
Marine Frouin
Address: 255 Earth and Space Science Building, Stony Brook, NY 11790
less
Related Authors
Christelle Lahaye
Université Bordeaux-Montaigne
Amelie Da Costa
Maison René Ginouvès (CNRS-Université Paris I-Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense-Ministère de la Culture)
Mario Pino
UNiversidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia
Cris Buco
Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico e Artístico Nacional - IPHAN
Aurélie Brodard
Université Bordeaux-Montaigne
Bibliothèque du LAMPEA
Aix-Marseille University
Guillaume Guérin
Technical University of Denmark (DTU)
InterestsView All (21)
Uploads
Papers by Marine Frouin
In order to better ascertain the chronological framework of the site, we dated several proxies. Various speleothem samples were processed by U-series using a coupled induced plasma mass spectrometer (ICPMS-MC). The resulting isotopic ratios are beyond the secular equilibrium and show that these samples do not appear to be in direct stratigraphic relation with the archaeological sequence.
Nine Equus teeth were analyzed by the combined ESR/U-series method. These samples were taken from Unit I to Unit XVI representing at least 2.5 m of stratigraphic depth and approximately 90% of the infilling. Many of the dated samples are burnt given that more than 85% of the faunal remains exhibit traces of fire exposure.
The bone retouchers, for which a comparative analysis with other sites has been published (Moigne et al., 2016), were probably produced during the Marine Isotope Stage (MIS 11-5) chronological interval corresponding to the later part of the Middle Pleistocene, inference that is in agreement with the palaeontological assemblage of the site. The radiometric results presented here are consistent and indicate a range from 350 to 183 ka, suggesting that a major part of the sedimentary infilling coinciding with the human occupation was contemporaneous with the MIS 9 to 7 time period.
to 55 ka, provides insight into the Middle Paleolithic peopling of
the Arabian Peninsula. The archaeological layer is interstratified within thick,
sandy silt floodplain deposits filling a piedmont basin. Luminescence dates, lack
of soil development, and gypsum precipitation indicate a high accretion rate of
the floodplain during Marine Isotope Stage 3, in connection with a (semi)-arid
environment. Rapid overbank sedimentation was likely a result of the remobilization
of loess material deposited on the Yemeni Great Escarpment at the
periphery of the adjacent Tihama coastal sand desert or of other sources. Fabric
and size analyses of the lithic artifacts, together with spatial projections, indicate
site modifications by floods. Primary modifications include (1) selective
accumulation of medium-sized lithic pieces as a result of hydraulic sorting, (2)
bimodal orientation of artifacts, and (3) ripple-like arrangement of lithics and
bone/tooth fragments. The overrepresentation of teeth may also be a consequence
of sorting. Although floods have distorted the original site patterning,
long-distance transport of artifacts by water can be excluded, as indicated by
relatively high refitting rate, close proximity of artifacts derived from the same
block of raw material, and lack of abrasion of the pieces. Therefore, the site is
considered “geologically” in situ because its remobilization by water occurred
shortly after human abandonment. This study also stresses that the effective
preservation of a site cannot be assessed without careful taphonomic study,
even in a potentially favorable depositional context such as silty alluvium."
In order to better ascertain the chronological framework of the site, we dated several proxies. Various speleothem samples were processed by U-series using a coupled induced plasma mass spectrometer (ICPMS-MC). The resulting isotopic ratios are beyond the secular equilibrium and show that these samples do not appear to be in direct stratigraphic relation with the archaeological sequence.
Nine Equus teeth were analyzed by the combined ESR/U-series method. These samples were taken from Unit I to Unit XVI representing at least 2.5 m of stratigraphic depth and approximately 90% of the infilling. Many of the dated samples are burnt given that more than 85% of the faunal remains exhibit traces of fire exposure.
The bone retouchers, for which a comparative analysis with other sites has been published (Moigne et al., 2016), were probably produced during the Marine Isotope Stage (MIS 11-5) chronological interval corresponding to the later part of the Middle Pleistocene, inference that is in agreement with the palaeontological assemblage of the site. The radiometric results presented here are consistent and indicate a range from 350 to 183 ka, suggesting that a major part of the sedimentary infilling coinciding with the human occupation was contemporaneous with the MIS 9 to 7 time period.
to 55 ka, provides insight into the Middle Paleolithic peopling of
the Arabian Peninsula. The archaeological layer is interstratified within thick,
sandy silt floodplain deposits filling a piedmont basin. Luminescence dates, lack
of soil development, and gypsum precipitation indicate a high accretion rate of
the floodplain during Marine Isotope Stage 3, in connection with a (semi)-arid
environment. Rapid overbank sedimentation was likely a result of the remobilization
of loess material deposited on the Yemeni Great Escarpment at the
periphery of the adjacent Tihama coastal sand desert or of other sources. Fabric
and size analyses of the lithic artifacts, together with spatial projections, indicate
site modifications by floods. Primary modifications include (1) selective
accumulation of medium-sized lithic pieces as a result of hydraulic sorting, (2)
bimodal orientation of artifacts, and (3) ripple-like arrangement of lithics and
bone/tooth fragments. The overrepresentation of teeth may also be a consequence
of sorting. Although floods have distorted the original site patterning,
long-distance transport of artifacts by water can be excluded, as indicated by
relatively high refitting rate, close proximity of artifacts derived from the same
block of raw material, and lack of abrasion of the pieces. Therefore, the site is
considered “geologically” in situ because its remobilization by water occurred
shortly after human abandonment. This study also stresses that the effective
preservation of a site cannot be assessed without careful taphonomic study,
even in a potentially favorable depositional context such as silty alluvium."