Evocation – S. T. Gibson

I missed the boat on A Dowry of Blood by S. T. Gibson. By every account I’ve seen, it’s an excellent, gripping, well-written book, and I was offered an arc of it, but I refused because I was busy. More fool me. But I learn from my mistakes, and there are two subsequent novels from the author now out so I thought hey, I’ll get in on that shit, and downloaded Evocation as an audiobook.

This turns out to have been an error.

Before we get onto the substance of the story, I have to say, some of the problem was the audiobook narration. It was Not Good. Sometimes there’s an ineffable connection that’s missing when you’re listening, when a narrator, for whatever reason, just does not vibe with you, and that was definitely true here, especially for the voices the narrator chose for the dialogue. This is not a failing on their part; sometimes we just do not connect, these things happen. But the narrator also kept mispronouncing words and that stressed me out enormously. The first few I chalked up to hey, maybe this is a US/UK pronunciation difference, but it kept on happening, enough that I started googling and… no, it’s not a dialect thing, at least not for most of them (I double checked, and google is adamant that pronouncing “chaise longue” as “chayz lounge” with a hard “ch” is just incorrect). It tended to be on unusual words, either old fashioned ones (there’s a lot of that in the book) or esoteric (I mean, it’s about magical practicioners, so of course), or just… fancier word choices than the immediately obvious synonym that could have gone in its place. Over time, this just became incredibly irritating listening, because I’m incapable of letting stuff go*.

It also did nothing to undermine the vibe I suspect I’d have got even were I reading this with my eyeballs: that someone needed to take away the author’s thesaurus. A few too many synonyms for “said” and “looked”, a few too many overcomplicated sentences that just didn’t sound natural, especially in dialogue. Compound this with a number of those words being mispronounced and it does just sound a bit… amateur? Juvenile? Like a teenager desperately trying to sound erudite and not quite getting the cadences right. Despite everyone involved being in their late twenties. The thing this really reminded me of (derogatory) is Masters of Death by Olivie Blake. I DNFed that one with a quickness because everyone in it was insufferable, and written to say all the long words by someone who clearly did not habitually use the long words themselves, and again, doing so with characters old enough that they definitely ought to know better.

But alas, the issues don’t end there. The story follows three people, David, Rhys and Moira. David and Rhys have a long history and a messy breakup behind them. Rhys and Moira are mostly happily married. David may have sort of accidentally tried to break them up one time but not entirely on purpose. Safe to say, everyone is not the best of buds. But David and Rhys have to play nice, because they’re both involved in the same occult society, and both gunning for the newly available high priest job. Will it go to David, old money, old magic and old connections who can schmooze with the old and young of the society and charm everyone right into his pocket? Or will it go to the upstart Rhys, hard worker, dedicated, learned and hell bent on dragging the society into the 21st century, ending their stagnation and slow decline? And will all of this get messed up by David suddenly being possessed, and having no one to turn to for help but a hostile ex and his entirely-reasonably-ill-disposed wife?

Yes. I mean, obviously. I’ve read books before.

The thing I knew going into this story – which may constitute a spoiler, if you’re more conservatively inclined in that regard, so look away now – is that it’s ultimately a story of a polyamorous relationship. At some point, I knew, even from the start of reading it, David, Rhys and Moira were all going to end up together. So all that heated sniping and crossness at the start was ultimately going to be a smokescreen, and a different relationship was going to emerge from beneath it, or at least sexual tension itself into being around the sniping. And it did… but. But. I kind of – maybe foolishly – assumed there was going to be more of a story around the relationship. Or that we’d progress past the crossness and sniping before like… 2/3 through the book. More fool me I guess?

What this meant is the pacing was wildly unfun. The first part of the book gets very boggy and sticky, with it feeling like the characters are going in circles, making bad choices and having the same conversations with each other over and again, waiting for something to click so their interactions can progress. It’s obviously trying to convey the slow process of Rhys lowering his guard with someone he used to love but no longer trusts, and Moira learning that this dickhead has literally any redeeming qualities (jury’s still out on that in my personal opinion). And I could sort of see that happening, if I squinted. But it’s not done smoothly at all, so the dialogue keeps circling back to the same topics, rehashing the same arguments with incremental changes, and it just gets so dull.

There’s also a significant issue in how those conversations run. Even aside from the clunky vocab rattling around the sides the whole time, the way they speak, particularly how Rhys and Moira speak is… well. I live on the internet. I’m familiar with reddit and twitter and their ways, and the way that the vocab of therapy gets picked up and thrown around and twisted out of shape by overuse. As on r/relationships, so here. There’s a lot of talk about boundaries and trauma and digging into the deep psychological motivations that is entirely alien to my experience of the sort of dialogue people have with their faces in the real world, rather than yelling on twitter, that it felt wildly unnatural and stilted. Maybe there are some people who really do talk like that in person? I have never met them. And again, it was constant, circling back and back and back again to tell David why he was crossing Rhys’ boundaries, why it was to do with his trauma from his childhood, and I just… please. Stop. I beg. A crumb of activity. A morsel of plot or actual character or relationship movement.

When we did get plot? It was fine. It was a perfectly pedestrian oh-no-a-curse-on-my-family-line kind of tale, done adequately enough, but there wasn’t really enough of it to fill a novel, precisely because the novel was way more interested in that three way relationship.

For this to have worked, for that focus to have landed for me, the characters really needed a whole lot more work, for me. David mostly comes across as an arsehole, and it’s really hard to grasp the redeeming qualities he’s supposed to have that make Rhys like him. Rhys meanwhile swings between several very disjointed character states, and his motivations never really make sense. He wants a bunch of different things and then sometimes takes actions almost nonsensically that serve none of those goals. He doesn’t back what he says with his actions, and we don’t get enough interiority from him to get a sense of why he might be being so inconsistent. People don’t have to be logical, but the reader needs to see a little bit of what’s making them tick, to grasp what moves them in the way it does. And then Moira… oh Moira. A black female character, tacked on to whatever the fuck was going on with the two white men, she just occasionally steps in to say something reasonable and make them grow up a bit, and I hate that for her. The threeway relationship that forms ultimately does so around the crux of the two men, despite her being married to one of them, and it feels like it sidelines her quite a bit. There are some interactions between her and David clearly trying to show something growing between them (that is of a very different nature to the sexual chemistry between Rhys and David), but I don’t think there’s enough there to sell it. Add in the fact that she’s having to grapple with both of the men just being absolute numpties half the time, I spent a lot of the book wanting her to ditch the pair of them and run off to another city to be happy. Her relationship with Rhys is a little better, but again it simply does not get the focus that Rhys/David does, and sometimes just lacks the chemistry needed to sell how in love with her, how desperately devoted to her, Rhys is meant to be, based on his own words.

Plaguing all three of them is also the common – annoying – issue that plagues many a book: people really aren’t as good as the author thinks they are at picking up thoughts, emotions and intentions from facial expressions. Even with the people to whom I am closest, with whom I spend all my time, I cannot glean the buckets of info these characters do from a single eyebrow twitch. It was just another thing that felt so implausible, so outside of the norm of human interaction, that the critical human core of the story fell flat.

So alas, I see in this story the shape of something that could have been good and interesting and unusual, but that something really needed a deft hand at character work to do it, and it’s just not there. So much of the story lives in dialogue, in charged moments and meaningful glances, and the spark or realism and humanity simply does not fill those lines. Without that, it is just some slightly annoying people circling the same interpersonal dramas, filling time until someone can be bothered to fix the possession problem. And that’s boring. I probably would have DNFed it had I not needed it to have on while I was crafting, and it has quite possibly soured me on picking up the author again. A massive shame all round.

*Partner discovered not long after we started dating, while playing a board game set in the ancient mediterranean, that he could wind me up no end by talking about the “he-loots” and “pleeeeeebs”, and has continued to do so in the six years since then. It is a known problem.

Posted in All, Fantasy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Hugo Awards 2024 – Novellas

And on to the novellas. In many ways, this is a category I am more well-read in than novel – I read so many great novellas last year, and had a real difficult time deciding which to condense down onto my ballot. Many of those were small press novellas, and I have to say I’m sad to see a predominance of Tor(dotcom) once again, though a little less overwhelming than in some years, as there is really a lot of strength out there in the small press publishers, and it would be wonderful to see that reflected in the shortlist. Neon Hemlock, for instance, reliably publish banger after solid banger, then there’s Luna Press’ extensive annual range, Stelliform, Small Beer, Subterranean, the list (apparently predominantly in the s section of the alphabet) goes on. I will continue to yell at them throughout the year in the hope of making whatever small dent I can in the hegemony of big press.

But that’s not what we’re here for – we’re talking about the current shortlist.

From least to most preferred, here is my run through of the finalists, along with a few of my thoughts about them:

We start with “Life Does Not Allow Us to Meet” by He Xi / 人生不相见, 何夕, translated by Alex Woodend (published in Adventures in Space: New Short stories by Chinese & English Science Fiction Writers). I caveat this with – this is a translation. How to approach prose in translation is always tricky, especially if you don’t speak the language of the original, and so cannot begin to see the shape of the words underneath the English, as I cannot.

That being said… this was clunky, and I don’t think it was the translation. Alex Woodend has also translated another on this list, and there are distinct differences for me between the prose of the two, with only one of them going moderately “clang” during reading.

Even aside from that… hoo boy, for this one. Hoo, and indeed, boy. I did not super enjoy it as a craft object, but that was somewhat beside the point of some of the incredibly dubious choices made in the story. Bit of casual genocide. Lot of misogyny, like… so much. All the women are small and little and delicate and did I mention small? And they must have things explained to them rationally, for they do not approach the problems as the rational man does. Yikes.

It’s also, for a lot of the story, incredibly dry hard SF that is far more interested in just telling you fact after fact after fact about the science, the world, the concept than actually doing any real storytelling, in a way that made it a reeeeal struggle to get through. And again, it might be easy to wonder if the translation was part of that, whether there was a fluidity and elan in the original that has not survived its journey into English but… I am dubious. It fits into a mode of hard SF I am not unfamiliar with, though one I have not encountered being published at all recently, and so it feels reasonable to assume that’s what it was going for. I can’t shy away from all criticism just because I might have missed something by not reading it in the original. I have to appreciate the text I have and the text I have kinda sucks.

Also yeah the politics of it are wildly unpleasant, so y’know, bottom of the ballot it goes.


Next up is “Seeds of Mercury” by Wang Jinkang / 水星播种, 王晋康, translated by Alex Woodend (also from Adventures in Space: New Short stories by Chinese & English Science Fiction Writers). Is it weird we got two stories from the same anthology? That feels weird. Is this an anthology of Chinese stories that really took off in the anglosphere and I just completely missed it? How much Chinese SFF is getting translated into English anyway? I don’t know!

Anyway, this one is also translated by Alex Woodend, and on the whole I found it to flow a lot more nicely, and just feel a lot more… if not naturalistic, then at least interested in the emotions of humanity. The characters in it felt like characters with motivations and lives, at least to an extent, and on the whole I had a perfectly pleasant time reading it.

The premise though… the premise is a little silly. A man gets an inheritance from a deceased family friend of organisms she’s been developing that can withstand enormous heat. She wants them to evolve and become sentient, but knows that process will take many many years and much investment. But the protagonist makes it happen, with the help of a rich investor, who has his own interest in the project. We follow the start of it all on earth, as well as the result of the experiment as the creatures live and evolve on Mercury, and what happens as their society develops into one with a religion/science culture war.

It’s not exactly a subtle story either, but there were moments of interest and amusement in it. This one was fine.


Then we come to The Mimicking of Known Successes by Malka Older (Tordotcom).

I read this on a long, solitary train trip up to Yorkshire, and I would in many ways consider it a perfect train book. It’s short, it’s compelling and it’s immersive, so you get immediately sucked in and can happily ignore the screaming children in your vicinity, but not so absorbed you forget to get off when you reach Leeds (I actually finished it before I got there, but the point stands).

It’s a reimagining of a Sherlock Holmes type of story/dynamic, in a future where Jupiter has been colonised, and people live there in a strangely steampunk-but-kinda-not society, in a vast world connected by floating train-monorail things. We follow an investigator looking into a man’s disappearance, that initially seems to have been a suicide (jumping off the train platform into the gaseous planetary oblivion below), but turns out to potentially be something a little more.

Along the way, there’s a connection with an old friend, discussions of the ethics of animal conservation in a world with limited resources, adventure, hijinx and suspense. All in all, it’s a romp, and I had a great time going through it.

It is a story that feels a little limited by the constraints of a novella – I think the characters could have done with a little more time on the page, to grow a little more organically, and I think the denouement was somewhat rushed – but it does make up for it by being so immediately captivating.

It also – in a very Holmesian way – is the start of a series, and so we get the episodic adventures of the pair returning in future at least twice more, and possibly even more so.

It doesn’t threaten higher in my ballot because for all that I had a great time with it, I don’t know that it did anything that felt like a stretch to me, in the way that the best books on a shortlist ought to. There wasn’t quite the magic or the wonder or the innovation that I want to see. It was a perfectly well crafted, perfectly delightful adventure, and did not upset me as a Holmes fan by being a monstrous misunderstanding of the original text, while also being very happy to take it wildly away from the source material, which I love to see. But it didn’t quite feel… special, I suppose.


Very hot on its heels (and for similar reasons) is Thornhedge by T. Kingfisher (Tor, Titan UK), something I did a full review of here. It’s another book I would consider delightful but not extraordinary. I had a nice time reading it. I would definitely recommend it to other people. But it just lacked that… something.

It also falls into the issue I have where I love T. Kingfisher’s work, right? I adore some of her books. I think some of her books have been extremely awards worthy, but somehow those aren’t the ones that make the award shortlist, or get the breakout success. Nettle and Bone was very much that for me – I enjoyed it fine, but didn’t get what it was about it that had caused such runaway success, where something like Paladin’s Grace I’d have understood in a second.

Thornhedge is a fairytale retelling, specifically of Sleeping Beauty, but with a shift in character perspective – as the cover says, there’s a princess trapped in a tower, but this isn’t her story. And as far as it goes, it’s a perfectly fine fairytale retelling with a dark twist, and the main character is such a T. Kingfisher protagonist, I would find it hard not to love her. She has the awkwardness, the self-consciousness, the self-doubt and the weirdness that characterises her, well, her characters, and as with many other stories, by the skill of Kingfisher’s writing, that metamorphoses into a strange sort of charm. There’s also a very charming secondary character who is very enjoyable to spend time with, but frankly could have done with a lot more time dedicated to him to make his part in the story feel a bit better.

It is a perfectly delightful little book to consume in a few hours. But it’s again not a stretch, not a wonder. It’s not doing anything new, or particularly strikingly. It’s turning a known fairytale on its head with a bit of darkness, sure but that’s… we’ve had that for a while. It’s nothing new.

To shamelessly quote my own past review:

it’s not going to set the world on fire or be thrust into the awards limelight [I have never claimed prophetic powers, and you should not believe me if I ever do]. Luckily not all books need to be that – it’s a book for the fun of reading, one that you’ll blitz through the first time, then put aside, and maybe come back to a few years later when you need something cosy and cheering. And those are just as important as the ones that break your heart or change the way you see the world entirely. Sometimes you need the downtime, the calm and the comfort, to leave you able to appreciate the bright and the brittle and the brilliant. And this is exactly that, done beautifully.

It’s a comforting, pleasant, restorative read. But those aren’t the books I put at the top of my ballot, even when I enjoy them just fine. Now if everyone else could appreciate one of her more exciting books with me so I can vote for it in an award next year, that would be grand, ta.


Next up, Rose/House by Arkady Martine (Subterranean). And here’s where we get to “interesting”.

This is a story about an empty house with its own central artificial intelligence woven into its fabric, told from the perspective of the one person allowed inside since the architect died a year earlier. Except – there’s a dead person inside the house, or at least so the house says, and the police would very much like to investigate that. Shame the house is being awfully unco-operative about the whole thing. The story follows the dead architect’s former protégé as she helps a police detective attempt to investigate the crime, while also unravelling some of the strangeness of Rose/House itself.

It’s a weird, haunting, dreamy sort of book, almost a ghost story where the ghost is the machine, and utterly unlike anything I’ve read before – I had no idea what to expect, whether on the first or last page, and it kept me wondering and wanting the whole way through, in the best possible way. It’s very much a “wondering” sort of story, leaving you the gaps for interpretation and speculation around the facts you’re given, and full of the strangeness of people, while also gifting us the wholly original strangeness of a sentient, somewhat hostile technohouse.

It was intensely a book of atmosphere – the heat of the desert, the cold absence of the empty house, the echoes of a presence no longer felt, in a life and a home. Even now, months after reading it, I can bring to mind not just the images it conjured for me, but the emotions too, far more even than the plot – I remember feeling haunted, on edge, expectant, waiting for the other shoe to drop, interspersed with moments of quiet and thoughtful clarity, perfect little scenes to pause in briefly. It is less a book about people – those it has are rendered beautifully, full of the mundane mystery and unknowableness of realistic portraits of people, but they’re not quite the focus of the story, more the vector by which it is moved along to its conclusion.

I would be absolutely happy if this won – it was a wonderful, singular story, and one I enjoyed, and more importantly appreciated, immensely.


And finally, at the top of my ballot, Mammoths at the Gates by Nghi Vo (Tordotcom). Preferences are not rational, and this one even less so than usual. I read this book at precisely the moment I needed to, and it hit just the right note, just the right topic, in just the right way, to really affect me at that time. I go into more detail in my full review here, but, in brief, I simply loved it.

I have loved all the stories in this series – each one has a delightful twist, a little conceit at the heart of its structure that unfolds alongside the events of the story, and that, more than anything, is what drives my love for them, and Mammoths at the Gates‘ place at the top of my ballot. There are many, many great stories in SFF, but it is a rarer breed that I truly crave – the great story with not only great but interesting writing, the story that does something a little more with the parameters of its storytelling. Particularly in this category, I like to see stories that play around with being novellas, stories that aren’t just shorter novels or longer short stories, that make use of their particular size and turn it into a feature, as Vo has in every single entry into this series. Because she only has so much space, she can use each little structural maguffin to great effect without worrying too much that the audience will tire of it through over exposure, nor miss it from brevity. It’s just precisely long enough,

And there’s a sense of that “just so” that runs throughout the telling of this story – words fall precisely into place, moments frozen in gorgeous clarity, dialogue pitched exactly right.

But there’s a soul underneath that precision, a comfort that comes from a resonating humanity – the protagonist, the monk Chih, lingers over food in every story, clearly a lover of that homelyest of comforts, but never more than in this one, the story where they go home to the Abbey they trained in. It’s a story full of comfort, like that. Simple things, especially simple foods, that remind us where we come from, and Vo has a way of conjuring with dishes I know nothing about and making me yearn for them like my own comfort foods.

And it’s that, that emotionally evocative constant, that has me putting this at the top of my ballot. It’s a story I felt, and keep on feeling, for which I love it deeply.


And that’s my ballot! Realistically, there are two I would be delighted to see win, three I would be perfectly ok with winning, and one I would really, really prefer not to, which is an acceptable distribution. It’s only disappointing because there were so, so many wonderful novellas out there in 2023, but that’s the nature of the shortlist. And this one at least has a pleasing variety to it.

I am absolutely hopeless at predictions, but my gut says either The Mimicking of Known Successes or Rose/House, the latter being somewhat hampered by the limited run in print when it first came out. We shall see.

Posted in All, Fantasy, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hugo Ballot Novels – Top Two

Another disappointing review this is going to be, because I’ve actually reviewed both of my top two before. I know, I suck.

Or… well. I suck, because I’m great, by which I mean an early adopter. I read Some Desperate Glory by Emily Tesh back in March 2023, picking it up on the basis of having loved her Greenhollow duology – a pair of historical fantasy novellas starting with Silver in the Wood which were haunting and beautiful and sad and desperately gay. When Nerds of a Feather was offered an early copy of her next book? I jumped at the chance, say no more, don’t care that it’s a totally different genre, and I reviewed it here. I stand by everything I said back then, but also want to add that it has stayed extremely fresh in my mind, even over a year later. It’s been a book I’ve loved talking about, reading other people’s reviews of, and just generally been an insufferable hype merchant for.

And then The Saint of Bright Doors I reviewed back in May, after seeing it referenced on Gautam Bhatia’s newsletter Words for Worlds (definite recommend, incidentally; he’s always got something interesting to say). I had heard nothing about it previously, and in fact heard nothing again about it for a while after I read it… and then the steady trickle began, and then the influx, and then the torrent of practically everyone I pay attention to in the SFF reviewing ecosystem, and I was once again smug for getting on the hype train at a much earlier stop. Choo choo mfers.

Anyway, if you want my much longer form thoughts on either of those books, the reviews spell them out, and I stand by them, even a year on. In contrast to Translation State, they are both also books I have very clear memories of and thoughts about, despite all the time that’s passed – they live on vividly in my mind, and I haven’t ever really put them to the side in the interim, where Translation State I read and then clearly moved on from. I suppose, looping back to that hype train, they are also both (Saint far more, though being an Illumicrate book certainly created a discussion around Some Desperate Glory too) books that have generated genuine and continuing conversation in the genre spaces I occupy. They’re both books that were substantial enough, interesting enough, and sometimes controversial enough, that people have just kept on having things to say about them. And quite right too, they’re both great. They are both books I find myself wanting to evangelise for, talk about, dig into, all the time. They’re both books that cover quite different subject matters, but really engage with it, and are willing to leave some open spaces within themselves for thoughts to seep in, for discussion to develop. They’re books that invite you in. And I love that for them.

They’re also both books where craft is clearly prized and treasured. The Saint of Bright Doors has slightly dreamy, mythic prose, full of imagery and strangeness, intersecting with vivid realities. It’s a book that can give you changing landscapes, changing time, and slot those neatly alongside the mundanities of existence and bureaucracy, allowing the big and the small to co-exist and enrich one another. Some Desperate Glory meanwhile carries over Tesh’s vivid descriptions of place and context that defined my love of Silver in the Wood and made them work in a wholly different context. She brings life to the cold utility of space bases, and makes places it feels true to have humans occupying.

They’re also both very theme-forward books. They have their core ideas, their core arguments, and have built a world around them to support them, but have understood that that world, that the people in it, need to be sufficient and plausible to support the themes for them to truly take hold.

I make them sound similar, but they’re really not. One is about space fascists/interrogating SF’s historical ideas of space colonialism, and the other is about religion and politics, the intersection of the two, power, lineages and the concept of destiny. Tonally, they are poles apart – The Saint of Bright Doors driftingly mythic with overtones of magical realism, occasionally undercut by almost intimate earthy reality; Some Desperate Glory cynical with an edge of dark humour that isn’t really entirely humour bleeding round the edges, ultimately itself undercut by a slightly desperate hopefulness.

But I love them both. I love their ideas. I love their prose. I love the way they commit without wavering to their perspectives and drag you along for the ride. I love that they both trust the reader to be able to come along too.

So which is the top of my ballot? Because there are no ties here, no cowardice from me, and there must be a single winner at the top of the ballot sheet.

If I have to choose, it’s The Saint of Bright Doors. Why? Some ineffable edge of vibes. A glorious moment of twist reveal of language the like of which I have never seen in an SFF book. That’s all, really. Truthfully, I will be happy if I see either win in Glasgow, and will cheer along with the best of them in either case. They would both deserve it.

Which leaves my final Hugo novel rankings as:
1) The Saint of Bright Doors – Vajra Chandrasekera
2) Some Desperate Glory – Emily Tesh
3) Translation State – Ann Leckie
4) Witch King – Martha Wells
5) The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi – Shannon Chakraborty
6) Starter Villain – John Scalzi

And so concludes my Hugo novel ballot. I will hopefully make time to do a single post covering the novellas as well, as I have some thoughts about that shortlist too (especially as I went into this nominating cycle of the Hugos with around 20 novellas I would be happy to see on the ballot). But I have the two translated novellas to read first, so watch this space I guess.

Posted in All, Awesome, Fantasy, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Six from Six – Best Books of the First Half of the Year

We interrupt my Hugo chatter briefly, because we are now half way through the year, to which I say “fuck, what, really? Already?? Surely not???”. The linear passage of time once again confounds me. But anyway, arbitrary designations of our progression through the year are a great time for arbitrary breakdowns of reading, right? So we’re doing that.

I’m going to talk about the six best books I read in the first six months of 2024, and some general thoughts about how the year is going for me, bookwise.


First up at the end of January I read When the Angels Left the Old Country by Sacha Lamb. This is the story of an angel and a demon who have studied the Torah together for many centuries in their little shtetl. But time and oppression being as they are, many of the young people from Shtetl have left to go to America. Now, one of those young people has gone missing, and Uriel and Little Ash decide that their best and only course of action is to go after her and find out what has happened. Thus begins their strange trip across the world, and a process of learning about themselves, the people around them and each other once they break out of the comforting rhythm of their normal life, and an exploration of the realities of going to America in a world determined to be hostile to Jews.

There was a lot about this book that I loved, but a huge part of it was about the relationship between Little Ash and Uriel, the two main characters. I’ve seen people compare them to Aziraphale and Crowley, but apart from the superficial similarity of an angel and a demon who become close to one another, there’s not much I’d really link up between the two stories. Little Ash and Uriel are far more determinedly drawn as supernatural in the sense of Strange and Uncanny – they approach the world markedly differently from those around them, and are extremely steeped in their own view and experiences of the world (where Aziraphale and Crowley often come across more as human+). There’s a huge development across the story in how they see and understand one another, and it’s all done so gently and so beautifully. There’s also much more gentleness with them as characters, in way that couldn’t really work with the humour of Good Omens. Which is fine, because y’know, different books.

There’s a lot about it I love, as a story, from the deep humanity of it, the deftness of its queer inclusion in a historical setting, the way it plays with expectations around the idea of the journey to America, and what that means for everyone involved, the way the story spools out never in the way you quite imagine its going to, but also just in the way it needed to. It’s a book to be savoured, rather than devoured, and I found a great deal of joy curled up in a chair with a blanket and mug of tea, spending the time on its lovely prose and lovelier people.

Incidentally, it also is a book where I very much went in with an absence of background knowledge – there’s a lot of terminology relating to Judaism that I’m unfamiliar with, and terms in a number of languages I don’t know, but the book has absolutely no interest in handholding me, a random non-Jewish, non-American person through it. There’s a glossary at the back, but I didn’t realise until after I finished reading, so I googled what I needed to google and just let the story get on with it, and it was all the better for not having tried to cater to me and my ignorance. More of that please.


Then in February I read Kushiel’s Dart by Jacqueline Carey, which is a book I’ve heard a huge number of mixed things about over the years, and which I’ve been meaning to get back to for a while. It’s the sort of thing I see a lot of authors I like referring to as a formative read for them – much like C. J. Cherryh’s work, which I also need to make an effort to look into – while not being something I see discussed much outside of that sphere. The Velvet Underground of books, or something? Anyway, all I really knew going in was “gender politics and relationship stuff, weird, yes, lots” and… well yeah it definitely achieved that.

It’s also in some ways a very difficult book. Difficult to read, at points. Difficult to discuss. Tackling difficult topics. It’s full of messy sex, problematic consent and all sorts of terrible choices and actions by a variety of people. But despite all of that, I also found it incredibly beautiful. It manages the difficult act of working through mess and nastiness while maintain a distance, a sense of standing above it – this isn’t a moralising book, in either direction, but one in which people, in all their messy glory, work through a bunch of complex, difficult and messy things, in the way that humans have always done.

And that is the crux of why I enjoyed it – it’s full of people, characters, being actually well… people. There’s intrigue and politics and relationships and feuding and all sorts of interpersonal dynamics, and even when the events get silly, the human aspects feel truly real throughout. And so, even though it was a heck of a tome, I was hooked throughout.


In March I picked up The Practice, the Horizon and the Chain by Sofia Samatar, which I reviewed for ARB here, if you want the long version of my thoughts.

The short version was that I loved it, of course, but also that it was such an intensely thoughtful book. There’s nothing about it, not a single word, that feels unconsidered, and so despite being a relatively slim volume, it packs a hell of a lot in just by being totally intentional at every turn.

It also touches on two very interesting and fraught themes which I feel tend not to be tackled in SFF as much as I’d like.

The first is class, and I think, to some extent, this is where my Britishness is showing. Of course I view the world through the lens of class; how could I be any other way, living in the Britain I live in? It’s just a fundamental part of our experience. With so much of the gravity of the SFF world being in the US, where the experience of class is wholly different, it’s not surprise that I don’t see a tonne of work that speaks to class in the sense I tend to view and understand it. And this… well, it’s not exactly that. It’s not class exactly as it exists in the world I see, projected into space. But it’s thinking about class in a way that really grabs me, and that I really wish we saw more of.

The second is religion, or spirituality more, I suppose. This one is less important to me directly, as it’s not something that’s a huge part of my life, but it’s something I recognise as a critical part of the broader human existence, and whose lack is keenly felt in a lot of stories that try to be deeply about humanity. But it’s here. It’s intense here. It’s everywhere. It’s the whole story. And it is so, so well done, and so moving, that it reminded me again how much it’s missed everywhere else.

All in all, hell of a book, one that will deserve a reread or three, and which says things that need saying about a number of topics. Incredibly impressive and beautiful while doing it.


Also in March (clearly just a top month, as one of my other contenders who didn’t quite make the six is there too) is OKPsyche by Anya Johanna DeNiro, which I reviewed for NoaF here.

This one… it’s kind of impossible to describe and review. It’s a hell of a story, and a deeply surreal one, all about connection, reality, community and the self, and the daily grind of existence. There are characters who may or may not be real, experiences that make no sense, and a drifting, stream of consciousness flow to it that is difficult to put down.

It’s a book that feels so deeply grounded inside the main character’s head that you feel drawn to them, close to them, from the moment you start reading, right up until the final page, and it achieves what the best of those sorts of stories achieve, and gives you the deepest gut punch possible of sympathy for them. Not the sort of fleeting sympathy akin to pity, I mean. The deep, connected fellow-feeling, the sense of knowing someone right into the deep, because really, through the story, we have known her. We get all her thoughts and feelings and they’re so beautifully, so raw-ly, transmitted on the page… even in the smallness of this novel, we get the time and space to feel connected to this other human. And that’s what I read stories for, at the core of it. I love people and exploring the selves of them, and this does that, heart and soul, with the sort of tender vulnerability that makes it feel almost intimate.


Then we had to wait until May for A Mourning Coat by Alex Jeffers, which I also reviewed for NoaF here.

This is another tender, intimate portrait of a person. And in fact, both this and OKPsyche deal with grief and the loss of a parent. That, at least, is coincidence – it’s not a theme I have a huge connection with on any specific level – but it is, I suppose, unsurprising that it’s sufficiently universal as to be explored and explored well by multiple stories.

A Mourning Coat‘s main focus though is on the protagonist finding himself in the aftermath of grief, and a grief that has shaped his life for a span of years, as he looks after an ailing father and withdraws from the world to do so. It’s a book about connections – with yourself, with the world, with the people around you and with the things that make you you – and it does all of that so gently and sensitively, it definitely made me want to tear up at some points. But it’s not, all told, a sad book, and that’s what makes it so special. It’s a book that takes you through grief and into hope, into those connections and being in the world again, and I don’t think I’ve read anything that tackles the subject quite like it.

I particularly enjoyed the approach to the protagonist refinding his love of fashion and fashion design – his job before having to give it all up to care for his father – and so the eponymous mourning coat is something of an avatar for his reawakening of his own selfhood. But because it’s a book that thinks about fashion and textile, we get a lot of lingering descriptions of texture and cloth, and this spools out wider, into a lot of lingering descriptions of the physical all through the story, which I loved.

We’re also – yes, there’s a theme on things I like – very heavily tied into the protagonist’s view of the world, and he has such a lovely, wry internal monologue, it was impossible not to love him instantly.

I should probably spell out – this is an SFF book, even though I’m sure it isn’t sounding like one so far. It’s set in another world, and does have some magical elements, but they are, for the most part, treated mundanely and as background to the main story (his grief and re-emergence), rather than the focus, though by the end of the book, you realise there’s been enough of them threaded through so deftly that you’ve actually internalised a lot of worldbuilding in a short space of time. It also has a delightful segment about the in-universe equivalent of SFF, specifically a slightly schlocky tv show, that was both incredibly loving and incredibly knowing.


And then finally in June we had Rakesfall, the new book by Vajra Chandrasekera (whose The Saint of Bright Doors I loved so much last year). This I also reviewed for NoaF here, because apparently I’ve been doing a great job of deciding what to review in 2024.

It’s another book I would describe as “weird shit” in the most loving way I can convey that sentiment. No, really. I love weird shit. The closest comp I can think of to this is Vellum by Hal Duncan, which is a reasonable contender for my favourite book in all of existence. Also describing this as “weird shit” is allowing me the cop out from having to try to tell you what it’s actually about, which is… quite tricky, it turns out.

The story follows a number of characters (two? four? some other number?) throughout time and space and reincarnations, in connected lives over and over again as they experience scenarios that rework through similar issues, and reconnect them with the same souls and the same relationships, renewed and reinvented and re-examined time after time. But it’s not just about those people, or even really mainly. It’s a web of a book, dragging those characters kicking and screaming through layer after layer of thoughtful examination of colonialism, environmental collapse, autonomy, destiny, inevitability, politics and religion, with brief detours into a little re-examination of the Ramayana, because why not?

This is, to be clear, not a book to go into expecting a mindless good time. It is a good time, but you have to be willing to think, to pause, to consider it and meet it where it’s at, and know that it will not hold your hand through the process. And that’s fine. I love books like that. But it’s important knowledge to have going in. It’s also a book that had me looking things up a lot (again, fine, and another thread running through my selections for my six books), so be prepared to have to pause and go “I do not know enough about this, let me just go check”, and your experience may be the richer for it. Or hey, don’t. I’m not the boss of you. I imagine it could also be enjoyable to sail through knowing there are currents under the surface but choosing not to dive into them this time, it’s just not how I roll.

Which makes it sound rather high concept (and… yeah, it is), but this is gloriously undercut by the author’s use of language, which may be one of my favourite things about it as a story. There’s a lot of very… I mean, the only way to say it is very online word choices, phraseology in here, that speaks to me a in a very direct way. The story also veers wildly across the spectrum of tone in a way that could be disconcerting or haphazard, but manages instead to be extremely artful and deliberate. It encompasses multitudes, while refusing to be pinned down to be a single one of any of them. It speaks in many voices, all the time, through time, and that is, somehow, absolutely perfect.


So… 2024 has, thus far, been a year of weird books, intimate character studies, books I have to do some work to understand, books just fundamentally about people, difficult books, thoughtful books, and beautiful books. And also a lot of books. I’m aiming for (and currently on track) my highest reading goal to date, and committed myself to a bunch of award related reading that means my summer is rammed. This was, now I’m amidst it, an error, but we live and learn. And at least my reviewing choices are generally coming in hot. On reflection, I think I am doing too much though. I’ve been really lucky to have read some great books like these, but three awards is simply too many for me to read overlapping like this, especially when one of them is the Hugo (and I decide to read all of Novel, Novella, Novelette, Short Story, Graphic Story and selections from Related Work, as well as playing some of the Best Game nominees).

One of the things I’ve noticed is – and I think this is about set lists, more than it is about the volume – that I have, this year, ended up making reading something of a chore. I am by default a mood reader, and once I cram in too much set reading, especially as it is now, to the point where nothing I have read for the last couple of months has been free choice, it becomes just… work. I still enjoy the reading, but some of the magic has rubbed off by removing that ability to just go “fuck it” and pick up whatever I fancy. I have a larger tbr than is my norm (or than I’m comfortable with – it’s somewhere in the 40s currently), and they’re all looking at me longingly, and I am looking back, and then I’m picking up something for a reading list or book club, that I don’t object to, but that I don’t want to read, and it’s all a bit wearing.

So for all that there’s been a lot of success in these six months, and some really wonderful books, I am very much looking forward to the latter half of the year, and for the opportunity to let my reading reset back to “for joy”, as opposed to being prescribed.

Posted in All, Awesome, Else, Not A Review | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Translation State – Ann Leckie

We continue my Hugo novel reading reviews with something of a jump upwards – for me, there’s a pretty distinct gap between my bottom 3 slots and my top 3 (and a jump from 3 to 5 stars in my Goodreads ratings). It says something about the quality of my top two that Translation State, the newest installment in the Imperial Radch series from Ann Leckie, a series I have consistently adored, only comes in third.

Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t any sort of indictment on this as a book. I enjoyed it plenty, and, as I say, gave it five stars. This is a good book I’m very glad to see on the Hugo Award shortlist. It’s just… not quite as stunning as the other two remaining. Not quite as interesting or fresh.

Which is the main substance of what I want to discuss about it as a book, in fact, because it’s something of a victim of Leckie’s own success.

When you’ve written a series so good, so beloved as this one – and it is so beloved of me, who has a signed and personalised copy of the first one sent all the way from the US by a friend – you set the bar for yourself pretty high. Almost impossibly high, even, because the problem with sequels and subsequent additions, is they can never have the shock and wow factor the first one did. That feeling of a new, completely unknown book that you discover you love is an unassailable high. By the fifth book in a series… you know. You just know. There’s nowhere to go but down. So I went in to this fully expecting to love it as much as I did, and it was just… exactly as expected. Good job everyone involved, A*, happy reading fun times. Which sounds so derogatory, but it really isn’t. Writing such a good book is hard, and down was always an option on the cards, and one she didn’t really risk overmuch at any point. I’m so glad it was good! I’m just not… surprised.

There’s another issue too. In some ways, this is simply a “wrong time wrong place” sort of problem, but I do also think it says something about this as a novel, especially when in contrast to the others in the series. I read Translation State over 13 months ago now. I preordered it and consumed it soon after receiving it, because it’s an author I love, a series I love and a book whose premise aligned with things I was interested in. Of course I dived straight in. But now, 13 months later, what do I actually remember about it? Well, it turns out… not all that much. It would be very easy to say “oh that’s just because you read it over a year ago”. And well, yes, obviously that’s part of it. But I don’t think it’s all of it. When I think about it in comparison to, say, Ancillary Justice, which I have not read in a number of years at this point, the amount I remember about characters, places, ideas, plot all pales in comparison. However this? It’s a book I remember loving, but I don’t really remember exactly quite… why. Annoyingly, it is not a book I reviewed at the time, so don’t have a handy crib sheet of my thoughts to refer back to either*. So I am left with vague images and emotional memories, a fondness that has left no deep impression, where other books would have lingered. I read Some Desperate Glory back in April and The Saint of Bright Doors in May, so even longer ago than Translation State, and I can tell you much, much more clearly what happened there, the names of characters, their interrelations, how events tie in to themes in both of those books. Time is clearly not the only component.

So I think this must say something about its success as a book. For whatever reason, something about it simply wasn’t as strong, as memorable, as some of the others. And that, more than anything, is why it’s third on my list.

And, perhaps disappointingly, that’s where I’m leaving this one. There’s no good to be found in me attempting a deeper dive of a review of something I don’t remember. It benefits no one. Had I known back then that this was going to be a Hugo nominee – and realistically I probably should have expected it might be – maybe I would have reviewed it, purely for the later utility. But then… do I really want my reviewing habits to be dictated by the Hugo Awards? She says, doing a bunch of reviews for the Hugo Awards. I don’t know – I like my current system of reviewing as the mood takes me, especially because my reviewing over at Nerds of a Feather and, more recently/forthcomingly, at Ancillary Review of Books tends to be much more pre-planned at regimented, so it does me good to have the contrast, and the freedom of spontaneity. Which is probably why there have been a few more essay-type posts this year. So it possibly says an additional thing about Translation State that the mood simply did not take me. I enjoyed reading it. I thought it was good. I gave it five stars. But nothing about it struck me as calling for a review, and did not invoke in me the sort of interesting thoughts that need to percolate through the process of reviewing to be fully understood and situated. It was simply a Very Good Book. And I’m glad of it. I’ll be perfectly content if it wins the Hugo. But I won’t be putting it at the top of my list, when there are things available that went a bit further, dared a bit harder… and ultimately left more of a mark on me for it.

Which leaves my current Hugo novel rankings as:
1) ???
2) ???
3) Translation State – Ann Leckie
4) Witch King – Martha Wells
5) The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi – Shannon Chakraborty
6) Starter Villain – John Scalzi

*I mostly do not miss that one year where I reviewed every single book I read, because it was way, way too much, and it stressed me out quite a bit by the end of the year, but it was really useful for knowing I would definitely have a record of my thoughts in case I ever needed to come back to them. Alas, the more books I read, the proportionally fewer of them I review, because time is distressingly linear and limited.

Posted in All, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Witch King – Martha Wells

Next up for my Hugo nominee reading is Witch King, the new fantasy book from previous winner Martha Wells, creator of Murderbot.

I actually liked this more than I liked Murderbot. Despite the oft-repeated adage about everyone loving it, Murderbot was extremely mid for me. And don’t get me wrong, I did not come out of Witch King full of love and adoration either, but it was, in my opinion, a bit of a step up. What I do think is interesting is… well, there are two things. Firstly, the fact that almost all of the discussion I’ve seen of this online has been framed around it being “disappointing” compared to Murderbot, and secondly (and I suspect connectedly) that precisely what I like about it is that it “fixes” some of the issues I had with Murderbot.

Maybe I should be treating this as its own separate book, unfettered by comparison to its sibling series… but I think their connection is important, both in the context of how I feel about Witch King, and what I think about its place in the award shortlist.

For the first part, because my thoughts about Murderbot run quite so counter to the general vibe, I came into this full of caution that the same would be true, that I would just not be into it and that Wells’ style is not my style – what I got, then, was a pleasant surprise. I think it’s a pretty well crafted book with some relatively interesting ideas, themes and characters. It’s not perfectly done, and it would never have made my own shortlist, but I can see why it made someone’s. Or… well, more on that in a minute with my second point. It does things that I thought were absent in Murderbot, that I generally need in a story – I cared far more about the characters and their feelings and their relationships with each other and, critically, with their context. I felt a sense of connection to… something in the story. I was invested. I was intrigued, even. Not always, not in vast amounts, but enough to keep me going through. Because that sense of connection was stunningly lacking for me in Murderbot, it so often felt like it was trying to be funny at the expense of being a good story, that I just ran out of bother. Clearly, others disagree.

But equally clearly, and on to my second point, that shift here isn’t what people wanted from Wells, based on the general vibe I’ve seen in reviews. Very little of it is overly negative, it’s just “aw, not as good as Murderbot” or “not as x as Murderbot” for a variety of x. Why, then, has it been nominated, when I would call its critical reception… tepid? Well… Martha Wells did recuse herself from nominations for Murderbot, but not for anything else she writes. Is this just overflow love? I mean, it’s impossible to say. It’s probably impossible for a single nominating person to say even inside the quiet space of their head, because it could well be entirely subconscious. But I do wonder if it played a part.

Aside from its place in the context, it’s hard to talk about this book because my approximate response to it is “fine, tending to good”. It’s a story about the eponymous Witch King, who has been trapped in a tomb for some time, and is awoken by treasure seekers who stumble into something more powerful than they can handle. As he frees his ally, saves a small child who was due to be sacrificed, murders some baddies and eats their souls, he tries to figure out what has happened that has led to him being imprisoned here, and what is going on in the world, because his memory shears off before giving an explanation. To complement this, we have a parallel thread of the story that begins in his youth, long ago, telling us about who he is, his place in the world, and that world’s relation to the wider political space of the story and history. The two timelines alternate, and eventually, as we reach the end, we begin to see how the past has bearing on the present, and how the two stories are very likely deeply intertwined, before the final denouement and action happenings, via a number of shenanigans and altercations, and a fair few soul eatings.

Which is something the story – and specifically the main character – does have in common with Murderbot. They are both enormous grumps with outsized ability to cause harm to humans and whom many people woefully misunderstand, but who, despite their attitude and powers, ultimately are trying to do the best for those around them. Kai, the Witch King, however, works far better for me, I think because we get to spend so long in his backstory. We are not limited to a novella length to get that handle on him before the story ends, and also, critically, we are seeing him alongside a close ally for the duration of the story. He has to interact with Ziede, and we get to see those interaction, get to see him deal with someone he likes, trusts and respects, and that gives us a side of him that the first Murderbot book lacks.

This isn’t just because character relationships are my favourite part of stories, I promise. I mean, they are, and that’s probably a part of it. But I do also think that Kai’s position in his story and his world, having to relate to people, communicate with them, bounce of them, work with them, both in his present and past narratives, necessarily gives us more of him as a character, which is critically necessary for the grumpy sort of anti-hero-ish thing he’s trying to be. He eats souls! The story needs to give us something to work with so we can sympathise with him (beyond just “well they were bad guys who deserved getting their souls eaten” because that isn’t reeeeaaaally enough), needs to show the person he is beside soul-cronching, to give us a reason to excuse it or understand it. Even with what it does give, I don’t think Wells has fully succeeded – I think soul-eating may be a bit inexcusable, and I can see why some of the other characters in the book aren’t enormous fans of it. But she’s given us something to work with, even if it doesn’t quite work for me.

It’s a shame this is such a closely tied novel to Kai’s perspective. In many ways, I found Ziede – a powerful elemental worker who would really fucking like to know where her wife is now please, thanks and or-else – much more interesting. I wanted her perspective on things, and not just what we get in her dialogue with Kai, especially because her presence in the past-narrative parts of the story is limited. Likewise, there were several side characters I’d have loved more time with, because what they brought was fascinating, but sparse.

I did also, unfortunately, get a little setting-bored. It’s a novel that is very interested in the world being built, and has every right to be, because it’s an interesting world, but it hasn’t fully balanced that out with all the other aspects of the story. The memories that are going to linger with me of this are likely to be nuggets of lore, rather than plot or people, and that’s never what I’m after. If we’d had just a bit more of everything else – more character time, more dialogue, more plot, more interaction – I think I’d have been much more sold on the whole thing, and then there could have been just as much of that perfectly excellent world building, but it could have taken more of a backseat to the more novel-shaped parts of things.

But it is an interesting world, I’ll give it that. It’s drawing on a number of historical cultures to craft things, but I saw echoes of several pieces of early Mesopotamia in there, as well as their more northerly and easterly neighbours, and some pieces of eastern Mediterranean drawn in too. It’s not a close pastiche – no full on pseudo-Phoenicians to be found here – but there are little glimmers of the familiar, interwoven with each other and with a healthy dose of “just made up”. The magic also takes up just the right amount of space within all that – the different types of it are all part of the world, but not all of the world, and politics and reality still intrude alongside them (and can overcome them). Despite also being very heavily focused on that worldbuilding, Wells hasn’t strayed into the zone of overexplaining the magic, which is one of my less favourite trends of some modern fantasy – it all, largely, still feels magical, even with the bit of explanation we do get. No Sandersonian logic puzzles to be found, no sciencifying of the mystical, just as I like it.

I also listened to this as an audiobook (which I’m getting into doing more, as it’s a great way to keep my brain busy while embroidering), and it was really well-read. The narrator did a great balance of distinctive voices for the characters without going overboard and silly with it, and really managed to inject some emotion and drama into some of the more exciting parts of the story. Would definitely recommend that part.

So on the whole, I enjoyed it. I would never have picked it up but for the Hugos, and I’m predominantly glad I did, but it’s not well-crafted enough or interesting enough to threaten the top spots in my ballot. It was a fun book that I had a pleasant time reading, did a few things I’ve not seen all that much of and did them mostly well… but not stellar, not stunning. A solid 3 stars.

This leaves my current Hugo novel rankings as:
1) ???
2) ???
3) ???
4) Witch King – Martha Wells
5) The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi – Shannon Chakraborty
6) Starter Villain – John Scalzi

There’s something of a gap between 3 and 4, possibly even more so than the gap between 5 and 6, so when I get to those, we’re heading well into “well this is GREAT” territory. There is much to look forward to discussing.

Posted in All, Fantasy | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi – Shannon Chakraborty

This is the second in my reviews of the Hugo novel nominees for 2024 (following Starter Villain by John Scalzi).

Full context for this one, my only previous reading experience with Shannon Chakraborty was The City of Brass which I was exceedingly meh about, and never continued the series.

Much of what I wasn’t into in the writing style back then is very much still present here, but it is such a shame, because at least for this one, I am actually really interested in quite a few bits of the premise. A mother as the main character you say? Where she dwells on her motherhood and what it means to her? And relates to her own mother, who has different feelings on the matter? Tell me more! A variety of protagonists at a variety of life stages in our books please, more of this, always! I am so into that… in theory.

Unfortunately, what I am not into:

a) this book
b) pirates

I’ll come back to a) in a second, but I do sometimes get the impression that, as an SFF fan, b) is a personal failing. Everyone seems to love pirates. Pirates are in. Pirates are hot. Gay pirates doubly so. But I’m just… not here for it. I don’t care. It’s one of the several themes* where people will often try to sell the book purely on the strength of it, and I’m just here like… ok, but what about the rest of the book? It is an aggressively value neutral concept for me. I could probably try to do some deep explanation here about the simplification of their role as being outside of societal bounds and thus free of stricture (see things like pirate marriages etc.) erasing the more difficult aspects of them, but that would, frankly, be overcomplicating things. It’s an aesthetic or just… irrational preference. I like what I like, and don’t want I don’t, and here we are.

The interesting bit for this book is that it does actually sorrrrt of touch on those more difficult aspects at times, and does seem to want to situate piracy within its actual context… but never quite goes all in on it. We get distracted by the various directions the plot goes in, and we settle on Amina being, while a little grubby in her soul, ultimately one of the Good Ones and so we live any risk of moral complexity on that score behind, which is something of a shame. I would have been into that.

And I think this epitomises a lot of my… I don’t want to say issues, because that implies thinking this book is bad in a way that isn’t true, but let’s say some of my disappointments with it, as a story. There are a number of themes, concepts and situations that it ambles towards digging into anything more deeply, we shy away somewhat and have some rollicking good plot instead. It’s an adventure story at its core, but it just dips its toes into more difficult waters, more interesting waters, without ever going for a full swim.

On the other hand, when we look at what it’s genuinely trying to do, rather than what I wished it did, it has a jolly good time with it all. It is a slightly dark, pacy adventure. It is a story that puts a mother and her motherhood at the centre – we do get an amount of her musing on her motherhood, and it influencing her decisions throughout, and even being used against her. Chakraborty has fully situated it into not only a well-realised world, one that feels lived in, but also one that we do not typically see a lot of in fantasy. We are somewhat straying away from the old staple of generic medieval Europe fantasy these days (good), but that doesn’t mean all other potential historically-inspired settings have had equal treatment, and “the Indian Ocean and its coastal cities and islands” is not one I can think of being the setting for a single other book I am aware of. One probably does exist, somewhere, sure. But it’s still a setting that has not had much of its day in the sun, and Chakraborty has done well with it here.

Particularly, it’s not just a geographical setting, it’s a world. The story dwells over and over about the melting pot of cultures that exists in this time and place – Amina herself has a very mixed heritage that she references a number of times, as do many of her crew. We know about people and their families, how this family came over from Iraq, how these people all have been sailors of renown for many years, how this city is more hostile to strangers than this other, how this one has made a name for itself in trade. We see people from a variety of backgrounds, religions and cultures throughout, and they are all situated clearly within that setting, at every point. And I really enjoyed that – I enjoyed the moments where Chakraborty was obviously taking pains to say “this is the who and the why and the what for this place and at this time”.

There was also some allusion to polyglossia, and to characters having to speak multiple languages to navigate their place within the world – something I always love to see in my historical fiction, because it would have been such a big part of so many people’s worlds in the past – but we did not delve too deeply here. And I get it, it’s hard to that in fiction without making it the focus or being a bit needlessly obscure in some of your dialogue, so I don’t sigh too hard… but I do love to see it when it’s there. More of this please.

However, to come back to a). While there are things about this book and story I like, it’s ultimately not a book that I was hugely down for. It had themes, or factors, or ideas I’m into, but something about its construction on a macro level just didn’t do it for me. I suspect an amount of that is the prose, which also did not jam with me when I read City of Brass. It was… fine. But not my sort of fine. And the problem with prose is that you simply cannot escape it when reading. If it doesn’t work for you, well, you’re stuck with it unless or until you can find some way to shut it out of your brain. And ignoring things that niggle me has never been one of my specialities. Possibly I wanted more out of the descriptions of places. Possibly I wanted more introspection. I don’t really know exactly what I wanted. But it wasn’t quite this, despite all the little things that made it interesting.

I think it’s a perfectly fine book, and I can see why it excites many people – it’s doing some things that are rare in current fantasy, while also using some other things (pirates) that are very à la mode, and being a very immersive and readable story while doing them all. But I am not those people. That’s just how it goes sometimes.

As a complete aside, though, the Fairyloot edition of it (which I have) is incredibly pretty, and it has one of the most beautiful front-of-book maps I’ve seen in a good long while.

*The others are:
– the old West
– the space race (I’m sorry I’m just not into how real spaceships work, ok?)
– the Victorian era (especially as steampunk)

Posted in All, Fantasy | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Starter Villain – John Scalzi

This is a review of the Hugo-nominated novel Starter Villain by John Scalzi. Or… well, is it? I’m going to talk about why I don’t like the book, it’s true (because I don’t, spoiler warning there for you), but that’s not really the point of it all. What I actually want to talk about is this book’s context as a Hugo nominee, the particular challenge of award shortlist reading, and what I do not like about Starter Villain and its position within the genre conversation, and what that says to me about the nominating community, and the collective choices we made to reach this point (and the ones we keep making).

The novel follows a struggling everyman in his early thirties who, shortly after discovering his estranged uncle has just died, gets swept into the hitherto unknown depths of said uncle’s billion dollar business empire. Which turns out not, primarily, to be parking garages, despite all he’d been told. Poor, hapless Charlie is rushed off to a supervillain lair on a volcanic island, and is thrown neck-deep into conniving, politicking and cut-throat business, without silly little things like “the law” really getting in the way. There are shenanigans, silly science and references galore, in this fun romp as the fish out of water figures out how to swim.

If I had read this with no context, not knowing who the author was, or that it was Hugo nominated, if it were just handed to me sight unseen… well, I still wouldn’t have liked it, but I wouldn’t have minded it. I’d have churned through it quickly, gone “huh”, put it down, and promptly forgotten it. It’s somewhat of a popcorn book.

But that isn’t how I experienced it. I try my best to read – with a few caveats – the shortlist for the Hugo categories I’m interested in (novel, novella, novelette, short story, graphic story) every year, and so I picked it up as a necessary part of that. I picked it up having not liked his book in last year’s slate – The Kaiju Preservation Society – and, more critically, not understood why it was on the ballot, why people had nominated. For me, it did not feel Hugo-award level. Obviously, as we now know, there were complications that fed into that whole situation, but at the time, before that knowledge, there was just a sense of confusion, and wanting to desperately know… why? Because Kaiju, for me, was a stunningly bland book. So I’m coming into this, the next year, with all that context behind me. And so when I read another stunningly bland book by the same author, which has again been nominated, those questions are all the more pressing – what is it about this book that has captured people enough, moved them to say “I think this is one of the best six novels of 2023”?

And that sits with me, throughout the process of reading. Reading, in fact, only made it worse, because for my tastes, for my interests, for my ideas about what I want to win a Hugo award, this simply does not compare. If we’re saying that the Hugo award nominees are the best of the genre I want them to be… I dunno, stretching the genre in some way. The most interesting, the most innovative, the most challenging, the most poetic, the most… well, you get it. I feel like the shortlist should all be full of superlatives, things which are interesting and individual, that if you read them, you’ll have some sort of reaction to them – even if you don’t like them. And this… wasn’t any of those for me. It felt almost painfully pat, the sort of story I’ve read before, will read again and will absolutely forget in between. Is that really what genre excellence is?

But if I don’t read it with that context in mind? Well, my reaction is different. There is – and should be more – space for people writing perfectly acceptable escapism that stretches no boundaries and challenges no minds, that is simply a brief entertainment and put down, that someone enjoys, for however long they inhabit it. There should be space for those books, for authors to write them and earn money enough to live off from them, in a diverse and well funded book ecosystem. But not every book that fills a niche is an award-winning book. And when they get put into that context, and compared to things that are challenging, thoughtful, insightful, beautifully written, whatever… well, they’re going to look all the worse for the comparison.

So my opinion of Starter Villain is probably lower than it might be, at the fault of neither the book nor the author, but instead the voting public, whose choices absolutely baffle me. I mean that genuinely – I would love to hear why someone nominated this, because I do not understand. There is nothing that I could see about this book, in the experience of reading it, that made sense in an awards context – it pushes no boundaries, aims for no great heights of art or prose, etc. etc. etc. – it’s just a perfectly ordinary book that seems to have stumbled into the wrong room.

But of course, when I read it as an award book, I’m reading critically. And when I read it critically… well, there are some things I notice about it that aren’t all that great.

The first, and most prominent overall thing is not a specific moment or line or anything, but the general vibe – it feels… out of time. There’s a constant whiff of the Joss Whedon era of nerd tv about it, in its stylings, its dialogue and especially in its humour. Which is… a mixed bag. There were plenty of reasons that era of nerd tv was beloved at the time but also plenty of reasons I’m glad it’s now passed. If you told me this book was written ten years ago, I would have believed you, because it just feels so much more in the vibe of that period. It’s not alone among Scalzi’s work for that either, it’s the exact same whiff I got off Kaiju, just this constant sense of “haven’t we been here before?”. Possibly for many that evokes a feeling of nostalgia, but for me, it’s just confusion.

Related to that is its sense of humour, which does not land for me a lot of the time anyway (my response to much of the jokes is “yes yes, very clever… anyway, moving on”), but at times does veer a little into the unkind, or unfairly flippant. A central part of the story – I suppose this is a spoiler if you care about that – is a labour dispute that happens between a bunch of sweary dolphins and our benevolent everyman protagonist who is now their ultimate boss. The initial interaction seems very dismissive of them for their protest, and while subsequent interactions are more sympathetic, the way it is played for humour and the way it is resolved don’t quite sit right for me.

And tying in to this whole feeling of datedness… the protagonist is meant to be 32. He is two years younger than I am. He felt at least a decade older than me, while reading him. Some of this is throwaway lines – like one that treats Facebook as the obvious and only social medium for people his age… sorry what? – and some of it is more about his dialogue, his tone, the way he speaks to people. A lot of characters in the book treat him as a young ‘un for being a millennial, but he comes across really quite midlife crisis, and it all just feels deeply odd. It’s a book out of its own time, both in the real world chronology and its sense of self.

The whole sense I get of this, as a book is… I feel like I am pulled back in time to 2014, and I’m in the science fiction society I was at uni, and someone goes “wouldn’t it be funny if…” and gives me the premise of this book. And we laugh, and maybe we add to it, and maybe say “what if there were genetically engineered cats that were spies!” and “what if there were dolphins, but they were objecting to working for the man!” “oh but dolphins are assholes, everyone knows that” “well now they’re smart assholes” and so on and so on. It’s a fun, funny conversation, that riffs on a bunch of the shared memes we all know, the common themes of our fandoms, the jokes all the cool nerds are currently making, and we laugh, and then we leave. And then ten years pass and it’s now and we have different memes, different jokes, and different themes. It’s like that conversation got crystallised in 2014, and made into a book, but I’m not there anymore, and we two are just too distant to see eye to eye anymore. It’s not wrong, it’s just… out of place? That’s how I felt, reading it.

And I wonder if that’s why it’s been nominated. Is it that nostalgia? Harking back to times that weren’t actually better but have the rose-tinted glow of faded memory, rather than engaging with the here, the now and the culture and context of this moment? Old, safe, comfortable, well-worn jokes, insulated from being challenged too much, but with just enough awareness of things like sexism being an issue that we know this is one of the good ones, that it’s ok to like it, but not enough engagement with it to really say anything dramatic. On a ballot that contains what the Hugo ballot this year contains, this stands out all the more – whether by interrogating old tropes, pushing boundaries of craft or giving us fascinating ideas, there are things here this year that do feel fresh, innovative and well… potentially award-winning. So I am stumped about this one. It was a disappointing read, a strangely out of place read, and not one I will be ranking highly in my ballot.

Posted in All, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

What I Read on My Holiday – the reprisening

Our lovely cottage for the weekend. Heptonstall was a really beautiful village.

Last year, I decided to take myself off to some remote(ish) part of England with a big stack of books for a long weekend of reading, quiet and generally ignoring the world. I had a great time, cannot recommend it enough as a holiday, and so this year I did it again, and with a friend for company. Instead of a shepherd hut, we booked a little 16th century cottage, between us brought five types of cheese (with breads, chutneys, cakes, biscuits, port and other delights besides), and had a wonderful time mostly ignoring each other and reading with blankets slung over our legs. It was delightful. We were warm, we were cosy, we read, we popped out to look at stars, and then came back in to read some more. We even found a dungeon under my bedroom*.

Hebden Bridge is also rather pretty

But one of the most delightful parts was, of course, the actual reading. Around this time of year, my reading often becomes heavily externally mandated. We’re well into Hugo reading time, I’ve got the SCKA shortlist to be getting on with, I have reviews I planned to write, arcs sitting staring at me in my netgalley queue, and a plan to buddy read the Clarke Award shortlist when it comes out, so it can be discussed before the winner is announced (so I have to hurry the other stuff up to make space), and a monthly book club besides. Not a lot of my reading gets to be just for joy, as the spirit moves me in the moment, and that can get a little suffocating. So I decided that, this reading holiday, while I could take some things from shortlists, some arcs, my choices weren’t to be mandated by them. I’d take some of the things that just seemed like I might want to read them, and I would simply read whatever took my fancy every time I reached a hand out to find something. And that was wonderful. So I’m going to talk about the books whose choosing brought me joy, and what I thought of them, in the order I read them:

The Mimicking of Known Successes by Malka Older.

This one is actually a Hugo novella nominee. But I wanted something to read on the train, something that promised to be absolutely devourable, and this felt like the moment for it, and so it was. I burned through it and finished reading somewhere between Leeds and Hebden Bridge, and it was just a delicious little snack to start off the weekend. I am a big fan of old school detective mysteries, and this was absolutely in the mode of Sherlock Holmes or the Granchester mysteries or Poirot, though somewhat more in space. A mysterious death, clues that lead back to a place from the detective’s history, a deepening conspiracy, running hither and thither gathering clues, increasing peril and a brilliant solution at the crux of the drama. Perfect train reading.

Is it my favourite book ever? No. I don’t think it’s a work of surpassing glory or anything. It was nice and fine and fun and doing a number of interesting things in the background while being so. But it was exactly what I wanted right then, and I appreciated that. I’ll absolutely read the sequel.

The Familiar by Leigh Bardugo

It’s only just come out. I wanted to get on the hype train. I had a cool bookmark for it. The end papers have a pretty pattern of pomegranates. History is neat. This is the substance of my reasoning for picking it next. Maybe something about being in a historical building nudged me that way as well? Who knows. In any case, I’ve enjoyed other Bardugo before, and this was no different, despite also being… really quite different. She clearly likes a morally dubious man who is nonetheless very sexy, but this one did not appear have done or intend to do any genocide, so I found him more palatable than many of the type. The story follows Luzia, a poor maid with Jewish heritage in Spain during the Inquisition, who has a little magic passed down to her from her family, that she uses to lighten the load of her heavy days. When this is discovered by her mistress and turned toward gaining the family a little more status, Luzia is thrust into a limelight that she cannot simply escape, and is not sure she wants to, despite the danger it brings her and her aunt, a glamorous courtesan. There are trials, perils, a fair amount of sorrow, and indeed a sexy magic man with some crimes to his name. Luzia’s perspective, her desire for more than her small life mixed with a keen awareness of her position in the regime she lives under, makes for a really interesting story, and very few of the characters in it are simply one thing. It was not so heavily grounded in its time and place as many historical novels, but the magic made things interesting, and the people worked very well, especially some of the more minor ones (I’m a big fan of chaotic bisexual lady playwright who just rocks about on the periphery of the story, being kind of a problem, for instance).

The interesting thing is, despite the parallels in some of the character archetypes she draws on, I don’t think I would have spotted this as being from the same author as Ninth House, had I not already known. Bardugo clearly has range, and I am really interested to see where else that range wanders.

Ysabel by Guy Gavriel Kay

A more retro pick, helping me work back through the slack of GGK novels I have not yet read (the remainder now being the rest of the Fionavar books, which I doubt I’ll get to as I wasn’t a huge fan of the first, and then Under Heaven and River of Stars, which I am saving for the next time I want to feel desperately sad in a very beautiful way). It was a really interesting one. It feels like a waystop between the style of the Fionavar books and Tigana (which itself feels like a waystop between those and the rest of his work, which forms a more coherent whole), despite that it was written after five of his normal pseudo-historical works. I did not love it like I love those, and there was a very peculiar minor plot choice right at the end, but it was still beautiful, there were some lovely moments of visual descriptions of Provence, of old buildings, and evocative, atmospheric passages about lost pagan celtic rituals which… well I was able to turn off the dubious bit of my brain and just accept them for what they were. Mostly.

We follow a teenage boy away in France while his father works on a photography project for a book, mooching about in the van with the grownups and generally following along through the Provençal sunshine until he stumbles on something deeply strange inside an empty chapel. Something that pulls him into a sequence of events that has been repeating itself for two thousand years or more. Something he can’t bring himself to walk away from. As he uncovers more of the people and magic he’s stumbled into, we learn about the story that started it all, the three people bound together through time, repeating their choices over and over again, unable to break from a cycle of violence and destruction… perhaps until now.

Did the teenage protagonist feel like an actual fifteen year old? No, not really. Did I care? Also no. Was the central “love” story thing very traditionally mythic feeling? Sure. Did it have some absolute banger romantic lines that stabbed me squarely in the heart? Also yes.

The banter between a number of the characters was delightful, and most importantly, it still felt like a GGK book, at moments. There was yearning and sadness and the sorrow of things faded into the night of history, never to be recovered. But also a Da Vinci Code style mystery romp which was… fun, I guess. But I would have preferred him to eviscerate my feelings as he usually does, if I’m honest. It was good, I liked it, but it wasn’t the full gutpunch I was hoping for.

The Brides of High Hill by Nghi Vo

A dip into the netgalley queue, and the sequel to a series I adore beyond reason. If you haven’t picked them up, each of the novellas in the Singing Hills cycle has a different device, a structural… something… that makes it interesting and unique. And because it changes book to book within the series, I really look forward, each time, to finding out what the next one is going to be. And they’ve stayed STRONG. Mammoths at the Gates, the 4th in the series, was possibly my favourite of the lot.

Which made this one slightly disappointing. It’s a great story still, I still really enjoyed it, but the structural device… ehhhhh. It’s borderline for me whether it even counts as one at all. And it’s so hard when you’re reading a series, and your expectations for the next installment are so bound up in what’s come before. I find this with GGK books too – I rate him on the scale of himself, not the scale of all other books, and so I end up under-rating, because that is a fundamentally unfair scale.

So by any reasonable standard, The Brides of High Hill is fun, immersive, fascinating and beautifully described. Atmosphere up the wazoo. I love how Vo works in food descriptions throughout her stories, and it leaves me thinking of cleric Chih, the protagonist, as someone for whom the ascetism of clerichood may not be entirely suited sometimes. There’s just such a love of flavour and the experience of food whenever it comes up, it’s delightful. The story is also a sort of mystery plot, and that aspect is managed perfectly, especially for the small space of a novella. The pacing is absolutely fantastic. There’s some properly creepy moments (mouldy library was especially evocative). It’s everything you want – or at least everything I want – in a novella.

But… it’s just not quite holding up to the standard of the rest of the series, because I wanted all that AND a neat structural device to make it shiny and exciting, because that’s what I’ve been conditioned to want. It does do a thing, but because it doesn’t feel like the same sort of thing, less… structurally significant? It just doesn’t quite scratch the itch.

A shame, but I did still really enjoy reading it, so I can’t complain too much.

Memorial by Alice Oswald

Poetry interlude!

I really like reading poetry. And then I don’t… actually do it most of the time. Do you know why? Because I’m a ninny. Specifically, they don’t take me very long, so it’s a quick win on the reading goal. So it feels like “cheating”. So I only read a poetry book when I feel like I have somehow “earned” it. Brains, who knows.

Anyway, holiday is a time for such things, and I have been meaning to get to this one for ages. It’s a reinterpretation of the Iliad purely as a record of those who died, and it is raw, and powerful and beautiful and somewhat soul-wrecking (complimentary). It is also deeply interesting as a text that is inextricably linked with its source text, to the point where I really don’t think it makes an awful lot of sense when viewed without at least a little knowledge of the original. So much of what it’s doing is about how it’s using translation as a stepping stone to poetry, and drawing upon the power of the original and creating meaning in the reinterpretation, requiring the reader to exist as the fulcrum between the two separate texts.

Luckily, I may or may not know a little about the Iliad, and so I found this absolutely devastating. I found myself forcing myself to slow down, to read the words aloud to myself and savour them, to hear them aloud and find their rhythms and twists. I will immediately be seeking out more of Oswald’s work. It was glorious.

Witch King by Martha Wells

This was… less glorious.

I come into Witch King with two unfortunate bits of context. The first – I am well aware of the “everyone loves Murderbot” tagline of Wells’ previous series, and as someone who did not love Murderbot, I find it incredibly grating. I didn’t hate them! I was just… meh. Like. It was fine. It wasn’t better than fine. But nor was it worse. So when the world is yelling at me that EVERYBODY LOVES IT, I get a bit peeved. The second bit of context – every single bit of reception I have seen for Witch King has been incredibly lukewarm, even when from people who do actually love Murderbot. And so when it comes up on the Hugo shortlist, it has me pulling A Face. Are people just nominating it from spillover Murderbot love? Who knows!

I didn’t actually start reading this on holiday, before it seems like I’m actively undermining my “for joy” mission statement. This was my audiobook I had ongoing for when doing embroidery, and I took that with me to try to keep on top of it while getting through a load of book, and also because it’s a very pleasant, calming, holiday activity to be doing.

But I did finish it, so it counts. And my response is approximately “meh”. It’s a perfectly fine story, put together perfectly fine, and in its protagonist I can even see some of what went into Murderbot, and how people fell in love with them… except a bit watered down. Which meant I preferred them, mildly, but I can see how it might not inspire adoration in those who want that. Otherwise, it’s a perfectly pleasant two strand story, following both past and present, to unravel a political situation and showcase an interesting world with some interesting ideas in it. But the plot never really gets better than just “fine”, and the world, while perfectly well done, isn’t so stunning as to be worth a novel just for it. The characters are somewhat flat throughout. I haven’t really got much more to say about it… it simply is.

Hell Bent by Leigh Bardugo

So we go back to Bardugo for something immersive and propulsive as a counterbalance. And she delivered.

I really enjoyed Ninth House, and was keen to read the sequel… but I wanted to wait until it came out in paperback to match my copy of the first, and so by the time it actually came, I was bogged down in plenty of other stuff and it just sort of slipped out of my grasp. It kept looking at me from the top of the tbr, hinting that maybe now was the time, and so finally I decided to listen.

I’m really glad I did. Like Ninth House, this is a properly propulsive novel with the right balance of action, mystery, characters and bad decisions that seem entirely plausible so you just want to see where the car is going to crash next. And hoo boy does it crash all over the place.

Aside from it being an absolute romp, I do also enjoy how Bardugo engages with the secret societies aspect of it – she’s leaning into the critique side of dark academia, and is willing to be pretty blunt on the page how crappy the power structures are that all of this magic is supporting. It’s all money and connections and the legacy of even worse money and connections, all the way down. There’s a moment where the gang have broken into a library (as you do) and they find an object there that allows you to magically tell where people are, but not who they are, not their names. They’re a bit puzzled by its original purpose, until the one black man in the group makes it plain that it was clearly used for finding runaway slaves, and that it’s a horrible object that deserves a sledgehammer, not safe preservation behind glass. No one disagrees. And moments like that, of someone just bluntly saying for those at home “this is for the rich and powerful, and we are just tools for them”, are scattered throughout, with just the right frequency that they never get forgotten, but also never overwhelm the story.

It’s also why the collection of central characters is so well done – so many of them exist at intersections of interest and relevance to the plot, and so you get some genuine reflection on how who they are ties in to all that’s going on, while also being something of an outsider. Whether it’s the black policeman trying to be a force for good within a structure he knows contains bad apples, the female grad student who has a privileged background but deals with some pretty blunt misogyny from older academics, or our protagonist who can see ghosts, who has this power no one else has, but whose strings are so easy to pull with money and threats because of her background, it’s a story that wants to think about identity and power in a slightly more complex way than your average page turner. It’s not a full on treatise on it – I would be looking elsewhere for that sort of story – but as adventurey dark academiay novels go? It’s really not half bad.

And so I really enjoyed it. To the extent that I had about ten pages left when I got off the train home, and I very nearly just stood there on the platform to finish them off, rather than having to put it down.

Embroidery project continues apace. I am particularly proud of the one for Ysabel.

All in all, a pretty good set of reads. Not necessarily as many as I fit in last time, but several of these were chunky, and I was also busy investigating a dungeon, eating cheese and having lovely chats with my friend. I’d call that a pretty successful reading holiday.

Proof of dungeon

*No really. There was a little storage room at the bottom of the cottage, that in the 18th and 19th centuries was the village lockup. Now it stores spiders and bikes, and the red reflective back of one of them gave me a massive panic before I opened the door to find out what it was.

Posted in All, Else, Fantasy, History/Myth, Off-Topic, Poetry, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Signal Fire Books, or: how I tell if a reviewers tastes match mine, so their reading recommendations are of any relevance to my life and choices

I consume a lot of reviewer content. Partly because I just like reading reviews, but in no small part because I like books and want people to tell me about books, quite possibly so I can decide if I want to buy and read them. But this can be a pretty difficult thing to judge (especially when dealing with people who review relentlessly positively, though that’s a whole other Thing). How do I tell if their tastes and mine line up? The long answer involves a lot of factors and a dedication to continuing to consume their content*, but there is a short answer as well, and it’s a few key books where, if our like/dislike doesn’t match up there… well it’s probably all going to be a wash.

So I thought it might be interesting to talk about five of my signal fire books** – the ones that are the most critical to me in determining a taste match, and why. I’m using a bunch of metrics for the things I care about in what I read – prose quality, whether its ethics match up to mine (this is mostly nebulous stuff like “book has misogyny vibes that I don’t think are purposeful to the story”, rather than “I think the author is a bad person”), themes I tend to like, whether the reviewer is as enthusiastic about weird shit as I am, that kind of thing. I’ve also tried to pick books that cover multiple bases and capture different aspects of what I look for in reading, rather than simply favourites and most hated. It’s about trying to capture the essence of someone’s taste as efficiently and comprehensively as possible, so each book has to do more than just “I like this”.

I’m pretty happy with my five – they span a range of things I care about, and attack them from multiple different angles, and so hopefully grasp the core of what I’m looking for in my reading. Here they are:

Red Rising by Pierce Brown – starting as the unrepentant hater I am, this one is actually probably one of the most useful to me at the moment. I think this book is badly written shite that aggressively fridges the female love interest, and do not trust anyone’s taste who thinks it a glorious triumph of literature. A lot of people on tiktok seem to think this book is good… in any way? Baffling. So if someone starts singing its praises, I can scroll on by, because I know we simply will not agree. It means I do a lot of scrolling.

To go into a touch more detail, I think this book would have been fine if it was taken more often as what it is – enjoyable trash. It’s not my sort of enjoyable trash, but I can respect someone regardless who goes “hey, it’s not well written, but I had fun”. That’s cool. My issue mainly comes with people holding it up as this beautifully prosey, intricately plotted, subtly political, radical piece of literature. It’s… it’s just not. And that’s fine! Not everything needs to be. But if someone is reviewing this as that piece of radical glory? Well we probably have a significantly different outlook on books, so it’s not gonna be all that useful of a recommendation source for me.

Key points: prose prose prose times a million, fridging the woman, unsubtle as all heck

Vellum by Hal Duncan – likes are, in many ways, trickier. If we both like a very popular book, for instance… well, that means nothing. So what I look for instead is my weirdo preferences, the ones that are less discussed but which I love with all of my little goblin heart. This is possibly the epitome of those. I have loved it dearly since I was a silly little undergrad foisting it on everyone who would give me the time of day because it brought me so much joy. It’s so weird. It’s so beautiful. It’s… quite mad. I have an abiding preference for magic that is not systematised, mythology that is heavily and thoughtfully reinterpreted and a cavalier attitude to linearity. This has all of those and more, and if they like it, it promises greatness.

Also, if they like it… they knew about it to begin with. Maybe we delve into the same bits of literature. Maybe we’re about the same age. So we probably draw from similar sources, and so their views may be a lot more contextually similar to mine.

Key points: prose, fascinating themes, weird shit (complimentary)

Lore Olympus by Rachel Smythe – I had to get one Greek mythology retelling in this list somewhere, because it’s a whole big deal of a category, and I have a lot of thoughts about… well, a lot of it. But I’m choosing one I dislike, and for specific reasons, because I think likes run the risk of someone just… liking all of them. Which is fine! Just not indicative of my tastes. So gunning for one of the bigger deals that is entirely not my thing, and hopefully thus siphoning off some of the less critical takes. And boy, do I think this one needs critical takes. Lore Olympus is the epitome of the terrible softboi Hades, let’s-make-a-rape-into-a-consensual-romance, turn the woman into the bad guy thing that is a scourge upon retellings. It does it so unrepentently, so clearly… if you like this one, of all of them, then there’s no helping it. Our tastes will simply not align.

Key points: dubious approach to retelling Greek myths, a trope I despise with all my soul

The Spear Cuts Through Water by Simon Jimenez – Another deeply weird book that is very dear to me. This time make it more overtly gay (Vellum is already pretty queer, but The Spear Cuts Through Water… the marketing at least shouted about it more, though I suspect that’s more to do with when it came out than anything else). Loving this tells me a reviewer enjoys romance and good character dynamics, cares about nuanced approaches to people being people, likes a book that plays around with form and structure, is willing to cope with a story switching about between first/second/third person (which is apparently a bigger deal than I would ever have thought it ought to be) and also is paying attention to the books that are coming out now. Which is neither good nor bad, but is useful, because it’s something I am also doing, so there’s just a much better likelihood that what they’re talking about is going to be useful to me. It’s also just an astonishingly good book, so there’s that.

The risk with putting likes on here, far more than dislikes, is how widely varied the reasons are likely to be. But with this one, there are so many things it does that so many people seem to have as their “absolutely not” issue – particularly second person narrative – that it feels a strong chance that it’s filtering for a lot of tolerances/preferences I also share.

Key points: prose that will make you weep, queerness, weird shit (complimentary), layers of sexy sexy delicious themes, very contemporary, playing about with structure

To Be Taught if Fortunate by Becky Chambers – this one was a toss-up against Project Hail Mary by Andy Weird (for similar but not identical reasons), but I eventually settled here because it feels more assumed that Becky Chambers lies closer to the rest of my tastes than Andy Weir does, so it’s a better differentiator. I have gained a bit of a reputation among friends as a hater of her work, but I swear, it’s not actually true! I am mostly pretty aggressively meh on the Wayfarers series, and the Monk and Robot books, it’s just that when something is so beloved, a defended “meh” starts to sound like hating. And I am sometimes an incredibly reactionary bitch. It goes both ways. Anyway, for the most part, she is simply a “shrug and I don’t get it” kind of author, which is fine. But… but. To Be Taught if Fortunate is another matter entirely. To Be Taught if Fortunate made me seethe when I read it. There’s a whole review’s worth of stuff I could cover, but the crux of it comes at the end of the story, where it is put pretty plainly on the page that science and space exploration in particular are the most important, corest bits of curiosity humans can have, and if you’re not into it you’re basically boring and worthless (hyperbole but not as much as I would like it to be). This attitude is one I have seen so much growing up through SFF spaces, especially as a woman, and double especially as a woman who did a non-science degree, and I hate it. Curiosity about the world takes many forms, and my abiding interest in other humans, in how they are, were and relate(d) to one another is no less valid than thinking comets are cool. Interest in sport, in theatre, in art, in your community, in faith, in all the myriad things humans care about, are all valid, and if someone endorses the message of this book uncritically, we simply do not agree on a fundamental level of beliefs about people. Our tastes will not cohere. And so I shall scroll on by.

Key points: a conclusion that makes me want to bite things (derogatory)

Is this going to be foolproof? Absolutely not. I’m sure there exist people who share my perspective on all five of these and yet somehow we disagree on most other things. Infinite diversity in infinite combination and all that, y’know? But I feel like these are a great starting point, and will do a lot of the work for me, so the rest can be vibes, nuances and actually… maybe reading the whole review, getting a sense of an actual person. Because it is more complex than matching points of data – there are people who like books I dislike, but do so so interestingly, so thoughtfully that I trust their taste regardless. There are people who are so good at explaining the feel of a book that their taste is irrelevant. But you have to start somewhere, and these feel like as good a foundation as any.

And I’d be really interested to know what yours are.

*Luckily I have fewer dedications in this life greater than my commitment to being catastrophically Online, so this is quite easy to accomplish in the main.
**I’ve seen people talk about these as red flag/green flag books, but I do not like that phrasing for a number of reasons. Also, I’m aiming for neutrality here – I’m not saying someone is a bad person for liking a book I dislike or vice versa. This is about how useful their reviews are to me in selecting books I will enjoy. Calling it a “red flag” feels a bit too moral-judgment.

Posted in All, Else, Not A Review, Off-Topic | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments