Paladin’s Grace – T. Kingfisher

paladins-graceMy short review is simply: It’s like Terry Pratchett wrote Dragon Age fanfic for a female-gaze audience.

My long review obviously has a lot more words.

Comparing things to Terry Pratchett is… not something I do lightly. I know it has a lot of *waves hands vaguely* for a lot of people. So to be clear – T. Kingfisher (which is Ursula Vernon in her adult prose-fiction hat) is using a very specific type of humour that is one of the defining traits I love about Pratchett… she’s highlighting the mundane aspects of the fantasy world, the stupid comments about socks, the wondering what happens to the bodily fluids of magic sword men, that emphasises the humanity of her characters. Much like, no matter what nonsense is happening in Discworld, the characters feel like actual people, who respond with actual concerns about day to day life (albeit a little aggressively caricatured), so too do the characters of Paladin’s Grace (and her other books set in the same setting, which I binged). I don’t think it’s that she’s attempting to copy Pratchett, or anything like that, just that there’s a commonality in the way they make their characters feel. Not only are they ignoring the fantasy tendency to whitewash over the dull and functional but necessary concerns of human life, they’re choosing to lean in, and so make their worlds feel all the realer for it, because well… everyone still does laundry… even as it’s a source of humour because… well… no one does laundry in fantasy novels.

I am extremely here for it.

But there are differences, and there’s one I really want to focus on, because it’s the one that really struck me throughout reading – the extent to which her books are so obviously not exclusively for the male gaze.

I read plenty of books these days by women, and either aimed at women or not aimed at any gender specifically. And that’s great. But it wasn’t until reading this that I realised how few trad-pseudo-medieval fantasy books I’ve read that are not-male-gaze. All the examples I can think of are either YA (your Trudi Canavans and the like) or… quite trash-trash… (the Deverry books, for example). Whereas even in your Pratchetts and other good medieval fantasy, I often find the romances particularly meh because the men don’t feel plausibly fanciable*… either they don’t feel real, or they feel like they’re trying more to appeal to a sense of what the male reader might want to be in the romance, rather than any idea of what a woman in that pairing might want to actually romance/be romanced by.

Obvious caveats here for me not speaking for all women etc. etc. you know the drill.

The best example I feel like I can give isn’t actually fantasy, but bear with me. I recently played through Mass Effect 1-3, and found myself very often grumbling about the romance I ended up pursuing. If you want to play a woman, your options are almost entirely dull, creepy (don’t fuck the PA or the ex-work-experience kid) or both. At the end of Mass Effect 1, there’s *gasp* a sex scene. It looks SO FUCKING WEIRD as fem-Shep… the way it’s set out seems to lean into traditional heterosexual depictions of sex on screen… and then they’ve just swapped the characters round. Everyone moves wrong and it was weird and awful. There’s also a very sexy alien who tries to seduce you on a space station and the way she goes about it… it’s hard to exactly put my finger on details, but it reads heavily as “cyberpunk sexy lady flirting with man”. With a woman in the protag role it just, again, felt weird and awful. This persisted (though got slightly less bad) all the way through the trilogy, and I think it’s one of the two primary reasons I just didn’t love it the way I love Dragon Age**. It wasn’t For Me, and it meant I struggled a lot with immersion. It was so clearly, so constantly, geared for a male audience that I just felt alienated out of it.

And this is true of a lot of books, albeit not quite so strongly.

So when I come to read a book like Paladin’s Grace, where I suddenly feel catered to… the rush is really quite something. It’s hard to appreciate the extent to which I’ve got used to just going “eh” at the romance aspects of trad-fantasy novels until I encounter one that isn’t “eh”. I felt SEEN and WANTED and WELCOME and it was GREAT***. And I think the primary reason for this is the way the male protagonist/love interest is written – the first word that springs to mind for me to describe him is simply “adorable”. Not… necessarily the word of choice for protagonists in traditional fiction aimed at men, hm?

There’s a lot else to love about the book (and again, her others in the same world – they share a lot in common so let this review stand for them all, in terms of how much I love them).

The story follows Stephen, who is a burly paladin whose god has died, and is trying to find his place in a world without the faith he previously fought for (yes he is a sword doofus and I love him – he knits socks), and a female perfumer caught up in some political shenanigans (she’s amazing, intelligent, funny and complex and I kind of want to be her). Their paths cross, mutual pining occurs, hilarity, nonsense and thrilling derring-do. There’s even an attempted murder to solve. In many ways, it’s not particularly exciting. But it’s in the details and the execution that the joy comes – the protagonists are both well-written and, while quirky, still very believably human. They both have complicated backgrounds they have to navigate and their own doubts and insecurities that make them absolute numpties when dealing with other people (but in a plausible way). The world around them is well drawn, funny and interesting – it’s not explained in a great deal of depth at any point, but each part you see makes good sense as you see it, and isn’t ashamed to be both intensely trad-fantasy nor to subvert it at the same time. It lets the realities of human life intrude on the fantasy constantly, and uses that to ground both the people and the plot, as well as create the funnies. It has (quite a few) moments of genuine, laugh out loud humour – I definitely found myself cackling at several points. It’s… an unsurprising story but just so well, so competently and so amusingly told.

I gave it five stars on Goodreads because it’s a pretty much perfect example of what it’s trying to be. It’s hard to find fault, and there’s nothing I’d change about it because nothing would make it better at being that. The “that” in question may not win awards or shake the foundations of the SFF literary establishment, but nor did it need or want to. It is a book written to be comforting and fun and funny and joyful, and it achieves them all with room to spare. I could easily read another five (or more) books in the same mould as this, and I would have the same cosy and contented reading experience.

I love it with the same force I reserve for some of my oldest favourite books, and I know it will be something I will come back to in future, and it will still bring me joy every time. It is a cup of tea and a biscuit in book form, and it is intensely soothing. You should definitely read it.

 

*”plausibly fanciable” is the term I use to explain what I want in Bioware RPG romance interests. I don’t have to personally fancy them, they don’t have to be my type, but I have to be able to at least see why someone would. It’s the difference between a friend dating someone and me going “huh, good for them, he seems nice” and “… what?”. A lot of trad-fantasy men are, ime, very much in the latter category.
**The other being the cyberpunk-esque future they’ve chosen where even if you’re full bore good guy by their standards, you’re still a maverick cop who plays around/breaks the rules to get results. I… do not like this.
***I’m talking specifically about feeling catered to as a woman here because it’s… what I can talk about. The books have a lot of low-key rep across a wide spectrum, and I’d like to hope they felt as non-exclusionary to others as they felt to me, but I just… don’t know.

Posted in All, Awesome, Fantasy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Who’s the Best Sword Doofus?

I’ve been reading (bingeing) some of Ursula Vernon’s books written as T. Kingfisher. I’ve not really been in a mood to read anything taxing, recently, and they’ve slotted beautifully into “comforting fun” reads – I hesitate to call them “trash” because they’re AMAZING but they are also tbh kinda trash – so I’ve been… powering through them At Pace. And one of the reasons they’ve been working so well for me is because they seem to feature my favourite fantasy archetype. I’ll probably write about the books themselves at some point anyway, but I felt like writing a post all on its own for this most glorious of characters – the sword doofus.

I love a sword doofus. If you’ve played Dragon Age: Origins, Alistair is a great example of the type – he’s good at what he’s good at, an idiot at some other things, he’s 100% a Good Person, but he’s charming, and he’s funny, and he doesn’t take the fact that he’s essentially a paladin anywhere near as seriously as you’d expect, most of the time. And that last bit is kinda key – you need to have some undercutting of seriousness to be a good sword doofus. And a sword, obviously. But you need to exist in a work that’s willing to laugh at itself now and then, even if the laughter comes in between moments of seriousness. It’s that laughter that makes them less Fictional Figure of Goodness and more Actual Person What Feels Like They Could Really Exist. It makes them approachable, even if they could whack you with a sword*. It makes them feel real and lovable and makes me defend them with great intensity when certain unnamed boyfriends try to tell me the dog is a better character. Rude.

Anyway… I figured it might be fun to talk about my favourite sword doofuses, and what makes them great.

AlistairWe’ll start with Alistair, because he is a Classic of the genre.

He has an awful lot in his life to be mopey about, but Alistair manages to be a sarcastic, wise-cracking numpty in spite of it for about 90% of his screen time in Dragon Age: Origins. Start flirting with him and he’ll fluster earnestly for a second and then make a hasty joke to puncture the tension. Get him to talk about his tragic backstory and you’ll also end up with a tale of how much he loves cheese. No earnest conversation stays that way for long, and that’s exactly how I like it. A woman can only take so much Serious Emotion.

He’s also great at the sword part of sword-doofusry. Get into a fight and he can be pretty well trusted to stay alive without constant help, unlike certain knife-wielding, elven rogues, or literally any mage you may have in your party. What’s he busy doing while you’re keeping Wynne alive? Probably bashing someone with a shield. Clanking about the place hitting people. Who knows, but he’s not gonna get thwarted by some darkspawn with a few arrows. And that’s a quality I really like in fictional people.

His only downside is that well… he’s even more of a hopeless romantic than one might expect. He does get a bit mushy if you romance him. Like… really quite squishy. Maybe too squishy. Does this stop him being my default and tbh only Origins romance? No it does not. But maybe more jokes and less undying love and we’d be even more perfect.

tenorA recent addition to the pantheon (because her original incarnation really wasn’t) is Adora out of being She-Ra.

She has a massive sword, she can transform into a ridiculous lorge and competent fighty lady, and she has a metric shit-tonne of guilt and responsibility going on… but she still finds time to be a total numpty. And to try to solve not-sword problems with a sword. She has her one area of expertise and well… why not apply it to everything?

I like Adora particularly because the sword-doofus genre feels like one that’s going to be overpopulated with men and underpopulated with women. Women very rarely get to be doofuses – they go ditsy instead, and I hate it. Women can be adorable klutzes who make stupid jokes, and yet very good at hitting things with sharp metal, too guys! So to have Adora sit so firmly in the genre is a fucking Delight. Do her friends sometimes have to point out to her that she’s being dense? Oh they sure do. Does that stop her being the hero? Not a bit!

More female doofus rep please.

Adora’s only downside is she’s not as often deliberately funny as I’d like. She’s not the one cracking the jokes, so much as being the joke, and to be the perfect sword doofus, one has to create humour for oneself, not just be intensely mockable.

50702014._sy475_Next up (no picture because books don’t always have them (ruuuuude)) – Stephen, the titular paladin from Paladin’s Grace by T. Kingfisher.

Big burly sword dude? Check!
Angst and whatnot about his dead god? Check!
Trying very hard to be Good in a complicated world? Check!
Being exasperated at people putting themselves in harm’s way? Oh so check!
Knitting socks for his friends? Che- wait what?

I’m sorry, but I love the idea of a paladin who knits socks to keep himself occupied. There’s a moment where he thinks about the potential tactical uses for his knitting needles, and weighs up the pros and cons about how much using them for each would mess up his knitting. He makes pink stripey socks for his paladin friends. It’s just so… delightful. And he smells like gingerbread.

He also has a really fun, 90% sarcasm-based relationship with one of his fellow paladins and spoilers: manages to have a day-long berserker session where the only real casualties are a rain barrel and an equestrian statue. He’s fundamentally a Nice Boy… who happens to have the ability to kill people if he wanted to. He’d just rather give them a stern talking to or deflect them by being Visibly Hench.

Maybe the guilt and angst gets a little bit too much at times… maybe. But he’s a pretty damn good sword-doofus. A+, will continue to read T. Kingfisher books.

gideonninth-featAnd another lady-doofus – Gideon out of Gideon the Ninth, by Tamsyn Muir.

She may have been raised in a creepy necromantic convent full of living skeletons, murder attempts and Very Serious People, but she likes saucy lesbian magazines, makes really awful jokes, can take almost nothing seriously and wears sunglasses over her (haphazardly applied) skull facepaint. Peak sword doofus, is what I’m saying. She may be the defending knight sworn to the service of the teenager in charge of a whole necromantically obsessed planet, but she is absolutely going to sass everyone in sight and goofily flex her muscles for the pretty lady she meets.

She also fulfills my personal happy criterion of ignoring her official rapier and instead wanting a hecking chonker of a two-handed sword. Two handed swording as a woman is a great look, imo.

Much like Adora, she gets massive points from me for being a female sword-doofus, and doubly so for being one in a book written from her viewpoint. Not only is there sarcasm and sass, but it’s our whole reading perspective. It’s the narrative voice. It’s a fucking joy.

Is there a downside? I’m honestly struggling to think of one.

1c99c19e85e7fdf12049417f25073280In a somewhat more borderline case – Captain Carrot Ironfoundersson, out of Discworld.

He has many of the traits of the sword doofus – he’s definitely a Good Guy, he does have a sword which he wields with casual ease, he gets into situations where he doesn’t get the context/subtext everyone else is keyed into, and he saves the day in sometimes… nonstandard ways. He’s even in a lot of comedic situations…

But is he the architect of them? Is he poking fun at himself? I think this one is more of a probably, at least given the overt stuff in the third person narrative. It’s strongly implied… but never really explicit. How much is he willing to laugh at himself? Unknown. He’s definitely more self-aware than he lets on to the world, but he’s not out there cracking jokes and making puns. He’s just busy cheerfully saving the world and letting cynicism bounce off his extremely shiny breastplate.

Does he have a sword? Yes. Is he a doofus? Undoubtedly. But I think, for him to be truly up there, he’d need to be self-consciously involved in his own doofusry. We are not here for subtlety in this endeavour.

4351425-0088714462-swordLooping back to some nostalgia telly now – Buffy, what is the Vampire Slayer.

Technically, she’s not sword-exclusive (I suppose neither is Carrot), and it’s not her first choice of weapon, but she’s perfectly capable with one should the occasion arise. And in all other regards, she has the trope down. Yes, there’s a heck of a lot of teenage angst going around, but if anyone is going to undercut the seriousness of the vampire slaying endeavour, it will be Buffy herself (ok or Zander… or Giles… or Spike… it’s not a very serious show, really). Sure, she’s dutybound to take on the role of vampire slayer, but she’s also gonna sass people. Often while doing it. In contrast to Carrot, she is absolutely the architect of her own doofusry, and if anything, she nudges against the boundaries of the type by being too self-aware with it. Can one be a sword doofus if one is trying to be a sword doofus on purpose? I’ve got all philosophical.

But I think she manages it, and again, kudos for being a wise-cracking lady, especially one willing to make the jokes and the sass while fighting the undead, demons and whatever else has exited the hellmouth this week. What she does best is lean in, and hard, onto being the sarcastic one, the exasperated one, and taking the piss out of the entire genre of her opponents. She knows vampires are ridiculous. She tells them so. They just… don’t learn. But none of this gets in the way of her being a proper Big Damn Hero when duty calls.

Her insistence on traditional vampire killing weaponry may lose her points, but no one can fault her for trying.

Others exist, but I think these six account for a good swathe of what I really love about the archetype.

I’m fundamentally allergic to an excess of earnest. In real life and in fiction, I struggle if I have take something emotionally seriously for all too long – it’s why I can’t watch a lot of tv shows properly, especially American ones, because they just expect me to sit through Emotions without anyone cracking a joke. It’s rude. And so for me, the sword doofus is the perfect character – they exist to hack the legs off any real emotional seriousness, and keep the world they’re in grounded and aware that people, no matter what else may be going on, demons, cults, necromancy, evil empires, whatever, they remain fundamentally people. It’s an archetype that forces real human interactions into whatever world it exists in, it necessitates the silliness of mundanity. And that’s something I think fantasy often really needs. That and good guys with a sense of humour.

If I had to pick a favourite… it’s probably Alistair, if I’m honest. Others may be better at the job, but his particular brand of incessant humour, often in the face of being told to please fucking stop already, or at least in the face of world-shattering catastrophe he’s meant to help fix, is endearing in the extreme. I need more stories in my life when the response of good men to evil deeds is jokes about how great cheese is, while they get round to the business of smiting. It may be hard to write it well, but when it’s done right, the pay off is fantastic.

 

*This is why Cassandra is not a sword doofus. She has many of the hallmarks, and in some ways, is a doofus… but she’s also kinda terrifying. She is not approachable. I fear her.

Posted in All, Else | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Harrow the Ninth – Tamsyn Muir

Alix E. Harrow provided the most accurate possible summary of Harrow the Ninth (henceforth simply Harrow) with the following gif:

Here does not endeth the review, because I clearly like the sound of my own voice enough to have a blog, but here totally could endeth the review, and you’d have a pretty accurate sense of Harrow and my feelings about it. And gives me an opportunity to remember how much I enjoyed Knives Out when I finally got round to watching it recently.

Anyway, actual words blog.

81oynyft0cl

The art really does remain gorgeous… I originally had Gideon on kindle, but bought it in hardback so, when I pre-ordered Harrow, I could have a lovely matching set

I… have been known to like a batshit book, in my time; my unwavering love for Vellum, possibly the most batshit book I’ve ever read*, is a testament to that. I did not go in expecting a batshit book in Harrow, but I’m fundamentally inclined towards liking nonsense like this, so I was happy to roll with it. Because by god it is some nonsense.

In fact, important consumer note here: if you liked Gideon the Ninth and are wanting to read Harrow because it’ll be more of the same – with a fairly linear adventure/mystery narrative – it might be worth being cautious about Harrow. I gave it 5 stars without even a pause, so I’m not saying it’s a bad book, but it’s a very different book, and if you’re not someone who likes to be absolutely baffled, and you don’t want to be getting the previous book out to check things and pulling increasingly distressed faces so your boyfriend asks if you’re ok… this might not be the book for you. It’s part of what I found most interesting about the reading experience, in fact, that Muir has done such a tone shift between the two books, she’s bound to lose some of the audience who like the first because they just don’t want what is being done with the second.

But, that all being said… Harrow is hands down, no question, honest to god, a more accomplished, better written and more interesting book than Gideon (which I loved and gave five stars, so…). Come for the lesbian space necromancy, stay for the intricate character work and laugh out loud self-referential humour.

Because at its core, what makes Harrow such a good book for me is that character work. Muir has, in a spoilery way I won’t go into, tied her hands a bit on the scope she has to portray Harrowhark, the protagonist, and she has absolutely knocked it out of the park despite/because of that hand tying. I didn’t even particularly like Harrow as a character in Gideon, but Muir has made being inside her head an absolute delight. And it is a book about being totally immersed inside someone’s head, seeing the world exactly and only as they see it, and trying to puzzle out what’s going on from their perspective. Those books only work if the character you’re inhabiting is compelling, and Harrow… is certainly that.

Which isn’t to say the supporting characters aren’t well drawn or present. They are. I absolutely fell in love with the dorky ridiculous man that is God, the Necrolord Prime, also known as John. I mean… John… god of all things. He likes tea and biscuits and wears shabby shirts that are a bit worn through. He makes dad jokes. How could I not love him? Muir really sold herself to me in Gideon by making a host of characters who showed their personalities quickly and compellingly, and she’s made no change to that in her sequel. There are fewer people in this one to keep track of (which is possibly for the best), but the ones that are there are so, so well done. They’re fundamentally people, even if they’re caricatures, in a way that book characters often aren’t, they have brilliant, natural-seeming dialogue, and they just make you want to hear more from them. One of our book club questions includes asking whether “the characters and their problems are relatable” and honestly… somehow… the answer is yes in Harrow. They’re doing space necromancy, and yet their problems are entirely relatable. That shouldn’t work. But it does, and I’m not complaining.

It’s also, despite in many ways being a massive smack in the face of… everything… a surprisingly subtle book. There are some things it did that I honestly didn’t even notice until afterwards, and then I looked back (or at reviews that mentioned them**) and went “oh… OH MAN”. It’s a book that will absolutely reward a reread, where I suspect I’ll spend the whole thing going “HOW DID I MISS THIS”. There will be Chekhov’s guns aplenty, and stupid foreshadowing jokes, I’m sure. I was almost tempted to do it immediately upon finishing the first time.

And it’s a book that’s basically impossible to talk about without spoiling the ending.

If I truly wanted to tell you how great of a book it is, I need to dig into how it lands the ending (answer: extremely well) and why the structure feels odd as you’re going through it but then clicks at a point later on… but it’s one of those books you really need to experience in bafflement, so I can’t. The bafflement is part of the experience. A really necessary, fantastic part that makes the pay off at the ending immensely worthwhile. Just… trust me.

And that feels like all I can say. I hate dancing around spoilers like this, because most of the time, being so vague doesn’t actually help anything. Some idea of what happens in the book isn’t “spoilers” but… sometimes you need to go in cold. Sometimes you need to just… experience it. And this is one of those (very few) times.

I suppose the other thing I can say is: I loved it. I loved it wholeheartedly, constantly and intensely. It’s a fantastic, gorgeous and amazing book, and I cannot believe I loved it more than I loved Gideon, but I did… book two is better than book one and that so rarely happens. Muir is Doing A Thing and she’s succeeded and it’s amazing. I am still hypothesising about all sorts of things that came up through the story. I now have a SPREADSHEET to work something out, for goodness’ sake. The wait for Alecto the Ninth is going to be absolutely interminable, and I can guarantee I’ll have reread both Gideon and Harrow before the time comes. And it will be so so worth it and so very enjoyable to do so. Please read them both – I need more people to enthuse at about them.

*A book I was only convinced made sense that one time I read it having not slept for two days.
** SPOILER WARNING ON THIS ONE (highlight to read it): the use of the second person is very very pointed. Extremely pointed. It’s one of the things dinged in a lot of reviews as being not good, but I loved it, I found it relatively subtly done and it serves its purpose extremely well, and when you get to the point of realising why it’s as it is… well. I suspect I was meant to twig earlier than I did but I was being daft.

 

Posted in All, Awesome, Fantasy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Pet – Akwaeke Emezi

pet-600x600-1This one was… difficult to rate.

My normal policy is to rate a book what I think of it as I, as I am now, come to it in the moment I read it. I don’t rate for “if I’d been in a better mood” or “if I’d read this before this other book” because that renders the process meaningless. I want my book ratings to reflect the experience I had of the book as I read it.

That… falls down a bit when I read a book that is a) extremely squarely not aimed at me and b) not the sort of thing I would ever have chosen to read, as the self I am now. Especially if it’s a book that I think might be very good for the people it’s aimed at, but just… not for the me that exists in the here and now. I feel bad rating something badly that is in all likelihood doing its job very well, but where I am a far from perfect assessor of that job.

Technically, I believe this is a YA book. It’s what it says on the front page. But I definitely feel like it’s aimed at the youngest band of YA, or the upper end of the next section down. And it’s… been a long time since I habitually read books aimed at 12 year olds (longer even than “since I was 12”, which is a fair while). I… don’t read much YA/whatever you call the next age bracket down. When I do, it’s pretty universally nostalgia rereads of things I experienced for the first time when in the right age bracket. Whatever other people find, reading YA/kids’ books as adults, is not a thing I have ever been capable of finding myself. And that’s cool, I just… don’t seek it out. We exist in mutual ignorance, and it’s all cool for everyone involved. So now I have to read a kids’ book (for book club)… and I don’t really know what to do with myself. It feels wrong to rate it how I find it now, because… well… how does that help anyone or achieve anything? I wouldn’t read a romance novel and then bitch there was a sex scene in it. Why would I read a book aimed at children and then mark it down for doing things that probably make it ideally suited for children? But… I don’t really have the tools and experience to properly assess if it is ideally suited for children… so if I tried to rate it on “how good do I think it would have been for 12 year old me”… I’m just making a wild-ass stab in the dark.

Basically, I gave it 3 stars and am feeling guilty about it, because I don’t think it deserves such a low rating, but it’s a rating that accurately reflects my adult experience of reading it. I’m essentially writing a blog to talk out my feelings about that in long form. Yay. Complicated 3 star ratings are the worst.

So the book is about a girl in the future, a utopian society that has eradicated the monsters of our present, discovering that the monsters aren’t actually as gone as everyone really believes. It’s a good, necessary story, and one that does a lot of work around how predators manage to stay hidden and why victims aren’t believed, while allowing the reader to see and understand that all through the eyes of someone who is having to learn it for the first time. It’s a story I’m really, really glad exists, and one I really do suspect is powerful and useful to read at the age the book is aimed at.

But… well… because it’s aimed at kids… it’s quite simple. It tells the story it needs to tell, which is a relatively short, direct one. It gives you the (relatively small number of) characters you need to tell that story, draws them well if simply, and focusses primarily on the view of the protagonist and the problem she’s there to see, understand and solve. It has a cast whose existences, lives and problems are realistic and diverse, and fit well within the bounds of the story it wants to tell. It is a short novel, of fairly direct prose and limited digressing passages of glorious descriptive whatever, without a huge amount of space for intricacy and complexity, for an enormity of character growth. There’s some, don’t get me wrong, but again, it’s fairly simple and directed, as is the rest of the book. It is… for me, as the adult I exist as now… not enough. The core, the idea and the purpose are great, but the execution feels… well… childish. I want more.

This isn’t exactly a criticism, because it’s not for me. God this is hard to put more words around. I don’t think it’s a badly written book. I don’t think it’s poorly constructed or ill thought out or whatever. But… it doesn’t do what I want books to do. I want my books… bigger, and complicateder, in form and language and structure. I want subplots and pretty prose and interweaving narratives. I want more characters, fleshed out more. I want depth. And breadth. I want the range that you need a bigger novel than this to fill out. And so I felt deeply unsatisfied by it, and guilty of that dissatisfaction. I just… didn’t enjoy reading it.

If I had to go with my gut, I would suspect it’s a really genuinely fantastic kids’ book. I think. Probably. Which… great. I’m glad. But… why has it been put into my hands, exactly? I’m… not sure what I was ever going to get out of it, other than this guilt and dissatisfaction and an infuriating sense of Not Getting It. Because I don’t. All I can feel is the absence of what I want out of my books, rather than the appreciation I suspect this deserves, from someone who is in the right place to find it. And this is exactly why I don’t read YA and kids’ books. It’s been a long time since I’ve been able to find the things in them that deserve to be found, and so I read the things I can appreciate, the things that do fill the gaps in me, because otherwise, no one wins.

Posted in All, Children's, YA | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Voting in the Hugos 2020

Weirdly, the first year I actually vote in the Hugos, I haven’t actually read all the novels. Pandemic has had a weird effect on my reading habits. But still, I read all the short fiction and nearly all the graphic novels, none of which categories I’ve super invested in before… but now I’ve read some things I have become entirely ride or die about my opinions and will watch the live stream of the awards rapt with attention. So it goes.

I’m going to have a go at predicting what I think will happen alongside what I want to happen (with, I imagine, limited success at best) and then we can all see what a fool I am come award time.

We’ll start with short fiction and build our way up:

Short Stories

My ordering:

  1. “And Now His Lordship Is Laughing”, by Shiv Ramdas (Strange Horizons, 9 September 2019)
  2. “As the Last I May Know”, by S.L. Huang (Tor.com, 23 October 2019)
  3. “Do Not Look Back, My Lion”, by Alix E. Harrow (Beneath Ceaseless Skies, January 2019)
  4. “Ten Excerpts from an Annotated Bibliography on the Cannibal Women of Ratnabar Island”, by Nibedita Sen (Nightmare Magazine, May 2019)
  5. “Blood Is Another Word for Hunger”, by Rivers Solomon (Tor.com, 24 July 2019)
  6. “A Catalog of Storms”, by Fran Wilde (Uncanny Magazine, January/February 2019)
  7. No award

There’s something of a gap for me between numbers 4 and 5, and I’d certainly not be upset if any of my top 3 won. I thought they were all great (and number 4 was just… incredibly NEAT). Possibly Do Not Look Back My Lion felt the most for me, but I think And Now His Lordship is Laughing is just… a really, really well constructed and written story. It is… just… in and of itself. Whereas DNLBML… I wanna read novels following on from it. I want that world and those characters and just… more of it. As the Last I May Know is… painfully unsubtle (in a good way), and makes its point hard and poignantly.

Catalog of Storms was… a bit frustrating. It was some perfectly interesting world building but didn’t really contain much in the way of a story.

I don’t have a lot of knowledge on this one, but I suspect ANHLiL may well win it. It’s just… really really well done.

Novelettes

  1. “For He Can Creep”, by Siobhan Carroll (Tor.com, 10 July 2019)
  2. Emergency Skin, by N.K. Jemisin (Forward Collection (Amazon))
  3. “Omphalos”, by Ted Chiang (Exhalation (Borzoi/Alfred A. Knopf; Picador))
  4. “The Blur in the Corner of Your Eye”, by Sarah Pinsker (Uncanny Magazine, July-August 2019)
  5. “The Archronology of Love”, by Caroline M. Yoachim (Lightspeed, April 2019)
  6. “Away With the Wolves”, by Sarah Gailey (Uncanny Magazine: Disabled People Destroy Fantasy Special Issue, September/October 2019)
  7. No award

I adored For He Can Creep. I unashamedly loved it. I had expected it to be twee and silly and mildly irritating, but it was none of those… it was just Really Bloody Good instead. Which is a bit of a bugger for Emergency Skin, which I think is really skillfully done – I really enjoyed the mixed use of the second person – but… well… For He Can Creep has cats. It has a cat called The Nighthunter Moppet. I mean. Come on. AND YET. Somehow, she’s made it… really actually good? Not just fun-silly. That’s… honestly really impressive.

Omphalos, I annoyingly read ages ago, but it was alright. One of the stories from that collection I at least remember, which bodes well.

4, 5 and 6 are all, annoyingly, on shades down the “meh” scale. The Blur in the Corner of Your Eye is… kinda mildly interesting I guess? Like, neat conceit. But I wasn’t mad keen. The other two are both boring and not particularly well done. Ah well.

I really really want For He Can Creep to Win… and part of me thinks it might because, well, apparently everyone loves cats. But if it doesn’t, I’d probably put my money on Emergency Skin.

Novellas

  1. This Is How You Lose the Time War, by Amal El-Mohtar and Max Gladstone (Saga Press; Jo Fletcher Books)
  2. The Deep, by Rivers Solomon, with Daveed Diggs, William Hutson & Jonathan Snipes (Saga Press/Gallery)
  3. The Haunting of Tram Car 015, by P. Djèlí Clark (Tor.com Publishing)
  4. “Anxiety Is the Dizziness of Freedom”, by Ted Chiang (Exhalation (Borzoi/Alfred A. Knopf; Picador))
  5. In an Absent Dream, by Seanan McGuire (Tor.com Publishing)
  6. No award
  7. To Be Taught, If Fortunate, by Becky Chambers (Harper Voyager; Hodder & Stoughton)

TIME WAR. TIIIIIME WAAAAAAAR. I mean, it’s already won a Nebula. Please let it continue to rake in all the awards going.

Which sucks for The Deep, as it’s bloody good, but… TIME WAR. Seriously, if not for Time War, I’d be waving the banner hard for Rivers Solomon on this one; I really loved it. It was haunting and personal and just… really well written.

The Haunting of Tram Car 015 was interesting… I enjoyed the djinn-punk-Cairo thing it had going on, far more than I enjoyed the story though. I think my first comment on it when coming out was to wonder why <competent woman with all the answers> was helping <apparently quite baffled and useless yet somehow a professional investigator protagonist>. Definitely some stuff in there didn’t quite fit right.

This was… less one of the Chiang stories I remember. I keep getting it mixed up with the one I extremely liked.

In and Absent Dream was fine? I think possibly it was a good example of what it is, but what it is isn’t really my thing.

I did a whole post on why To Be Taught if Fortunate is legitimately terrible so… uh… yeah.

Honestly, if Time War doesn’t win? I riot. But if so, I’d really really hope The Deep gets it instead… I don’t think anything else on that list is even close.

Graphic Novels

  1. Die, Volume 1: Fantasy Heartbreaker, by Kieron Gillen and Stephanie Hans, letters by Clayton Cowles (Image)
  2. The Wicked + The Divine, Volume 9: “Okay”, by Kieron Gillen and Jamie McKelvie, colours by Matt Wilson, letters by Clayton Cowles (Image)
  3. Monstress, Volume 4: The Chosen, written by Marjorie Liu, art by Sana Takeda (Image)
  4. Paper Girls, Volume 6, written by Brian K. Vaughan, drawn by Cliff Chiang, colours by Matt Wilson, letters by Jared K. Fletcher (Image)
  5. LaGuardia, written by Nnedi Okorafor, art by Tana Ford, colours by James Devlin (Berger Books; Dark Horse)
  6. Mooncakes, by Wendy Xu and Suzanne Walker, letters by Joamette Gil (Oni Press; Lion Forge)
  7. No award

I will admit on this one, I’ve not read the 6th volume of Paper Girls (although I have read a couple of the ones previous), but I’m happy with putting it there purely because I was… quite dubious about the two below it. It’s more a mark of The Line than a comment on what I thought about that series in and of itself.

The top three however… fuck me don’t make me PICK. I love all three of them, but in the end, Die gets the top spot for pure, heart-renching emotionality. Part of me does want WicDiv 9 to win… I don’t think it’s the best in the series (that’s what 8 is for), but it gets massive massive points for ending a series and ending it WELL. That’s hard. So I kinda feel like it should be rewarded for that? Whereas having a really exciting first volume is a bit easier to do. But… Die vol. 1 is a really exciting first volume… so…

I’m glad I’ve read LaGuardia and Mooncakes, but they neither of them quite do it for me, albeit in different ways. I liked the story in LaGuardia – it’s really compelling – but the art style just really really isn’t my thing at all. It’s creeping towards (but not quite in) a style I see more often in cartoons and find kinda unsettling. Mooncakes, meanwhile, is doing something I find quite fun… but exists in a more stylised and polished form in Moonstruck… so I was forever comparing the two unfavourably, especially on the art front. The styles are distinctively different, but I can’t help but just feel that the art in Moonstruck is… better. Mooncakes’ story is nice, and the characters are fine but… when your opposition is Die, WicDiv and Monstress… nice and fine are just not good enough.

Novels

  1. A Memory Called Empire, by Arkady Martine (Tor; Tor UK)
  2. Gideon the Ninth, by Tamsyn Muir (Tor.com Publishing)
  3. The City in the Middle of the Night, by Charlie Jane Anders (Tor; Titan)
  4. The Light Brigade, by Kameron Hurley (Saga; Angry Robot UK)
  5. The Ten Thousand Doors of January, by Alix E. Harrow (Redhook; Orbit UK)
  6. Middlegame, by Seanan McGuire (Tor.com Publishing)
  7. No award

So I’ve only read three, and the rest are in italics because this is the order I predict for my own feelings about them, and want a record for when I do subsequently get round to reading them. It is possibly worth noting that I am putting two books I’ve never read, one by an author I’ve never read… above one I have. I really didn’t rate 10k doors, and it’s not doing much better with time and distance. It’s not… memorable, except in bad ways.

Having now read a Seanan McGuire novella, I’m not particularly keen to go out and read her novel, but I may well get to it in time. I can’t imagine I’ll hate it, but I just can’t really muster any enthusiasm either.

The main issue here though is… how to pick between Gideon and Memory. I so, so wanted one of them (ideally Memory) to get the Nebula so the other could take the Hugo, and then the world would be very nearly perfect (maybe if The Raven Tower picked up a different award somewhere else). But alas, the single book on the slate I did not manage to get round to reading got the Nebula (rude) and given I didn’t particularly like the Hugo novelette by the same author, I’m neither rushing out to read A Song for a New Day nor particularly thrilled about it beating books I know are fantastic. Maybe it is truly breathtaking. Maybe I’m missing out. Who knows. Someone clearly thinks so. But given that the world has cruelly foiled my plans, I’m down to having to pick favourites and… in the end… Memory just has to win. The extent to which it gut punched me in the feels means it just has to squeak out on top.

That being said, I suspect Gideon will get the win. And I’m not upset about it. I am super hyped for my preorder of the sequel to arrive (SOON!), and it’s a great book that I loved. But one of the two of them really does need to take the prize because they both are just… so… so good. They deserve all the love.

Over all thoughts

The thing I found most interesting about the reading this year (caveat for obviously not having read all of the novels, but I figure I’d have found something in the other categories) – there’s very little I actively hate, which is unusual. Normally there’s at least one of the novels that I full on rage at, and often more. I’m still not over New York 2140. Or Too Like the Lightning. Or Six Wakes. Or Space Opera. But not so here. Just my strong dislike of To Be Taught, If Fortunate, and even that doesn’t reach the towering zenith of anger I normally get for at least one thing.

I’m almost disappointed. I kinda like doing the rage posts. But maybe it was good this year, on a year when I’m really struggling to get through long, difficult or uncomfortable books, that nothing I’ve yet put under my own nose has totally pissed me off. Small mercies.

So yeah, I await the inevitable reveal of my inability to predict the likes of others.

Also this voting thing (and this “access to the voter packet” thing) is really fun and definitely worth the money. I should do this again.

 

Posted in All, Else, Fantasy, Graphic Novels & Comics, Not A Review, Science Fiction, Short Stories | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Desdemona and the Deep – C. S. E. Cooney

9781250229823Only a novella, but hey, I’m dragging myself back into reading things, so I’ll take what works. I can’t actually remember who made me aware of this one, but I bought it on a whim a month or so ago, and I’m glad I did… although I didn’t wholeheartedly love it.

I’m normally wary of statements like “it needed a much better editor” or “it only needed to be a novella”. Certainly if I find myself thinking them, I want to dig into why… is it just that I actually think the book isn’t very good and want to try to excuse it in some way? But this is one of the few where I genuinely think I have a valid point – I think it ought to have been a full length novel. The single major failing it has, at least for me, is that a lot of key moments of character interaction or motivation are elided, and so you witness a character decision without seeing how the character got to the point of making it, especially ones that involve a turning point in behaviour or moral outlook. They sort of come out of nowhere. If you squint, you can cobble together for yourself an explanation, but it’s barely there in the book, and I think the narrative would have been much better served by having those points fleshed out longer, so the progression and behaviour of the actors makes sense. Their development, especially the protagonist’s, just feels… condensed. And it’s a real shame, because it was a pretty big sticking point for me – it really has an effect on how coherent the story feels as a whole – and yet the rest of the book was quite so good.

The story follows a rich socialite daughter, who heads into the goblin world to right a wrong done by her somewhat evil industrialist father. Which in and of itself, not stunningly interesting… but it works really quite well with the setting. I can’t think of many fantasy books that take place in either the real-world 1920s, or a fantasy pastiche thereof. The only one that comes immediately to mind beyond this… also happened to be really, truly, atrociously written*. It’s not exactly generic-medieval, or Victoriana, in terms of popularity. But I think it manages to capture some of what people are going for when they write steampunk trash – the weird cross-pollination of the old and the new, historical and technological – without being crap and/or steampunk. Despite it being a fantasy other version of our world, Cooney is also entirely happy to situate the societal issues of the time within it, so the story happens against a backdrop of women’s suffrage and exploitative, poorly-legislated capitalism – we start with a fundraiser for women suffering life-changing conditions due to poor factory conditions.

And then you chuck in fairies.

I’ll admit, I like fairy-fantasy, especially the sort that’s all dark bargains and trickery. It’s just… intrinsically appealing. My threshold for enjoying it is probably lower than a lot of other stuff. But this one is still just… good. For two reasons – 1) I like that she’s gone and made her own, other-world version of fairy realms and folkore and managed to pack it into a novella without it feeling desperately forced (while still giving you enough grounding for it to feel like a proper folklore) and 2) because it is sitting precisely alongside the time period setting she’s chosen. Glamorous dresses and champagne and starving artists being funded by socialites… somehow just seems to juxtapose beautifully with cruel, beautiful and tricksy fairies in a hidden underworld. It’s also a time period that gives you the protagonist – a spoiled socialite with money to burn, but at a time when the extent to which she is constrained by rules and her father’s will is changing. The amount she can exercise her own freedom is changing, and so you don’t have the same level of restriction of activity you might find in a medieval-fantasy or Victorian-esque story (or the problem of it being inexplicably absent because steampunk).

And the protagonist is really really interesting. I don’t want to say “great”, because I don’t wholeheartedly like her. But nor am I supposed to. She’s complicated, and not entirely a good person, and so it felt such a shame how much her growth was hemmed in by the size of the book. She deserved more, and felt like she had more to give. I’d have easily read more, just about her, and her relationship with her best friend Chaz absolutely could have borne more digging into. It was there – Cooney does enough to show in dialogue that the relationship feels really real – but it was only just there. If there’d been space for it, I think it could have been a really exciting centre-piece of the novel.

In the end, I struggled with what to give this on Goodreads. 4 felt like too wholehearted an endorsement – it makes it look like I really did like it an awful lot with only minor reservations. But 3 also feels like it does it a disservice. 3 doesn’t say “interesting”… and “interesting” is by far the adjective most springing to mind for this. In the end, I went 4, but it does come with reservations, especially around the character work, and their growth and development, because there just isn’t time to cram a richly developed world, a decent story and full, complex character growth into 216 pages. Something had to give, and it was that. But if another story set in this world came out, but a full novel length? I’d absolutely read it, and hope for much better things.

Ok I googled it and it turns out two novels in the world existed prior to the novella. Best get on reading those, I guess. Whoops.

 

*Witchmark by C. L. Polk

Posted in All, Fantasy | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

To Be Taught, If Fortunate – Becky Chambers

I’m voting in the Hugos this year – very exciting stuff. As such, I’d intended to wait until I voted (and had read all I was going to read, which I admit, I’m leaving a bit up to the wire) to do a nice round up post, especially on what I thought about the various bits of short fiction. That was… the plan. However, in an event that will surprise very few of you, something has annoyed me enough that I feel it deserves a post all of its own. Is it Becky Chambers’ novella To Be Taught, If Fortunate? Yes yes it is.

I am, of course, biased. I have read all three of the Wayfarer books and thought them all, at best, empty fluff. A few sub-par Star Trek TNG episodes slung together in book form, for the first book, for instance. Not objectionable, exactly, but devoid of any emotional resonance for me personally. Just… eh. Fine. I guess*. Which happens. Not all books are masterpieces, not all books resonate with me personally, some books get to be just fine, nothing special, and then drift out of my sphere of awareness forever. Except, well, lots of Hugo nominations, so they haven’t.

I promise, I did my best with this one. I knew it wasn’t Wayfarers, I knew it wasn’t the same universe or story, and so I tried my honest best to be open minded, to take it as a new book, and try to find whatever joy in it there was to all the people who nominated it for a Hugo award.

Didn’t find it.

Despite reading it when I have vanishingly little to do (I just finished the Mass Effect trilogy and have been feeling too lazy to accomplish much of anything but reading Hugo nominees). Despite it interspersing a work day in which there was extremely little to do, and all of it things I’m not interested in in the slightest… I found myself stopping at frequent points to proclaim that it was BORING. The boyfriend had been requested not to spoil, either, so had to bear the brunt of my grumbling in silence. He is long-suffering. But it was boring. Really, truly, dull. Constantly, unendingly dull. Which is impressive, in a novella. 132 pages is not a lot of space for “unending”. And this is the thing. I have other complaints about the book – which I will of course go into shortly – but this one is really the interesting one. I dislike a lot of books. I even hate a lot of books, or am angry at them. But “boring” isn’t actually that common an issue I have. In many ways because SFF is a genre built on cool ideas, so the things that get through the filter tend to be interesting or fun in some ways… just possibly also badly written or with terrible politics. Boring is unusual, and kinda fascinating. I wasn’t even particularly bored by the Wayfarer books. I didn’t like them all that much, didn’t think they were particularly well constructed and all that… but they were easy reads that I could plough through in a day or two. I wasn’t being kicked out of immersion because I was too bored to focus on what little was going on in the text.

That being said, I think there are two main reasons why I was quite so bored, and one of them isn’t at all a surprise, based on how I felt about the Wayfarer books – I found the characters so utterly devoid of human interest, emotional resonance or even frankly feeling like proper characters at all that I just did not connect with them on any level. I didn’t care. And I really do need to care (hating being a form of caring, so that works too) to be able to push myself through stuff. I need to be invested in some way. It’s not been all that long since I read Record of a Spaceborn Few, and already, I have forgotten not just the names of the characters, but the shape of most of their stories. They left precious little impression on me, and it’s evaporated easily. There’s a very vague shape of a story left, fragments of things that happen, but nothing more. The other two, even more so. And then this novella has kicked it all up a notch. Even as I read I felt… nothing for them. Even in the moments that were clearly intended to convey emotion. I’m not a daft woman, most of the time. I could see on the page what the author was trying to do, what they wanted me to feel, and it just… wasn’t there… every single time. That, for me, is boring. I want to feel. The books I love are the ones that make me feel deeply.

The second is at least new, for Chambers (in my opinion), at least, and pretty interesting to happen in a novella – everything felt too dragged out. She used a lot of words to say very little, and none of that extra wordage felt like it did me any good. It was just a sensation of “yes yes get on with it”. I got the impression that, primarily, those long passages were trying to evoke wonder. They didn’t. And when something doesn’t prompt an emotional response, but keeps on going as if it has, trying to build on it… that’s pretty boring too.

I was just… constantly bored.

Oh, and patronised too, that was fun.

And angry about the ideology of the book, too. Angry and bored together, great combo.

These all… sort of link up together though. The book talks a lot (at length, it feels like it goes on for longer than it does) about the wonder of space, and astronauts going to space, and discovering things in space, and science, and doing science, even boring science, and learning! And Curiosity! The Great Ideals of Humanity! To do this, it felt the need to explain a lot of scientific concepts, like chirality. But Chambers decided the best way to do this without alienating her audience was to do so as if the reader were a child. We did not need a long section of text about ambidextrousness and scissors and gloves to get us to chirality to get us to proteins to get us to… and so on. And I’m not saying books should only use words they strictly “need”. That’s not how literature. But when all that extra prose is not giving me anything, when there’s no wonder, no joy, no sadness, no excitement, no… nothing… it’s pointless. There was just… so much empty fluff that wasn’t doing anything for me at every turn. I’m not a scientist, by any stretch. I am not an expert, even in a hobbyist sort of way. But I felt so, so talked down to, it grated on me over and over again. I cannot imagine reading this as someone who actually knows about any of it, even in more than passing. And that’s… entirely possible to do. I read books with components of classics in all the time without feeling patronised in the slightest. But it’s not happened here.

And then when you got through the patronising fluff, to the core of the ideas… the ideals she’s trying to talk about. They’re fundamentally annoying. There’s a long passage near the end, talking about how scientists will understand the protagonist’s point of view, and talking at length about curiosity and the search for knowledge, the value of going out into the universe to seek… more. These are things I pretty much agree with. Knowledge is great, I’m irritatingly curious most of the time, and if there’s a whole universe full of stuff to know of course we should go out looking for it. But she’s fully gone into a view – not an uncommon one in the slightest – that is just that somehow… science is the sum totality of human curiosity and knowledge. That only by going out and doing Science in Space are we being good, curious humans. There’s a paragraph where she (the protagonist) admits to being unfamiliar with the thinking of non-scientists, wonders if they care at all, if “this sort of knowledge is is cherished, is yearned for”. She mentions the “empty trappings of civilisation” at one point, how while she was out in space doing science “the right things mattered”, compared to people problems, like politics and war, love and death.

And I hate that. It puts me right off. The question she’s asking about is absolutely a biggie. No question. But this assumption that people outside of the sphere of science don’t care because these facts “won’t put food on the table. They won’t build a roof over your head. They won’t strengthen your relationships or keep you healthy or help you do your chores. They change nothing about the everyday.” is preposterous. Is insulting. And is so common it hurts, especially in nerdy spheres. There isn’t only Science and Day-To-Day life. LET OTHER PEOPLE HAVE RICH, DEEP THOUGHTS TOO, ok? Things can be noble and vital and worthy and fascinating and glorious that have nothing to do with stars and proteins and comets. All those things can be worthy and fascinating… but so can a huge range of the human existence. Science is not the be all and end all of knowledge and intellectual interest, ok?

That rant was, of course, not solely prompted by this particular book. I can’t blame one novella for everything. But I can blame it for fitting into a stupid, reductive pattern that crops up over and again. I can blame it for patronising me. I can blame it for failing to think outside its narrow little box.

And of course I can blame it for the writing being pretty bland, of course. But that’s no different from her other stuff.

I felt, by the end of the book, that I was supposed to have felt some swooping joy and wonder, a fellowship with the protagonist and the bittersweet glory of the science she and her fellows were doing. But I didn’t. Not even at the crescendo of the plot. I was just bored, grumpy, patronised and annoyed. I saw things I’ve felt genuine emotion for in other places, different media, and just in other books, and they left me cold and empty. It’s… disappointing and sad, really. I wanted more than that. I got an awful lot more than that, from some of the other novellas (more on which in another, future post, I’m sure). I cannot convey the extent to which I promise you, I tried my honest best to like it, to not be clouded by disliking her other books… which I disliked less than this in any case. But… well.

I gave it 2 stars on Goodreads, because I’ve read some truly abominable things in the past, and they’ve very much set the bar for 1 star being pretty shite. But more importantly, unless something dramatically changes between now and the close of voting, I’ll be ranking it below no award in the Hugos. I don’t want to talk about “deserve”, because that’s a complicated thought in an award that is, essentially, a popularity contest… but I’d consider it a worse occurrence for things, all considered, if this won than if nothing did.

 

*And then lots of people told me emphatically that I was wrong and they’re great and so on, so I dug into my position and have become known as being emphatically anti-Wayfarer-books. Such is the way of things.

Posted in All, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

The Ten Thousand Doors of January – Alix E. Harrow

51utms5zzxlIt has been over a month since my last blog post. This is not because I’m running behind – for once – as I’m typing this the day I finished my next book. This… only tends to happen when I’m deeply uninspired to read (looking at you The Dark Forest). And obviously this time it might also be circumstances, but “uninspired” does not give you an inaccurate portrait of my feelings on The Ten Thousand Doors of January. Incomplete, perhaps. But not inaccurate.

Before I go into it though, I need first to talk about Lyra Belacqua*. I was never a fan of the His Dark Materials trilogy. And while I’m sure there are lots of reasons for that, the primary one I always give is that I never liked Lyra. I never understood her. And maybe as I’ve got older I’ve developed a touch more in the way of empathy, but still, she’s basically the epitome of a trope I just can’t get behind – wilful, headstrong, untameable little girls. Logically, great trope. We love to see it. But personally? My heart’s just not in it. I was… not that sort of girl and never wanted to be. I was quiet and bookish and well-behaved – my mother loves to recount the story of me telling her off for speeding… from my car-seat, at an age too young for me now to remember the incident at all – and had I been in Lyra’s place? Jordan College would have been a dream. And so for all that I see the value in stories of enterprising, extreme-protagonist-energy, go-getting, rule-defying, sense-ignoring, brave and wilful girls… it’s just never been me, not even slightly. And I clearly need something to hook myself onto to get into a story, even if just a hint of commonality.

January Scaller, protagonist of The Ten Thousand Doors of January (hereby abbreviated as 10k Doors)… is exactly a Lyra. And because the book starts ever so painfully slowly, and deeply focussed in on her and her alone… it bored me out of my skull. I just… didn’t care. I could not bring myself to care about the traumatic and tragic life of a girl raised in a wealthy house full of archaeological treasures yearning to be Free and Adventuring and Unconstrained by Politeness. There’s more to it than that – there’s a lot of stuff in her early years about racism and “knowing your place” that is totally understandable. But because it’s told from a child’s perspective of seeing those things but not really understanding them until later, there’s a much heavier focus on her Lyra-like qualities instead.

Nothing… really happens all that much until around 51% into the book. That’s a long-ass way to go pootling around inside the childhood/teenage head of someone you really don’t care about.

But it’s ok! It’s not all her internal monologue! Some of it is her reading a book about… another… wilful… untameable little girl. Oh. Although it’s also interspersed with some awkwardly try-hard pseudo academic writing, which did not help its case all that much either. It doesn’t sound like actual academic writing… it sounds like what people think academic writing sounded like in the 1910s. I can confirm it is not so. Not that it was anywhere near as bad, but it grated a little on my soul like Too Like the Lightning‘s pseudo Enlightenment tone. Just too obviously wrong.

And while I’m comparing it unfavourably to stuff, I need to come to the biggest comparison of all. It’s one that struck me on the very first page, and kept on going all the way through the book – The Starless Sea. Both are books, as I’m sure you can guess at least from the title of 10k Doors, that want to talk meta about portal fantasy. They want to be doing maybe a bit more with it, while also musing on the power of words, possibly made a little bit more literal, as well as escapism and coming of age. I don’t honestly know which came first, but they were published pretty close to each other… and one of them is far and away, hands down, no question the better book. Spoilers, it ain’t this one. The Starless Sea starts out seeming like it’s going to pander to feelings of “aren’t we bookish people just better than everyone else?” (ugh, hate it, it happens too much), and then turns out to be not that, better than that, and just stunningly beautiful. It sees all the tropes it could have walked right into and either ignored them or subverted them to become something new and different. 10k Doors? Did not do that. I don’t think it’s a book that’s trying really to shock the reader. For all that some/most of the plot is pretty predictable, it felt like that… wasn’t an accidental flaw so much as something that just didn’t matter. But while it affects the academic stuff about the interconnectedness of doors… it never develops it further, and is in fact just pretty standard portal fantasy. It’s probably unfair to compare it to The Starless Sea, in that sense, but I can’t help it. They’re two books built on such close premises and that end so utterly far apart in terms of success.

Because after the first half of the book or so, once some plot actually starts happening in 10k Doors… it’s just really… uninspired. It’s an adventure tale with some reeeeally sappy romance.

Ok sorry, another tangent, but the romance is horrific, true love at first sight level shit and I am not here for it In The Slightest. Guys, it is 2020, we can do better than this.

But yes, standard adventure tale. But because it’s all so… inside the mind of the protagonist – who, as I believe I’ve made clear, I don’t care about – it feels really one dimensional. And there’s no real tension. Because it’s so predictable, you know not only that she’ll be fine, but it’s easy to suspect really early exactly the ways in which she will make herself fine and… it never subverts that. It’s just… exactly as it seems it’s going to be. Sad girl grows up with rich pseudo-uncle in unhappy and constrained childhood, father goes missing, oh noes, drama ensues, bad people are bad, she learns to be unconstrained, does various things, saves day, hurrah.

And just for me? Eh.

The things the book does well – and there are some, I was torn between giving it 2 or 3 stars on Goodreads – are all in the frills and edges. There’s a really good black female character… who gets very little page time or focus, despite possibly being the only competent person in the book. Maybe one of two competent people. The stuff around January’s mixed-raceness is never really brought up. When it’s an issue – there are points when it’s an issue – they’re a single incident rather than it being a part of the narrative. So it feels scrappy. There’s stuff about January having been brought up wealthy and isolated from hardship… but she overcomes that eventually by… deciding to? Kinda? Basically there’s a wealth of good Ideas and they’re just never enough of the focus of the book to be of interest… because the focus is January being Sad that she is a Constrained, Wilful girl who wants to be Unconstrained. If we’d had more time for Jane Irimu, badass hunter lady who takes no shit, actually got her perspective and her voice, I’d have been way more invested, I think.

Basically, I can imagine there are people this book is great for. But they are people for whom Lyra is great. Who love stories like that, of girls yearning to be free of rules. And I am not those people, so the tight focus on a character who’s all about that? Just leaves me cold. It happens. There’s not a huge amount wrong with the story, really. It’s just not a me story. And if I had liked January herself, if I’d felt a fellowship with her? I suspect I’d be giving it 4 out of 5. It was still an Extremely slow start that I suspect I would always have been bothered by, and likewise it was always going to suffer in the shadow of The Starless Sea, but it’s a book that’s going to live or die on how much you like the protagonist, for the most part.

And so, because we now have the Hugo list, and this is on both, we can do some Nebula AND Hugo standings. Exciting times.

Nebulas are… not a surprise, I suspect:

  1. A Memory Called Empire
  2. Gideon the Ninth
  3. Gods of Jade and Shadow
  4.  The Ten Thousand Doors of January
  5.  [unknown]
  6. RON
  7. Fire with Fire

Nothing is going to fight for that bottom spot, so it’s just a case of where A Song for a New Day fits in. Tentative assumption is that it’s going to be in spot 4 or 5, because I just tend not to enjoy dystopias very much. I… do not know how soon I’m going to read it though, as it’s a near future dystopia, post-pandemic world and… eesh. Them feels at the mo. Hmm. We’ll see.

So, the Hugos! The nominees have been announced as follows:

If I order the ones I’ve now read, we get:

  1. A Memory Called Empire
  2. Gideon the Ninth
  3. The Ten Thousand Doors of January

Of the rest… I was already excited about and intending to read the Charlie Jane Anders, and a friend has been sufficiently enthusiastic about The Light Brigade that it’s counterbalanced my instinctive “ugh, milSF” and I’m intrigued. Apparently it does some subverting and all the milSF purists don’t like it. Which just leaves Middlegame as the mystery entry, but I’ve never read any longform Seanan McGuire, and with her 13(?) Hugo nominations, I should probably get on that by now. Unlike the Nebulas, there’s nothing in there filling me with dread, which is frankly a weird and unexpected twist.

Although, if you’d not already spotted – where the fuck is The Raven Tower? I am baffled and deeply offended it’s not in there, or the Nebulas, or any other major awards I’ve seen so far. It’s so fucking good! It’s better than this! It’s better than the stupid Caine book. It… might be better than Gideon the Ninth, which I loved. Don’t make me pick between it and Memory Called Empire. But it should be here and it’s not and that is a tragedy.

Anyway, I’m not reading the Pinsker, and I’ve got ages yet on the Hugos, so next book (which I may or may not blog) is self-indulgent classics reading.

*Ok, you can tell I’ve literally only just finished the book because I’m talking like it, not me. Ugghghghh get out of my brain.

Posted in All, Fantasy | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fire with Fire – Charles E. Gannon

15803179._uy475_ss475_And so, inauspiciously, I begin the Nebula novel nominee read.

The slate for this year is as follows:

A Memory Called Empire – Arkady Martine (already read)
Gideon the Ninth – Tamsyn Muir (already read)
Gods of Jade and Shadow – Silvia Moreno-Garcia (already read)
A Song for a New Day – Sarah Pinsker
The Ten Thousand Doors of January – Alix E. Harrow
Marque of Caine – Charles E. Gannon

Already, half of them I have already spoken on, how sad (I’ll rank them at the end). Of the remaining three, the last is actually the fifth book in a series. Past me was committed enough to read a middle series book to catch up with an award slate. But then past me also had to endure three books of Cixin Liu and has learnt from that experience. Oh god have I learnt. So, instead of committing myself to reading all the way up to Marque of Caine, I decided just to read the first book in the series, Fire with Fire, especially as it was itself nominated for a Nebula, back in the same year as Ancillary Justice (2014). This particular concurrence will become relevant later.

I decided to start with this one, because I thought I was going to like it the least of the whole slate. Now, having read it? I hope to any god that’s up there I’m right. It’s one of the worst books I’ve ever read. The only one in recent years worse than it is Altered Carbon. Yeah, that’s right, Too Like the Lightning is BETTER than it. Let that sink in.

Fire With Fire is BAD

This is what it took to get me through this book

This book is unremittingly, unforgivably shit. I have been reading it for… probably two weeks now? It feels longer. I only finished it because this evening, I sat down and decided, being at around 35%, that every 10% marker I reached, I’d award myself an alcoholic beverage for doing so. I’m now quite drunk, but I did finish the book. I’m not sure I’d have managed it sober.

I am very proud of myself for this achievement, and will reward myself by reading some actually decent fucking literature for at least my next two books because oh god I must purge my brain.

Ahem. Anyway.

Before I get into the specifics of why this book is fucking shite, I must draw your mind back to the distant days of 2014. Things were occurring in SFF back in those olden times. Harken back, do you recall – the Sad Puppies? The Rabid Puppies? If you do, you may begin to suspect where this is going. If not, lucky you. Shortly put, they were a group of people who thought that SFF was better off back in the good old days, when it was tales of manly men and their derring do (generally in space), with none of this SJW nonsense politicising* the genre. Vom. They tried (and tbh kinda succeeded) to commit anyone who agreed with them to a slate of nominations, to try to flood the awards with books that fit their agenda. The Sad variant were the icky but not like… militantly shitty flavour. The Rabid variant? Just… ew. Anyway, they’ve ultimately lost, and SFF has become all the better for it. I mean, FFS, the genre has ALWAYS been political. But there’s always someone who thinks it was better “back in his day”**, and well, shit happened.

Anyway, where this book (EDITED TO ADD: not this book, the second in the series) comes in – it was included (EDITED TO ADD: not with the knowledge of the author) in the Nebula nominees right when all that was going down bigtime. The author protested, including objections to the presence of Vox Day (more details from the author himself below in the comments – googling this does not produce a clear answer in any way, so please do go by Gannon’s own commented words on this). If you’re not familiar with Vox Day? Well, he’s just a massive shitbag. So not liking him isn’t proof of any sort of real discernment, just that Gannon didn’t fancy being palpably bigoted in a public forum.

I repeat, vom.

EDIT: So please bear in mind I was quite drunk when I wrote all this. I don’t want to take away from the tone of the original too much – I’m well aware most of y’all like the shouty posts the best – but it is worth thoroughly fact checking stuff. We (not just me, boyfriend, who was soberer, did some of it) had done a cursory Google, but that was insufficient, clearly. Absolutely mea maxima inebriata*** culpa. I normally do better, but I am also normally not clearing out our fortified wine stocks. If I do this sort of thing again, I’ll hold posting until sober me can do some proper double checks. END EDIT

I know this is more context than I normally bother with, but context is important here, because the whole Puppy shenanigan was super important. And then if we look at the stuff being published around the same time – we come back to Ancillary Justice. We have some radical, gender focussed SFF that is really thinking about society and culture and structures and oppression. That sees being political as a boon, and engages with ideas, and tries to actually explore what SFF can bring, as a genre, to the big table of thinking about shit. It’s not the only book to ever do it, of course, but it did it big, and at a time when it was super important to be doing so.

Meanwhile, Chaz Gannon was busy writing a fan wank about 1960s culture. I’m honestly not even being hyperbolic here – though I often am. If you gave me his book and told me it was golden age MilSF trash, I’d have 100% believed you. It’s a casually misogynistic trashfire of boys’ own adventure romp meets James Bond in space, and that is So. Fucking. Dated. If you want this, just read something actually from the 1960s. At least then it has the excuse of not knowing any better.

The book follows the adventures of Caine Riordan****, who is a True American Patriot, and a real Straight Arrow (and thus too honest for spy shit), and also a True Polymath, a word I’m not sure the author actually knows the meaning of. That’s a recurring theme. I’d really like someone to confiscate his thesaurus because he’s using it wrong. And waaaay too often. Caine Riordan also (eventually, it took a long time for a woman to even show up) seduces multiple women, all of whom the author describes as “sinuous” and “cat-like”. After the fourth time of coming across “sinuous”, I began to suspect him of a snake fetish. Caine then solves problems by being Honest and Knowing Things because he is an analyst and a Writer (he is actually described as a “wordsmith” at one point in the book), and by being better at [insert job here] than [job holder] throughout the book because he’s a Helldiver of Lyko- sorry, a True Polymath.

If I’m honest, I’m never going to be seeking out MilSF, but this feels like a sick parody of the genre, even to someone who doesn’t read it. It’s not just tropey, it’s crass, facile and not even self aware. And yeah, the implicit bigotry gets EXTREMELY wearing really quickly. I’d like to think that we can draw a lot of conclusions about someone based on the near future world they envision, and for Gannon, the feeds are all coming up “bigot”. The Chinese character is old, quiet and wise, and in the bit where he finally speaks, he mentions fortune cookies. Absolutely take this as a thingy… shit… there’s a classical word for when you take a part of a thing to mean the whole of thing… I think it’s the word for “roof” in Greek which is used to mean “house”… and then has become a term for generalising by a subpart? I cannot think of the word, it’s 1am and I’m sloshed. But take this as a one-of-those for the whole book and you won’t be wrong.

And then! And then. We get to my other major issue. The prose is amateur as fuck.

People often say “I could do better” and they don’t actually mean that, they just mean it’s crap. I say this in entire sincerity here though – I could write better prose than Charles Gannon. And this is not because I in any way rate my authorial abilities. I have one mode of talent and that’s “ranty angry blog”. Faced with writing serious literature, I’d be awful. And I would still be better than Mr. Gannon, if only because I would only choose to use words whose meaning I actually know.

This made it extremely difficult to read. Hence my need for alcoholic assistance. I couldn’t cheerfully hate read it because it has no pace. It’s impossible to get sucked into the story because the shitty prose gets in the way. I am spending my entire time going “why the fuck have you written it like this??” and I just can’t pay attention. Not that paying attention would have done any favours – what substance there is is as trite as you could possibly imagine.

Oh, and another thing!***** In the cause of having his “”””polymath”””” character be able to solve anything through the rigorous application of “”logic””, the author happily makes a mockery of any sort of archaeological and anthropological study. That was fun. But of course, one instance of something is absolutely a valid platform to make sweeping statements about an entire species and the sum total of galactic history, rewriting all of our current understanding. Especially when reached by a layperson.

That is my sarcasm quota exceeded for the day, sorry.

There’s also someone who eats olives in an evil manner. Repeatedly. For reasons… best left unexamined, if we’re honest with ourselves.

In summation, a man who apparently thinks the world was better in about 1960, has written a wankfest in honour of his thoughts, and made the Mary Sue-est possible self-insert character to lead his turgid dreams. I can think of no reason it got nominated for an award (or frankly even published) than that a lot of other men share his political ideologies, and none of them have an ounce of authorial talent or critical appreciation to spare. It’s dross. Shit. Unforgiveable tripe. And that it continues to be award nominated is as damning an indictment on the genre as anyone could possibly imagine in the year of our lord 20-fucking-20. We’re better than this shit. Or we ought to be.

I’m offended that I had to read it, and glad I didn’t have to pay for the privilege, because it’s available for free from Baen books. Of course it’s Baen books.

Don’t read it. Even if you think you like MilSF and object to SJWs, don’t encourage this sort of retrograde, amateur nonsense. Just reread Asimov and Clarke, ok? They’re honestly better written. And if you actually like your books to feature women who aren’t reduced to their sinuousness, non-white characters who aren’t joking stereotypes, and prose that isn’t a 13 year old’s homage to shitty spy films but IN SPACE… I mean, you’re probably already reading better stuff than this anyway, but if you need the nudge, read Ann Leckie instead. She’s a better person, and can actually write a sentence worth reading.

So the Nebula standings currently run thus:

  1. A Memory Called Empire
  2. Gideon the Ninth
  3. Gods of Jade and Shadow
  4.  [unknown]
  5.  [unknown]
  6. RON
  7. This fucking piece of shit novel I spent hours of my life reading.

Don’t make the same mistakes I did, ok? You’re better than this. I did it so you don’t have to… make better decisions than me. I regret that I could not give it fewer than 1 star on Goodreads.

I’m now going to read one of Hexarchate Stories by Yoon Ha Lee or A Thousand Ships by Natalie Haynes and try to forget this ever existed.

*swigs port*

*I’m drunk enough I struggled to spell that.
**It’s nearly always a “him”.
***The actual adjective is “crapulata” which is honestly funnier, but requires you to know Latin to get the joke I’m making. Or “ebria”, but that’s boring too.
****Every single character name in the book is terrible, and I never got used to it.
*****I am absolutely a parody angry drunk right now and I don’t care.

 

Posted in All, Blacklist, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

A Memory Called Empire – Arkady Martine (reread)

81v45yuwqulThis is a post for people who’ve already read the book, without question. But it’s also not really a post for anyone at all, except myself. If you’re interested in my more general thoughts, I posted about it when I finished it the first time, here, and it will be much more accessible (though still quite personal). This one is going to be something… else.

Having read A Memory Called Empire once, I know how it ends. And however else the story goes, I know that it ends on the decision I found saddest and most affecting of the whole narrative – the fact that the Ambassador Mahit Dzmare decides not to stay within the empire, the jewel of the world, and instead asks only to return to her home station, her boon from the new-crowned emperor, while she still wants to go. More than any moment in the book – and there are so so many that I felt very deeply – this decision is the one I come to when I think about the story, and what it means to me. And I realised, as I was reading for the second time, that I had been wrong before. I’d thought it touched me so deeply because I felt a fellowship to Mahit, felt a strong kinship with her as protagonist and her views and biases, and that was what drew me in.

But I realise now, and I realise that this is a problem, that it means I’m reading the book… not wrong, because there’s not such thing, but taking a different message than the one intended… I realise that actually, I’m not like Mahit at all. I’m like Yskandr. And for all that they are fundamentally similar people, it is their differences, their main, single difference, that tilts the whole story on its edge at the end, and is why I feel so utterly, wretchedly sad when I finish it.

It’s a story about empire, and how that empire consumes all things by degrees. How it consumes with culture, with desire and longing and a desire for belonging, with wanting to be within it. That’s a huge part of the story. And being myself, I cannot help but read this through the lens of my being a classicist, and being half in love with the Roman world, just as Mahit is with Teixcalaan. I spoke about that before, in my other post.

But the thing is, and I am an idiot for not realising it properly as I read the first time, we never really step away from the empire as aggressor. As beautiful, as poetical, as tempting and lovely as Teixcalaan is, it is always seen as the enemy, the ultimate problem to be evaded. Mahit understands that. It’s why she succeeds where Yskandr has failed, and why she goes home at the end. She’s tempted, because she wouldn’t be good at her job as Ambassador were she not, by the beautiful side of empire, by Three Seagrass and what she represents. But she never loses sight of that ultimate truth, of the barbarity and cruelty that underlies it all, and it’s what allows her to win, in the end. And what hurts her so much. She’s strong. Yskandr – and I realise, myself – is weak. Or maybe not weak, but… he succumbs. He weighs the balance of his own self-worth, his self-identity, his pride in who he is and where he comes from, his pride in who he will be seen as being in this other place… and he accounts it less than the joy of being allowed to remain. His love and captivation with the beauty weigh heavier to him than his knowledge of the bad.

And, as far as I understand the book, that is an ultimately incorrect decision.

Logically, I entirely agree. The empire is at its core a bad thing. An aggressive, consuming, taking thing that cannot bear the existence of difference, of variation and independence, and one that can only exist by continuing to consume. The beauty, the culture, the exquisite civilisation isn’t separate from the cruelty – it requires it to continue. It is an empire, much like Rome, that makes the beauty out of the barbarity. Of course it’s an awful thing. And yet… for some people, for Yskandr, for me… it doesn’t matter, in the end. We make that decision for ourselves, and Mahit makes the other. Mahit sees the truth of it.

Which is why I say I read the book wrong. I see what it says, I see what the truth of the story is, but I am captivated by what’s outside of it, and cannot internalise the heart of it, however much I can see it there.

And so rereading it was a painful exercise in weighing and measuring myself, and finding myself wanting. I loved it nonetheless. The story of someone who makes a brave decision is a common one, and when it’s a brave decision we all know is right, but that we would never be able to make ourselves, in that moment… well, that’s why it’s a common story. It’s a deeply compelling one. It’s a theme I find in much of the fiction I like – envisioning a world in which the person making the decisions is better, or braver or stronger or more perservering, than I could be. In that sense, this is an aspirational story. I know I ought to be Mahit. Yskandr, I think, knows that too. It’s why he praises her, in those key moments at the end, even though he doesn’t quite realise what the ultimate end of those decisions will be.

And all of this – forgive me, that was a lot of waffling about me and my feelings – feeds into two of the parallel themes running through the story that I didn’t dwell on as much as I should have the first time. The discussion of the imago machines, and the idea that each successor must be compatible with the one who came before. And the discussion of the city algorithm, the “perfect” algorithm, that is going wrong at key moments in the story. Because to some extent, aren’t they the same thing? Mahit comes to the realisation – not a massively shocking one but apt in its place in the story – that the algorithm is only as good as the man who programmed it. Ten Pearl had – has – biases, and surely his program has inherited those. It makes value judgments, and surely then… it needs values. And values mean biases. And biases mean errors. But we never quite get to look at the flip side of this – if each imago owner has to be compatible with the first, if each ambassador has to have the same aptitudes as the previous one… who decided, for the very first ambassador, what those aptitudes were? Someone decided what “good” looked like, and imago machines just preserve the value judgments of the long-dead. Sure, those judgments have been tried by years of usage, but it could just be an extended exercise in confirmation bias. Two sides of the same coin, two different technologies.

Mahit has been picked for this job because she is like Yskandr. Because she too loves the empire a little too much. But she thrives because she isn’t enough like Yskandr. Because she loves it that little bit less, in the end, than she loves knowing who she is, and than she loves being valued for herself and her own merits, with no caveat. She doesn’t want to be good “for a barbarian”. She’s a very fortuitous glitch. The algorithm, the original axioms, were wrong. Maybe she ultimately succeeds because she didn’t have a fully integrated Yskandr in her head the whole time. And that means that to some extent, Teixcalaan had already succeeded. It had eaten the station enough, affected their biases, their axioms enough, that this imago line could ever so easily have lost Lsel entirely. But they didn’t.

I like that, as a story, however much I want, in that self-insert, escapist way of wanting, that Yskandr could be right too. That she could live happily ever after in the empire, writing beautiful poems, and manage to forget what it devours to live. But this is the right ending, and a good one, and a deeply meaningful one. More so for people like me, who need a reminder of the spiky parts, when we’re too busy looking at the flowers.

And so I loved it more the second time around. I saw more that I missed, and I saw it in a new way, and it was better for the second seeing. I wonder if, when I first read it, I considered The Raven Tower a better book, simply because I wanted Mahit to make my decision, in the end. Whereas now I see that this is the better book, exactly because she doesn’t.

I can’t wait for the sequel, and to read that twice too, and feel painfully seen, and to keep on reading anyway.

Posted in All, Awesome, Science Fiction | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment