Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Mar;49(3):247-53.
doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4930247.x.

Insulin action after resistive training in insulin resistant older men and women

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Insulin action after resistive training in insulin resistant older men and women

A S Ryan et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effects of resistive training (RT) on insulin action and assess the determinants of the changes in insulin action.

Design: Longitudinal study.

Setting: Outpatient setting.

Participants: Eighteen older men and older postmenopausal women (65-74 years) with normal (6 men and 5 women) or impaired glucose tolerance (4 men and 3 women).

Intervention: Six months of progressive whole-body RT.

Measurements: Upper and lower body strength was assessed by the one repetition maximum test. Total body fat and fat-free mass (FFM) were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before and after 6 months of RT. Insulin sensitivity was estimated from the relationship of glucose utilization (M) to the concentration of insulin (I) during the last 30 minutes of 3-hour hyperinsulinemic-euglycenic clamps (240 pmol x min(-2) x min(-1)) (M/I) before and after RT.

Results: RT significantly improved upper- and lower-body muscular strength (P < .005). FFM increased after RT in the entire group (P < .01) with no significant change in body fat. Although the change in M was larger in men (13%) than women (3%), the difference was not significant. The change in M was a function of initial M (r = -0.53, P < .05). There was a trend (0.060+/-0.006 vs 0.066+/-0.006 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)/pmol/l, n = 18) for M/I to increase after RT in the combined group of men and women (P = .06). There were no significant relationships between changes in M or M/I with changes in body composition or strength.

Conclusion: A 6-month RT program tends to improve insulin action in insulin-resistant older adults. These results suggest that RT may be useful in ameliorating insulin resistance that often occurs with physical inactivity, obesity, and loss of muscular strength in older insulin resistant men and women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types