Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb 11;17(4):641.
doi: 10.3390/nu17040641.

Five-Day Treatment with B. licheniformis Along with Classical Vancomycin Treatment Was Effective in Preserving Gut Microbiota in Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-Day Treatment with B. licheniformis Along with Classical Vancomycin Treatment Was Effective in Preserving Gut Microbiota in Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection

Tae-Geun Gweon et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives:Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an important nosocomial diarrheal disease. The benefits of the probiotic Bacillus licheniformis (B. licheniformis) in the preservation of intestinal microbiota have not been studied in patients with CDI to date. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of B. licheniformis in preserving the intestinal microbiota in patients with CDI. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out at six academic centers in Korea. Individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate CDI were included in this trial. CDI was treated with vancomycin 125 mg four times daily for two weeks. Along with vancomycin, B. licheniformis was administered for five days in this study, while a placebo was given to the placebo group. Microbiome analysis was performed before and five days after administering vancomycin and B. licheniformis or placebo, using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Alpha and beta diversity was compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 35 participants were finally included in this study, with 16 in the study group and 19 in the placebo group. The alpha diversity was similar in both groups before CDI treatment. After five days of the administration of vancomycin and B. licheniformis or placebo, alpha diversity did not decrease in the study group (Chao1 index, p = 0.665; observed features, p = 0.692). In contrast, alpha diversity decreased in the placebo group (Chao1 index, p = 0.011; observed features, p = 0.011). Beta diversity did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: The addition of B. licheniformis to vancomycin was effective in preserving gut microbiota in patients with CDI.

Keywords: Bacillus licheniformis; Clostridioides difficile infection; microbiota; probiotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of alpha diversity between probiotic and placebo groups at randomization. Alpha diversities measured using Chao1 index, p = 0.337 (a); observed features, p = 0.290 (b); Shannon diversity index, p = 0.832 (c); and Simpson diversity index, p = 0.806 (d), are comparable between the two groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of alpha diversity for probiotic group between before and five days after treatment. Alpha diversities measured using Chao1 index (p = 0.665) (a), observed features (p = 0.692) (b), Shannon diversity index (p = 0.287) (c), and Simpson diversity index (p = 0.806) (d) are comparable before and after treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of alpha diversity for placebo group between before and five days after treatment. Alpha diversity measured using Chao1 index (p = 0.011) (a) and observed features (p = 0.011) (b) are decreased five days after treatment. However, alpha diversities measured using Shannon (p = 0.138) (c) and Simpson (p = 0.311) (d) diversity indices are comparable. * Statistically significant.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of beta diversity. Beta diversity differs between before and five days after treatment in probiotic group (p = 0.001) (a). Beta diversity differs between before and five days after treatment in placebo group (p = 0.002) (b). Beta diversity is comparable between probiotic and placebo groups (c).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of beta diversity. Beta diversity differs between before and five days after treatment in probiotic group (p = 0.001) (a). Beta diversity differs between before and five days after treatment in placebo group (p = 0.002) (b). Beta diversity is comparable between probiotic and placebo groups (c).

References

    1. Ananthakrishnan A.N. Clostridium difficile infection: Epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011;8:17–26. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.190. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winter S.E., Bäumler A.J. Gut dysbiosis: Ecological causes and causative effects on human disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2023;120:e2316579120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2316579120. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lessa F.C., Mu Y., Bamberg W.M., Beldavs Z.G., Dumyati G.K., Dunn J.R., Farley M.M., Holzbauer S.M., Meek J.I., Phipps E.C., et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:825–834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baek J., Choi I., Cho Y., Kim J., Lee Y., Kim M., Kim K., Cho Y.-S. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection in the intensive care unit: A KASID multi-centre study. J. Hosp. Infect. 2023;139:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guh A.Y., Mu Y., Winston L.G., Johnston H., Olson D., Farley M.M., Wilson L.E., Holzbauer S.M., Phipps E.C., Dumyati G.K., et al. Trends in U.S. Burden of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1320–1330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910215. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources