
Flora Hajdu
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development, Associate Professor
Related Authors
Nicola Ansell
Brunel University
Ruth Evans
University of Reading
Amy Norman
Independent Researcher
Seroala Tsoeu-Ntokoane
National University of Lesotho
Liam Riley
Wilfrid Laurier University
Neil Howard
University of Bath
Sharon Bessell
The Australian National University
Ellen Block
College of Saint Benedict/St. John's University
Scott Drimie
University of Stellenbosch
Uploads
Papers by Flora Hajdu
mitigating climate change frequently claim that they simultaneously reduce degradation. However, despite the centrality
of ‘degradation’ in the forest carbon discourse, reference is rarely made to the significant body of literature questioning
generalizations about degradation in Africa since the mid-1990s. Many studies have exposed biases and problematic
underlying motives in claims of degradation in various African regions. Combining this literature with discourse analysis,
we present a framework for analysing degradation narratives in order to explore the extent to which these are based on
evidence or opinion. We acknowledge that environmental change is complex, and increasingly so today in the face of
climate change, and we stress that narratives cannot be pinned down as ‘true or false’. However, unconfirmed ‘truths’
about degradation being acute have resulted in significant, costly and far-reaching actions to halt it. Thus there is a need
to scrutinize the empirical evidence using the best available knowledge. Our framework, designed to be easily applicable
for practitioners, could facilitate increased engagement with and scrutiny of degradation claims in forest carbon interventions.
mitigating climate change frequently claim that they simultaneously reduce degradation. However, despite the centrality
of ‘degradation’ in the forest carbon discourse, reference is rarely made to the significant body of literature questioning
generalizations about degradation in Africa since the mid-1990s. Many studies have exposed biases and problematic
underlying motives in claims of degradation in various African regions. Combining this literature with discourse analysis,
we present a framework for analysing degradation narratives in order to explore the extent to which these are based on
evidence or opinion. We acknowledge that environmental change is complex, and increasingly so today in the face of
climate change, and we stress that narratives cannot be pinned down as ‘true or false’. However, unconfirmed ‘truths’
about degradation being acute have resulted in significant, costly and far-reaching actions to halt it. Thus there is a need
to scrutinize the empirical evidence using the best available knowledge. Our framework, designed to be easily applicable
for practitioners, could facilitate increased engagement with and scrutiny of degradation claims in forest carbon interventions.