BOX INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY FILES FORMislavsky R, Dietvorst B, Simonsohn U. (2019) 'Critical Condition: People Don’t Dislike a Corporate Experiment More Than They Dislike Its Worst Condition'.
Marketing Science. .
doi:
10.1287/mksc.2019.1166CITING THIS RESEARCHBOX
Simonsohn, U., Mislavsky, R., & Dietvorst, B. (2025). ResearchBox 15, 'Critical Condition', https://ResearchBox.org/15. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15031611
LICENSE FOR USEAll content posted to ResearchBox is under a
CC By 4.0 License (all use is allowed as long as authorship of the content is attributed). When using content from ResearchBox please
cite the original work, and provide a link to the URL for this box (https://researchbox.org/15).
BOX PUBLIC SINCE
October 26, 2020
BOX CREATORSUri Simonsohn (
[email protected])
Robert Mislavsky (
[email protected])
Berkeley Dietvorst (
[email protected])
ABSTRACTWhy have companies faced a backlash for running experiments? Academics and pundits have argued that people find corporate experimentation intrinsically objectionable. Here we investigate “experiment aversion,” finding evidence that, if anything, experiments are more acceptable than the worst policies they contain. In six studies, participants evaluated the acceptability of either corporate policy changes or of experiments testing them. When all policy changes were deemed acceptable, so was the experiment even when it involved deception, unequal outcomes, and lack of consent. When a policy change was deemed unacceptable, so was the experiment but less so. The acceptability of an experiment hinges on its critical condition—its least acceptable policy. Experiments are not unpopular; unpopular policies are unpopular.
