Python vs ...

Re: Python vs ...

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 23:57:40 GMT, Ray Smith wrote:[color=blue]
> when I program a tricky well written piece of code[/color]

When I see a piece of code that can be described as "tricky", I think
"Gee I bet this is a source of bugs".

Make your code obvious, please. Trickiness is what I want in a mystery
novel or a puzzle, not in code to be read by humans.

--
\ "I busted a mirror and got seven years bad luck, but my lawyer |
`\ thinks he can get me five." -- Steven Wright |
_o__) |
http://bignose.squidly.org/ 9CFE12B0 791A4267 887F520C B7AC2E51 BD41714B

Re: Python vs ...

Ben Finney wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 23:57:40 GMT, Ray Smith wrote:
>[color=green]
>>when I program a tricky well written piece of code[/color]
>
>
> When I see a piece of code that can be described as "tricky", I think
> "Gee I bet this is a source of bugs".
>
> Make your code obvious, please. Trickiness is what I want in a mystery
> novel or a puzzle, not in code to be read by humans.[/color]

"Tricky" was probably a bad word ... "difficult" might be a better word.

So to say it again ...


'''
when I program a difficult problem "well" in another language I say to
myself ...

"Gee I was clever"

when I program a difficult problem "well" in Python I say to myself ...

"Gee Python is Clever"
'''

Regards,

Ray Smith

Re: Python vs ...

Ray Smith wrote:[color=blue]
>
> "Tricky" was probably a bad word ... "difficult" might be a better word.[/color]

No, "tricky" is just fine, though you really meant "tricky problem".

You _did_ say "well written piece of code", and most of us understood
what you meant without any problem. ;-)

-Peter