Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/2244| Title: | How to Schedule Multiple Graphical Representations? A Classroom Experiment With an Intelligent Tutoring System for Fractions |
| Authors: | Rau, Martina Rummel, Nikol Aleven, Vincent Pacilio, Laura Tunc-Pekkan, Zelha |
| Issue Date: | Jul-2012 |
| Publisher: | International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) |
| Citation: | Rau, M., Rummel, N., Aleven, V., Pacilio, L., & Tunc-Pekkan, Z. (2012). How to Schedule Multiple Graphical Representations? A Classroom Experiment With an Intelligent Tutoring System for Fractions. In van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M. J., & Reimann, P. (Eds.), The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012) – Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 64-71). Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA: International Society of the Learning Sciences. |
| Abstract: | Providing learners with multiple representations of the learning content has been shown to enhance learning outcomes. When designing problem sequences with multiple representations, designers of intelligent tutoring systems must decide how to schedule the representations. Prior research on contextual interference has demonstrated that interleaving different types of learning tasks can foster a deep understanding of the underlying concepts. Do the same advantages apply to interleaving representations? In a classroom experiment, we compared four conditions that varied the practice schedules of multiple graphical representations between interleaving and blocking. The multiple-representation conditions were compared to three single-representation control conditions. During their regular classroom instruction, 290 4th and 5th-grade students worked for five hours with versions of an intelligent tutoring system for fractions. On several dependent measures, interleaving multiple graphical representations led to better learning results than blocking multiple graphical representations. Findings from a think-aloud study give insight into the underlying cognitive processes. |
| URI: | https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2012.1.64 https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/2244 |
| Appears in Collections: | ICLS 2012 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.