Peter Samis
Related Authors
Palmyre Pierroux
University of Oslo
Dana Carlisle Kletchka
The Ohio State University
Palmyre Pierroux
University of Oslo
Sohl Lee
SUNY: Stony Brook University
Joan L Saverino
University of Pennsylvania
Florian Wiencek
Danube University Krems
maria mortati
California College of the Arts
Graham Black
Nottingham Trent University
Pamela Erskine-Loftus, PhD
Freelance
Susan Ashley
Northumbria University
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Peter Samis
CONNECT: Visitor-Centered Museum Interpretation”—at once a search for defining criteria of excellence across museum types and an opportunity to visit salient sites, observe and talk with visitors and fellow museum professionals, and report back to the field. Initially hoping to benchmark “best practices” in museum interpretation, we solicited nominations and criteria from more than 50 colleagues in North America and Europe. From that list, we distilled a small subset of museums that, with the help of the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, we were able to visit, document, and describe. All told, we conducted 35 interviews, including 11 with museum directors and seven each with curators, educator-interpretive specialists, and cross-departmental collaborative teams. We began the study by looking for innovative interpretive practices. What we found was something more: a visitor-centered focus leads to organizational transformation. Once a museum decides to shift its approach and place visitors at the center of its mission, how does it follow through on that goal? The following anecdotes offer a first glimpse of what we saw, a set of scenes that touch on the changes taking place in museum practice.
• What do artists, in their role as extremely subtle information designers, have to teach us about how deep knowledge is conveyed? What do their visual strategies teach us about interface?
• How can a digital program be designed that respects the properties inherent in each artwork, and yet harnesses the power of multimedia to make connections across space and time?
CONNECT: Visitor-Centered Museum Interpretation”—at once a search for defining criteria of excellence across museum types and an opportunity to visit salient sites, observe and talk with visitors and fellow museum professionals, and report back to the field. Initially hoping to benchmark “best practices” in museum interpretation, we solicited nominations and criteria from more than 50 colleagues in North America and Europe. From that list, we distilled a small subset of museums that, with the help of the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, we were able to visit, document, and describe. All told, we conducted 35 interviews, including 11 with museum directors and seven each with curators, educator-interpretive specialists, and cross-departmental collaborative teams. We began the study by looking for innovative interpretive practices. What we found was something more: a visitor-centered focus leads to organizational transformation. Once a museum decides to shift its approach and place visitors at the center of its mission, how does it follow through on that goal? The following anecdotes offer a first glimpse of what we saw, a set of scenes that touch on the changes taking place in museum practice.
• What do artists, in their role as extremely subtle information designers, have to teach us about how deep knowledge is conveyed? What do their visual strategies teach us about interface?
• How can a digital program be designed that respects the properties inherent in each artwork, and yet harnesses the power of multimedia to make connections across space and time?