Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 24:11:1366409.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1366409. eCollection 2024.

The artificial sweetener neotame negatively regulates the intestinal epithelium directly through T1R3-signaling and indirectly through pathogenic changes to model gut bacteria

Affiliations

The artificial sweetener neotame negatively regulates the intestinal epithelium directly through T1R3-signaling and indirectly through pathogenic changes to model gut bacteria

Aparna Shil et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies have indicated considerable health risks associated with the consumption of artificial sweeteners. Neotame is a relatively new sweetener in the global market however there is still limited data on the impact of neotame on the intestinal epithelium or the commensal microbiota.

Methods: In the present study, we use a model of the intestinal epithelium (Caco-2) and microbiota (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis) to investigate how physiologically-relevant exposure of neotame impacts intestinal epithelial cell function, gut bacterial metabolism and pathogenicity, and gut epithelium-microbiota interactions.

Results: Our findings show that neotame causes intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis and death with siRNA knockdown of T1R3 expression significantly attenuating the neotame-induced loss to cell viability. Similarly, neotame exposure results in barrier disruption with enhanced monolayer leak and reduced claudin-3 cell surface expression through a T1R3-dependent pathway. Using the gut bacteria models, E. coli and E. faecalis, neotame significantly increased biofilm formation and metabolites of E. coli, but not E. faecalis, reduced Caco-2 cell viability. In co-culture studies, neotame exposure increased adhesion capacity of E. coli and E. faecalis onto Caco-2 cells and invasion capacity of E. coli. Neotame-induced biofilm formation, E.coli-specific Caco-2 cell death, adhesion and invasion was identified to be meditated through a taste-dependent pathway.

Discussion: Our study identifies novel pathogenic effects of neotame on the intestinal epithelium or bacteria alone, and in co-cultures to mimic the gut microbiome. These findings demonstrate the need to better understand food additives common in the global market and the molecular mechanisms underlying potential negative health impacts.

Keywords: artificial sweeteners; gut; intestinal epithelium; microbiota; neotame; nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neotame causes epithelial cell death and disruption of the intestinal epithelial monolayer. Caco-2 cells were exposed to neotame at a range of concentrations for 6 h (B, C) and 24 h (A, D, E, F). Cell viability (A) was assessed using MTT assay and cell death and apoptosis was assessed using flow cytometry (B, C). Epithelial monolayer permeability was determined using FITC-dextran Transwell assay (D) and claudin 3 expression at the Caco-2 cell surface was assessed using whole cell ELISA (E) and Western blotting with Caco-2 cell lysates (F). Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M, n = 6-8. *p < 0.05 vs. vehicle for neotame (0 μM).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neotame regulates Caco-2 cell viability and intestinal epithelial barrier function through T1R3-dependent signaling. T1R3 expression was silenced in Caco-2 cells using T1R3-specific siRNA and compared to non-specific (ns) siRNA. Knockdown of protein levels was confirmed using Western blotting, representative blot [(A)i] and quantification [(A)ii] shown, and whole cell ELISA (B). Following siRNA transfection, Caco-2 cells were exposed to neotame at a range of concentrations for 6 h (D) and 24 h (C, E < F). Cell viability (C) was assessed using MTT assay and cell apoptosis (D) was assessed using flow cytometry. Epithelial monolayer permeability (E) was determined using FITC-dextran Transwell assay and claudin 3 expression (F) at the Caco-2 cell surface was assessed using whole Cell ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M, n = 6–8. *p < 0.05 vs. non-specific siRNA, vehicle for neotame (0 μM).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exposure to neotame significantly increases biofilm formation by E. coli and E. faecalis, and cytotoxic effect of soluble bacteria factors released from E. coli, in a zinc-dependent manner. Bacterial growth of E. coli (A) and E. faecalis (D) was measured over 96 h following exposure to neotame at a range of concentrations. Absorbance was measured at 600 nm and normalized to vehicle at 0 h. Biofilm formation of E. coli (B) and E. faecalis (E) was measured, using crystal violet assay, following exposure to neotame (100 μM) in the presence and absence of zinc sulfate (100 μM) for 24 h. Cytotoxicity in Caco-2 cells was measured following 24 h exposure to bacterial supernatant, where E. coli (C) and E. faecalis (F) were incubated with neotame (100 μM) in the presence and absence of zinc sulfate (100 μM) for 24 h. Data was normalized to vehicle for neotame and presented as mean ± S.E.M, n = 6–8. *p < 0.05 vs. vehicle for neotame and zinc sulfate (0 μM).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neotame significant disrupts the Caco-2 cell—bacteria interaction in a zinc-dependent and -independent manner. Bacteria cell adhesion to (A–C) and invasion of (D–F) Caco-2 cells was measured following E. coli (A, B, D, E) and E. faecalis (A, C, D, F) exposure to neotame (100 μM) in the presence and absence of zinc sulfate (100 μM). Bacteria adhesion index is expressed as ratio of total bacteria attached per viable Caco-2 cells (normalized to 100) and bacteria invasion index is expressed as the ratio of intracellular bacteria compared with the control (normalized to 100). Data is presented as mean ± S.E.M, n = 5–6. *p < 0.05 vs. vehicle for neotame and zinc sulfate (0 μM), #p < 0.05 vs. vehicle for zinc sulfate only.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic to show the direct (T1R3-dependent) and indirect (bacteria-dependent) impact of the artificial sweetener neotame on the intestinal epithelial cell.

References

    1. Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, Maza O, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. (2014) 514:181–6. 10.1038/nature13793 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gardner C, Wylie-Rosett J, Gidding SS, Johnson RK, Reader D, Lichtenstein AH, et al. Nonnutritive sweeteners: current use and health perspectives: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. (2012) 35:1798–808. 10.2337/dc12-9002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration H . Food labeling: health claims; dietary noncariogenic carbohydrate sweeteners and dental caries. Final rule. Fed Regist. (2006) 71:15559-64. Available online at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2006/03/29/06-3007/food-labeli... - PubMed
    1. Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence L . Artificial Sweetener Market - Forecasts from 2020 to 2025. (2020). Available online at: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5125096/artificial-sweetener-...
    1. Magnuson BA, Carakostas MC, Moore NH, Poulos SP, Renwick AG. Biological fate of low-calorie sweeteners. Nutr Rev. (2016) 74:670–89. 10.1093/nutrit/nuw032 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources