Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1179.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38446.498542.8F. Epub 2005 May 13.

Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey

R Brian Haynes  1 , K Ann McKibbon, Nancy L Wilczynski, Stephen D Walter, Stephen R Werre; Hedges Team
Affiliations

Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey

R Brian Haynes et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To develop and test optimal Medline search strategies for retrieving sound clinical studies on prevention or treatment of health disorders.

Design: Analytical survey.

Data sources: 161 clinical journals indexed in Medline for the year 2000.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of 4862 unique terms in 18 404 combinations.

Results: Only 1587 (24.2%) of 6568 articles on treatment met criteria for testing clinical interventions. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 99.3% (95% confidence interval 98.7% to 99.8%) at a specificity of 70.4% (69.8% to 70.9%). Compared with best single terms, best multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by 4.1% (absolute increase), but with substantial loss of specificity (absolute difference 23.7%) when sensitivity was maximised. When terms were combined to maximise specificity, 97.4% (97.3% to 97.6%) was achieved, about the same as that achieved by the best single term (97.6%, 97.4% to 97.7%). The strategies newly reported in this paper outperformed other validated search strategies except for two strategies that had slightly higher specificity (98.1% and 97.6% v 97.4%) but lower sensitivity (42.0% and 92.8% v 93.1%).

Conclusion: New empirical search strategies have been validated to optimise retrieval from Medline of articles reporting high quality clinical studies on prevention or treatment of health disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in data collection to determine optimal retrieval of articles on treatment from Medline
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Clever searching for evidence.
    Sanders S, Del Mar C. Sanders S, et al. BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1162-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1162. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15905232 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Library of Medicine, Bibliographic Services Division. Number of Medline searches. www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/medline_growth_508.html (accessed 3 Jul 2003).
    1. Robinson KA, Dickersin K. Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31: 150-3. - PubMed
    1. Nwosu CR, Khan KS, Chien PF. A two-term Medline search strategy for identifying randomized trials in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91: 618-22. - PubMed
    1. Marson AG, Chadwick DW. How easy are randomized controlled trials in epilepsy to find on Medline? The sensitivity and precision of two Medline searches. Epilepsia 1996;37: 377-80. - PubMed
    1. Adams CE, Power A, Frederick K, LeFebvre C. An investigation of the adequacy of Medline searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care. Psychol Med 1994;24: 741-8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms