
Vanja Hamzić
Vanja Hamzić is Reader in Law, History and Anthropology at SOAS University of London. He holds two First Class Honours degrees from the University of Sarajevo, an LLM with Distinction from the University of Nottingham and a PhD from King’s College London. He has worked as an activist and researcher with various international and civil society organisations in South and Southeast Asia, Europe, the Middle East and West and South Africa. Before coming to SOAS, Dr Hamzić held academic posts at City, University of London and King’s College London.
The bulk of Dr Hamzić’s legal, anthropological and historical research addresses issues in human subjectivity formation—especially those related to gender, sexual, racial, class, linguistic and religious difference—with the principal fieldwork sites in Pakistan, Indonesia, Senegal and Louisiana. While the focus of Dr Hamzić’s work has been, for quite some time, the Islamic legal tradition, both in its historical and present-day diversity, he is also interested in how some of its strands have influenced (and, in some cases, moulded into) other South Asian, South East Asian, West African and circum-Atlantic traditions. Dr Hamzić’s work to date has particularly sought to shed new light on how gender-variant individuals and communities—such as khwajasara in Pakistan, waria and others in Indonesia as well as numerous historical identitary formations across West Africa—have braved the turbulent tides of racial capitalism, colonialism, slavery and other legally-sanctioned oppression and how, in turn, they have developed and abided by multiple manifestations of insurrectionary vernacular knowledge (about themselves and the world at large). It is this knowledge and being-in-the-world—often preserved in oral traditions, rites of passage and rituals of the everyday—that has survived not only the epistemic and literal violence of the nation-state and its legal institutions, but the sustained ‘will to disappear’ in the colonial and post-colonial archive, too.
Dr Hamzić is also interested in, and has contributed to, current transnational debates on legal and social theory, human rights, Marxist and postcolonial and decolonial studies, the Cold War, feminist legal theory, global law/governance studies, social anthropology and philosophy. In this context, he has written about alegality, distemporalities, legal violence, Third World feminisms and queer theory, homeliness, touch, Muslim Marxism, the unknowable, the Lacanian Real and other critical concepts.
Dr Hamzić’s current book-length project addresses gender variance and cosmological and legal pluralism in eighteenth-century Senegambia as well as the ways the enslaved gender-variant West Africans have survived the Middle Passage and ‘New World’ gender regimes, in particular that of colonial (i.e. first French and then Spanish) Louisiana. The project seeks to develop an interruptive approach to circum-Atlantic colonial and post-colonial history-making and to critically address the question of archival silences.
Dr Hamzić is a co-founder and former Co-Chair of the Centre for Ottoman Studies at SOAS and a member of a number of other SOAS research centres. He was a long-time Faculty Member of the Institute for Global Law and Policy at Harvard Law School and a Researcher of the International State Crime Initiative at Queen Mary University of London. Dr Hamzić is also an Associate Academic Fellow of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple. In the academic year 2016-17, he was a Residential Member of the School of Social Science in the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton.
____
Phone: +44 (0)20 7898 4501
Address: SOAS University of London
Thornhaugh St, Russell Sq
London WC1H 0XG
The bulk of Dr Hamzić’s legal, anthropological and historical research addresses issues in human subjectivity formation—especially those related to gender, sexual, racial, class, linguistic and religious difference—with the principal fieldwork sites in Pakistan, Indonesia, Senegal and Louisiana. While the focus of Dr Hamzić’s work has been, for quite some time, the Islamic legal tradition, both in its historical and present-day diversity, he is also interested in how some of its strands have influenced (and, in some cases, moulded into) other South Asian, South East Asian, West African and circum-Atlantic traditions. Dr Hamzić’s work to date has particularly sought to shed new light on how gender-variant individuals and communities—such as khwajasara in Pakistan, waria and others in Indonesia as well as numerous historical identitary formations across West Africa—have braved the turbulent tides of racial capitalism, colonialism, slavery and other legally-sanctioned oppression and how, in turn, they have developed and abided by multiple manifestations of insurrectionary vernacular knowledge (about themselves and the world at large). It is this knowledge and being-in-the-world—often preserved in oral traditions, rites of passage and rituals of the everyday—that has survived not only the epistemic and literal violence of the nation-state and its legal institutions, but the sustained ‘will to disappear’ in the colonial and post-colonial archive, too.
Dr Hamzić is also interested in, and has contributed to, current transnational debates on legal and social theory, human rights, Marxist and postcolonial and decolonial studies, the Cold War, feminist legal theory, global law/governance studies, social anthropology and philosophy. In this context, he has written about alegality, distemporalities, legal violence, Third World feminisms and queer theory, homeliness, touch, Muslim Marxism, the unknowable, the Lacanian Real and other critical concepts.
Dr Hamzić’s current book-length project addresses gender variance and cosmological and legal pluralism in eighteenth-century Senegambia as well as the ways the enslaved gender-variant West Africans have survived the Middle Passage and ‘New World’ gender regimes, in particular that of colonial (i.e. first French and then Spanish) Louisiana. The project seeks to develop an interruptive approach to circum-Atlantic colonial and post-colonial history-making and to critically address the question of archival silences.
Dr Hamzić is a co-founder and former Co-Chair of the Centre for Ottoman Studies at SOAS and a member of a number of other SOAS research centres. He was a long-time Faculty Member of the Institute for Global Law and Policy at Harvard Law School and a Researcher of the International State Crime Initiative at Queen Mary University of London. Dr Hamzić is also an Associate Academic Fellow of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple. In the academic year 2016-17, he was a Residential Member of the School of Social Science in the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton.
____
Phone: +44 (0)20 7898 4501
Address: SOAS University of London
Thornhaugh St, Russell Sq
London WC1H 0XG
less
Related Authors
Lucy Durán
SOAS University of London
Toby Green
King's College London
Dexter Story
University of California, Los Angeles
Timothy Mangin
Boston College
alice bellagamba
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Tara A . Dudley
The University of Texas at Austin
Douglas Thomas
State University of New York @ Brockport
Sharon F Kivenko
Tufts University
John Gillespie Jr.
University of California, Irvine
Avery R Everhart
University of British Columbia
InterestsView All (31)
Uploads
Edited Books by Vanja Hamzić
The unknowable, often loosely described as that what is left behind (and yet remains) once we have chartered our lifeworlds, or lifeworlds of others we seek to know, is by no means a new concept. As I show in this essay, the unknowable has resurfaced as an idea in social anthropology and has found renewed salience in continental philosophy. Its application to political theory, on the other hand, holds the promise of resistance to the notion that politics is (ever) an ontology. In an eclectic survey of each of these fields of inquiry, I will endeavor to demonstrate that the unknowable is typically seen as a condition of reality—it’s a thing in that it is thinkable as thing or, for some, as things. My choice of authors and their disciplinary leanings is guided by their theoretical reliance on thing(s) and a certain cross-disciplinary structuralist tradition that regards reality as consisting of definable clusters—including the cluster of the unknowable. Perhaps this should be said right away: to me, a critique of the unknowable makes sense precisely inasmuch as it can reveal the failures of structuralism to account for reality’s ostensible clusters. Reality is messy and so is the unknowable. And, because of this, our disciplines are ultimately unable to deal with the unknowable in a structured, premeditative way. That’s not a bad thing. Instead, this simply shows that our disciplines are ripe for re-imagination and our critical pursuits in need of recalibration towards a much messier understanding of what can and what cannot be known.
Books by Vanja Hamzić
Table of Contents
1. Richard Falk ~ Foreword: Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) special issue
2. Usha Natarajan, John Reynolds, Amar Bhatia & Sujith Xavier ~ Introduction: TWAIL - On Praxis and the Intellectual
3. Georges Abi-Saab ~ The Third World Intellectual in Praxis: Confrontation, Participation, or Operation behind Enemy Lines?
4. Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah ~ On Fighting for Global Justice: The Role of a Third World International Lawyer
5. Nesrine Badawi ~ Regulation of Armed Conflict: Critical Comparativism
6. Reem Bahdi & Mudar Kassis ~ Decolonisation, Dignity and Development Aid: A Judicial Education Experience in Palestine
7. Ali Hammoudi ~ The Conjunctural in International Law: The Revolutionary Struggle against Semi-Peripheral Sovereignty in Iraq
8. Vanja Hamzic ~ Mir-Said Sultan-Galiev and the Idea of Muslim Marxism: Empire, Third World(s) and Praxis
9. Adil Hasan Khan ~ International Lawyers in the Aftermath of Disasters: Inheriting from Radhabinod Pal and Upendra Baxi
10. Zoran Oklopcic ~ The South of Western Constitutionalism: A Map ahead of a Journey
11. John Reynolds ~ Disrupting Civility: Amateur Intellectuals, International Lawyers and TWAIL as Praxis
12. Adrian A Smith ~ Migration, Development and Security within Racialised Global Capitalism: Refusing the Balance Game
Contents
1. Foreword: Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL)
Richard Falk
2. Introduction: TWAIL - on praxis and the intellectual
Usha Natarajan, John Reynolds, Amar Bhatia and Sujith Xavier
3. The Third World intellectual in praxis: confrontation, participation, or operation behind enemy lines?
Georges Abi-Saab
4. On fighting for global justice: the role of a Third World international lawyer
M. Sornarajah
5. Regulation of armed conflict: critical comparativism
Nesrine Badawi
6. Decolonisation, dignity and development aid: a judicial education experience in Palestine
Reem Bahdi and Mudar Kassis
7. The conjunctural in international law: the revolutionary struggle against semi-peripheral sovereignty in Iraq
Ali Hammoudi
8. Mir-Said Sultan-Galiev and the idea of Muslim Marxism: empire, Third World(s) and praxis
Vanja Hamzic
9. International lawyers in the aftermath of disasters: inheriting from Radhabinod Pal and Upendra Baxi
Adil Hasan Khan
10. The South of Western constitutionalism: a map ahead of a journey
Zoran Oklopcic
11. Disrupting civility: amateur intellectuals, international lawyers and TWAIL as praxis
John Reynolds
12. Migration, development and security within racialised global capitalism: refusing the balance game
Adrian A. Smith
Papers by Vanja Hamzić
The unknowable, often loosely described as that what is left behind (and yet remains) once we have chartered our lifeworlds, or lifeworlds of others we seek to know, is by no means a new concept. As I show in this essay, the unknowable has resurfaced as an idea in social anthropology and has found renewed salience in continental philosophy. Its application to political theory, on the other hand, holds the promise of resistance to the notion that politics is (ever) an ontology. In an eclectic survey of each of these fields of inquiry, I will endeavor to demonstrate that the unknowable is typically seen as a condition of reality—it’s a thing in that it is thinkable as thing or, for some, as things. My choice of authors and their disciplinary leanings is guided by their theoretical reliance on thing(s) and a certain cross-disciplinary structuralist tradition that regards reality as consisting of definable clusters—including the cluster of the unknowable. Perhaps this should be said right away: to me, a critique of the unknowable makes sense precisely inasmuch as it can reveal the failures of structuralism to account for reality’s ostensible clusters. Reality is messy and so is the unknowable. And, because of this, our disciplines are ultimately unable to deal with the unknowable in a structured, premeditative way. That’s not a bad thing. Instead, this simply shows that our disciplines are ripe for re-imagination and our critical pursuits in need of recalibration towards a much messier understanding of what can and what cannot be known.
Table of Contents
1. Richard Falk ~ Foreword: Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) special issue
2. Usha Natarajan, John Reynolds, Amar Bhatia & Sujith Xavier ~ Introduction: TWAIL - On Praxis and the Intellectual
3. Georges Abi-Saab ~ The Third World Intellectual in Praxis: Confrontation, Participation, or Operation behind Enemy Lines?
4. Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah ~ On Fighting for Global Justice: The Role of a Third World International Lawyer
5. Nesrine Badawi ~ Regulation of Armed Conflict: Critical Comparativism
6. Reem Bahdi & Mudar Kassis ~ Decolonisation, Dignity and Development Aid: A Judicial Education Experience in Palestine
7. Ali Hammoudi ~ The Conjunctural in International Law: The Revolutionary Struggle against Semi-Peripheral Sovereignty in Iraq
8. Vanja Hamzic ~ Mir-Said Sultan-Galiev and the Idea of Muslim Marxism: Empire, Third World(s) and Praxis
9. Adil Hasan Khan ~ International Lawyers in the Aftermath of Disasters: Inheriting from Radhabinod Pal and Upendra Baxi
10. Zoran Oklopcic ~ The South of Western Constitutionalism: A Map ahead of a Journey
11. John Reynolds ~ Disrupting Civility: Amateur Intellectuals, International Lawyers and TWAIL as Praxis
12. Adrian A Smith ~ Migration, Development and Security within Racialised Global Capitalism: Refusing the Balance Game
Contents
1. Foreword: Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL)
Richard Falk
2. Introduction: TWAIL - on praxis and the intellectual
Usha Natarajan, John Reynolds, Amar Bhatia and Sujith Xavier
3. The Third World intellectual in praxis: confrontation, participation, or operation behind enemy lines?
Georges Abi-Saab
4. On fighting for global justice: the role of a Third World international lawyer
M. Sornarajah
5. Regulation of armed conflict: critical comparativism
Nesrine Badawi
6. Decolonisation, dignity and development aid: a judicial education experience in Palestine
Reem Bahdi and Mudar Kassis
7. The conjunctural in international law: the revolutionary struggle against semi-peripheral sovereignty in Iraq
Ali Hammoudi
8. Mir-Said Sultan-Galiev and the idea of Muslim Marxism: empire, Third World(s) and praxis
Vanja Hamzic
9. International lawyers in the aftermath of disasters: inheriting from Radhabinod Pal and Upendra Baxi
Adil Hasan Khan
10. The South of Western constitutionalism: a map ahead of a journey
Zoran Oklopcic
11. Disrupting civility: amateur intellectuals, international lawyers and TWAIL as praxis
John Reynolds
12. Migration, development and security within racialised global capitalism: refusing the balance game
Adrian A. Smith
I would like to offer my response in four motions, that are also emotions, that are also affects, that are also critical stances, situated in a series of Otto’s texts. I contend that each of these offers an insight into Otto’s affectively invested critique, a window to what might be called her methodology that is also, and inseparably so, a way of life with international law.