Videos by Gorazd Andrejč
Books by Gorazd Andrejč
ویتگنشتاین و اختلاف نظر میان دینی Wittgenstein and Interreligious Disagreement, 2022
این کتاب با توجه ویژه به اختلاف بینادینی، تفاسیر جرج لیندبک، دیوید تریسی و دیوید بورل از فلسفه وی... more این کتاب با توجه ویژه به اختلاف بینادینی، تفاسیر جرج لیندبک، دیوید تریسی و دیوید بورل از فلسفه ویتگنشتاین را نقادانه بررسی می‌کند. اینکه در آثار موجود پیرامون مناسبات بینادینی، ویتگنشتاین به انحاء متفاوت و گاه متناقض تفسیر شده بدان سبب است که پژوهش فلسفی او به نظریه پردازی در باب دین نپرداخته است. گرزد آندریچ، استاد دانشگاه خرونینگن (هلند)، نشان داده که چگونه برداشت‌های مختلف سه اندیشمند نامبرده از فرایافت¬های ویتگنشتاین در کنار نظرگاههای الهیاتی آنها گفتمان جدیدی در فلسفه دین مقایسه ای پدید آورده است. جواد طاهری، مترجم کتاب و دستیار پژوهشی پروفسور آندریچ این کتاب را حاوی روش جدیدی در استفاده از جهات توصیفی و هنجاری فرایافت های ویتگنشتاینی در تفسیر اختلاف بینادینی می¬داند که با نگاهی خلاقانه به تحلیل نظرگاههای این سه فیلسوف تاثیرگذار پرداخته است.
Key Concepts in Religion. Maribor: Aristej, 2018 (in Slovenian. Orig. title: Religijski pojmovnik... more Key Concepts in Religion. Maribor: Aristej, 2018 (in Slovenian. Orig. title: Religijski pojmovnik za mlade)
Gorazd Andrejč v svojem Pojmovniku religijo obravnava iz perspektiv različnih znanstvenih disciplin: zgodovine, sociologije, antropologije, politologije, filozofije, pa tudi teologije in religiologije, ki kombinira metode omenjenih disciplin.
»Prav zaradi tega, ker je religija polje kulturnih bojev, vkopanih mnenj, neredko močnih čustev, včasih pa celo vojn, moramo biti pri njenem preučevanju pozorni, potrpežljivi, natančni in odprtega uma. Religije se je, kot vsakega družbenega pojava, treba lotiti kritično in znanstveno. Nerazumevanje religijskih pogledov na življenje (če smo nereligiozni), in obratno, nerazumevanje ali obtoževanje ateističnega pogleda na življenje in religijo (če smo religiozni) sta navadno znak pomanjkanja posluha za druge in drugačnost. Kakršnokoli je že naše stališče do religije, duhovnosti, boga ali bogov, je družbeni dialog med neverujočimi in verujočimi neizogiben, če želimo živeti v vsaj minimalno urejeni in svobodni politični skupnosti.«
Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studi... more Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies, co-edited with Daniel Weiss; Leiden: Brill (Volume 9 in Philosophy of Religion – World Religions series); 2019.
Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein argues that Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion and his thought in general continue to be highly relevant for present and future research on interreligious relations. Spanning several (sub)disciplines – from philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, comparative philosophy, comparative theology, to religious studies – the contributions engage with recent developments in interpretation of Wittgenstein and those in philosophy and theology of interreligious encounter. The book shows that there is an important and under-explored potential for constructive and fruitful engagement between these academic fields. It explores, and attempts to realize, some of this potential by involving both philosophers and theologians, and critically assesses previous applications of Wittgenstein’s work in interreligious studies.
This book critically examines three distinct interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, those of Geo... more This book critically examines three distinct interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, those of George Lindbeck, David Tracy, and David Burrell, while paying special attention to the topic of interreligious disagreement. In theological and philosophical work on interreligious communication, Ludwig Wittgenstein has been interpreted in very different, sometimes contradicting ways. This is partly due to the nature of Wittgenstein’s philosophy, which is not composed of a theory but several, varying conceptions of religion. In this volume, Gorazd Andrejč illustrates how assorted uptakes of Wittgenstein’s conceptions of religion, and the differing theological perspectives of the authors who formulated them, shape interpretations of interreligious disagreement and dialogue. Inspired by selected perspectives from Tillichian philosophical theology, this book suggests a new way of engaging both descriptive and normative aspects of Wittgenstein’s conceptions of religion in the interpretation of interreligious disagreement.
http://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9781137503077
This is an edited volume on the conceptual, judicial, political and theological dimensions of rel... more This is an edited volume on the conceptual, judicial, political and theological dimensions of religious freedom, mostly by Slovenian authors (sociology, political studies, law, religious studies, and history) and published in Slovene language. The contributions address the topics ranging from the legal aspects of religious freedom in Slovenia, the Catholic-Protestant and religious-secular relations in Slovenia and beyond, Jewish-Christian relations in Europe, to feminist-Muslim perspectives on freedom of religious expression and the attitudes of the media towards Islam in Europe.
Contributors: Jernej Koselj, Marjan Tos, Fanika Krajnc-Vrecko, Marjana Harcet, Ahmed Pasic, Gorazd Andrejc, David Stevens, Drago Cepar and Pavel Gantar.
Academic Papers by Gorazd Andrejč
Religions, 2023
This essay examines pantheism within the framework of the ‘faith and reason’ field in the philoso... more This essay examines pantheism within the framework of the ‘faith and reason’ field in the philosophy of religion, with an emphasis on the question of the relationship between pantheism and empirical–scientific rationality. I address this question from what I call the Wittgensteinian Nonoverlapping Magisteria (WNOMA) approach to religion and science. WNOMA affirms a categorial difference between religious and scientific language and attitudes. This difference is interpreted with the help of Wittgenstein’s distinction between religious and scientific beliefs and van Fraassen’s distinction between religious and empiricist stances. This means that WNOMA is antievidentialist regarding religious beliefs and sees the experiential and instinctive aspects of religion as more fundamental than the systematic–intellectual aspect. Part of the variety in contemporary pantheism relates to the question of whether the emphasis is on the experiential–spiritual side of pantheism or its intellectual side, i.e., whether pantheism is ‘hot’ or ‘cold’. I examine a few telling examples: Spinoza, Einstein, the World Pantheism Movement and a recent awe-some argument for pantheism by Ryan Byerly. The main contribution of this paper is a critical reading of these versions of pantheism from a WNOMA perspective, through which I hope to establish the plausibility and show some of the persuasive force of the WNOMA approach to pantheism, focusing on the relation of pantheism to scientific rationality on the one hand and felt experience on the other. I argue that hotter kinds of pantheism can be intellectually virtuous if they find a way to combine the empiricist stance and pantheist religious stance, even without a developed philosophical or theological system. I also argue that colder and philosophically rigorous pantheism can be problematic if it assumes religious evidentialism, neglects the experiential part of pantheism in favor of intellectualism or/and confuses the spheres of science and religion.
This article is a contribution to the special issue of Religions journal, titled "Religion, Science and Technology in Pantheism, Animism and Paganism", edited by Victoria Dos Santos and Gorazd Andrejc:
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions/special_issues/RSTinPAP
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
Philosophy and the Spiritual Life, edited by V. Harrison, T. McNabb. London: Routledge. pp. 125-141. , 2023
The main idea of this chapter stems from a grammatical peculiarity of ‘being a saint’ in the Chri... more The main idea of this chapter stems from a grammatical peculiarity of ‘being a saint’ in the Christian context, which can be described as follows: the term ‘saint’ seems to be ascribable only to others but not to oneself. To appreciate the nature of the problem the author have described in the introduction it is important to get a feel for the different meanings that ‘saint’ can have in Christianity and see for which of those the problem is relevant. The Lutheran-episodic conception of sainthood which the author suggests instead of the strong realist metaphysics of sainthood can live with the broader, inclusive sense of ‘saint’ which stems from early Christian usage, according to which all Christians are saints. The fact that everybody, even those individuals who do the most saintly acts, has defects and weaknesses, should always guide use of the term ‘saint’.
Slavia Centralis, 2019
Published in Slovenian in Slavia Centralis, 2019/1, 18-30.
Abstract
Deliberation as critical, ... more Published in Slovenian in Slavia Centralis, 2019/1, 18-30.
Abstract
Deliberation as critical, open, inclusive and argument-based discussion about matters of public interest is a crucial mechanism of a healthy democracy. According to deliberative democracy defenders, like Jürgen Habermas, deliberation contributes to achieving a better and more just society. The present essay analyses the
intertwinement between the development of this political value in the Euro-Atlantic world on the one hand, and Protestantism and its development on the other. Recent works in the history of Protestantism and the political history of democracy paint a complex, but powerful picture: despite the religious conservative tendencies in Protestantism, it seems that a notable measure of freedom of research, belief and debate could be found in the societies where Protestantism had become a dominant religious culture. While this development is partly a result of contingent historic events, it also had much to do with internal theological impulses within the Protestant thought.
Key words: deliberation, Protestantism, democracy, debate, public discussion
Povzetek
Deliberacija oziroma kritična, odprta, vključujoča in argumentirana javna razprava o stvareh javnega interesa je ključen mehanizem demokratične politične ureditve. Po prepričanju zagovornikov deliberativne demokracije, kot je Jürgen Habermas, deliberacija prispeva k doseganju boljše in pravičnejše družbe. Prispevek analizira prepletenost razvoja te politične vrednote v evro-atlantskem svetu s protestantizmom in njegovim razvojem. Novejša raziskovanja zgodovine protestantizma in politične zgodovine demokracije kažejo kompleksno, a zgovorno sliko: kljub prisotnosti religijskih konzervativnih tendenc v protestantizmu se zdi, da je za družbe, v katerih je protestantizem postal prevladujoča religijska kultura, postala značilna precejšnja mera svobode raziskovanja, verovanja in debatiranja. To dejstvo je bilo delno rezultat naključnih zgodovinskih dogodkov, delno pa notranjih teoloških impulzov v protestantski misli.
Ključne besede: deliberacija, protestantizem, demokracija, debata, javna razprava
‘Interpretations of Wittgenstein, Religion and Interreligious Relations’, in G. Andrejč and D. We... more ‘Interpretations of Wittgenstein, Religion and Interreligious Relations’, in G. Andrejč and D. Weiss (eds.), Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies. Leiden: Brill; forthcoming Sept/Oct 2019.
In the introductive chapter to the volume, I place the studies presented in the volume within the most relevant scholarly contexts: first and foremost, the studies in Wittgenstein interpretation, especially of Wittgenstein on ‘religion’, ‘belief’, and related concepts; and second, the recent versions of Wittgensteinian philosophy of religion and Wittgensteinian theology. I do this by offering a way to read Wittgenstein on religion through tracing four conceptions or ‘pictures’ of religion in Wittgenstein’s thought, which have a particular place in Wittgenstein’s specific understanding of philosophy as grammatical investigation. I show how the studies in the current volume relate to previous applications of Wittgenstein to the study of interreligious encounter, communication, disagreement, and related topics, and suggest how they are connected to some of the recent debates in religious studies, comparative theology, and comparative philosophy of religion more broadly.
Keywords: Wittgenstein, Religious language, Interreligious relations, Comparative theology, Interreligious dialogue.
Liberal Theology Today, 2019
‘Liberal Theology as a Slippery Slope: What’s in the Metaphor?’, in Jörg Lauster, Ulrich Schmied... more ‘Liberal Theology as a Slippery Slope: What’s in the Metaphor?’, in Jörg Lauster, Ulrich Schmiedel and Peter Schüz (eds.), Liberale Theologie heute/Liberal Theology Today. Mohr Siebeck, forthcoming 2019/20.
A metaphor, commonly used by the critics of Liberal Theology, portrays it as a slippery slope between Christianity and unbelief. Descriptively-sociologically speaking, the picture of " sliding through liberal theology towards unbelief " includes some truth. In this paper, however, I take a closer look at the philosophical and theological meaning of the slippery slope argument and offer a response to it. Firstly, I examine and critique the underlying conception(s) of religious belief in typical contemporary anti-Liberal uses of the slippery slope argument against Liberal Theology. Secondly, I argue that the Slippery Slope metaphor can and should be taken (also) as a positive interpretation of an adequate religious belief-attitude rather than (merely as) a negative criticism.
Delivered as an academic paper at the conference Liberal Theology Today, Ludwig Maximillan University, Munich, 18-21 July 2018.
This chapter offers a comparative analysis of the discourse within two Christian communities in S... more This chapter offers a comparative analysis of the discourse within two Christian communities in Slovenia: the Roman Catholic Church (majority) and the Seventh-day Adventist Church (small minority). Among their responses to the 2015–2016 migrant crisis in Slovenia, we could find attitudes and arguments that were particular to the Slovenian context. Those attitudes and arguments had to do with the Slovenian socio-political imaginary and cultural memory, which includes anti-Muslim tropes, Slovenian political dynamics, and the Slovenian experience with Bosnian Muslims. A clear tension between a Christian-humanitarian attitude and an anti-Muslim identitarian Christianity brought a significant disunity into the Catholic response, while the Adventist response remained almost consistently Christian humanitarian. The main difference, however, was not along the denominational lines, but between those Christian responses that were theological and those that moved away from theology into securitarian and identitarian discourse.
Rooting itself in Catholic social teaching rather than theology of creation, this book develops a... more Rooting itself in Catholic social teaching rather than theology of creation, this book develops a novel approach to Catholic ecological ethics. It argues that the traditional conception of the social common good should be fully broadened to encompass all creation, including abiota. Furthermore, the book suggests a comparative-theological approach to ecological ethics through careful conversations with Buddhist, Hindu, and American Lakota conceptions and practices. While its vision of the cosmic common good at times appears too inclusive and perhaps ‘too good to be true’, this book is a valuable contribution to Christian ecological ethics and includes a fresh comparative-theological take on ecological questions.
I suggest that we can recognize four major conceptions of religion in Wittgenstein’s work. I call... more I suggest that we can recognize four major conceptions of religion in Wittgenstein’s work. I call them grammaticalist, instinctivist, existentialist, and nonsensicalist conceptions of religion. The grammaticalist conception of religion depicts central religious utterances as ‘grammatical propositions’, or grammatical ‘remarks’ (PI §251). For example, Christian doctrinal formulations, such as ‘God has sent his Son Jesus Christ for the salvation of souls’, are understood as rules of grammar for the central Christian concepts, in this case ‘God’, ‘God’s son’, ‘salvation’, and ‘soul’. Instinctivist conception refers to Wittgenstein’s emphasis that religion (of linguistic behaviour, believing, rituals, and other religious practices), however complex and intellectually sophisticated, has primarily to do with ‘primitive’ or ‘instinctive reactions’, and not (at least not primarily) with ‘cool’ intellectual procedures. By Wittgenstein’s existentialist conception of religion I mean his affirmation of the intimate connection between religious believing on one hand and decisions of living importance as well as particular kinds of felt experience on the other (e.g. wonder at the existence of the world, feeling of absolute safety, existential guilt). Lastly, nonsensicalist conception depicts religious language as ‘[running] against the boundaries of language’, as the expressions of religiously and ethically salient experience are strictly speaking ‘nonsensical’ (LE 11–12).
In this paper, I explore the possibility of reading Wittgenstein’s understanding of religious bel... more In this paper, I explore the possibility of reading Wittgenstein’s understanding of religious belief with Tillich’s concept of existential/religious doubt, especially as developed in his Dynamics of Faith. I will argue, first, that Wittgenstein’s understanding of religious belief as a deep certainty of a grammatical remark is not the same as his understanding of hinge-certainty of “hinge propositions”, and that the relevant difference is that Wittgenstein leaves room for the possibility of doubt in the former but not in the latter. I then argue that Tillich’s concept of dynamic faith by which Tillich explicates the role of doubt internal to religious believing can significantly enrich the Wittgensteinian conception of religious belief. Despite the notable differences between Wittgenstein’s thoughts and Tillich’s overall system of theology, Tillich’s treatment of the concept of “faith” signals a possibility of a more positive way of relating Wittgenstein’s grammatical investigation and Tillich’s mature understanding of philosophical theology. At the end of the essay, responding to D.Z. Phillips’ negative assessment of Tillich’s theology in the name of Wittgenstein, I will suggest what that more positive way of relating the two might look like.
I this essay, I compare Schleiermacher’s and Tillich’s attitudes towards Judaism and explore how ... more I this essay, I compare Schleiermacher’s and Tillich’s attitudes towards Judaism and explore how these were related (or weren't?) with their respective philosophical theologies.
Dialogue Theories 2. Frances Sleap & Omer Sener (editors), London: Dialogue Society, forthcoming.
Wittgenstein's work is especially relevant for understanding ‘hard’ kinds of dialogue: intercultu... more Wittgenstein's work is especially relevant for understanding ‘hard’ kinds of dialogue: intercultural, interfaith and religious-secular dialogue, i.e. dialogues between individuals or groups with different overall perspectives on reality as a whole, and orientations in life. Wittgenstein emphasized the fact that different world-pictures – and hence, we can extrapolate, different religions and cultures – are often characterized by different depth-grammars. But he also affirmed important ‘connecting links’ between these: in his later work he repeatedly writes that a persistent grammatical investigation reveals that the roots of most language games are not in intellectual reasoning but in instinctive reactions. While these are not necessarily 'good', they comprise 'non-intellectual grounds' that enable - especially if dialogue partners persist in joint, cross-worldpicture grammatical investigation for some time - significant degree of interfaith and intercultural (literal) communication.
To be published in an edited volume on military chaplancies and religious diversity (edited by Torkel Brekke and Vladimir Tikhonov)
Religious Plurality and the Slovenian Military Chaplaincy
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
T... more Religious Plurality and the Slovenian Military Chaplaincy
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
This study focuses on the the ways in which religious diversity features in and affects the activities, the structure and the attitudes of the military chaplaincy in the Slovenian Armed Forces (SAF). The chaplaincy's future is shaped by the fact that this is a post-Communist state with a historically Catholic majority affected by a vibrant conflict over secular-religious relationships, a conflict evoked in regular debate between the politically dominant parties of the Left and Right. This study illustrates how chaplaincy staff are affected by this polarization, and explores the extent to which their treatment of religious diversity supports their attempts to surmount the constraints placed on chaplaincy by the polarization they experience.
Brief Description of the Book:
Title: Military Chaplaincy in an Era of Religious Pluralism: Military–Religious Nexus in Asia, Europe, and USA. Oxford/New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Edited by Torkel Brekke and Vladimir Tikhonov
Part of Religion and Democracy Series
Present-day militaries are often microcosms of the societies that maintain them. Unsurprising then that the armed forces have to come to terms with the question of religion, a subject that has increasingly become of importance in modern nation states.
At the very heart of these connections between the armed forces, religion, and society is the institution of military chaplaincy. Acting as spiritual guides, military chaplains contribute to war efforts by espousing the legitimacy of state violence and preserving the mental health of soldiers. Their role in performing the last rites of the fallen is also of paramount importance Through cross-cultural analysis and taking into account the diversities of military chaplaincies, this volume examines how they mirror societal attitudes towards the armed forces and also contribute in shaping them. Comparing the varied cultural and political contexts of the USA, India, Slovenia, South Korea, Japan, and many other countries, the book takes a pioneering step towards broadening the horizons of existing scholarship in this field.
About the Editors
Torkel Brekke is Deputy Director and Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Norway. He is the author of several books, among them Faithonomics: Religion and the Free Market (2016) and Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization (2012).
Vladimir Tikhonov is Professor at the University of Oslo. Recently, he published Modern Korea and Its Others: Perceptions of the Neighbouring Countries and Korean Modernity (2015) and co-edited (with Torkel Brekke) Buddhism and Violence: Militarism and Buddhism in Modern Asia (2012).
Table of Content:
Introduction: Military Chaplaincy in Comparative Perspective
Torkel Brekke
1. Religious Teachers in the Indian Army
Torkel Brekke
2. Religious Plurality and the Slovenian Military Chaplaincy
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
3. Paths Untrodden in Japanese Buddhist Chaplaincy to the Imperial Military
Micah Auerback
4. ‘Operation Dhamma’: The Sri Lankan Armed Forces as an instrument of Buddhist Nationalism
Iselin Frydenlund
5. Military Rabbis as Community Builders: The Israeli Case
Ori Goldberg
6. The Divine Is in the Details: Managing Religion in Pluralizing Militaries
Kim Philip Hansen
7. Pluralistic Permutations: The Thai Buddhist Military Chaplaincy
Michael Jerryson
8. From Confessional to Concessional: The Adaptation to Religious Pluralism by the Chaplaincy of the Norwegian Armed Forces
Bård Mæland and Nils Terje Lunde
9. Religion in the Sepoy Army of British India
Kaushik Roy
10. Twilight of the Padres: The End of British Military Chaplaincy in India
Michael Snape
11. South Korean Military Chaplaincy in the 1950–70s: Religion as Ideology?
Vladimir Tikhonov
Poligrafi, No. 71/72, 2014. (in Slovenian) pp. 95-120., Feb 2014
Mystical experience can be interpreted as experience in which existential feelings have a promine... more Mystical experience can be interpreted as experience in which existential feelings have a prominent role - unintentional, all-encompassing, affective states which open (or close) the world of possibilities of being for one and enable intentionality (beliefs, emotional feelings, etc.) in the first place (Heidegger, Ratcliffe). What is the relationship between relevant existential feelings and Christian religious language? In this essay I am asking this question with the help of a phenomenological understanding of existential feelings, late-Wittgensteinian understanding of religious language, and a protestant (Schleiermacher-Tillichian) mystical theology. The result is a somewhat counter-intuitive "late-Wittgensteinian phenomenology of mystical experience", which is possible, however, because Wittgenstein's critique of (Jamesian) religious experience is not a complete rejection, i.e. anti-experientialist, but aimed at a particular model of the mind in which an 'inner person' supposedly looks at an 'internal screen of consciousness'. Once such picture of religiously significant, felt experience is abandoned, a late-Wittgensteinian phenomenology of feelings is enabled which, I argue, is a promising framework for understanding the relationship between certain kinds of existential feelings and religious language.
The article engages with two contemporary understandings of Schleiermacher’s notion of feeling wh... more The article engages with two contemporary understandings of Schleiermacher’s notion of feeling which are in important aspects in conflict: a social understanding (Kevin W. Hector and Christine Helmer) and an existentialmystical understanding (Thandeka). Using the phenomenological category of ‘existential feelings’ drawn from the work of Matthew Ratcliffe, I argue that they can be brought into a coherent overall account that recognizes different aspects of feeling in Schleiermacher’s work. I also suggest that such an interpretation of Schleiermacher’s concept of religious feeling offers a different and better understanding of the role of feelings in religious experience and belief than the contemporary ‘perception-model’ of religious experience.
Uploads
Videos by Gorazd Andrejč
The event was live-streamed via the Facebook page of the Institute for philosophical studies (https://www.facebook.com/ZRS.kp.si/).
Speakers on the first day were Carool Kersten, Nadja Furlan Štante, Lenart Škof, Constantine Sandis, and John Durham Peters, with introductions by Gorazd Andrejč, Lenart Škof, and Mladen Popović.
Graphic art by @vaileart_insta (https://www.instagram.com/vaileart_insta/)
Music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
Books by Gorazd Andrejč
Gorazd Andrejč v svojem Pojmovniku religijo obravnava iz perspektiv različnih znanstvenih disciplin: zgodovine, sociologije, antropologije, politologije, filozofije, pa tudi teologije in religiologije, ki kombinira metode omenjenih disciplin.
»Prav zaradi tega, ker je religija polje kulturnih bojev, vkopanih mnenj, neredko močnih čustev, včasih pa celo vojn, moramo biti pri njenem preučevanju pozorni, potrpežljivi, natančni in odprtega uma. Religije se je, kot vsakega družbenega pojava, treba lotiti kritično in znanstveno. Nerazumevanje religijskih pogledov na življenje (če smo nereligiozni), in obratno, nerazumevanje ali obtoževanje ateističnega pogleda na življenje in religijo (če smo religiozni) sta navadno znak pomanjkanja posluha za druge in drugačnost. Kakršnokoli je že naše stališče do religije, duhovnosti, boga ali bogov, je družbeni dialog med neverujočimi in verujočimi neizogiben, če želimo živeti v vsaj minimalno urejeni in svobodni politični skupnosti.«
Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein argues that Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion and his thought in general continue to be highly relevant for present and future research on interreligious relations. Spanning several (sub)disciplines – from philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, comparative philosophy, comparative theology, to religious studies – the contributions engage with recent developments in interpretation of Wittgenstein and those in philosophy and theology of interreligious encounter. The book shows that there is an important and under-explored potential for constructive and fruitful engagement between these academic fields. It explores, and attempts to realize, some of this potential by involving both philosophers and theologians, and critically assesses previous applications of Wittgenstein’s work in interreligious studies.
http://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9781137503077
Contributors: Jernej Koselj, Marjan Tos, Fanika Krajnc-Vrecko, Marjana Harcet, Ahmed Pasic, Gorazd Andrejc, David Stevens, Drago Cepar and Pavel Gantar.
Academic Papers by Gorazd Andrejč
This article is a contribution to the special issue of Religions journal, titled "Religion, Science and Technology in Pantheism, Animism and Paganism", edited by Victoria Dos Santos and Gorazd Andrejc:
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions/special_issues/RSTinPAP
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
Abstract
Deliberation as critical, open, inclusive and argument-based discussion about matters of public interest is a crucial mechanism of a healthy democracy. According to deliberative democracy defenders, like Jürgen Habermas, deliberation contributes to achieving a better and more just society. The present essay analyses the
intertwinement between the development of this political value in the Euro-Atlantic world on the one hand, and Protestantism and its development on the other. Recent works in the history of Protestantism and the political history of democracy paint a complex, but powerful picture: despite the religious conservative tendencies in Protestantism, it seems that a notable measure of freedom of research, belief and debate could be found in the societies where Protestantism had become a dominant religious culture. While this development is partly a result of contingent historic events, it also had much to do with internal theological impulses within the Protestant thought.
Key words: deliberation, Protestantism, democracy, debate, public discussion
Povzetek
Deliberacija oziroma kritična, odprta, vključujoča in argumentirana javna razprava o stvareh javnega interesa je ključen mehanizem demokratične politične ureditve. Po prepričanju zagovornikov deliberativne demokracije, kot je Jürgen Habermas, deliberacija prispeva k doseganju boljše in pravičnejše družbe. Prispevek analizira prepletenost razvoja te politične vrednote v evro-atlantskem svetu s protestantizmom in njegovim razvojem. Novejša raziskovanja zgodovine protestantizma in politične zgodovine demokracije kažejo kompleksno, a zgovorno sliko: kljub prisotnosti religijskih konzervativnih tendenc v protestantizmu se zdi, da je za družbe, v katerih je protestantizem postal prevladujoča religijska kultura, postala značilna precejšnja mera svobode raziskovanja, verovanja in debatiranja. To dejstvo je bilo delno rezultat naključnih zgodovinskih dogodkov, delno pa notranjih teoloških impulzov v protestantski misli.
Ključne besede: deliberacija, protestantizem, demokracija, debata, javna razprava
In the introductive chapter to the volume, I place the studies presented in the volume within the most relevant scholarly contexts: first and foremost, the studies in Wittgenstein interpretation, especially of Wittgenstein on ‘religion’, ‘belief’, and related concepts; and second, the recent versions of Wittgensteinian philosophy of religion and Wittgensteinian theology. I do this by offering a way to read Wittgenstein on religion through tracing four conceptions or ‘pictures’ of religion in Wittgenstein’s thought, which have a particular place in Wittgenstein’s specific understanding of philosophy as grammatical investigation. I show how the studies in the current volume relate to previous applications of Wittgenstein to the study of interreligious encounter, communication, disagreement, and related topics, and suggest how they are connected to some of the recent debates in religious studies, comparative theology, and comparative philosophy of religion more broadly.
Keywords: Wittgenstein, Religious language, Interreligious relations, Comparative theology, Interreligious dialogue.
A metaphor, commonly used by the critics of Liberal Theology, portrays it as a slippery slope between Christianity and unbelief. Descriptively-sociologically speaking, the picture of " sliding through liberal theology towards unbelief " includes some truth. In this paper, however, I take a closer look at the philosophical and theological meaning of the slippery slope argument and offer a response to it. Firstly, I examine and critique the underlying conception(s) of religious belief in typical contemporary anti-Liberal uses of the slippery slope argument against Liberal Theology. Secondly, I argue that the Slippery Slope metaphor can and should be taken (also) as a positive interpretation of an adequate religious belief-attitude rather than (merely as) a negative criticism.
Delivered as an academic paper at the conference Liberal Theology Today, Ludwig Maximillan University, Munich, 18-21 July 2018.
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
This study focuses on the the ways in which religious diversity features in and affects the activities, the structure and the attitudes of the military chaplaincy in the Slovenian Armed Forces (SAF). The chaplaincy's future is shaped by the fact that this is a post-Communist state with a historically Catholic majority affected by a vibrant conflict over secular-religious relationships, a conflict evoked in regular debate between the politically dominant parties of the Left and Right. This study illustrates how chaplaincy staff are affected by this polarization, and explores the extent to which their treatment of religious diversity supports their attempts to surmount the constraints placed on chaplaincy by the polarization they experience.
Brief Description of the Book:
Title: Military Chaplaincy in an Era of Religious Pluralism: Military–Religious Nexus in Asia, Europe, and USA. Oxford/New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Edited by Torkel Brekke and Vladimir Tikhonov
Part of Religion and Democracy Series
Present-day militaries are often microcosms of the societies that maintain them. Unsurprising then that the armed forces have to come to terms with the question of religion, a subject that has increasingly become of importance in modern nation states.
At the very heart of these connections between the armed forces, religion, and society is the institution of military chaplaincy. Acting as spiritual guides, military chaplains contribute to war efforts by espousing the legitimacy of state violence and preserving the mental health of soldiers. Their role in performing the last rites of the fallen is also of paramount importance Through cross-cultural analysis and taking into account the diversities of military chaplaincies, this volume examines how they mirror societal attitudes towards the armed forces and also contribute in shaping them. Comparing the varied cultural and political contexts of the USA, India, Slovenia, South Korea, Japan, and many other countries, the book takes a pioneering step towards broadening the horizons of existing scholarship in this field.
About the Editors
Torkel Brekke is Deputy Director and Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Norway. He is the author of several books, among them Faithonomics: Religion and the Free Market (2016) and Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization (2012).
Vladimir Tikhonov is Professor at the University of Oslo. Recently, he published Modern Korea and Its Others: Perceptions of the Neighbouring Countries and Korean Modernity (2015) and co-edited (with Torkel Brekke) Buddhism and Violence: Militarism and Buddhism in Modern Asia (2012).
Table of Content:
Introduction: Military Chaplaincy in Comparative Perspective
Torkel Brekke
1. Religious Teachers in the Indian Army
Torkel Brekke
2. Religious Plurality and the Slovenian Military Chaplaincy
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
3. Paths Untrodden in Japanese Buddhist Chaplaincy to the Imperial Military
Micah Auerback
4. ‘Operation Dhamma’: The Sri Lankan Armed Forces as an instrument of Buddhist Nationalism
Iselin Frydenlund
5. Military Rabbis as Community Builders: The Israeli Case
Ori Goldberg
6. The Divine Is in the Details: Managing Religion in Pluralizing Militaries
Kim Philip Hansen
7. Pluralistic Permutations: The Thai Buddhist Military Chaplaincy
Michael Jerryson
8. From Confessional to Concessional: The Adaptation to Religious Pluralism by the Chaplaincy of the Norwegian Armed Forces
Bård Mæland and Nils Terje Lunde
9. Religion in the Sepoy Army of British India
Kaushik Roy
10. Twilight of the Padres: The End of British Military Chaplaincy in India
Michael Snape
11. South Korean Military Chaplaincy in the 1950–70s: Religion as Ideology?
Vladimir Tikhonov
The event was live-streamed via the Facebook page of the Institute for philosophical studies (https://www.facebook.com/ZRS.kp.si/).
Speakers on the first day were Carool Kersten, Nadja Furlan Štante, Lenart Škof, Constantine Sandis, and John Durham Peters, with introductions by Gorazd Andrejč, Lenart Škof, and Mladen Popović.
Graphic art by @vaileart_insta (https://www.instagram.com/vaileart_insta/)
Music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
Gorazd Andrejč v svojem Pojmovniku religijo obravnava iz perspektiv različnih znanstvenih disciplin: zgodovine, sociologije, antropologije, politologije, filozofije, pa tudi teologije in religiologije, ki kombinira metode omenjenih disciplin.
»Prav zaradi tega, ker je religija polje kulturnih bojev, vkopanih mnenj, neredko močnih čustev, včasih pa celo vojn, moramo biti pri njenem preučevanju pozorni, potrpežljivi, natančni in odprtega uma. Religije se je, kot vsakega družbenega pojava, treba lotiti kritično in znanstveno. Nerazumevanje religijskih pogledov na življenje (če smo nereligiozni), in obratno, nerazumevanje ali obtoževanje ateističnega pogleda na življenje in religijo (če smo religiozni) sta navadno znak pomanjkanja posluha za druge in drugačnost. Kakršnokoli je že naše stališče do religije, duhovnosti, boga ali bogov, je družbeni dialog med neverujočimi in verujočimi neizogiben, če želimo živeti v vsaj minimalno urejeni in svobodni politični skupnosti.«
Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein argues that Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion and his thought in general continue to be highly relevant for present and future research on interreligious relations. Spanning several (sub)disciplines – from philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, comparative philosophy, comparative theology, to religious studies – the contributions engage with recent developments in interpretation of Wittgenstein and those in philosophy and theology of interreligious encounter. The book shows that there is an important and under-explored potential for constructive and fruitful engagement between these academic fields. It explores, and attempts to realize, some of this potential by involving both philosophers and theologians, and critically assesses previous applications of Wittgenstein’s work in interreligious studies.
http://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9781137503077
Contributors: Jernej Koselj, Marjan Tos, Fanika Krajnc-Vrecko, Marjana Harcet, Ahmed Pasic, Gorazd Andrejc, David Stevens, Drago Cepar and Pavel Gantar.
This article is a contribution to the special issue of Religions journal, titled "Religion, Science and Technology in Pantheism, Animism and Paganism", edited by Victoria Dos Santos and Gorazd Andrejc:
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions/special_issues/RSTinPAP
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
Abstract
Deliberation as critical, open, inclusive and argument-based discussion about matters of public interest is a crucial mechanism of a healthy democracy. According to deliberative democracy defenders, like Jürgen Habermas, deliberation contributes to achieving a better and more just society. The present essay analyses the
intertwinement between the development of this political value in the Euro-Atlantic world on the one hand, and Protestantism and its development on the other. Recent works in the history of Protestantism and the political history of democracy paint a complex, but powerful picture: despite the religious conservative tendencies in Protestantism, it seems that a notable measure of freedom of research, belief and debate could be found in the societies where Protestantism had become a dominant religious culture. While this development is partly a result of contingent historic events, it also had much to do with internal theological impulses within the Protestant thought.
Key words: deliberation, Protestantism, democracy, debate, public discussion
Povzetek
Deliberacija oziroma kritična, odprta, vključujoča in argumentirana javna razprava o stvareh javnega interesa je ključen mehanizem demokratične politične ureditve. Po prepričanju zagovornikov deliberativne demokracije, kot je Jürgen Habermas, deliberacija prispeva k doseganju boljše in pravičnejše družbe. Prispevek analizira prepletenost razvoja te politične vrednote v evro-atlantskem svetu s protestantizmom in njegovim razvojem. Novejša raziskovanja zgodovine protestantizma in politične zgodovine demokracije kažejo kompleksno, a zgovorno sliko: kljub prisotnosti religijskih konzervativnih tendenc v protestantizmu se zdi, da je za družbe, v katerih je protestantizem postal prevladujoča religijska kultura, postala značilna precejšnja mera svobode raziskovanja, verovanja in debatiranja. To dejstvo je bilo delno rezultat naključnih zgodovinskih dogodkov, delno pa notranjih teoloških impulzov v protestantski misli.
Ključne besede: deliberacija, protestantizem, demokracija, debata, javna razprava
In the introductive chapter to the volume, I place the studies presented in the volume within the most relevant scholarly contexts: first and foremost, the studies in Wittgenstein interpretation, especially of Wittgenstein on ‘religion’, ‘belief’, and related concepts; and second, the recent versions of Wittgensteinian philosophy of religion and Wittgensteinian theology. I do this by offering a way to read Wittgenstein on religion through tracing four conceptions or ‘pictures’ of religion in Wittgenstein’s thought, which have a particular place in Wittgenstein’s specific understanding of philosophy as grammatical investigation. I show how the studies in the current volume relate to previous applications of Wittgenstein to the study of interreligious encounter, communication, disagreement, and related topics, and suggest how they are connected to some of the recent debates in religious studies, comparative theology, and comparative philosophy of religion more broadly.
Keywords: Wittgenstein, Religious language, Interreligious relations, Comparative theology, Interreligious dialogue.
A metaphor, commonly used by the critics of Liberal Theology, portrays it as a slippery slope between Christianity and unbelief. Descriptively-sociologically speaking, the picture of " sliding through liberal theology towards unbelief " includes some truth. In this paper, however, I take a closer look at the philosophical and theological meaning of the slippery slope argument and offer a response to it. Firstly, I examine and critique the underlying conception(s) of religious belief in typical contemporary anti-Liberal uses of the slippery slope argument against Liberal Theology. Secondly, I argue that the Slippery Slope metaphor can and should be taken (also) as a positive interpretation of an adequate religious belief-attitude rather than (merely as) a negative criticism.
Delivered as an academic paper at the conference Liberal Theology Today, Ludwig Maximillan University, Munich, 18-21 July 2018.
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
This study focuses on the the ways in which religious diversity features in and affects the activities, the structure and the attitudes of the military chaplaincy in the Slovenian Armed Forces (SAF). The chaplaincy's future is shaped by the fact that this is a post-Communist state with a historically Catholic majority affected by a vibrant conflict over secular-religious relationships, a conflict evoked in regular debate between the politically dominant parties of the Left and Right. This study illustrates how chaplaincy staff are affected by this polarization, and explores the extent to which their treatment of religious diversity supports their attempts to surmount the constraints placed on chaplaincy by the polarization they experience.
Brief Description of the Book:
Title: Military Chaplaincy in an Era of Religious Pluralism: Military–Religious Nexus in Asia, Europe, and USA. Oxford/New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Edited by Torkel Brekke and Vladimir Tikhonov
Part of Religion and Democracy Series
Present-day militaries are often microcosms of the societies that maintain them. Unsurprising then that the armed forces have to come to terms with the question of religion, a subject that has increasingly become of importance in modern nation states.
At the very heart of these connections between the armed forces, religion, and society is the institution of military chaplaincy. Acting as spiritual guides, military chaplains contribute to war efforts by espousing the legitimacy of state violence and preserving the mental health of soldiers. Their role in performing the last rites of the fallen is also of paramount importance Through cross-cultural analysis and taking into account the diversities of military chaplaincies, this volume examines how they mirror societal attitudes towards the armed forces and also contribute in shaping them. Comparing the varied cultural and political contexts of the USA, India, Slovenia, South Korea, Japan, and many other countries, the book takes a pioneering step towards broadening the horizons of existing scholarship in this field.
About the Editors
Torkel Brekke is Deputy Director and Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Norway. He is the author of several books, among them Faithonomics: Religion and the Free Market (2016) and Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization (2012).
Vladimir Tikhonov is Professor at the University of Oslo. Recently, he published Modern Korea and Its Others: Perceptions of the Neighbouring Countries and Korean Modernity (2015) and co-edited (with Torkel Brekke) Buddhism and Violence: Militarism and Buddhism in Modern Asia (2012).
Table of Content:
Introduction: Military Chaplaincy in Comparative Perspective
Torkel Brekke
1. Religious Teachers in the Indian Army
Torkel Brekke
2. Religious Plurality and the Slovenian Military Chaplaincy
Gorazd Andrejč and George R. Wilkes
3. Paths Untrodden in Japanese Buddhist Chaplaincy to the Imperial Military
Micah Auerback
4. ‘Operation Dhamma’: The Sri Lankan Armed Forces as an instrument of Buddhist Nationalism
Iselin Frydenlund
5. Military Rabbis as Community Builders: The Israeli Case
Ori Goldberg
6. The Divine Is in the Details: Managing Religion in Pluralizing Militaries
Kim Philip Hansen
7. Pluralistic Permutations: The Thai Buddhist Military Chaplaincy
Michael Jerryson
8. From Confessional to Concessional: The Adaptation to Religious Pluralism by the Chaplaincy of the Norwegian Armed Forces
Bård Mæland and Nils Terje Lunde
9. Religion in the Sepoy Army of British India
Kaushik Roy
10. Twilight of the Padres: The End of British Military Chaplaincy in India
Michael Snape
11. South Korean Military Chaplaincy in the 1950–70s: Religion as Ideology?
Vladimir Tikhonov
This study presents key findings from a survey focused on the reconciliation process in Bosnia and Herzegovina, with a sample of 2060 respondents answering a written questionnaire with 78 questions. A diverse sample of respondents were found in 13 cities, selected to capture very different economic, cultural, political and geographical contexts. Individual sections of the report explain the study’s design and results, and give further detail that will be important to readers with an interest in attitudes in their city, or among different parts of the country’s population: women and men; wealthier and poorer, employed and unemployed; older and younger; more educated and less educated; more religious and less religious; former soldiers, prison camp inmates, refugees and other civilians during the war; members of the constituent peoples and minorities."
While not exactly universal, placing beings and predicaments onto a vertical kind of spiritual and moral hierarchy is common to many cultures. Embodied cognition helps us understand this. We argue that its findings and interpretations have important implications for philosophy of religion and theology.
Link: https://www.rug.nl/research/centre-for-religious-studies/research-centres/centre-religion-conflict-globalization/blog/spiritual-hierarchy-of-being-the-embodied-cognitive-perspective
The strong ‘religious vote’ for Trump raises – or rather, revives – poignant questions about the relationship between faith, reason and politics. Is there something about religious ways of reasoning and speaking more generally, perhaps, that goes against the virtue of truthfulness?
Call for Papers (Submission deadline: 15 March!)
The interdisciplinary conference Entanglement or Separation? Contextual Investigations in Science and Religion will take place in the coastal city of Koper, Slovenia from 15th to 17th May 2025.
The conference will provide a space to present and debate recent research in different disciplines – including but not limited to philosophy, theology, religious studies, sociology, anthropology and history – on the topic of the entanglement and/or separation of science and religion. We are calling for papers that address the conference theme from any domain of science and any religious or spiritual perspective, either historically or in the present context and/or practice of a particular scientific discipline or religion.
Keynote Speakers:
· Niels Henrik Gregersen (University of Copenhagen)
· Noreen Herzfeld (St. John’s University and the College of St. Benedict, Minnesota)
· Todd Weir (University of Groningen)
· Ted Peters (Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley)
The conference venue is the ZRS Koper Centre for Humanities, located in a historic Tiepolo-Gravisi Villa in Koper, Slovenia: https://www.zrs-kp.si/en/centre-for-humanities/
To apply with a short paper (20-25 minutes), please send a 250 words abstract and a short bio (two sentences) to both Dr. Gorazd Andrejč (g.andrejc[at]rug.nl) and Professor Noreen Herzfeld (NHerzfeld[at]csbsju.edu) by 15 March 2025. Feedback information regarding acceptance will be provided by the end of March.
#EuArE2024 (European Academy of Religion Annual Conference 2024)
20-24 May 2024, Palermo, Italy
The international conference Nature Religions, Science and Technology seeks to bring into the contemporary discussion interdisciplinary debates in the fields of religion, science and technology, by focusing especially on philosophical, theological, anthropological and religious studies perspectives. The contributions include original research on selected topics in pantheism, animism and/or paganism — especially (but not exclusively) in their ‘Western’ forms — in relation to important questions about science and technology. In this way, the research presented and produced by both established as well as early career scholars, addresses contemporary cultural and intellectual sensibilities that arise in the intersection of these fields. A selection of the papers presented will be published in a special issue of journal Religions, titled Religion, Science and Technology in Pantheism, Animism and Paganism.
The conference is a part of the research project Creatures, Humans, Robots: Creation Theology Between Humanism and Posthumanism, based at the Institute for Philosophical Studies, Science and Research Centre of Koper (ZRS Koper), Slovenia, and funded by Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS). The conference is co-organized and supported by ZRS Koper, and the Centre for Religion, Health and Wellbeing at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, University of Groningen. It is taking place at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, on 22nd and 23rd September, 2022.
Gorazd Andrejč and Victoria Dos Santos, 18.09.2022
The keynote speakers at the conference are Andrei Buckareff, Katherine Swancutt, Kocku on Stuckrad, Victor J. Krebs.
The questions that will be addressed include, but are not limited to, the following: Given the strong preference for immanent divine and embodied spirituality in contemporary pantheism, animism and paganism, does this give (any of) them intellectual advantage in relating to science and technology, compared to theism? Why has animism often been suspicious of, and presented as alternative to, ‘Western rationalism’ and hence, to a notable extent, Western science? If the tension between animism and science is not inevitable, what are the philosophical and discursive approaches that allow contemporary animism to combine with rigorous scientific investigation/theory? Is the 4E approach in cognitive science positively compatible with animism, paganism or pantheism? What are the arguments for adopting the so-called naturalistic paganism (or scientific paganism)? How exactly does the technology-focused paganism (technopaganism) relate to modern science and technology on the one hand, and to the more nature-focused paganism on the other? Does the immersive and boundary-transgressing phenomenology of nature, characteristic of some forms of pantheism, animism and paganism, help ground better environmental ethics than a more ‘detached’ approaches to environmental ethics (which typically also rely more explicitly on technological solutions to environmental problems)?
The conference is supported by Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), Science and Research Centre, Koper, and the Centre for Religion, Health and Wellbeing (Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, University of Groningen).
During this two-day symposium, the invited scholars will explore and question the ways in which religion or secularism are (said to be) relevant for rethinking human-environment and human-machine relationships. The speakers are approaching the topic from notably different disciplinary angles (philosophy, theology, literary studies and history of ideas), which will enable a unique cross-disciplinary conversation.
Contributors:
John Durham Peters (Yale University)
Constantine Sandis (University of Hertfordshire)
Todd Weir (University of Groningen)
Carool Kersten (King’s College London/SRC Koper)
Noreen Herzfeld (St. John’s University in Minnesota/SRC Koper)
Lenart Škof (SRC Koper/AMEU ISH)
Polona Tratnik (New University/IRRIS)
Nadja Furlan Štante (SRC Koper)
Gorazd Andrejč (University of Groningen/SRC Koper)
Artificial Intelligence is on the march and it seems destined to play a bigger and bigger part in our lives. Gut feelings about AI tend to be negative but could it be used for good? How might its development affect religious belief or religious practice? With Ed Kessler to explore AI are Beth Singler of Homerton College, Cambridge, and Gorazd Andrejč of ZRS Koper and Univesity of Groningen.
The World Academy of Sciences for the advancement of science in developing countries (TWAS)
Lundqvist Room - Adriatico Guesthouse, Strada Costiera 11, Trieste
The MED-HUB project is organising this workshop with the aim of mapping the relevant knowledge and discussing latest research results in terms of values and religion throughout the EURO-MED region, with special focus on contemporary theories and practices of interreligious dialogues in the region. The purpose of the workshop is that by creating a community of scholars, teachers and other relevant stakeholders (NGOs, associations, etc.) we will be able to suggest new ways of how to teach future Euro-Mediterranean studies in the field of interreligious dialogue and education.
The topics addressed will be:
- Current theories and practices of interreligious dialogue and related kinds of intercultural communication
- Values and paths of interreligious dialogues in the era of (in)security and fear
- Addressing the limitations and recent cultural criticisms of interreligious dialogue
- Particularities of the history and present situation of interreligious relations in the Euro-Mediterranean and its relevancy for the future of interreligious relationships
- The importance of the common values for intercultural negotiation and education, in the context of religious and worldview differences in the Euro-Mediterranean region
- Educational aspects: ways towards teaching youth a tolerant dialogue between cultures, values and religions
- Intercultural dialogue within the framework of changing political paradigms and new connectivities
- Proposal for the »Mediterranean Nathan chair on interreligious education« to be jointly installed in Trieste & Piran
The online course Jews, Christians and Muslims in Europe: Modern Challenges focuses on the relationships between Jews, Christians and Muslims in modern Europe and in European history. It consists of three modules, each lasting for four weeks.
In addition to historical topics, such as interreligious relations in medieval Spain, Enlightenment Britain, and 20th-century Germany, participants will engage with contemporary topics such as the relation of religion, ethnicity and citizenship in Bosnia and Herzegovina; the Muhammad cartoons controversy in Denmark; the social reality of Syrian refugees in Sweden; and the Abrahamic approaches to forgiveness and reconciliation.
Students will be encouraged to address challenging questions through case studies and set readings (in sociology, history, anthropology, and theology).
At the same time, we should also ask critically whether interreligious dialogue has indeed been as beneficial and useful as the dialogue activists claim it has and as they want it to be. While dialogue between the religions can be understood as a pressing step in the modern development of intercultural relations, it can only work when it is founded on careful investigation of their foundations.
At this conference, we want to reconceptualize the question of the importance of an active and well informed interreligious dialogue. The focus will be on in-depth, philosophical-theological conversation between Christians and Muslims. We will explore new ways in which philosophical theories can foster Christian-Muslim understanding.
Examples of the questions to be addressed are:
• Can Christian and Muslim theologies as equal partners in conversation, and as comparative theologies, help us foster better intercultural understanding?
• What are best philosophical models and theories of dialogue for framing the theological conversation between European Christians on one hand and Iranian and other Middle Eastern Muslims on the other?
• Is it the Aristotelian, Platonist, one of the modern philosophical foundations (Continental, Analytical, Witgensteinian, Phenomenological, Deconstructivist, Pragmatist, or other), or a combination of these?
• How can the experiences and perspectives of the relevant “in-house” minorities (Muslim minorities in Europe, Christian minorities in the Middle East), as well as those of Christians and Muslims in special social and political circumstances (refugees, migrants, displaced persons), inform contemporary philosophical-theological dialogue between Christianity and Islam?
• And, how should philosophical and comparative theologies address the contemporary criticisms of interreligious dialogue, which brand it as a failed tool for better understanding between cultures, or as a Western invention and tool for cultural domination, or as a cover-up for power-relations between groups in power, as opposed to empowering those who are ofen voiceless and excluded from interreligious dialogue (“heretical” sects, secularists, women, sexual and other minorities, migrants)?
At the conference, we will address these and related questions in carefully prepared lectures, delivered in pairs during thematically ordered 1,5 hour sessions of two speakers, with ample time for responses and discussions.
Lecture Titles:
Mohsen Javadi: The Primacy of Justice in Islamic Social Ethics: a Solution for Religious and Cultural Conflicts
Janez Juhant: Religion, Society and Mystics: The Spiritual Ground(s) of Societal Life
Carool Kersten: Of Double Genealogies and West-East Investigations: Resetting The Christian-Muslim Encounter
Elmar Kuhn: Is the Clash of Religions the Future of Our World?
Saida Mirsadri: Process Islam: Towards a Metaphysical Foundation for Interreligious Dialogue
Jafar Morvarid: Language-Games Philosophy as a Philosophical Foundation for Interreligious Dialogue
Joshua Ralston: Comparative Political Theology: a Framework for Christian-Muslim Dialogue
Rasoul Rasoulipour: Philosophy of Religion: An Existential Approach
Mohammad Saeedimehr: Islamic Mysticism and Muslim-Christian Dialogue
Klaus von Stosch: Comparative Theology and Christian-Muslim Dialogue: A Relationship of Mutual Foundation
Lenart Škof: A New Temporality of Religion: On Political Theology and its Ethical Core
Javad Taheri: Possibility of a Comparative Theology According to Allamah Sayyed Muhammad Hossein Tabataba’i’s Philosophy
Bojan Žalec: Religious Exclusivism, Dialogue and Coexistence
At the same time, we should also ask critically whether interreligious dialogue has indeed been as beneficial and useful as the dialogue activists claim it has and as they want it to be. While dialogue between the religions can be understood as a pressing step in the modern development of intercultural relations, it can only work when it is founded on careful investigation of their foundations.
At this conference, we want to reconceptualize the question of the importance of an active and well informed interreligious dialogue. The focus will be on in-depth, philosophical-theological conversation between Christians and Muslims. We will explore new ways in which philosophical theories can foster Christian-Muslim understanding. Examples of the questions to be addressed are:
• Can Christian and Muslim theologies as equal partners in conversaton, and as comparative theologies, help us foster better intercultural understanding?
• What are best philosophical models and theories of dialogue for framing the theological conversation between European Christians on one hand and Iranian and other Middle Eastern Muslims on the other?
• Is it the Aristotelian, Platonist, one of the modern philosophical foundations (Continental, Analytical, Witgensteinian, Phenomenological, Deconstructivist, Pragmatist, or other), or a combination of these?
• How can the experiences and perspectives of the relevant “in-house” minorities (Muslim minorities in Europe, Christian minorities in the Middle East), as well as those of Christians and Muslims in special social and political circumstances (refugees, migrants, displaced persons), inform contemporary philosophicaltheological dialogue between Christianity and Islam?
• And, how should philosophical and comparative theologies address the contemporary criticisms of interreligious dialogue, which brand it as a failed tool for better understanding between cultures, or as a Western invention and tool for cultural domination, or as a cover-up for power-relations between groups in power, as opposed to empowering those who are often voiceless and excluded from interreligious dialogue (“heretical” sects, secularists, women, sexual and other minorities, migrants)?
At the conference, we will address these and related questions in carefully prepared lectures, delivered in pairs during thematically ordered 1,5 hour sessions of two speakers, with ample time for responses and discussions.
Conference co -organized by:
Science and Research Centre Koper (Slovenia)
Iranian Association for Philosophy of Religion (Iran)
Centre for Comparative Theology and Cultural Studies, University of Paderborn (Germany)
European Academy of Sciences and Arts (EASA) – World Religions Class (Austria)
As we live in an age of increasing plurality but also instability, the need for interreligious understanding, grounded on solid academic research and in touch with the realities of interreligious encounter, is greater than ever. The course has been designed to meet this need. It consists of two modules (part-time and flexible) – 'Exploring the Principles' and 'Addressing the Issues' – which together with Induction and Conclusion weeks lasts for 10 weeks in total.
The course combines history, philosophy, sociology, ethics, politics, and theology. It will provide a forum in which participants will, for example, explore different kinds of interreligious understanding (Intellectual, Empathic, Civil, Spiritual) between religions and compare the ways in which such understanding can be achieved in different cultural and political contexts in the world (US, Asia, Europe).
Applications are now being accepted for the course commencing on Monday 1 April 2019. The deadline for applications is Sunday 10 March 2019.
The course fee is £325. Bursaries are available.
For further details, visit the course webpage: https://www.woolf.cam.ac.uk/study/online-courses/interreligious-understanding-today
Conference: New Perspectives In European Philosophy of Religion
Maribor, 28-29 November 2018
Venue: Faculty of Arts, Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Main Speakers:
Yujin Nagasawa
Hanne Appelqvist
Robin LePoidevin
Nuno Venturinha
Aku Visala
Marko Uršič
Conference: New Perspectives in European Philosophy of Religion
28-29 November 2018, University of Maribor, Slovenia
Confirmed speakers:
Robin Le Poidevin (University of Leeds)
Hanne Appelqvist (University of Turku)
Yujin Nagasawa (University of Birmingham)
Aku Visala (University of Helsinki)
Sebastjan Vörös (University of Ljubljana)
Gorazd Andrejč (University of Maribor)
Contemporary analytic philosophy of religion is developing fast and in different directions. We find critical engagements with cognitive science and its implications for philosophy of religion; non-classical forms of theism and deism are being developed with fresh expressions and arguments; the links between aesthetics and analytic philosophy of religion have opened up new field of research; the theoretical possibilities of non-Western religious-philosophical thought have become more appreciated in Western philosophy of religion; at the same time, new lines of debate have emerged on some of the traditional topics, such as the Ontological Argument and the the Fine-Tuning variant of the Teleological Argument.
At this conference organized by the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor (Slovenia), recent research on some of these topics will be presented and discussed. The speakers are coming from different European universities. The two-day conference in Maribor is meant especially for early career scholars and PhD students interested in recent analytic philosophy of religion. But more senior scholars and those whose work combines different philosophical methodologies and philosophy with other disciplines are also welcome.
Applications are being accepted for short papers (20 min + 10 min discussion). You can apply by sending an abstract of 300 words to the conference organizer Dr G. Andrejč (ga344[at]cam.ac.uk). The deadline for applications is 10 September 2018. The conference fee is 20 EUR for students and early career scholars (up to 5 years after the completion of the PhD), and 30 EUR for others. The conference will take place at the Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor. We will provide recommendations for accommodation nearby (affordable but good standard) and travel advice to Maribor for international participants.
More information will become available in due course on the website:
https://tinyurl.com/mariborconference
https://woolfinstitute.wordpress.com/2015/07/08/wittgenstein-and-interreligious-communication/
The conference Wittgenstein and Interreligious Communication, organized by The Woolf Institute, will provide a platform for conversation on recent and current approaches from these and other theological and philosophical perspectives towards interreligious communication that engage with Wittgenstein’s thought.
Please see pp. 2-4 of this document to see the conference programme, or visit https://wittcomm.wordpress.com/ .
Introduction
1. Phenomenology of Existential Feelings Within a
Broader Philosophical Context
2. Schleiermacher’s ‘Gefühl’ as Existential Feeling
3. Wittgenstein, Belief-Attitudes, and ‘Hinge-
Certainty’
4. Beyond the Wittgensteinian Grammaticalist View
of Religious Belief
5. The Expressive Among the Functions of Language
6. God-talk, Feelings and Beliefs
Conclusion
Online: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/10262
razgovara činile su komunikaciju sa učesnicima/ -cama otvorenom. Stavovi i interpretacije, koji su rezultat spleta društvenih, kontekstualnih i osobih okolnosti, „ne robuju“ dominirajućim političkim podjelama i ideologijama koje zagovaraju politički i religijski akteri na nivou cijele države. Svjedočili smo brojnim intepretacijama, stavovima, primjerima aktivnosti i inicijativa koje su lokalnog karaktera, a koje su primjer drugačijeg promišljanja na temu pomirenja i izgradnje povjerenja, i koje bi trebalo da dobiju više prostora i pažnje u javnosti.