In our critical analyses of the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goal of SDG 16, we examined two conflict-ridden regions of Somaliland and Balochistan. The rationale behind choosing regions was to highlight the factors...
moreIn our critical analyses of the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goal of SDG 16, we examined two conflict-ridden regions of Somaliland and Balochistan. The rationale behind choosing regions was to highlight the factors affecting SDGs at a regional level, especially regarding environmental sustainability, international development efforts, and the protracted political status of these two restive regions.
The presentation focused on similarities and key differences that affect the implementation and monitoring of SDG 16 in Somaliland and Balochistan. The presentation highlighted commonalities between the two, such as colonial territorial divisions of the historic lands, post-independence economic deprivation, political marginalization, and separatist sentiment in the indigenous population. The two main contrasts highlighted were the self-declared independent status of Somaliland and the active, armed separatist movement in the backdrop of Chinese development efforts in Balochistan.
The presentation highlighted the self-declared independent status of Somaliland, which makes it a unique case study of SDG implementation. Furthermore, it was argued that despite not being involved in SDG in negotiations in 2015, it has proactively engaged Agenda 2030 and included them in its National Development Plan II (Somaliland SDG16+ Progress Report, Somaliland Civil Society SDG16+ Coalition, 2019; ). Due to unrecognized political status, civil society organizations play an active role in implementation and monitoring. The government reports the implementation to an assortment of CSOs instead of the UN. It can be termed the bottom-up approach to the implementation (Localising SDG16+: A Somaliland Case Study | Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017).
In the case of Balochistan, the central contention was how an exclusive rather than inclusive development agenda by both national governments together with huge Chinese investment in the region is fueling separatist movements and is making the implementation of SDG 16 even more difficult in an already underdeveloped country (Costing Priority SDG Targets in Balochistan, n.d.). While the provincial government and national government implement the SDGs, the presentation highlighted some of the grave failures concerning different elements of SDG 16, such as corruption, weak institutions, and lack of democratic participation, in the backdrop of separatist movements that see the Chinese Development Agenda as exploitive, exclusive, and an attempt at neo-colonialism (Suleman, 2023; Nazir Ahmad Mir & Yousuf, 2024).
Furthermore, the presentation highlighted the issue of environmental degradation in the newly developed port city of Gwadar as an example of the failure to implement the SDGs (Suleman, 2023; Nazir Ahmad Mir & Yousuf, 2024). The port city is the site of multi-billion dollar Chinese investment and infrastructural development. Gwadar is the epitome of an exclusive development agenda. A total disregard for the indigenous population and lack of development in the old city has led to flooding of the native lands (Suleman, 2023; Nazir Ahmad Mir & Yousuf, 2024). Other issues that were alluded to were illegal fishing contracts and enforced disappearances in the wake of the burgeoning separatist movement.
In a critical reflection on the implementation of SDG 16 in both regions, we find two different approaches in two restive regions. In the case of Somaliland, due to the lack of internationally recognized political status, the bottom approach to implementation and monitoring is observed, whereas, the Balochistan armed separatist movement has restricted the space for civil society to organize, and the national and provincial governments have failed to implement targets and prioritize SDG 16 (Arugay et al., 2021). The widely held distrust of national and provincial governments leaves little room for community engagement and consultation, including women's groups, youth groups, minority rights organizations, etc (Localising SDG16+: A Somaliland Case Study | Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017). It can also be termed a failure to uphold a key community development principle of community engagement. The top-down approach and lack of civic or grassroots engagement in the wake of foreign intervention and international development make it difficult for national and provincial governments to adapt the SDGs to the local context in Balochistan, whereas Somaliland has a more inclusive approach to SDGs and can fit SDGs to the local context.
In terms of implementation of the SDG 16 targets, Somaliland has prioritized SDG 16 as compared to Balochistan. Although we find serious capacity constraints in both Somaliland and Balochistan, we see several efforts to improve 16.3 (rule of law) and 16.10 (access to information) and expand legal aid services in Somaliland. In Balochistan, the focus is more on other goals like SDG 3 (health), SDG 4 (education), and SDG 8 (decent work) (Iqbal, 2023; Localising SDG16+: A Somaliland Case Study | Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017).
With regards to institutional structures or frameworks and being part of the internationally recognized state of Pakistan, Balochistan has access to international support and is well placed for long-term implementation of SDGs and SDG 16 in particular as compared to Somaliland, which relies heavily on CSOs and may face challenges in sustaining efforts over time (Nguyen, 2017).
Resource constraints and lack of funding are problems that are common to both the restive regions. Both case studies show how financial constraints can limit the implementation of the SDGs. The SDG 16 goals of peace, justice, and inclusive society are inextricably inked to transparency (Iqbal, 2023; Costing Priority SDG Targets in Balochistan, n.d.)
Both case studies offer key lessons in the implementation of SDG 16. The approach of a self-declared independent state that is seeking political recognition is more focused towards grassroot civic engagements, a bottom-up approach towards implementation with more community engagement and local empowerment (Localising SDG16+: A Somaliland Case Study | Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2017). On the other hand, with a strong separatist movement that seeks to limit the national and international intervention in Balochistan, a top-down approach by the national and provincial governments with a strong institutional framework that gives little priority to SDG 16 thus results in issues and challenges that threaten the environment, indigenous community livelihood, and further invigorate separatist sentiments in the populace. An ideal scenario might involve both a politically recognized government with a strong institutional framework and active community participation and consultation in implementing the SDGs.
The class discussion after the presentation was around the broader question of whether international frameworks, institutions, and interventions can help achieve the SDGs in the local contexts. It was a pertinent question about Balochistan and Somalia, which both sought international recognition of their issues. In the case of Balochistan, wider recognition of challenges and threats to the indigenous population's land and livelihood. During the class discussion, there was wider agreement on issues and challenges that can arise with such foreign involvement and developmental intervention.