Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;158(4):382-389.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.6096.

Recurrence and Mortality Risk of Merkel Cell Carcinoma by Cancer Stage and Time From Diagnosis

Affiliations

Recurrence and Mortality Risk of Merkel Cell Carcinoma by Cancer Stage and Time From Diagnosis

Aubriana M McEvoy et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Abstract

Importance: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) often behaves aggressively; however, disease-recurrence data are not captured in national databases, and it is unclear what proportion of patients with MCC experience a recurrence (estimates vary from 27%-77%). Stage-specific recurrence data that includes time from diagnosis would provide more precise prognostic information and contribute to risk-appropriate clinical surveillance.

Objective: To estimate risk of stage-specific MCC recurrence and mortality over time since diagnosis.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study included 618 patients with MCC who were prospectively enrolled in a Seattle-based data repository between 2003 and 2019. Of these patients, 223 experienced a recurrence of MCC. Data analysis was performed July 2019 to November 2021.

Main outcomes and measures: Stage-specific recurrence and survival, as well as cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: Among the 618 patients included in the analysis (median [range] age, 69 [11-98] years; 227 [37%] female), the 5-year recurrence rate for MCC was 40%. Risk of recurrence in the first year was high (11% for patients with pathologic stage I, 33% for pathologic stage IIA/IIB, 30% for pathologic stage IIIA, 45% for pathologic stage IIIB, and 58% for pathologic stage IV), with 95% of recurrences occurring within the first 3 years. Median follow-up among living patients was 4.3 years. Beyond stage, 4 factors were associated with increased recurrence risk in univariable analyses: immunosuppression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.3; P < .001), male sex (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .001), known primary lesion among patients with clinically detectable nodal disease (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-4.0; P = .001), and older age (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; P = .06 for each 10-year increase). Among 187 deaths in the cohort, 121 (65%) were due to MCC. The MCC-specific survival rate was strongly stage dependent (95% at 5 years for patients with pathologic stage I vs 41% for pathologic stage IV). Among patients presenting with stage I to II MCC, a local recurrence (17 arising within/adjacent to the primary tumor scar) did not appreciably diminish survival compared with patients who had no recurrence (85% vs 88% MCC-specific survival at 5 years).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, the MCC recurrence rate (approximately 40%) was notably different than that reported for invasive melanoma (approximately 19%), squamous cell carcinoma (approximately 5%-9%), or basal cell carcinoma (approximately 1%-2%) following definitive therapy. Because more than 90% of MCC recurrences arise within 3 years, it is appropriate to adjust surveillance intensity accordingly. Stage- and time-specific recurrence data can assist in appropriately focusing surveillance resources on patients and time intervals in which recurrence risk is highest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Hippe reported grants from GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, and Canon Medical Systems USA outside the submitted work. Dr Nghiem reported personal fees from Rain Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Sanofi/Regeneron, 4SC, and Merck; grants from EMD Serono and Bristol Myers Squibb to his institution outside the submitted work; and a patent for Merkel cell polyomavirus T antigen–specific T-cell receptors and uses thereof pending (University of Washington), as well as a patent for novel epitopes as T-cell targets in Merkel cell carcinoma pending (University of Denmark and University of Washington). No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Comparison of Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) Recurrence and Survival Rates Between the Present Cohort and Existing Literature
Recurrence and survival rates were similar across studies, with the Seattle cohort (shaded in gray) having a larger sample size and more recent data. NA indicates not available. aMedian follow-up time. bMean follow-up time. c95% CI, 36%-43%. dOne patient presented with stage IV cancer. eCalculated from available data.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) Recurrence-Free Survival and Disease-Specific Survival by Pathologic and Clinical Stage
Staging was determined according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition. Curves were estimated using cumulative incidence functions with death from a non-MCC cause as a competing risk. Curves were truncated when the number at risk was fewer than 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC)-Specific Survival After First MCC Recurrence
Results largely reflect outcomes in the preimmunotherapy era. Analysis was performed using cumulative incidence functions and censored when number at risk was 1. Non-MCC death was a competing risk for MCC-specific survival. Staging was determined based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paulson KG, Iyer JG, Blom A, et al. . Systemic immune suppression predicts diminished Merkel cell carcinoma-specific survival independent of stage. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(3):642-646. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.388 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA, et al. . Merkel cell carcinoma: current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3):457-463. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albores-Saavedra J, Batich K, Chable-Montero F, Sagy N, Schwartz AM, Henson DE. Merkel cell carcinoma demographics, morphology, and survival based on 3870 cases: a population based study. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37(1):20-27. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2009.01370.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker JC. Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(suppl 7):vii81-vii85. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Busam K, Coit DG. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(10):2300-2309. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.329 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types