Incorporating population-level genetic variability within laboratory models in toxicology: From the individual to the population
- PMID: 29275117
- PMCID: PMC5801153
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.12.007
Incorporating population-level genetic variability within laboratory models in toxicology: From the individual to the population
Abstract
Humans respond to chemical exposures differently due to many factors, such as previous and concurrent stressors, age, sex, and genetic background. The vast majority of laboratory-based toxicology studies, however, have not considered the impact of population-level variability within dose-response relationships. The lack of data dealing with the influence of genetic diversity on the response to chemical exposure provides a difficult challenge for risk assessment as individuals within the population will display a wide-range of responses following toxicant challenge. Notably, the genetic background of individuals plays a major role in the variability seen in a population-level response to a drug or chemical and, thus, there is growing interest in including genetic diversity into laboratory-models. Here we outline several laboratory-based models that can be used to assay the influence of genetic variability on an individual's response to chemicals: 1) genetically-diverse cell lines, 2) human primary cells, 3) and genetically-diverse mouse panels. We also provide a succinct review for several seminal studies to highlight the capability, feasibility, and power of each of these models. This article is intended to highlight the need to include population-level genetic diversity into toxicological study designs via laboratory-based models with the goal to provide and supplement evidence in assessing the risk posed by chemicals to the human population. As such, incorporation of genetic variability will positively impact human-based risk assessment and provide empirical data to aid and influence decision-making processes in relation to chemical exposures.
Keywords: Genetic variability; Population-Based models; Risk assessment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
-
Impact of pharmacogenetics on toxicological studies. Statistical implications.J Exp Anim Sci. 1993 Sep;35(5-6):259-81. J Exp Anim Sci. 1993. PMID: 8218441 Review.
-
Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Sep;54(8):485-617. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985. Epub 2024 Aug 16. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024. PMID: 39150724
-
Toxicology and genetic toxicology in the new era of "toxicogenomics": impact of "-omics" technologies.Mutat Res. 2002 Jan 29;499(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00292-5. Mutat Res. 2002. PMID: 11804602 Review.
-
Erratum: High-Throughput Identification of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato in Tomato using Seedling Flood Assay.J Vis Exp. 2023 Oct 18;(200). doi: 10.3791/6576. J Vis Exp. 2023. PMID: 37851522
Cited by
-
Advancing understanding of human variability through toxicokinetic modeling, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, and new approach methodologies.Hum Genomics. 2024 Nov 21;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00691-9. Hum Genomics. 2024. PMID: 39574200 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Characterizing Serpinb2 as a Modulator of TCDD-Induced Suppression of the B Cell.Chem Res Toxicol. 2018 Nov 19;31(11):1248-1259. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00225. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Chem Res Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 30339366 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic background and sex control the outcome of high-fat diet feeding in mice.iScience. 2022 May 25;25(6):104468. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104468. eCollection 2022 Jun 17. iScience. 2022. PMID: 35677645 Free PMC article.
-
Toxic Responses Induced at High Doses May Affect Benchmark Doses.Dose Response. 2020 Apr 21;18(2):1559325820919605. doi: 10.1177/1559325820919605. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun. Dose Response. 2020. PMID: 32341684 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic review of genetic and epigenetic factors underlying differential toxicity to environmental lead (Pb) exposure.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):35583-35598. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19333-5. Epub 2022 Mar 4. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35244845 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abdo N, Xia M, Brown CC, Kosyk O, Huang R, Sakamuru S, Zhou YH, Jack JR, Gallins P, Xia K, Li Y, Chiu WA, Motsinger-Reif AA, Austin CP, Tice RR, Rusyn I, Wright FA. Population-based in vitro hazard and concentration-response assessment of chemicals: the 1000 genomes high-throughput screening study. Environ Health Perspect. 2015b;123:458–466. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Abu-Toamih Atamni HJ, Ziner Y, Mott R, Wolf L, Iraqi FA. Glucose tolerance female-specific QTL mapped in collaborative cross mice. Mammalian genome: official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 2017;28:20–30. - PubMed
-
- Adams DJ, Doran AG, Lilue J, Keane TM. The Mouse Genomes Project: a repository of inbred laboratory mouse strain genomes. Mammalian genome: official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 2015;26:403–412. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed HMM, Salerno S, Morelli S, Giorno L, De Bartolo L. 3D liver membrane system by co-culturing human hepatocytes, sinusoidal endothelial and stellate cells. Biofabrication. 2017;9:025022. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials