
Amber Benezra
Washington University in St. Louis, Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Visiting Researcher
Assistant Professor of STS in the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Science at Stevens Institute of Technology and the Farber Junior Faculty Fellow in STS.
Amber Benezra is a sociocultural anthropologist researching how studies of the human microbiome intersect with biomedical ethics, public health/technological infrastructures, and care. In partnership with human microbial ecologists, she is developing an "anthropology of microbes" to address global health problems across disciplines.
Her book Gut Anthro was published by University of Minnesota Press in May 2023. Gut Anthro is an account of fieldwork collaborating with human microbial ecologists studying gut microbes and malnutrition. The book explores what it means to collaborate interdisciplinarily, facing the corresponding compromises and uncertainties, challenges and failures. What would it mean for anthropology to act with science? Gut Anthro follows microbes through various enactments in scientific research—microbes as kin, as data, and as race. Gut Anthro is a tour de force of science studies and medical anthropology as well as an intensely personal and deeply theoretical account of what it means to do anthropology today.
https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/gut-anthro
Amber Benezra is a sociocultural anthropologist researching how studies of the human microbiome intersect with biomedical ethics, public health/technological infrastructures, and care. In partnership with human microbial ecologists, she is developing an "anthropology of microbes" to address global health problems across disciplines.
Her book Gut Anthro was published by University of Minnesota Press in May 2023. Gut Anthro is an account of fieldwork collaborating with human microbial ecologists studying gut microbes and malnutrition. The book explores what it means to collaborate interdisciplinarily, facing the corresponding compromises and uncertainties, challenges and failures. What would it mean for anthropology to act with science? Gut Anthro follows microbes through various enactments in scientific research—microbes as kin, as data, and as race. Gut Anthro is a tour de force of science studies and medical anthropology as well as an intensely personal and deeply theoretical account of what it means to do anthropology today.
https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/gut-anthro
less
Related Authors
Amanda Lewis
Washington University in St. Louis
Alejandra B Osorio
Wellesley College
Andrea Peto
Central European University
Stephen Muecke
University of Notre Dame (Australia)
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Giulia Sissa
Ucla
Florin Curta
University of Florida
Rob S E A N Wilson
University of California, Santa Cruz
Manuel Tironi
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Stephen Whittle
Manchester Metropolitan University
InterestsView All (14)
Uploads
Books by Amber Benezra
As lab scientists studied the interrelationships between gut microbes and malnutrition in resource-poor countries, Amber Benezra explored ways to reconcile the scale and speed differences between the lab, the intimate biosocial practices of Bangladeshi mothers and their children, and the looming structural violence of poverty. In vital ways, Gut Anthro is about what it means to collaborate—with mothers, local field researchers in Bangladesh, massive philanthropic global health organizations, the microbiome scientists, and, of course, with microbes. It follows microbes through various enactments in scientific research—microbes as kin, as data, and as race. Revealing how racial categories are used in microbiome research, Benezra argues that microbial differences need transdisciplinary collaboration to address racial health disparities without reifying race as a straightforward biological or social designation.
Gut Anthro is a tour de force of science studies and medical anthropology as well as an intensely personal and deeply theoretical account of what it means to do anthropology today.
Papers by Amber Benezra
The human microbiome is an important emergent area of cross, multi and transdisciplinary study. The complexity of this topic leads to conflicting narratives and regulatory challenges. It raises questions about the benefits of its commercialisation and drives debates about alternative models for engaging with its publics, patients and other potential beneficiaries. The social sciences and the humanities have begun to explore the microbiome as an object of empirical study and as an opportunity for theoretical innovation. They can play an important role in facilitating the development of research that is socially relevant, that incorporates cultural norms and expectations around microbes and that investigates how social and biological lives intersect. This is a propitious moment to establish lines of collaboration in the study of the microbiome that incorporate the concerns and capabilities of the social sciences and the humanities together with those of the natural sciences and relevant stakeholders outside academia. This paper presents an agenda for the engagement of the social sciences with microbiome research and its implications for public policy and social change. Our methods were informed by existing multidisciplinary science-policy agenda-setting exercises. We recruited 36 academics and stakeholders and asked them to produce a list of important questions about the microbiome that were in need of further social science research. We refined this initial list into an agenda of 32 questions and organised them into eight themes that both complement and extend existing research trajectories. This agenda was further developed through a structured workshop where 21 of our participants refined the agenda and reflected on the challenges and the limitations of the exercise itself. The agenda identifies the need for research that addresses the implications of the human microbiome for human health, public health, public and private sector research and notions of self and identity. It also suggests new lines of research sensitive to the complexity and heterogeneity of human-microbiome relations, and how these intersect with questions of environmental governance, social and spatial inequality and public engagement with science.
and philosophy of science is beginning to take
particular notice of microbial life. The works
examined here attempt to address these aliens among
(and within) us from different scientific and ethical
standpoints.
As lab scientists studied the interrelationships between gut microbes and malnutrition in resource-poor countries, Amber Benezra explored ways to reconcile the scale and speed differences between the lab, the intimate biosocial practices of Bangladeshi mothers and their children, and the looming structural violence of poverty. In vital ways, Gut Anthro is about what it means to collaborate—with mothers, local field researchers in Bangladesh, massive philanthropic global health organizations, the microbiome scientists, and, of course, with microbes. It follows microbes through various enactments in scientific research—microbes as kin, as data, and as race. Revealing how racial categories are used in microbiome research, Benezra argues that microbial differences need transdisciplinary collaboration to address racial health disparities without reifying race as a straightforward biological or social designation.
Gut Anthro is a tour de force of science studies and medical anthropology as well as an intensely personal and deeply theoretical account of what it means to do anthropology today.
The human microbiome is an important emergent area of cross, multi and transdisciplinary study. The complexity of this topic leads to conflicting narratives and regulatory challenges. It raises questions about the benefits of its commercialisation and drives debates about alternative models for engaging with its publics, patients and other potential beneficiaries. The social sciences and the humanities have begun to explore the microbiome as an object of empirical study and as an opportunity for theoretical innovation. They can play an important role in facilitating the development of research that is socially relevant, that incorporates cultural norms and expectations around microbes and that investigates how social and biological lives intersect. This is a propitious moment to establish lines of collaboration in the study of the microbiome that incorporate the concerns and capabilities of the social sciences and the humanities together with those of the natural sciences and relevant stakeholders outside academia. This paper presents an agenda for the engagement of the social sciences with microbiome research and its implications for public policy and social change. Our methods were informed by existing multidisciplinary science-policy agenda-setting exercises. We recruited 36 academics and stakeholders and asked them to produce a list of important questions about the microbiome that were in need of further social science research. We refined this initial list into an agenda of 32 questions and organised them into eight themes that both complement and extend existing research trajectories. This agenda was further developed through a structured workshop where 21 of our participants refined the agenda and reflected on the challenges and the limitations of the exercise itself. The agenda identifies the need for research that addresses the implications of the human microbiome for human health, public health, public and private sector research and notions of self and identity. It also suggests new lines of research sensitive to the complexity and heterogeneity of human-microbiome relations, and how these intersect with questions of environmental governance, social and spatial inequality and public engagement with science.
and philosophy of science is beginning to take
particular notice of microbial life. The works
examined here attempt to address these aliens among
(and within) us from different scientific and ethical
standpoints.
by Diana Crow