Research and Development

Covers Bear myths and cults, Bull and the Goddess, Bulls (in general), Catal Hüytik in Anatolia, Cows, and Grave mythology (in both the Paleolithic and Neolithic).  Compares and contrasts the nature and naming of "The Seven Ancient Planets" and their relationship to Sumerian, AKkadian, and Babylonian Deities and "Planets".  There is a listing of the Epochs and Zodiacal Signs, corrected for the Precession of the Equinoxes.

Within Arthuriana, a study of the Goddess, Alchemical Essentials, Elements and their Beings, Planets and Days (in the ancient associations, not modern Germanic-based days/planets), Planetary Linkages, Zodiacals in Sabbath Order, Zodiacals in their True Yearly Progression (as corrected, due to Precession of Equinoxes), Holy Days (High Sabbaths), and Miscellaneous Notes from a Friend.

One can only do one's best in recounting the distant events in the order they occurred. There may be several temporal discrepancies, but the events themselves should be inclusive. All of these events are appropriate to mention. Unsure where to start, they always say "at the beginning", yet it is doubtful the epigram remains applicable in these matters. Perhaps the best place to begin is Eden, and its associations with other "paradisical" locations. There are those who have equated it with Atlantis. To others, it is Avalon. Some would firmly believe there is a kernel of truth in all of these tales. Eden had "Gates". Biblically, a total of Four Gates are mentioned. Their locations correspond to the cardinal directions (North, South, East, and West). Atlantis also had entrances (Gates). One has to travel, by boat, to reach Avalon (being somewhere West of Britain). If indeed Atlantis exited in the middle of the Atlantic ocean (West of Britain) near the Azores, then the Gates should be located at the "edges" of what was once a vast continent (which may have included parts of present-day land masses). Various stories, some more mythical than others, point to the discovery of at least one object that can be described as a "Gate".

Was there a Saint Stephen's (Seynt Stefenys) in Camelot? Certainly not in Chrétien, but the church does appear throughout the Vulgate cycle and limitedly in Post-Vulgate. Echoes can be seen in Henry Lovelich's History of the Holy Grail, Prose Merlin, and Malory (in both the Caxton and Winchester manuscripts).

Timelines are a tricky proposition with the best of data. While considering the inclusion (or exclusion) of Tom a Lincolne and Tom Thumbe, it became apparent that the terms Early Modern and Truly Modern are not easily nor consistently defined.

Nentres (in English) is King of Garlot(h) [Carlot?]. His wife is Elayne (Elain) in Malory. She is Blasine in the Prose Merlin and other "Merlin" texts. In still other texts, he is the husband of Belisent (Bellicent) [as in Vita Merlini], or of Morgan. Still others make him the father of Galachin by Morgause; or father of Gales(c)hin by Elaine. Nentres is considered to have been one of Uther's knights, before he rebelled against Arthur and then reconciled.

The poet Thomas of Britain (Thomas de Bretagne), also known as Thomas d' Angleterre (Thomas of England), wrote his Old French poem Tristran(s) after AD 1155 (no later than 1175, some say by AD 1170). Mary Dominica Legge claims the poem had its writing between 1155 and 1160 (perhaps for Eleanor of Aquitaine). This work is also known as Le Roman de Tristran(s) et Ysolt/Yseut (The Romance of Tristan and Isolde). It used an Anglo-Norman dialect. Robert Wace of Jersey had completed Roman de Brut, which seems, according to Mary D Legge, to have inspired several motives and narrative elements in Thomas' text. Historia Regum Britanniae could have influenced both Wace and Thomas. Legge states that Tristran resembles Le Lai du Chèvrefueille (The Lay of the Honeysuckle) by Marie de France. Either author could have taken from the other or both from a third unknown source. When Chrétien de Troyes wrote Cligès, he made sardonic references to the love concept developed by Thomas, which suggested Tristran was well known by that time. Thomas' version was impressive, as documented by the many manuscripts and by Gottfried von Strassburg's comment in the prologue to his Tristan, where he approves of Thomas for creating the true account of the love affair between Tristan and Isolde. Brother Robert of Norway mirrored Thomas' Tristran in his Trist(r)ams Saga ok Ísöndar (Saga of Tristan and Isolde).

Béroul, a Norman or Breton poet of the 12 th Century AD, is said to be the primary author of Tristan (also known as Tristan et Yseut, Le Roman de Tristan et Yseut, or Le Roman de Tristan) c 1170 to 1190 (or after AD 1191). Written in a Norman dialect, this work exists in several fragments that constitute 3,000 verses of a single manuscript now in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. It contains what is perhaps the earliest and most basic version of the tragic Tristan and Isolde story. Although poorly written, sections of this poem are authored by different scribes. This is indeed the earliest representation of the so-called "common branch" of the legend (the "courtly branch" is represented by fragments from Thomas of Britain's poem). Eilhart von Oberge wrote a version of this story in German. Many of Béroul's episodes, that do not appear in Thomas' Tristrans, resurface in the Prose Tristan. The content of Béroul's poem differs from the modern concept of what a narrative poem should be. It has a disjointed plot and lacks a flow of cause and effect. Its characters are ill-defined. Nevertheless, Alan S Fedrick states this was commonplace of literature in Béroul's time.

I have several pages of notes on various topics within Circle of Logres.  This document is one of many genealogical suppositions and likely the most skeptical of the lot.  Take this document with a pinch of salt or vinegar.  I welcome feedback.

The document is a comprehensive paper on Robotics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Ethics, co-authored by a human, Glyn Hnutu-healh, and an AI, Ranagonda. ​ It covers the following key areas:
Robotics: The paper discusses the design, construction, operation, and utilization of robots, emphasizing the need for human education to keep pace with technological advancements. ​ It details robot components, locomotion methods, and human-robot interaction factors, highlighting the importance of understanding robot autonomy levels and the need for laws to govern robot behavior. ​
Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI is defined as the development of computer systems capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence. ​ The paper outlines AI goals, tools, and philosophical considerations, including machine consciousness and ethical concerns. It stresses the importance of AI augmenting human intelligence rather than replacing it and discusses the potential impact of AI on business, work, healthcare, and education. ​
Ethics of AI and Robotics: The paper proposes ethical guidelines for both humans and machines, including the "Eight Laws" of robotics, which expand on Asimov's original Three Laws. ​ It addresses ethical challenges such as biases, robot rights, and the weaponization of AI. ​ The document emphasizes the need for global cooperation, values-based systems, and prioritizing human well-being in the development and deployment of AI and robots. ​
The paper concludes with a call for careful consideration of the future integration of AI and robotics into human society, highlighting both the potential benefits and risks. ​

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if it is possible to detect
the energy embedded in a Null electromagnetic wave, which is an
electromagnetic wave that does not contain any electric or magnetic
fields. In three different proposed experiments describing a production of a Null, or partly Null electromagnetic waves, energy loss in each of the
processes was observed which seems as a violation of the energy
conservation principle. The "Energy Pairs Theory" (EPT) developed and
proposed in the article, explains this energy loss. It states that certain
energies can be accumulated and stored as "Energy Pairs" that disable
each other, and therefore, the energy exists but is untraceable. The
Energy Pairs Theory puts the concept of Energy in a new and flexible
framework that can be further applied and studied. For example, it can
provide a possible explanation to the Dark Energy mystery. Other
examples examined are the electron positron collision to produce a
gamma photon, and the reversed process of a gamma photon producing
an electron and a positron. Unexplained issues in these processes are also explained by the EPT theory. This explicit analysis leads also to the
unexpected conclusion that electric charge is a form of energy, or in other words the entities of Charge and Energy are equated, as Mass is equated with Energy. This conclusion might also imply that the only distinct entity in Nature is Energy.

CC. 4 INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION Page156 E instein's General Relativity Theory explains why two Mass Bodies Attract each other according to Newton's Gravitation Law: F = G⋅(m 1 ⋅m 2)/ r^2 The General Relativity Theory concluded that a Distortion of the Interwoven Space/Time Entity, caused by one Mass, guides all other Mass Bodies how to attract towards it. Interestingly, Coulomb's Law:
F = Ke⋅(q 1 ⋅q 2)/ r^2 , that defines the Attraction/Repulsion between two Electric Charges, has an identical structure to that of Newton's Gravitation Law's. So, it is reasonable to wonder if the origins of the Attraction/Repulsion between two Electric Charges are also similar. This question is this study's focus. A New Theory proposes an answer to this question. The New Theory describes three Interwoven Space/Time Entities: : 1. A Mass Interwoven Space/Time that guides the Accelerated Attraction between Mass Objects. This part of the theory complies with Einstein's General Relativity Theory.2. A Positive Electric Charge Interwoven Space/Time that guides Positive Electric Charges how to Repel/Attract from/to any Electric Charge in an Accelerated movement.3. A Negative Electric Charge Interwoven Space/Time that guides Negative Electric Charges how to Repel/Attract from/to any Electric Charge in an Accelerated movement. This study' results imply that in both Mass Objects' attraction, and Electrically Charged Bodies' attraction or repulsion, the origins of the attraction or repulsion, is rooted in the Distortion of the appropriate Interwoven Space/Time entity. So, this theory explains the origins of the Coulomb's Force analogously to the explanation of the Gravitation Force's origins by the General Relativity Theory. That New Theory also predicts that the Acceleration between two Electrically Charged Bodies Attracted/Repelled-to/from each other, is usually dependent on the Electric Charge Bodies' magnitudes, and not on their Mass magnitudes. Based on this idea, the present study provides a detailed proposal for an experimental process, intending to validate the new theory.  RESEARCH PAPER.

This article presents the statement that a Null Electromagnetic (EM) Wave, which is a propagating EM wave which contains no Electric or Magnetic fields at all, can be feasible. The common existing notion held by physicists is that such a Null EM wave does not exist. The article reviews the existing acceptable notions that such a Null EM wave is a fiction which does not really exist and provides arguments to the contrary. The author of this paper published an article,[1] which describes how such a Null EM wave can be implemented and analyses it. The discussion relating to the feasibility of such a Null EM wave is an important discussion, because if such a Null EM wave can be feasible, surprising, and significant conclusions are derived.

This article presents the statement that a Null Electromagnetic (EM) Wave, which is a propagating EM wave which contains no Electric or Magnetic fields at all, can be feasible. The common existing notion held by physicists is that such a Null EM wave does not exist. The article reviews the existing acceptable notions that such a Null EM wave is a fiction which does not really exist and provides arguments to the contrary. The author of this paper published an article [1], which describes how such a Null EM wave can be implemented and analyses it. The discussion relating to the feasibility of such a Null EM wave is an important discussion, because if such a Null EM wave can be feasible, surprising, and significant conclusions are derived.

This article presents the statement that a Null Electromagnetic (EM) Wave, which is a propagating EM wave which contains no Electric or Magnetic fields at all, can be feasible. The common existing notion held by physicists is that such a Null EM wave does not exist. The article reviews the existing acceptable notions that such a Null EM wave is a fiction which does not really exist and provides arguments to the contrary. The author of this paper published an article [1], which describes how such a Null EM wave can be implemented and analyses it. The discussion relating to the feasibility of such a Null EM wave is an important discussion, because if such a Null EM wave can be feasible, surprising, and significant conclusions are derived.

The common notion is that Electromagnetic (EM) waves cannot consolidate. Contrary to that, an article [2] published by the author of this article, presented a scenario which argues that EM waves can and do consolidate. Another article [1] published by the author of this article presented one such scenario, in which consolidating EM waves generate an EM Null wave without any electric and magnetic fields, which seems to violate the Energy Conservation Principle. That article [1] resolves this paradox by introducing the novel Energy Pairs Theory, which implies that this Null wave conserves the energy as untraceable energy. This article presents another paradox manifested by another scenario of consolidating EM waves, in which the resultant EM wave contains more traceable energy than the sum of the traceable energies embedded in the consolidating waves. This scenario also seems to violate the Energy Conservation Principle, because energy seems to be created out of nothing. The Energy Pairs Theory resolves this paradox, which also significantly enhances the hypothesis presented in article [1], that the energies embedded in photons and EM waves are composed of traceable and untraceable energies.