
Blanca Misse
Related Authors
J. H. Chajes
University of Haifa
Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire
University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
Julia Hell
University of Michigan
Noe Cornago
University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
John Sutton
Macquarie University
Grietje (River) Baars
SOAS University of London
Michaela Valente
Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" di Roma
Fidel J Tavárez
Queens College of the City University of New York
Karen Ng
Vanderbilt University
Marie Christine Duggan
Keene State College
InterestsView All (11)
Uploads
Papers by Blanca Misse
that is, the elimination of all college presidents, provosts, deans
and other top level administrators who we argue form a parasitical group that was developed over time in order to exercise both
political and financial control over faculty, staff and students. We
examine the way that the idea of “shared governance” disguises
the de facto dictatorship of administration over faculty self-governance, explore the history of how this power grab took place and
furthermore explore alternative forms of faculty self-management
in both US history and abroad (especially in Latin America).
work, his Man as Plant (1748) undertakes the undoing of the
metaphysical foundations of our human species’ difference
from other forms of natural life. La Mettrie is not opposed to the
recognition of what is properly human in nature. What he contests is our
self-aggrandized sense of species superiority rooted in a supposed
ontological difference between human and other natural beings. Man as
Plant works toward challenging this conception by insisting on the
“analogies we find in the two major kingdoms”—plants and animals, as he
states—for “there is in our Species, like in Plants, a principal Root, and
capillary roots.”1 La Mettrie’s natural history is in fact an invitation to reengage with our natural roots, our plant and animal roots, from a materialist point of view. Returning to the root also means here allowing and
performing a series of identifications between Man and Nature, in order to
produce a different, non-metaphysical genealogy of the “I” or the Self, and
to bring new desires to consciousness.
that is, the elimination of all college presidents, provosts, deans
and other top level administrators who we argue form a parasitical group that was developed over time in order to exercise both
political and financial control over faculty, staff and students. We
examine the way that the idea of “shared governance” disguises
the de facto dictatorship of administration over faculty self-governance, explore the history of how this power grab took place and
furthermore explore alternative forms of faculty self-management
in both US history and abroad (especially in Latin America).
work, his Man as Plant (1748) undertakes the undoing of the
metaphysical foundations of our human species’ difference
from other forms of natural life. La Mettrie is not opposed to the
recognition of what is properly human in nature. What he contests is our
self-aggrandized sense of species superiority rooted in a supposed
ontological difference between human and other natural beings. Man as
Plant works toward challenging this conception by insisting on the
“analogies we find in the two major kingdoms”—plants and animals, as he
states—for “there is in our Species, like in Plants, a principal Root, and
capillary roots.”1 La Mettrie’s natural history is in fact an invitation to reengage with our natural roots, our plant and animal roots, from a materialist point of view. Returning to the root also means here allowing and
performing a series of identifications between Man and Nature, in order to
produce a different, non-metaphysical genealogy of the “I” or the Self, and
to bring new desires to consciousness.