Showing posts with label interview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label interview. Show all posts

Monday, February 23, 2026

SMFS Spotlight: Cheryl Head

Elena Smith is back with another interview with one of the all-star writers from the Short Mystery Fiction Society. In the spotlight this time is Cheryl Head, an immensely talented author in the genres of both crime and historical fiction (and, as was announced just a few weeks ago, winner of this year's Saints and Sinners Literary Festival fiction contest with her story "By Any Other Name").. Among her works are the Charlie Mack Motown Mysteries (subject of a question on Jeopardy!) and the novel Time's Undoing, based on her own family history, which was a finalist for the Anthony, Macavity and Agatha awards and the Los Angeles Book Prize. For my money, she's one of the most important writers working in the mystery field today, and it's an honor to have her in SMFS. Take it away, Elena! 





Before you turned to writing full time, you had a distinguished career as a television producer.  What was the impetus that made you leave the corporate world and turn to writing full time? How easy - or hard - has that been?


I had a very fulfilling career in public media, and worked in both public television and public radio for three decades at the local and national levels. I was a radio reporter/producer in Detroit; Vice President of Production at the Detroit public television station; and Senior Vice President of Administration at WETA in Washington, DC. I was writing all the time - grants, scripts, essays, Congressional testimony, and yes, I even wrote a pledge break, or two.  But my last job in public media, as a grant maker and program executive at the now defunded Corporation for Public Broadcasting, became less enjoyable - and very stressful - because of the politics surrounding our work. I started writing my first novel during my last couple of years in public broadcasting, as a creative outlet. 

I had to flex a lot of new muscles to write fiction, and I’m still growing in the craft, but I’ve always been a very good storyteller. 

Did your previous career affect your writing in any way? Did it open doors for you, or did you find yourself starting from scratch (or should I say “jump” ;-) )?


Absolutely.  I use all my experiences from my media career - the travel, the meetings, the people I’ve met along the way - to inform my plots, characters and dialogue. I’ve traveled to five of the seven continents, and I’m always amazed at how the world’s people are more alike than unalike (as Maya Angelou’s poem says). But, I will say navigating the business side of writing and publishing was like starting from “jump” or to do you one better from Detroit slang: from the “git-go”.  As a writer, in today’s publishing landscape, it helps to be adept at marketing, publicity, and social media. As a former television producer I learned that, but the thing that’s different now is the explosion of platforms to do that promotion, and the shrinking attention spans of audiences bombarded with all that content. 

On your website, https://www.cherylhead.com/ your fiction novel “Time’s Undoing” was inspired by real events in your family. Was this a difficult story to write? Why or why not?

Yes. It was difficult to write. At the same time, it made me a better writer. I think I’m equally balanced at right-brain and left-brain processing. I can really get as turned on by analyzing a budget (I know. Please don’t judge me. LOL), as writing a pithy scene of dialogue. Before Time’s Undoing, I was very much a plotter. However, the novel was so personal (it’s a fictionalized retelling of the murder of my grandfather, by Birmingham, Alabama police, in the Jim Crow era of 1929) that I wrote the chapters that are in my grandfather’s voice, organically. It was challenging.  But I was very motivated by the anger I felt when George Floyd was killed.  I began writing Time’s Undoing the day after that tragic event. 

Did you do a lot of research into your own past, or did you just write from the heart?

I did an extraordinary amount of research.  I always do for my crime fiction series, but for that project it was a daily, 3-4 hours routine of searches through newspaper databases, Ancestry.com records, library archives, and conducting oral history interviews. Through that effort, I was able to acquire my grandfather’s death certificate which my family had never had, and I discovered a tiny newspaper account of his death. The book is constructed in dual timelines. For the historical chapters, I immersed myself in the research, set it aside, and wrote from my heart, and soul.

You have published both short stories and fiction. Do you have a preference, or do you let your story tell you how much you need to say? When you get a notion, how soon do you know if it will become a short story or a novel?


I think I have a preference for the short story, and I have dozens of unpublished shorts I’ve written over twenty years. I first fell in love with mystery/crime fiction as a teenager reading Poe’s The Murders in the Rue Morgue, and The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, and by the time I read Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery, I was convinced that a well-written short story can have such emotional heft that it can change the way you think about the world. I know if I’m setting out to write a short story, or a novel. But, I’ve written a recent short story that members of my writers group tell me should be a novel. We’ll see.

What has been your best experience as a writer?

I hope to have many rewarding experiences as a writer, but for now I’m simply thrilled anytime my characters want to talk to me. It’s happened a few times. Usually, it’s just a whisper that I shouldn’t forget about them. But, the first time it happened, a character announced to me as I was waking up one morning, that he was gay. I remember sitting up in bed and saying aloud: “What?”  I was three-quarters through my first novel, about Black soldiers in World War II, and I had to go back and change a lot of the book. 

You are a triple minority - female, black and gay. How much does this impact your work, and in what way(s), if any?

As I’ve gotten older, I think of being Black, female and queer as being a triple threat. Like a Broadway performer who can act, sing, and dance. Or a college athlete who plays football, basketball, and runs track and field.  I’ve learned to embrace all these aspects of my personality, and don’t think of it as having minority status. Instead, it’s a superpower which gives me at least three different ways of viewing the world, and my place in it, and it also gives me a lot of leeway as a writer. Not all my stories have queer characters, but a lot of them do. My novels primarily have female protagonists, but I adore writing my male characters, and I have the most fun with them. My writing will always be informed by the diversity and inclusion of our world, and I’m 
not about to stop using either of those powerful words. They must have power, else why are there those who want to eradicate them? 

I have not read all of your work, so forgive me if this is a stupid question: Have you ever written from a perspective that is not your own? (I.e. - men write from a female POV, whites write as people of color) If you have, how hard or easy did you think it was, and why?

Yes. And it’s a very valid question right now. I’ve written, for instance, about a trans woman in my Charlie Mack Motown Mysteries. I got in her head, and she in mine, as we navigated that story. I liked her very much, but I had some anxious moments writing her. I’m very careful when either writing about, or from the POV of, a person different than me. When I do I lead with humility, and ask for help. I always seek out a couple of sensitivity readers - and I pay them. 


As someone who started her literary career after a corporate career, is there any advice you would give to people who are just starting their journey?

We all have stories in us. Some of us must get those stories out into the world. We’re called writers. My corporate career helped me with the discipline needed to get the work done. Writing, and getting better at it, requires practice and consistency. I can’t tell you how often the body memory of my media work gets me to the finish line of a novel. Once you’ve had the job of getting a live newscast on the air at 10 p.m., as I’ve done, having a two-week deadline on a manuscript edit is child’s play. 

Who would you recommend that I interview next? (Feel free to name more than one person)

I would recommend Curtis Ippolito a writer based in California.He's recently edited an anthology of crime/mystery stories about climate change, and won the best short story Anthony Award in New Orleans.   Ann Aptaker is queer crime fiction writer--a wonderful wordsmith-who has works in several Best Of short story mystery anthologies, and Fay Snowden, novelist and short story writer.  She's an amazing writer, and smart person.

Friday, January 2, 2026

SMFS Spotlight: Josh Pachter

Elena Smith kicks off 2026 in style with her third interview of an SMFS member, and she's got a real all-star this time out.  Josh Pachter is a recipient of the Golden Derringer for Lifetime Achievement in Short Mystery Fiction, and has received or been nominated for more awards than can easily be listed. He's published scores of fantastic stories, and translated dozens more from a variety of languages. He's also edited a number of terrific anthologies, and anybody who's had the pleasure of meeting him knows that he's a great conversationalist with a plethora of amazing tales from the history of our genre and his own globe-trotting adventures. Take it away, Elena!

Your first story was published by EQMM when you were a teenager. Was it the first one you submitted, or had you been trying for a while?

 

“E.Q. Griffen Earns His Name” was written when I was sixteen, but I’d turned seventeen by the time EQMM published it in their December 1968 issue. As far as I can remember, it was the first time I’d ever written a piece of fiction. I’d previously contributed a poem to a fanzine published by the Soupy Sales fan club. (It was called “The Midnight Ride of Soupy Sales,” and it began, “Listen, my children, no cries, no wails, / And I’ll tell you the story of Soupy Sales.” And, yes, I still have a copy of the fanzine on my bookshelves. I was about twelve or thirteen when it came out….) 


 

Which mystery authors were your early influences? What was it that engaged you in their work?

 

Ellery Queen, of course. Rex Stout, Agatha Christie. I think what engaged me more than the crimes, more than the mysteries, were the characters, those idiosyncratic, intelligent people who were able to use their minds to make sense out of confusion. One short story that was uniquely influential was Richard Deming’s “Open File,” a police procedural in which the cops failed to solve the case they were investigating. I read it in an EQMM reprint anthology in 1967 and thought that enough clues had been presented to make the identity of the guilty party obvious. So at the age of fifteen I wrote a new ending and sent it off to the magazine. A couple of weeks later, I received a two-page handwritten response from editor Frederic Dannay, who was also half of the “Ellery Queen” writing team, suggesting that I try writing a complete story of my own. I did, and that was “E.Q. Griffen Earns His Name,” and Mr. Dannay bought it.

 

How long have you been a member of SMFS?

 

A little more than six years. 

 

How did you learn about SMFS?

 

I think it was probably either Rob Lopresti or Michael Bracken who suggested I join.


 

Are there other professional organizations you’d recommend joining?

 

SMFS is the first professional organization I recommend people interested in crime fiction join, even if they’re not themselves writers. I think it provides more day-by-day value than any of the other organizations I belong to … and unlike most of the others, which charge annual dues, SMFS is free! I’m also a member of Sisters in Crime, Mystery Writers of America, and International Thriller Writers (also free). The SMFS list serve provides market news, cautionary notes about iffy publishers, and especially camaraderie every single day, and I don’t get nearly as much of that anywhere else. And of course I like the idea of being able to participate actively in the nomination and voting and (occasionally, when my time permits) judging parts of the Derringer process. Then there’s the f2f lunch every spring at the Malice Domestic conference, which is always attended by fifteen or so members and always a good time.

 

I have read several of your short stories – “Monkey Business,” “The Great Filling Station Holdup,” and “Only the Good Die Young,” from the anthologies of the same names. I’ve noticed your skill with dialects. In “Monkey Business,” it’s intellectual; in “The Great Filling Station Holdup,” it’s southern twang, and “Only the Good Die Young” hat-tips classic detective noir. Do you write your stories then go back and apply the dialect, or do your characters speak to you as you create?

 

I’ve always been good with languages and accents. When I’m writing characters with distinctive voices, I just write their dialogue the way it seems to me it ought to sound.  Then I read my stories aloud before I submit them, and if bits of dialogue don’t sound right, I fix them.


 

How do you know so many dialects? Is it because you have lived in different places, or is it from binge-watching TV

 

Well, I don’t really watch a lot of television, but I lived in Europe and the Middle East for more than a decade, teaching on US military bases. All that time spent in other parts of the world has helped me develop an ear for other ways of speaking. I’m glad to know that you think I do it well. Thanks!

 

You have edited eight anthologies of crime stories inspired by songs written by well-known singer/songwriters and rock groups. Have some been more successful than others? If so, what do you attribute that to?

 

How do you define “success”? How I define it is: “Would the question ‘Have people read the book and enjoyed it?’ be answered with a ‘Yes’?” And by that definition, all eight of the books have been equally successful. I recognize, though, that other people have other definitions of success, and by those definitions, sure, some of the books have been more successful than others. The Joni Mitchell and Jimmy Buffett books have  —  so far  —  sold the most copies, but perhaps that’s not surprising, since they were the first two to be published and have therefore been out in the world the longest. 

 

The Joni Mitchell, Paul Simon, Beatles, and Grateful Dead volumes were all finalists for the Best Anthology Anthony Award that’s given out at Bouchercon every year, and the Dead one was a finalist for 2025’s first-ever Best Anthology Derringer. Stacy Woodson’s take on “River” from the Joni book and Michael Bracken’s on “The Downeaster ‘Alexa’” from the Billy Joel one won Derringers, and Dru Ann Love and Kristopher Zgorski’s “Ticket to Ride” from the Beatles anthology won the Anthony, Agatha, and Macavity awards. James D.F. Hannah’s “No Man’s Land” from the Billy Joel book was reprinted in The Best American Mystery and Suspense, and David Avallone’s “The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion)” from the Dead one was reprinted in Best Mystery Stories of the Year. The Stephen Sondheim book had a standing-room-only launch event featuring ten of the twenty contributors at the Drama Book Shop in New York and was recently streamed as an episode of the DBS’s Drama Book Show podcast.

 

All of these are examples of measures of success. To what do I attribute the fact that certain books achieved some of them while others didn’t? I wish I knew. If I understood what comprised that secret sauce, I would apply it to all of my projects!

 

Were you the first person to do this? If so, what gave you the idea? 

 

No. To the best of my knowledge, Joe Clifford got there first, with anthologies inspired by the songs of Bruce Springsteen in 2014 and Johnny Cash in 2017. In 2019, I wrote a story inspired by Joni Mitchell’s “The Beat of Black Wings” and couldn’t find an appropriate market for it. I happened to stumble across Clifford’s books right around then and thought, I know what I’ll do! I’ll edit a book of stories inspired by Joni songs, and then I can buy my story from myself! Not only did that work out, but it turned out to be fun, so I decided to do more of them, inspired by the songs of other lyricists I admire … plus an anthology inspired by the films of the Marx Brothers. 


 

I was fortunate to find publishers who were interested in taking on the books, and the books have been fortunate to find readers who’ve been interested in reading them. Unfortunately, the publisher who released the Joni, Billy Joel, and Marx Brothers books was bought out by a company that didn’t want to support short-form fiction, and the company that did the Buffett, Simon, Beatles, and Dead books shut down with no warning two weeks before it was supposed to release a similar volume of stories inspired by Lyle Lovett songs. The good news is that Open Road Integrated Media re-released the Joni anthology in January 2025 and will be putting out the Lyle book and re-releasing the Beatles and Dead books in 2026, then in 2027 doing new editions of the Buffett and Simon books (with new stories inspired by songs from the albums Jimmy and Paul released after those books’ original publications), while Level Best will be re-releasing the Marx and Billy Joel books (each with a new story that wasn’t in the original edition).

 

When you read for pleasure, do you have a favorite mystery/ crime genre?

 

Not really. I have favorite authors, mostly people I’ve been reading for a long time (Ellery Queen, Rex Stout, John D. MacDonald), plus some who younger readers would call old-timers but who to me are “newer” writers (James Lee Burke, Michael Connelly, Lawrence Block). I will gladly read everyone who seems interesting to me — men, women, nonbinary, straight, LGBTQIA+, Caucasian, POC, American, international — but I acknowledge that, when I look at that short list of favorites, all six of them are straight white American men. I feel as if I ought to apologize for that, but I’m not sure what exactly I’d be apologizing for. For liking what I like?

 

When you write, do you have a favorite mystery/ crime genre?

 

My stuff used to be all over the map, but recently I’ve been concentrating on two series, each of them in a subgenre that’s relatively new to me. My Helmut Erhard stories are about a private eye who, despite his German name, is a Texan, born and bred, and my Dr. Guislain stories are historicals, set in Ghent (Belgium) in the mid-Nineteenth Century. There are fourteen Helmut stories so far, with more to come, but the Dr. Guislain stories are a miniseries — for a reason that is revealed in the fifth and final story.  

 

Are there any mystery/crime genres that you have not yet written in? Which ones? Do you plan to try them out some day?

 

Hmm. I’ve done a traditional whodunit novel (Dutch Threat, Genius Book Publishing), a children’s/YA mystery (First Week Free at the Roomy Toilet, Level Best Books), a mystery/horror crossover (“Pisan Zapra,” AHMM, November 2016), pastiches (my Puzzle Club miniseries), and parodies (of Ellery Queen, Ed McBain, and Edward D. Hoch). I have not done a science-fiction mystery, so perhaps I’ll give that a shot at some point.


 

Who would you recommend that I interview next? (Feel free to name more than one person)

 

Since your previous interviews were men, how about going with a woman next? I recommend Barb Goffman, who has been a finalist for major crime-fiction awards umpty-eleven times, won more of them than I can count, and received the SMFS’s Golden Derringer in 2024. 

 

Or, taking my logic two steps further, since your first three interviews were with straight white men, how about interviewing a queer Black woman next? In that case, I vote for Cheryl Head, who in addition to her many accomplishments as a writer is also co-chair of the organizing committee for the 2027 Bouchercon, which will be held in Washington, D.C.

 

Sunday, December 14, 2025

SMFS Spotlight: Bruce Robert Coffin

Short Mystery Fiction Society member Elena Smith has graciously offered to conduct interviews spotlighting members of the Society.  Here is the second, with bestselling novelist and short story writer Bruce Robert Coffin.  Take it away, Elena!



You are the author of three novel series - the John Byron series, 4 books, published by Witness Impulse (Harper Collins); Turner and Mosley Files, 5 books, co-authored with LynDee Walker, published by Severn River; and the detective Justice series, 3 books, published by Severn River. I need to catch my breath — such a long list in a fairly short time! The John Byron series and the Detective Justice series are both police procedurals, whereas the Turner and Mosley Files were action/ adventure. How did it feel to switch genres? What was your reason for this decision?

 

Seeing this as an opportunity my fab literary agent, Paula Munier, wanted me to step outside my comfort zone and try my hand at a standalone thriller. I think I started five different manuscripts before I finally found one that I loved and knew had legs. I was in the middle of writing that thriller when Paula contacted me about coauthoring a brand new action/adventure series with LynDee Walker. Long story short, it took about four months before agreeing to coauthor what would become The Turner and Mosley Files.

Your readers might be surprised to know that switching gears from the procedural to action/adventure really wasn’t the jarring transition you might imagine. 

Though there are clearly differences in the two genres, the process of writing a compelling storyline with interesting characters doesn’t change all that much. I actually found it rather freeing as a writer to step outside the boundaries typical of a procedural mystery. The hardest part was writing with another established author. Once LynDee and I got to the point where we trusted each other as writers, the whole process became an absolute blast!

What did you like most about writing action adventure?

I guess the thing that was the most fun was really diving deep into my imagination. LynDee and I both knew we wanted to take the readers on a thrill ride where almost anything could happen. I guess it was our attempt to recapture that feeling of watching the original Indiana Jones movies. To write novels with a historic treasure — partly based in reality, fun characters, a plethora of bad guys —  then stretch believability a bit to make each book a fantastical and exciting tale. The Turner and Mosley Files have been so much fun to write. Hopefully the readers have enjoyed them too!

What do you like most about writing detective fiction?

Probably the same things I like about reading detective fiction. I believe that the reason mystery novels have such a broad appeal is that the stories become interactive in that the reader gets caught up in trying to solve the crime right alongside the protagonists. I’ve had many readers tell me that they absolutely feel like they were right there with my detectives conducting an interview or chasing down a bad guy. When I read detective fiction I want to feel like I’m part of what is happening. When I write them, I want to give my readers that same experience.

What made you decide to stop writing each series?

As I alluded to earlier, it’s less about my wants as a writer and more about the business of writing. Every author hopes to pen a series that becomes so wildly popular that it never ends. But the harsh reality is that publishing is a business, and sales will always dictate the length of a series. Besides, I never like to think of my series as having ended, more like we pressed pause. 


Your second series, Turner and Mosley Files, was co-authored with LynDee Walker. Writing is often considered a solitary procedure. What aspect(s) of writing with a partner did you find easier to do? Any aspects that were harder?

Believe it or not, I didn’t find writing with another person all that different than writing alone, maybe due to the fact that we live so far apart. Some things LynDee and I obviously did together like fleshing out the early things about who the characters were and what made them tick, but much of the writing and plotting we did on our own then passed it off to the other. That’s why I say the trust aspect of coauthoring is so important. LynDee did the lion’s share of the plotting, while I focused on the first draft of the manuscript. Working that way required me to trust that LynDee would come up with a fabulous storyline, and she had to trust that I wouldn’t ruin her idea with too much improvisation. Coauthoring, regardless of how the work gets divided, is a true partnership.

How did you first meet LynDee Walker?  I.e. - through your job, or through Sisters in Crime or another professional organization?

You know we’ve discussed this at length, and though neither of us is sure I think we first met at Malice Domestic years ago. Probably why Malice remains one of my favorite conferences. And of course neither of us could have imagined writing novels together! Just goes to show that none of us really knows what the future holds.

I am glad to see you writing a detective series again. I’d heard that some of the major publishers were steering clear of police procedurals. Did you find that to be true? Are these books “in favor” with publishers once again?

Thank you. It is nice to be back in the procedural saddle again, as it was where I began my writing career. It feels a bit like coming home. Getting to know Brock Justice, Chloe Wright, and the rest of my new characters has been great fun. I hope readers agree!

As for procedurals falling out of favor, I’m not entirely sure that was ever true. While publishers might worry about the winds of change in the industry, I think readers are the ultimate deciders of what is popular. Some good examples of ongoing popular procedural series would be Michael Connelly’s Bosch, Tracy Clark’s Harriet Foster, John Sanford’s Lucas Davenport, Paul Doiron’s Mike Bowditch, and Louise Penny’s Chief Inspector Gamache. Those are just a few of my personal favorites.


How often do you write short mystery fiction? Do your short stories come from ideas you want to pursue, or are you more likely to respond to prompts for anthologies?

It is really something I have no control over. When an idea for a short story comes to me I write it. Sometimes it’s due to an anthology invite or call, but more often the idea simply shows up like an uninvited guest. Normally, I write a short story just to exorcise the idea from my head. There is nothing worse than having a short story begging for your attention while you’re busy writing a novel under a deadline. I find the best way to handle that is to write it down quickly, while the idea is still fresh. If the story is any good, I’ll go back later and flesh it out into something I’m proud to share.

Are there any SMFS members you would you like to recommend for future interviews?

The very first name that popped into my head was the inimitable Josh Pachter!


Saturday, November 15, 2025

SMFS Spotlight: Kevin R. Tipple

 Short Mystery Fiction Society member Elena Smith has graciously offered to conduct interviews spotlighting members of the Society.  Here is the first, with longtime member and former President Kevin R. Tipple.  Take it away, Elena!


I know you currently live in Texas. Is this the only state you’ve lived in?


Yes. When I was a kid, we used to go on vacation for weeks at a time here in Texas and in a number of national and state parks in western states, but Texas has always been it for a home.

Does your locale influence your stories? If so, in what way?

Well, the bigger influence is what I have been through, but location matters as I set a lot of stories here in north Texas. So, I take a location, say the nearby Waffle House, and make it part of the story as I did for my story, “First Contact,” in the Santa Rage anthology. The weather here also makes an appearance in that one as I open with the weather which is frowned upon by some. My old apartment complex and some of the things that happened there are fictionalized in my story, “Death in Dallas” (This Ain’t Paradise) British Bump Off anthology coming in early January. Weather makes an appearance in that one as well. The location in those tales and all of my work matters in some way. Sometimes the location is its own character and sometimes it is more of a secondary character.
Kevin reading at Noir at the Bar


When did you have your first story published?

Late 1980s. “Hell, Here and Now” was originally a story written for a Saturday literature class at the University of Texas at Dallas. There were fifty students in the class. The class was on Dante and we were to write a story with him going through a new circle of Hell. We had to create a new level of hell, explain what it was designed for, and send him through it. It was only after we  submitted them that the professor announced he would read parts of the ones he really liked to the class. After reading five of them, he announced that one was so good, he was going to read the entire fifteen-pages plus. He looked at me, smirked as he knew how much I hated the attention, and then started reading mine aloud. Shockingly, not only did the floor not open and swallow me whole, but the class laughed at the jokes in it, and seemed to enjoy it. He pulled me aside after class and said I should be writing, submitting my work. Went home and told my very pregnant wife who vehemently told me she had been right and I should do this “writing thing.” Nobody was ever a bigger cheerleader for me and my writing. I know a lot of folks complain about their spouses on this, but Sandi was always very sure I was going to do great things writing wise.

How has your writing improved since then, and what do you attribute this to?

Assuming it has, and there have been many times I seriously wondered about that, I think writing, submitting, and being edited by others has made it better. Being part of a writing group from the late ’90s to around 2011 definitely made me a better writer as we sat and discussed what worked and what didn’t in our stories. I’d still be in a writing group if we had one in my area as I think it can really help IF one can find the right group. I didn’t fully appreciate what I had at the time. Since the end of those writing group days, I do not have much outside input before I submit and that has worked against me as well as for me. Time has also played a huge factor in all of this. Decades later, I am a far different person now at this age with everything I have been through, and what I am facing, and that, no doubt, has changed me for better and for worse. That also can’t help but affect the writing.

How long have you been a member of SMFS?

I think since sometime in the late ’90s.
 
How did you learn about it?

Earl Staggs. A member, past SMFS president, and a deeply missed good friend.

What do you like most about it?

The exposure to other folks who write mystery and crime fiction. I have read a lot of good stuff by way of finding folks on the list. Reading stuff improves your own writing.

What aspect of SMFS membership has been the most beneficial to you?

At this point, with the way things are now for me and the list, I would say the market news is the most beneficial. I don’t participate in the Zoom deals as my internet in NE Dallas is really bad. I also tend to stay away from some of the conversational threads, the recent crime music one comes to mind, as I just don’t have anything to share. Market info is very important to me as is being able to publicize when somebody is publishing one of my deals.

Is there anyone specific you would like to recommend for my next interview (provided the subject is willing...)?

Barry Ergang or Bruce Robert Coffin.
 
You can read Kevin R. Tipple’s story, "Choked on Love" in the Perp Wore Pumpkin 2 Thanksgiving Anthology (Misti Media) and on his blog: https://kevintipplescorner.blogspot.com/



Monday, August 3, 2020

Friday, July 31, 2020

SMFS Member News: Edith Maxwell/Maddie Day


SMFS list member Edith Maxwell, has participated as part of a panel on food cozies for “Bookmarked: The Under the Radar Book Club.”  Produced by WGBH Boston (NPR) and hosted by Callie Crossley, Edith Maxwell as Maddie Day was one of three authors participating in a discussion on food cozies. Under her Maddie Day persona, Edith read an excerpt from her latest book, Nacho Average Murder: A Country Store Mystery. The discussion can be listened to here.



Synopsis:

It’s our special August edition of “Bookmarked: The Under the Radar Book Club” and we’re talking with authors who leave the spicy and sweet on the page in a mystery sub-genre known as food cozies. On the plate — author Joanne Fluke’s Coconut Layer Cake Murders, Maddie Day’s Nacho Average Murder, and V.M. Burns’ “Motherless Child.” These mavens of full-stomach fiction join us for an hour-long conversation about this popular genre, perfect for a summer read.
Guests:

·         Joanne Fluke is the author of “Coconut Layer Cake Murder: a Hannah Swensen Mystery,” the 26th novel in a series.
·         Maddie Day is the author of “Nacho Average Murder: a Country Store Mystery,” the seventh in a series.
·         V.M. Burns is the author of “Motherless Child: an RJ Franklin Mystery, “ the second in a series.