Sensitive Clinical Queries retrieved relevant systematic reviews as well as primary studies: an analytic survey
- PMID: 21775104
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.007
Sensitive Clinical Queries retrieved relevant systematic reviews as well as primary studies: an analytic survey
Abstract
Objective: To determine how well the previously validated broad and narrow Clinical Queries for treatment, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology studies, retrieve not only primary studies but also relevant systematic reviews.
Study design and setting: Using the Clinical Hedges Database housed at McMaster University, we tested the retrieval performance of the Clinical Queries.
Results: For most purpose categories (therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology) and most databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO), the sensitive (broad) Clinical Queries search terms had sensitivities higher than 90% for retrieving relevant systematic reviews as well as primary studies. When testing specific (narrow) Clinical Queries, in 8 of 12 cases, specificity was 94% or higher, but sensitivity dropped below 50%. For all purpose categories and all databases, performance was improved when combining the sensitive or specific Clinical Queries with our existing sensitive or specific systematic review search filter using the Boolean OR; sensitivities ranged from 90.7% to 99.7% and specificities ranged from 92.4% to 98.0% with sensitivities higher than 50%.
Conclusion: The sensitive Clinical Queries for therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology perform well in retrieving not only primary studies but also systematic reviews. Search performance can be improved by combining the Clinical Queries with our sensitive or specific systematic review filter.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.006. Epub 2009 Feb 20. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19230607 Free PMC article.
-
MEDLINE clinical queries are robust when searching in recent publishing years.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):363-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001075. Epub 2012 Sep 27. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23019242 Free PMC article.
-
The efficiency of database searches for creating systematic reviews was improved by search filters.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;95:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Nov 27. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29191446
-
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 12;14(3):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021. J Med Internet Res. 2012. PMID: 22693047 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00823.x. Health Info Libr J. 2009. PMID: 19712212 Review.
Cited by
-
Concordance between decision analysis and matching systematic review of randomized controlled trials in assessment of treatment comparisons: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Jul 15;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-57. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014. PMID: 25023450 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimizing a literature surveillance strategy to retrieve sound overall prognosis and risk assessment model papers.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):766-771. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa232. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021. PMID: 33484123 Free PMC article.
-
Automated screening of research studies for systematic reviews using study characteristics.Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;7(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0724-7. Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29695296 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review automation technologies.Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;3:74. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74. Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25005128 Free PMC article.
-
Search strategies (filters) to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and Embase.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):MR000054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000054.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37681507 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical