{"@attributes":{"version":"2.0"},"channel":{"title":"DrwhoLand Games","link":"https:\/\/station-5.livejournal.com\/","description":"DrwhoLand Games - LiveJournal.com","lastBuildDate":"Sun, 09 May 2010 04:54:19 GMT","generator":"LiveJournal \/ LiveJournal.com","item":{"guid":"https:\/\/station-5.livejournal.com\/5401.html","pubDate":"Sun, 09 May 2010 04:54:19 GMT","title":"Apples to Apples Part 3 - Read if you signed up! (Though you can also participate if you didn't.)","author":"crumplysnorkack","link":"https:\/\/station-5.livejournal.com\/5401.html","description":"Name: Apples to Apples (Part 3)
Due Date: Saturday, May 15, 11 PM EST\/Sunday, May 16, 4 AM GMT
I'm about to post the adjectives with the subjects.
Not everybody gave me their subjects. They'll still get a chance to judge, but if they don't respond, I'll either randomize the winner or open it to voting.
View Poll: #1562032<\/a><\/div>
Rules\/How to submit:<\/b> I will reply to this post with one comment per player. (Your name will be in the subject line of the comment meant for you.) Each of these comments will have an adjective and a list of subjects all the other players submitted for it. Your job--for the post that has your name on it--is to be the judge. Pick the subject you feel is best and\/or most amusingly described by the adjective by replying to that post. Everyone will get to judge one set of subjects.
If the comment does not have your name in the subject line, you are not the judge.
Judges:<\/b> Your job is to pick the subject you think is best--or most amusingly--described by the adjective. So you could pick \"being exterminated\" as a winner for \"terrifying,\" because it's true, or you could pick \"Daleks in Manhattan,\" because it's funny. Or any other reason. It really doesn't matter--it can be as ridiculous or as serious as you want it to be; it's up to you.
You may want to wait to pick a winner to give people a chance to try to persuade you, though they may try to persuade you after you've made your decision. You may also change you decision as long as you do it before the deadline.
You don't have to justify your decision, but you can if you feel like it. Include as lengthy or as short an explanation for it as you want.
Non-Judges:<\/b> You may reply to the comment anonymously<\/b>, trying to sway the judge. The anonymity is just so your team isn't what sways the judge's decision. You can try to persuade the judge to pick your word, or not to pick another, or just pick one you like, even if you haven't participated so far. That's right, everyone can do this part, even if you never signed up. Anyone should feel free to discuss or debate. Get as silly or as serious as you want. Just keep it anonymous if you're not the judge. (And, just in case it needs saying, don't reveal your team to the judge.) You can keep trying to persuade the judge as long as you want, even after her or she has made a decision.
Feel free to use images, videos, or whatever you deem suitable to make your point.
Points:<\/b>
10 points if you participated in both parts
10 points if your entry is chosen
Hopefully this will work; I'll do my best to count, but I don't want to promise points here just in case:<\/i>
5 points for discussing with other players--5 points for each comment, but the maximum is 15. You can comment more than three times, though; you just won't get points for it. You can do this even if you haven't signed up! You'll just need to tell me that it was you at this thread, as soon as possible<\/a> so I have everyone's IPs in one place. (Make sure you read that thread, and post there every time your IP changes.
Team Comms:<\/b> Do not discuss this challenge in the team comms. We don't want to bias the judges.
Comments are screened just so I can make sure people are posting anonymously when they should be\/not accidentally revealing any information.
Questions can be posted to this thread.<\/a>","comments":"https:\/\/station-5.livejournal.com\/5401.html?view=comments#comments","category":["apples to apples","challenge"]}}}