. Mai 2007 Editor: L. Cárdenas ... (S. 51) Das Gegenteil ist der Fall: Clemen glaubte an eine Kontinuität der Deutungen, an ewige Gehalte, an eine „unüber-sehbare Reihe von Bildwerken, [..] die ihre Deu-tung von selbst darbieten." [5] Der bei Alois Rie-gl vorbildlich formulierte ...
In National his contribution Socialism in to 1969, the Frantisek German Graus discussion noted on... more In National his contribution Socialism in to 1969, the Frantisek German Graus discussion noted on that Historians historians may and National Socialism in 1969, Fr ntisek Graus noted that historians may have fallen short of the ideal even though they followed the accepted rules of historical research (Graus 94-95). The history of historiography must not restrict itself, therefore, to accounts of the steady accumulation of historical knowledge: it has to pay attention to the social and political context of historians' work. In recent years there have been lively debates amongst German historians, and among the public in general, on the involvement of German historians in Nazi Germany's policy towards the East-Central and Eastern European nations.1 The discussions centre mainly on two points. The first is the political involvement of historians who played an important role in post-war West-German historiography (Aly, 1997 and 1999). The second is the question of modernization: Ostforschung, and in a wider context since the 1920s the concept of Volksgeschichte (ethnic history), appear to be to some extent precursors of modern West-German social history, which seems to run counter to their exponents' reactionary political intentions (Oberkrome, Klesmann). It would be reasonable to inquire whether discussion of these two points seeks to explain the contribution of the historians concerned to the genesis of Hitler's eastern policy, or if such discussions aim primarily at the deconstruction or legitimization of authorities for reasons that may be found within the discipline. This article, however, tries to avoid such present-day problems and concentrates on the role of German Ostforschung within the scholarly discipline of history and on the reconstruction of the place of Baltic history within Ostforschung itself.
of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see... more of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see how many people are here.” The film pays attention to the peculiar context of the Roma Holocaust remembrance: the continued persecution of the Roma throughout Europe that is still present today. The film features Raymond Gurême, who was born in a Traveler family in France, and who survived imprisonment in different camps during World War II. The 89-year-old man claims that in September 2014 he was assaulted in his caravan by a French police officer with a baton. As Mr. Gurême concludes: “The French gendarmerie treated us very badly during the war. I think it’s almost the same today.”
... memory. We should not aspire to judge, but instead try to understand what is going on, becaus... more ... memory. We should not aspire to judge, but instead try to understand what is going on, because this conflict over memory is important not just for Estonia and the other Baltic states, but for the whole of Europe. To understand ...
Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally... more Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally-about the "return of history" to public debates, have produced such an amount of scholarly and essayistic works since the 1980s that is almost impossible to overview. "Coming to terms with the past" has been a major battlefield of German debates for decades and has gained even more public attention since the Historikerstreit in the mid-1980s. With the collapse of the Soviet block, notions of coping with the past have broadened significantly in political and judicial terms. Vergangenheitspolitik has proven to be a more precise term for practical political as well as judicial activities that intend to contain the impact of past crimes and injustice. Past politics as a specific way of coming to terms with the past implies to be closely related to the aftermath of dictatorship in collective memory as well as in history and memory politics. 2 In East European societies, the major concern of past politics has referred to injustice in non-democratic systems in general, with a strong focus on socialist rule. In such a broad reading, past politics is no longer limited to the German debate, but has become a subject of international discussions too. 3 In Germany however, debates concerning the GDR are clearly separated from the discourse on Vergangenheitsbewältigung that refers to the Nazi past, and tendencies of re-nationalizing German history have been critically observed. 4 All three aspects of the (West) German discussion-coming to terms with the past as a major issue of public discourses, past politics in judicial terms and tendencies of re-nationalizing historical narratives-shall serve here as a foil for analyzing East European developments. This article shall outline recent changes of public and historiographical discourses on the Second World War, with a focus on Poland and the Baltic States. After a brief look at postwar perceptions it addresses the impact of the revolutions 1989-1991 and analyzes then in particular how the Holocaust became the key element in the social memories related to World War II. My argument is that in East Central Europe a transnational perspective on the war has emerged, which has challenged national discourses of victimhood as well as traditional Western perceptions of the war and its consequences in Eastern Europe. Without any doubt, there is on the one hand a public interest in discussing the connection between Nazi and Stalinist past as well as comparing their impact in those societies that had experienced both regimes. 5 On the other hand, mémoire collective is becoming increasingly transnational and globalized. 6 Here, the changing notions of the Holocaust, which Daniel Levy and Natan Sznaider have analyzed, have become crucial. 7 The guiding questions focus on the relation between World War II and the five decades of dependence until 1989 in collective memory, to internal and external influences on recent debates and finally to the question to what extent the Holocaust has become a kind of "foundation myth" of a new Europe in the societies of the former Soviet hemisphere. 8
Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally... more Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally-about the "return of history" to public debates, have produced such an amount of scholarly and essayistic works since the 1980s that is almost impossible to overview. "Coming to terms with the past" has been a major battlefield of German debates for decades and has gained even more public attention since the Historikerstreit in the mid-1980s. With the collapse of the Soviet block, notions of coping with the past have broadened significantly in political and judicial terms. Vergangenheitspolitik has proven to be a more precise term for practical political as well as judicial activities that intend to contain the impact of past crimes and injustice. Past politics as a specific way of coming to terms with the past implies to be closely related to the aftermath of dictatorship in collective memory as well as in history and memory politics. 2 In East European societies, the major concern of past politics has referred to injustice in non-democratic systems in general, with a strong focus on socialist rule. In such a broad reading, past politics is no longer limited to the German debate, but has become a subject of international discussions too. 3 In Germany however, debates concerning the GDR are clearly separated from the discourse on Vergangenheitsbewältigung that refers to the Nazi past, and tendencies of re-nationalizing German history have been critically observed. 4 All three aspects of the (West) German discussion-coming to terms with the past as a major issue of public discourses, past politics in judicial terms and tendencies of re-nationalizing historical narratives-shall serve here as a foil for analyzing East European developments. This article shall outline recent changes of public and historiographical discourses on the Second World War, with a focus on Poland and the Baltic States. After a brief look at postwar perceptions it addresses the impact of the revolutions 1989-1991 and analyzes then in particular how the Holocaust became the key element in the social memories related to World War II. My argument is that in East Central Europe a transnational perspective on the war has emerged, which has challenged national discourses of victimhood as well as traditional Western perceptions of the war and its consequences in Eastern Europe. Without any doubt, there is on the one hand a public interest in discussing the connection between Nazi and Stalinist past as well as comparing their impact in those societies that had experienced both regimes. 5 On the other hand, mémoire collective is becoming increasingly transnational and globalized. 6 Here, the changing notions of the Holocaust, which Daniel Levy and Natan Sznaider have analyzed, have become crucial. 7 The guiding questions focus on the relation between World War II and the five decades of dependence until 1989 in collective memory, to internal and external influences on recent debates and finally to the question to what extent the Holocaust has become a kind of "foundation myth" of a new Europe in the societies of the former Soviet hemisphere. 8
This article analyzes the impact of small nations on the constitution of a historical region in N... more This article analyzes the impact of small nations on the constitution of a historical region in North Eastern Europe. It is shown that the small nations' drive for emancipation, self-determination, and independence from the surrounding large states formed the backbone of regional discourses in the Baltic Sea region since the beginning twentieth century. Similar features may be noticed already in the older discourse on “Norden”. After the realization of a Baltic League failed in the 1920s, and as the East Baltic states remained outside the “Nordic” unity, the “Baltic” issue consequently shrunk to the three Baltic states. For they continued to keep the notion of a Baltic Sea region in cultural and historical terms alive, North Eastern Europe may be identified as the centre of historical discourses on Baltic sea region-building, which is based on similar social values as in the Nordic nations.
The Baltic Sea Region as a Historical Region: Klaus Zernack's Concept of North Eastern Europe The... more The Baltic Sea Region as a Historical Region: Klaus Zernack's Concept of North Eastern Europe The article presents and discusses the historiographical concept of North Eastern Europe which has been coined by the German historian Klaus Zernack (1931-2017). Firstly, the article looks into the origins of the term, which date back to the nineteenth century, and stresses the significance of the research on the multicultural region of Old Livonia conducted by the Estonian-German historian Paul Johansen. His findings turned out to be crucial for shaping Zernack's understanding of the concept of North Eastern Europe, which is discussed in the second part of the text. Zernack first referred to the term in his research on early modern Swedish-Russian diplomatic relations, but in various articles published subsequently he expanded his understanding of North Eastern Europe to comprise the multicultural history and political entanglements of the whole Baltic Sea region. The third part of the article discusses the impact of Zernack's notion. In contrast with the influence he had on shaping the historiographical concept of East Central Europe within German scholarship, North Eastern Europe as a historical region has not gained similar traction among scholars. This may be explained by three factors. Firstly, the Baltic Sea region has once more become a more convincing geographical term, also in international scholarly discussion, especially when compared to Zernack's deliberately artificial term. Secondly, the notion of Norden, in particular since the 1990s, has expanded to incorporate the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and thus started, at least partly, to compete with North Eastern Europe. Thirdly, the concept of North Eastern Europe has been ambiguous by a reference to, on the one hand, only the eastern part of the Baltic Sea region and, on the other hand, to this whole region. Thus, North Eastern Europe proves to be an epistemologically stimulating notion that, however, is more difficult to handle outside scholarly debates.
The present study is based on a systematic research review. Systematic review is to identify, eva... more The present study is based on a systematic research review. Systematic review is to identify, evaluate, and summaries the findings of all relevant studies. Systematic reviews represent one of the most important forms of research evidences upon which clinicians, their patients and policy makers rely when making decisions. The review of literature is significant constituent of the research process and should be carried out in an organized manner. It involves a systematic identification, location and analysis of documents containing information related to the research problem. The reason of reviewing literature is to determine what has already done by the scientific community related to the research problem and to gain a notion regarding different aspects of the subject matter understudy. The major objective of the current study is to conduct a systematic review on Suicidal behavior in borderline Personality disorder among adolescents. To accomplish this objective, it was very important to collect the literature on; (A). Adolescents (B). Suicidal behavior. (C). Borderline personality disorder among adolescents.
Based on the discussion about the role of ethnic history(Volksgeschichte) as a methodically innov... more Based on the discussion about the role of ethnic history(Volksgeschichte) as a methodically innovative approach in German historical research after 1918, this article examines the relationship of ethnically and regionally oriented approaches in the historiography of ...
of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see... more of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see how many people are here.” The film pays attention to the peculiar context of the Roma Holocaust remembrance: the continued persecution of the Roma throughout Europe that is still present today. The film features Raymond Gurême, who was born in a Traveler family in France, and who survived imprisonment in different camps during World War II. The 89-year-old man claims that in September 2014 he was assaulted in his caravan by a French police officer with a baton. As Mr. Gurême concludes: “The French gendarmerie treated us very badly during the war. I think it’s almost the same today.”
... 2. Mai 2007 Editor: L. Cárdenas ... (S. 51) Das Gegenteil ist der Fall: Clemen glaubte an ein... more ... 2. Mai 2007 Editor: L. Cárdenas ... (S. 51) Das Gegenteil ist der Fall: Clemen glaubte an eine Kontinuität der Deutungen, an ewige Gehalte, an eine „unüber-sehbare Reihe von Bildwerken, [..] die ihre Deu-tung von selbst darbieten." [5] Der bei Alois Rie-gl vorbildlich formulierte ...
In National his contribution Socialism in to 1969, the Frantisek German Graus discussion noted on... more In National his contribution Socialism in to 1969, the Frantisek German Graus discussion noted on that Historians historians may and National Socialism in 1969, Fr ntisek Graus noted that historians may have fallen short of the ideal even though they followed the accepted rules of historical research (Graus 94-95). The history of historiography must not restrict itself, therefore, to accounts of the steady accumulation of historical knowledge: it has to pay attention to the social and political context of historians' work. In recent years there have been lively debates amongst German historians, and among the public in general, on the involvement of German historians in Nazi Germany's policy towards the East-Central and Eastern European nations.1 The discussions centre mainly on two points. The first is the political involvement of historians who played an important role in post-war West-German historiography (Aly, 1997 and 1999). The second is the question of modernization: Ostforschung, and in a wider context since the 1920s the concept of Volksgeschichte (ethnic history), appear to be to some extent precursors of modern West-German social history, which seems to run counter to their exponents' reactionary political intentions (Oberkrome, Klesmann). It would be reasonable to inquire whether discussion of these two points seeks to explain the contribution of the historians concerned to the genesis of Hitler's eastern policy, or if such discussions aim primarily at the deconstruction or legitimization of authorities for reasons that may be found within the discipline. This article, however, tries to avoid such present-day problems and concentrates on the role of German Ostforschung within the scholarly discipline of history and on the reconstruction of the place of Baltic history within Ostforschung itself.
of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see... more of genocide. The [Czech] government will exhume the mass graves [in Lety u Písku] and we will see how many people are here.” The film pays attention to the peculiar context of the Roma Holocaust remembrance: the continued persecution of the Roma throughout Europe that is still present today. The film features Raymond Gurême, who was born in a Traveler family in France, and who survived imprisonment in different camps during World War II. The 89-year-old man claims that in September 2014 he was assaulted in his caravan by a French police officer with a baton. As Mr. Gurême concludes: “The French gendarmerie treated us very badly during the war. I think it’s almost the same today.”
... memory. We should not aspire to judge, but instead try to understand what is going on, becaus... more ... memory. We should not aspire to judge, but instead try to understand what is going on, because this conflict over memory is important not just for Estonia and the other Baltic states, but for the whole of Europe. To understand ...
Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally... more Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally-about the "return of history" to public debates, have produced such an amount of scholarly and essayistic works since the 1980s that is almost impossible to overview. "Coming to terms with the past" has been a major battlefield of German debates for decades and has gained even more public attention since the Historikerstreit in the mid-1980s. With the collapse of the Soviet block, notions of coping with the past have broadened significantly in political and judicial terms. Vergangenheitspolitik has proven to be a more precise term for practical political as well as judicial activities that intend to contain the impact of past crimes and injustice. Past politics as a specific way of coming to terms with the past implies to be closely related to the aftermath of dictatorship in collective memory as well as in history and memory politics. 2 In East European societies, the major concern of past politics has referred to injustice in non-democratic systems in general, with a strong focus on socialist rule. In such a broad reading, past politics is no longer limited to the German debate, but has become a subject of international discussions too. 3 In Germany however, debates concerning the GDR are clearly separated from the discourse on Vergangenheitsbewältigung that refers to the Nazi past, and tendencies of re-nationalizing German history have been critically observed. 4 All three aspects of the (West) German discussion-coming to terms with the past as a major issue of public discourses, past politics in judicial terms and tendencies of re-nationalizing historical narratives-shall serve here as a foil for analyzing East European developments. This article shall outline recent changes of public and historiographical discourses on the Second World War, with a focus on Poland and the Baltic States. After a brief look at postwar perceptions it addresses the impact of the revolutions 1989-1991 and analyzes then in particular how the Holocaust became the key element in the social memories related to World War II. My argument is that in East Central Europe a transnational perspective on the war has emerged, which has challenged national discourses of victimhood as well as traditional Western perceptions of the war and its consequences in Eastern Europe. Without any doubt, there is on the one hand a public interest in discussing the connection between Nazi and Stalinist past as well as comparing their impact in those societies that had experienced both regimes. 5 On the other hand, mémoire collective is becoming increasingly transnational and globalized. 6 Here, the changing notions of the Holocaust, which Daniel Levy and Natan Sznaider have analyzed, have become crucial. 7 The guiding questions focus on the relation between World War II and the five decades of dependence until 1989 in collective memory, to internal and external influences on recent debates and finally to the question to what extent the Holocaust has become a kind of "foundation myth" of a new Europe in the societies of the former Soviet hemisphere. 8
Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally... more Discussions about Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit and Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1 ormore generally-about the "return of history" to public debates, have produced such an amount of scholarly and essayistic works since the 1980s that is almost impossible to overview. "Coming to terms with the past" has been a major battlefield of German debates for decades and has gained even more public attention since the Historikerstreit in the mid-1980s. With the collapse of the Soviet block, notions of coping with the past have broadened significantly in political and judicial terms. Vergangenheitspolitik has proven to be a more precise term for practical political as well as judicial activities that intend to contain the impact of past crimes and injustice. Past politics as a specific way of coming to terms with the past implies to be closely related to the aftermath of dictatorship in collective memory as well as in history and memory politics. 2 In East European societies, the major concern of past politics has referred to injustice in non-democratic systems in general, with a strong focus on socialist rule. In such a broad reading, past politics is no longer limited to the German debate, but has become a subject of international discussions too. 3 In Germany however, debates concerning the GDR are clearly separated from the discourse on Vergangenheitsbewältigung that refers to the Nazi past, and tendencies of re-nationalizing German history have been critically observed. 4 All three aspects of the (West) German discussion-coming to terms with the past as a major issue of public discourses, past politics in judicial terms and tendencies of re-nationalizing historical narratives-shall serve here as a foil for analyzing East European developments. This article shall outline recent changes of public and historiographical discourses on the Second World War, with a focus on Poland and the Baltic States. After a brief look at postwar perceptions it addresses the impact of the revolutions 1989-1991 and analyzes then in particular how the Holocaust became the key element in the social memories related to World War II. My argument is that in East Central Europe a transnational perspective on the war has emerged, which has challenged national discourses of victimhood as well as traditional Western perceptions of the war and its consequences in Eastern Europe. Without any doubt, there is on the one hand a public interest in discussing the connection between Nazi and Stalinist past as well as comparing their impact in those societies that had experienced both regimes. 5 On the other hand, mémoire collective is becoming increasingly transnational and globalized. 6 Here, the changing notions of the Holocaust, which Daniel Levy and Natan Sznaider have analyzed, have become crucial. 7 The guiding questions focus on the relation between World War II and the five decades of dependence until 1989 in collective memory, to internal and external influences on recent debates and finally to the question to what extent the Holocaust has become a kind of "foundation myth" of a new Europe in the societies of the former Soviet hemisphere. 8
This article analyzes the impact of small nations on the constitution of a historical region in N... more This article analyzes the impact of small nations on the constitution of a historical region in North Eastern Europe. It is shown that the small nations' drive for emancipation, self-determination, and independence from the surrounding large states formed the backbone of regional discourses in the Baltic Sea region since the beginning twentieth century. Similar features may be noticed already in the older discourse on “Norden”. After the realization of a Baltic League failed in the 1920s, and as the East Baltic states remained outside the “Nordic” unity, the “Baltic” issue consequently shrunk to the three Baltic states. For they continued to keep the notion of a Baltic Sea region in cultural and historical terms alive, North Eastern Europe may be identified as the centre of historical discourses on Baltic sea region-building, which is based on similar social values as in the Nordic nations.
The Baltic Sea Region as a Historical Region: Klaus Zernack's Concept of North Eastern Europe The... more The Baltic Sea Region as a Historical Region: Klaus Zernack's Concept of North Eastern Europe The article presents and discusses the historiographical concept of North Eastern Europe which has been coined by the German historian Klaus Zernack (1931-2017). Firstly, the article looks into the origins of the term, which date back to the nineteenth century, and stresses the significance of the research on the multicultural region of Old Livonia conducted by the Estonian-German historian Paul Johansen. His findings turned out to be crucial for shaping Zernack's understanding of the concept of North Eastern Europe, which is discussed in the second part of the text. Zernack first referred to the term in his research on early modern Swedish-Russian diplomatic relations, but in various articles published subsequently he expanded his understanding of North Eastern Europe to comprise the multicultural history and political entanglements of the whole Baltic Sea region. The third part of the article discusses the impact of Zernack's notion. In contrast with the influence he had on shaping the historiographical concept of East Central Europe within German scholarship, North Eastern Europe as a historical region has not gained similar traction among scholars. This may be explained by three factors. Firstly, the Baltic Sea region has once more become a more convincing geographical term, also in international scholarly discussion, especially when compared to Zernack's deliberately artificial term. Secondly, the notion of Norden, in particular since the 1990s, has expanded to incorporate the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and thus started, at least partly, to compete with North Eastern Europe. Thirdly, the concept of North Eastern Europe has been ambiguous by a reference to, on the one hand, only the eastern part of the Baltic Sea region and, on the other hand, to this whole region. Thus, North Eastern Europe proves to be an epistemologically stimulating notion that, however, is more difficult to handle outside scholarly debates.
Politics of History (Geschichtspolitik) has become a major catchword in the Polish public discour... more Politics of History (Geschichtspolitik) has become a major catchword in the Polish public discourse since 2000, when the debate on the wartime murder of the Jews from the town of Jedwabne began. Since then a politicized culture of remembrance has developed in Poland, which is most visible in various new and internationally proclaimed historical museums.
Public commemoration of World War II resembles the giant Tur Tur from Michael Ende's novel " Jim ... more Public commemoration of World War II resembles the giant Tur Tur from Michael Ende's novel " Jim Button " : The farther it is, the bigger it appears. In the first years after 1989, the re-emergence of national identity discourses in East Central Europe and the striving for integration into western political structures were both based on a departure from Soviet narratives of World War II and thus parallel running. Discussions about lessons from the past, however, did not end with NATO and EU enlargement. Instead of an end of history one sees on the contrary that rather diverging political strategies are built upon contested collective memories in East Central Europe during the last years. Besides legal arguments derived from World War II are still alive as well. This presentation will focus on those discourses related to World War II, first of all in Poland and the Baltic states that have an impact on recent political strategies. Here, debates on the Holo-caust, on national victimhood and collaboration are addressed as major points. The paper concludes with a discussion whether such discourses tend to prolong older lines of conflicts, whether they reflect functionalist strategies of acquiring an " entry ticket " to Western political structures, or whether they contribute to new, transnational forms of commemoration and cooperation.
Михаил Попович: Продолжая обсуждение проблемы, поставленной Алексеем Мартынюком, я бы хотел приве... more Михаил Попович: Продолжая обсуждение проблемы, поставленной Алексеем Мартынюком, я бы хотел привести пример нового подхода к изучению Slavia Byzantina в парадигме глобальной истории. В марте 2019 г. в Филадельфии состоялась 94-я встреча ассоциации «Medieval Academy of America», посвященная проблематике «Глобального поворота в медиевистике». Во время дискуссии был выдвинут тезис, что медиевистика может быть осмыслена не только как научная дисциплина, но и как исторический и культурный феномен, охватывающий не только научное пространство Европы, но также и такие регионы, как Ближний Восток, Восточная и Южная Азия, Африка и Америка. Сегодня мы постоянно слышим, как многие коллеги-историки в своих профессиональных работах, а также в масс-медиа и в сети Интернет говорят о таком феномене как «глобальное Средневековье».
Uploads
Papers by Jörg Hackmann